On Mon, 1 Jan 2018 19:05:44 +0100 Philipp Klaus Krause <p...@spth.de> wrote:
> While many users of SDCC - including myself - typically do not use an > IDE together with SDCC or do not need tigher integration of the IDE they > use with SDCC, better IDE integration seems to be a common request. > > AFAIK, the only IDEs with SDCC support are Code::Blocks (out-of-the-box) > and Eclipse (via an old plugin). I have documented the current state at > http://sdcc.sourceforge.net/mediawiki/index.php/IDE_integration. > > I guess the next steps could be: > > * Update the Eclipse plugin to work well with current Eclipse and SDCC > for many of the architectures targeted by SDCC. Another thing would be to enable sdcc to be told to call its object files "foo.o" not "foo.rel" and possibly to dump all the other files (listing etc) in a differenrent directory as an option. Right now the fact sdcc uses weird names (and I understand the history) makes it hard to work with a lot of otherwise quite generic tooling that expects "normal" compiler conventions but otherwise doesn't do anything particularly magic. Alan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
