Moin, On Sunday 05 March 2006 18:54, Ed Halley wrote: > What with all this talk about merging, I would still like to see the > "official" x.y numbering scheme match that of SDL itself, instead of a > completely different "rewrite two" numbering scheme which bears no > relation to the library it's trying to bind.
I have to say that the version numbers are our least concern atm. At least for CPAN it is not possible to use a lower version now, anyway. best wishes, tels -- Signed on Sun Mar 5 20:51:39 2006 with key 0x93B84C15. Visit my photo gallery at http://bloodgate.com/photos/ PGP key on http://bloodgate.com/tels.asc or per email. "Most of the screen on a blog is blank for an imaginary populace of readers still using 640x480 resolution. I didn't buy a 19" monitor to have 50% of its screen realestate pissed away on firing white pixels, you assholes." -- maddox from xmission
pgpXH3cZu0xl3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
