I totally think HIFTBSO is just as good as their previous albums. I agree that lots
of it is good in a different way, but it was hardly "thrown together". Actually it was
anything but thrown together. If you've read interviews with them about the
songwriting process for that album, they said that is was incredible and that they
could have written 3 albums worth of material during that time period when they had
first gotten back together and started writing songs again. I dont see how one could
think those songs were merely thrown together. well, whatever.
-matt t. carlson
--
On Tue, 27 Jul 1999 04:17:18 Corgan25 wrote:
>Well,
> I have only been a SDRE fan for about 5 months but I do own all 3 of their
>albums and I love them all. But a friend of mine and I were discussing the
>change in style of music and Lyrical content on HIFTBSO compared to Diary. My
>friend is (by far) all about the style presented on Diary compared to
>HIFTBSO. His idea is that Diary had a lot more passion and HIFTBSO was more
>of a "reunion" type record where they all tried to get back together and
>write a score of music that was just thrown together for sake of Keeping a
>name for themselves in the music society. I personally love BOTH albums. I
>love Diary's style but I also feel the change in HIFTBSO was a more aged,
>experienced effort at the music. While lyrically HIFTBSO it not as adequate I
>believe the music is just as good but that they had approached the musical
>writing process from a different angle that was unique and more in the
>direction the band was headed. Does anyone else think that HIFTBSO is just as
>good also but in a different way? -Cassidy
>
>
Angelfire for your free web-based e-mail. http://www.angelfire.com
