Matt hits on an important point - we're talking about Rails here, yet Ruby as a language is still wonderfully powerful within the ecosystem of alternatives. I don't think the value of building things in Ruby and quasi-Ruby (CoffeeScript ;-) has waned at all. We may just be building different things and architecting things differently.
Ben On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Matt Aimonetti <[email protected]>wrote: > I mostly agree with the article. But it will take a little bit before > everybody's on the same page. > Rails for me is yet another tool in my toolbox when I need to create "web > 2.0" site, mainly dynamically generated on the server side. > > The one thing tho, even when I try hard, I almost always come back to Ruby > even when working in a Ruby/Scala shop and having a thing for Lisp and Go. > > - Matt > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Chris McCann <[email protected]>wrote: > >> An interesting post about where Rails fits in with the current web- >> enabled application landscape. >> >> http://broadcastingadam.com/2011/11/moving_on_from_rails >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Chris >> >> -- >> SD Ruby mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby > > > -- > SD Ruby mailing list > [email protected] > http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby > -- SD Ruby mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby
