Rich Bowen wrote: > I personally have little opinion on this. Although I think that 'device' > is sufficiently generic as to be meaningless to most folk, I think that > within a certain circle (ie, folks used to Unix) it may have a more > specific meaning. This is my only concern with the name.
I dunno. Categorizing scripts is a much tougher job than categorizing modules, which is tough enough. I think the overarching rule should be, If a user had need for a script like this, where would she most likely go looking for it? Given that, a top-level category like "Device" might not be bad, although maybe "Hardware Interface" would be even better. Category names are just English expressions, right? -- John Douglas Porter I no longer love the color of your sweaters.
