REE is great. I've used it for a very long time now and if you can't do 1.9.2, definately use REE. In fact, we just moved an app over from 1.8.7 to REE 1.8.7 and cut many of our large requests time in 1/2 due to the garbage collection opimizations!
Ryan On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Rohan Deshpande <[email protected] > wrote: > I use REE 1.8.7 and Passenger for most my deployments, and in most > cases noticed much better memory utilization over time (not > immediately, but after a few days without a reboot memory stayed > pretty low). > > In addition, using the garbage collection facilities in REE can be a > big help. You can hook into the GC by doing: > > GC.enable_stats > > and then gather all sorts of data around the number and type of > objects being created, etc. It helps tremendously when trying to track > down memory leaks. > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Matt Aimonetti <[email protected]> > wrote: > > REE is only 1.8.7, and it's is well tested and used by many. The Phusion > > guys talked about porting their changes to 1.9 but haven't done it yet. > > - Matt > > > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Allan Schougaard > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> Does anyone have experience with the Ruby Enterprise Edition? > >> Any gotchas? > >> Is there any way to get it to work as Ruby 1.9? (on their website it > says > >> "100% > >> compatible with the official Ruby interpreter, version > >> 1.8.7.") > >> > >> Many thanks, > >> --Allan > >> > >> -- > >> SD Ruby mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby > > > > -- > > SD Ruby mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby > > -- > SD Ruby mailing list > [email protected] > http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby > -- SD Ruby mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby
