Depends on what you do, if you are doing a lot of IO and using threads, 1.9 is much faster. But it seriously depends on what you do. You'll need to upgrade to 1.9 eventually anyway ;)
- Matt On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Allan Schougaard < [email protected]> wrote: > Is 1.9.2 comparable with REE 1.8.7 in performance? > > Thanks, > --Allan > > > *From:* Ryan Felton <[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Mon, June 27, 2011 3:32:59 PM > *Subject:* Re: [SDRuby] Ruby Enterprise Edition, any experiences? > > REE is great. I've used it for a very long time now and if you can't do > 1.9.2, definately use REE. In fact, we just moved an app over from 1.8.7 to > REE 1.8.7 and cut many of our large requests time in 1/2 due to the garbage > collection opimizations! > > Ryan > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Rohan Deshpande < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I use REE 1.8.7 and Passenger for most my deployments, and in most >> cases noticed much better memory utilization over time (not >> immediately, but after a few days without a reboot memory stayed >> pretty low). >> >> In addition, using the garbage collection facilities in REE can be a >> big help. You can hook into the GC by doing: >> >> GC.enable_stats >> >> and then gather all sorts of data around the number and type of >> objects being created, etc. It helps tremendously when trying to track >> down memory leaks. >> >> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Matt Aimonetti <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > REE is only 1.8.7, and it's is well tested and used by many. The Phusion >> > guys talked about porting their changes to 1.9 but haven't done it yet. >> > - Matt >> > >> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Allan Schougaard >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Does anyone have experience with the Ruby Enterprise Edition? >> >> Any gotchas? >> >> Is there any way to get it to work as Ruby 1.9? (on their website it >> says >> >> "100% >> >> compatible with the official Ruby interpreter, version >> >> 1.8.7.") >> >> >> >> Many thanks, >> >> --Allan >> >> >> >> -- >> >> SD Ruby mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby >> > >> > -- >> > SD Ruby mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby >> >> -- >> SD Ruby mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby >> > > -- > SD Ruby mailing list > [email protected] > http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby > > -- > SD Ruby mailing list > [email protected] > http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby > -- SD Ruby mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby
