On 01/02/2018 07:10 AM, Alan Cox wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jan 2018 19:05:44 +0100
Philipp Klaus Krause <p...@spth.de> wrote:
While many users of SDCC - including myself - typically do not use an
IDE together with SDCC or do not need tigher integration of the IDE they
use with SDCC, better IDE integration seems to be a common request.
AFAIK, the only IDEs with SDCC support are Code::Blocks (out-of-the-box)
and Eclipse (via an old plugin). I have documented the current state at
http://sdcc.sourceforge.net/mediawiki/index.php/IDE_integration.
I guess the next steps could be:
* Update the Eclipse plugin to work well with current Eclipse and SDCC
for many of the architectures targeted by SDCC.
Another thing would be to enable sdcc to be told to call its object files
"foo.o" not "foo.rel" and possibly to dump all the other files
(listing etc) in a differenrent directory as an option.
Right now the fact sdcc uses weird names (and I understand the history)
makes it hard to work with a lot of otherwise quite generic tooling that
expects "normal" compiler conventions but otherwise doesn't do anything
particularly magic.
Alan
Could that be done through command line switches, giving the user the
choice of which set of names and paths to use?
Bob McConnell
N2SPP
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Sdcc-user mailing list
Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
