On Nov 30, 2011, at 10:50 AM, Chris McCann wrote: > An interesting post about where Rails fits in with the current web- > enabled application landscape.
I read an interesting piece recently (can’t locate it right now) arguing that the move to SSD or memory-based data stores removes the “my language may be slow, but it’s much faster than the database” rationale for using languages such as Ruby. This does seem to me to be pretty sound for sites trying to scale. -- SD Ruby mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby
