heres my guesses, both the autograph and pic apply:
1.  maybe they didnt have a bassist at the time.  i remember that they 
recorded with jeff palmer, then he left and they picked up joe before 
touring.  
2.  if they had a bassist, he may not have felt like he was a "full member" 
and thus worthy of signing or posing.

the recent pic is probably from the same time of the autographs, during all 
the promotion for HIFTBSO.

just my thoughts.
jeff.

In a message dated 1/13/00 12:26:01 AM Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> << and only jeremy 
>   will and dan signed it,. im not sure why joe didnt or whatever, but its 
now 
> 
>   framed and hung up in my room >>
>  
>  i find that very interesting. also the fact that in the AP article, the 
>  picture only includes Will, Jeremy and Dan. Is that because they are the 
>  original members? i don't really understand that. does anyone have any 
>  theories/ guesses??
>  bye 
>  agnes
>  

Reply via email to