He, or she, was very thoughtful and eager and I enjoyed chatting or corresponding with Kunda. When harsh comments were directed to me in a public dialog, Kunda was quick to show a more compassionate and reasonable attitude.
However, I asked Kunda to identify him/herself as I like to know whom I am talking with, I think it inadvisable to have continuing dialogs with phantoms. Alas, I gave Kunda and in-depth background about me, but that didn't seem to convince Kunda to give up a name. I felt that I did not earn Kunda's trust. When my request to identify Kunda was ignored, I just did not feel anything more productive could come of continuing dialog. Much of development, in my opinion, is about the people who make up the effort. If someone if not willing to at least say "This is who I am", then credibility falters and it sends a clear message: I don't trust you. And collaborative efforts are about trust. I think Kunda was an asset to this project and provided an essential component. I hope that someday Kunda will be able to stand in the light and overcome the penchant to hide in anonymity. John On 4/28/2017 5:37 AM, benedek wrote: > Hi everybody. > > Somebody know where is Kunda? What happened to him? He is coming back? > > Regards > > Peter > > --------- k?vetkez? r?sz --------- > Egy csatolt HTML ?llom?ny ?t lett konvert?lva... > URL: > <http://lists.scribus.net/pipermail/scribus/attachments/20170428/db83709b/attachment.html> > ___ > Scribus Mailing List: scribus at lists.scribus.net > Edit your options or unsubscribe: > http://lists.scribus.net/mailman/listinfo/scribus > See also: > http://wiki.scribus.net > http://forums.scribus.net >
