On 04/28/2012 09:22 PM, John Ghormley KJ4UFG wrote: > No offense intended, Joe, but think about > that for a moment. That argument just doesn't seem to make sense.
Not a problem, John. I can see how having to repeat the (almost) identical data over and over would lead to a bigger file, but I've no idea how much bigger. That's why I also mentioned the possibility of embedded or outlined fonts as being a factor as well. I do hope that somebody who really knows what's going on will chime in and set us all straight.
