Merb 0.9 should be released in 2 weeks.

Merb FTW!

-Matt

On 1/30/08, robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I've been working with Merb for a little while now. It's a great
> little framework and I actually prefer it over rails. The performance
> is up 300% faster than rails and if you use datamapper, it is easy
> enough to have concurrent connections to various databases.
>
> I'll be releasing a merb app here shortly that will catalog merb
> resources for people who want to find more information about merb,
> tutorials, blog posts etc. Also, on that note, the guys in irb #merb
> are welcoming and easy to talk to. The core guys hang out there and
> are happy answer questions.
>
> I think Merb is gonna hit big towards the middle to end of this year.
> If anything, merb could be a rails killer.
>
> On Jan 30, 1:10 am, "Jordan Fowler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Merb: A Memo
> >
> > You may or may not have heard about the lightweight Ruby web framework
> Merb
> > (http://merbivore.com/). Merb stands for Mongrel + Erb, but it's a whole
> lot
> > more than the name might imply. I've been using it over the past few
> weeks
> > to build a file upload app which will coincide with the main application
> > built in Rails.
> >
> > It's worth asking what the main distinctions are between the frameworks
> and
> > why you might want to use one over the other. Whereas Rails is the
> framework
> > that has lowered the barrier to entry for many people, Merb brings
> > performance and purity to a clever but sometimes obfuscated world. If
> you're
> > an MVC buff like me, you'll appreciate the attention given in making
> each of
> > the parts (Model, View, and Controller) independent and therefore
> > replaceable. A great example of this can be found in the choices of
> > supported ORM (Object Relational Mapping) libraries; something Rails
> doesn't
> > offer out of the box. Merb also provides you with a straightforward way
> to
> > use any template engine you'd like, very similar to Rails'
> implementation.
> >
> > Unlike Rails, Merb is thread-safe. To illustrate the difference, imagine
> a
> > one-way road with a single lane (a process). In a non thread-safe
> > environment, cars can only travel down the road single-file, one after
> the
> > other (each car being a thread). Having a thread-safe environment simply
> > means that our road can handle more than one lane and allow cars to
> travel
> > alongside one another (share process resources simultaneously). In
> practical
> > terms, this means a single Mongrel instance can handle multiple file
> uploads
> > simultaneously.
> >
> > Merb is truer to Ruby than it is to making sure web development doesn't
> > hurt. I'm not saying building an application with Merb is painful, but
> you
> > will need a bit more Ruby prowess than Rails demands. Tradeoffs are a
> fact
> > of life, so in many cases learning more Ruby and using Merb can mean far
> > better performance.
> >
> > Using the right tool for the right job is important. I highly recommend
> > checking out Merb and using it when applicable.
> >
> > Jordan Fowler
> >
> > P.S.
> > I'm planning an in depth talk on Merb for our next meeting. Let's get a
> > conversation going about your experiences with Merb and what you might
> like
> > to know more about.
> >
> > --
> > Jordan A. Fowler
> > 2621 First Ave Apt 5
> > San Diego, CA 92103
> > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Website:http://www.jordanfowler.com
> > Phone: 406.546.8055
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
SD Ruby mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to