On Wednesday 24 January 2018,Philipp Klaus Krause <p...@spth.de> wrote: > Am 24.01.2018 um 08:02 schrieb Åke Rehnman: > > those instructions is a workaround for a bug in the stm8 causing a > > DIV/DIVW instruction to return a false result (in the interrupted > > program). > > > > /Ake
> Sometimes SDCC will be able to prove that the workaround is not needed, > and omit it. But in the presence of inline assembly or function calls to > functions not yet defined, it will prefer err on the safe side. > > Philipp Thank you! The errata does not explain it very well, but your information in gen.c about clearing CCR bit 6 helps. I am also glad that you got me to find and read the errata! I can easily avoid this with __naked now. No problem. Thanks, -Richard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
