TDD/BDD really is a fundamental shift away from how developers may
have been doing things, likely since they started programming, i.e.
its necessary to drill the Red/Green/Refactor concept in with concrete
examples / presentations. My take on Agile is that it quickly falls
apart once R/G/R is compromised (falling into the we'll-do-the-tests-
last-cause-we-dont-have-enough-time trap, etc) and the result is
people never see its benefits (point being that it's central to
success with agile). I worked on a couple projects recently with dudes
from pivotal labs and thoughtbot and operating in a pure environment
like that is f***ing amazing - the project ran from iteration to
iteration without a single hitch - but we were vigilant about
coverage / keeping the CI green, etc. i.e. it's a strict discipline
and that reality needs to be conveyed / maintained. Anyhow some
thoughts..

brez

On Mar 25, 1:16 am, Nic Benders <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm with Rob voting for a more advanced coverage of Agile, for me the hardest 
> part of getting Agile at companies was in the details.  
>
> Everybody _wanted_ Agile, even executives had heard that it was the "right" 
> way to do things, but that didn't make it happen.  What we needed then was 
> some real concrete advice on how to get things going, and someone to look at 
> our process and point out all the toxic things that we were still doing.  
> Eventually I made progress on my own, but I think it would have been a lot 
> faster if we could have gotten some pragmatic advice from people who had gone 
> before us.
>
> (So in summary:  I'm looking forward to the meeting)
> -Nic
>
> On Mar 24, 2010, at 9:35 PM, Rob Kaufman wrote:
>
> > Hey Joon,
> >  My talk is about the when and where, it sounds like you are focusing
> > more on the how.  I think they will dove tail together really nicely.
> > As you know there are several pretty strong TDD and BDD frameworks in
> > Ruby, it sounds like your going to go over the basics of a few of the
> > top ones.  That diversity has let to some debate as how best to test
> > what.  My plan is to basically lay out the arguments for everyone.
>
> >  As far as the the agile talk, I personally would like to see
> > something a little more advanced, but I'd love to hear what other
> > members of the group think.  Guys and Gals?
>
> > Best,
> > Rob
>
> > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 17:38, June Clarke <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Hey Rob & Rubyists,
>
> >> We're planning on giving a talk on BDD and TDD for Ruby. It will be a
> >> basic introduction to rSpec and Cucumber by example. Would there be
> >> overlap with what you are thinking Rob?
>
> >> And we're also hoping to do a 15 minute introduction to Agile, though
> >> we could give a more advanced topic if you guys would prefer.
>
> >> June.
>
>

-- 
SD Ruby mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sdruby+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words 
"REMOVE ME" as the subject.

Reply via email to