I watched the Google IO talk on Chrome Frame last week and it is pretty
impressive. I wouldn't hesitate to using it. Not only do you get better
browser support, but you also get a huge JavaScript speed improvement. They
said in talk that Yahoo is using it as the default render-er for their
homepage and I think Google uses it for Gmail too.

-Brad


On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Patrick Crowley <[email protected]>wrote:

> > You still code for browsers below ie8? (this is the reason the web is not
> evolving!!!!! /rant).
>
> Dude, I've been pushing web standards pretty hard for five years. Ask
> @hober. /rant ;)
>
> > in all seriousness, the only downside I've experienced, is the fact the
> users that are stuck using said awful browsers, are required to run thru a
> download/install process. And typically, those users aren't exactly
> experienced in such a process. I wonder what the success rate of a chrome
> frame funnel looks like.
>
> Yeah, that's why I'm asking. I'd really like to use this, but I worry about
> the app that I'm working on right now. There's definitely a subset of users
> who are older and non-technical.
>
> > However, I read just last week that a new beta version of chrome frame
> > is out that does not require admin override.  Not sure how this is
> > accomplished, but guessing it's a good hack.
>
>
> I'm really excited for this. It would rock to just code for webkit and IE9,
> then force everyone else to use Google Chrome Frame.
>
> Just wondering if anyone in the group is doing this yet.
>
> -- Patrick
>
> --
> SD Ruby mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby
>

-- 
SD Ruby mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby

Reply via email to