Bug#297973: NMU patch

[Blars Blarson]

NMU patch attached.

-- 
Blars Blarson   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.blars.org/blars.html
With Microsoft, failure is not an option.  It is a standard feature.
diff -ruN ../orig/sigcperl-0.2.0/debian/changelog 
sigcperl-0.2.0/debian/changelog
--- ../orig/sigcperl-0.2.0/debian/changelog 2005-09-04 05:33:44.0 
+
+++ sigcperl-0.2.0/debian/changelog 2005-09-04 05:40:44.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+sigcperl (0.2.0-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * 0-day NMU durring bug squishing party
+  * fix for gcc 4.0 (closes: #297973)
+  * standards version 3.6.2
+
+ -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Sun,  4 Sep 2005 05:36:09 +
+
 sigcperl (0.2.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Updated Standards-Version to 3.6.1.
diff -ruN ../orig/sigcperl-0.2.0/debian/control sigcperl-0.2.0/debian/control
--- ../orig/sigcperl-0.2.0/debian/control   2005-09-04 05:33:44.0 
+
+++ sigcperl-0.2.0/debian/control   2005-09-04 05:40:23.0 +
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.0.0), libsigc++-1.2-dev, libperl-dev (= 5.8.0)
-Standards-Version: 3.6.1
+Standards-Version: 3.6.2
 
 Package: libsigcperl-dev
 Section: libdevel
diff -ruN ../orig/sigcperl-0.2.0/sigcperl/convert.h 
sigcperl-0.2.0/sigcperl/convert.h
--- ../orig/sigcperl-0.2.0/sigcperl/convert.h   2002-08-15 17:29:31.0 
+
+++ sigcperl-0.2.0/sigcperl/convert.h   2005-09-04 05:39:43.0 +
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
 template inline ArgBoxdouble::ArgBox(SV *val) throw()
   : m_val(SvNV(val)) {}
 
-inline std::string SigCPerl::get_string(SV *val) throw()
+inline std::string get_string(SV *val) throw()
 {
   STRLEN len;
   const char *str = SvPV(val, len);

Processed: Fixed in NMU of sigcperl 0.2.0-2.1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tag 297973 + fixed
Bug#297973: sigcperl: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): explicit qualification in 
declaration of `std::string SigCPerl::get_string(SV*)'
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed

 quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#320541: unsafe temp file creation (CAN-2004-2265)

[Florian Weimer]

* Frank Lichtenheld:

 On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 11:53:52PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
 * Frank Lichtenheld:
 
  I mean, after closing fd _and_ unlinking the temporary file it is
  completly gone and the race is open again, isn't it? Wouldn't be
  the right fix to return the fd from the function and not bother
  about the filename at all?
 
 In the interest of a minimal change, it might make more sense to
 simply leave the file around, so that it is subsequently opened again?

 True, but that would mean not to unlink it, wouldn't it?

Yes, this is exactly what I mean.

By the way, libconvert-uulib-perl contains a copy of the code.  I'll
check if it is affected, too.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#326489: libdc0: please recompile the library for g++4 transition

[Modestas Vainius]

2005 m. rugsėjis 4 d., sekmadienis 02:44, Steve Langasek rašė:
 This is not true; the package is both installable and usable.  The C++
 transition is nevertheless an RC bug on libdc0, because it is not
 possible to rebuild this package (e.g., for a security fix) without
 breaking the library ABI.
Ok. I'm sorry for a bit wrong reasoning. Yes it's installable (actually I 
still have it installed, my bad) but practically unusable in its current 
stage. The only rdepend, valknut, can't be installed nor any other app can be 
compiled against it in sid because of the different ABI. So I don't see any 
way how current libdc0, the shared library, can be practically used 
distribution-wide. And your point is, of course, correct too.


pgpji5Jq4SULQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#326090: cpio always dereferences symlinks not in archive!

[Carl Miller]

Package: cpio
Version: 2.6-4
Followup-For: Bug #326090


It's much worse than just that cpio -p does not copy dangling symlinks.
Try adding to your archive a symlink that's not dangling, but whose
target file is not in the archive.  In this case, cpio dereferences the
link and includes the pointed-to file in the archive rather than the
link!

e.g.:

ln -sf /proc/kcore /dev/core
find /dev -xdev -true -print | cpio -o -H ustar -a | gzip -c -9  
/tmp/dev.tar.gz

You'll find the entire contents of your RAM in /tmp/dev.tar.gz if you
execute that as root.  /dev/core gets dereferenced, and the *entire*
contents of /proc/kcore gets added to the archive.  Not what I'm looking
for in a disk backup solution.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.29
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages cpio depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

cpio recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: merge #322524 in #316764

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 severity 322524 grave
Bug#322524: wmfire: could'nt not install wmfire with libgtop2-5
Severity set to `grave'.

 merge 316764 322524
Bug#316764: wmfire depends on unavailable package libgtop2-2
Bug#322524: wmfire: could'nt not install wmfire with libgtop2-5
Merged 316764 322524.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#326574: Uninstallable on sid; depends on unavailable packages

[Yavor Doganov]

Subject: Uninstallable on sid; depends on unavailable packages
Package: lostirc
Version: 0.4.5-1
Severity: grave
Tags: sid

Some of the libraries that lostirc depends on were renamed as part of
the C++ ABI transition.  The package is currently uninstallable on sid
and needs to be rebuilt.

-- 
Yavor Doganov   JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free Software Association - Bulgaria   http://fsa-bg.org
GNOME in Bulgarian! http://gnome.cult.bg


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: 316764 322524 pending

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tags 316764 + pending
Bug#316764: wmfire depends on unavailable package libgtop2-2
Tags were: sid experimental
Bug#322524: wmfire: could'nt not install wmfire with libgtop2-5
Tags added: pending

 tags 322524 + pending
Bug#322524: wmfire: could'nt not install wmfire with libgtop2-5
Tags were: pending sid experimental
Bug#316764: wmfire depends on unavailable package libgtop2-2
Tags added: pending

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#326580: raidutils: ftbfs [sparc] 'volatile void exit(int)' conflicts with /usr/include/stdlib.h

[Blars Blarson]

Package: raidutils
Version: 0.0.4-6
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source

raidutils failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc
pbuilder:


if sparc-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../include -O3 -DMESSAGES 
-D_DPT_ACTIVE_ALIGNMENT -Dtrue=1 -Dfalse=0 -DHORIZONTAL -DNEW_RSC_MGR 
-DNEW_RSC_HDR -D_DPT_FLASH   -g -O2 -MT raidutil-command.o -MD -MP -MF 
.deps/raidutil-command.Tpo -c -o raidutil-command.o `test -f 'command.cpp' || 
echo './'`command.cpp; \
then mv -f .deps/raidutil-command.Tpo .deps/raidutil-command.Po; else rm -f 
.deps/raidutil-command.Tpo; exit 1; fi
command.cpp:2246: error: declaration of C function 'volatile void exit(int)' 
conflicts with
/usr/include/stdlib.h:640: error: previous declaration 'void exit(int)' here
make[3]: *** [raidutil-command.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/raidutils-0.0.4/raidutil'


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#326584: ohphone: uninstallable in sid: rebuild for C++ transition

[Steve Langasek]

Package: ohphone
Version: 1:1.4.3+20050304-3
Severity: grave

The ohphone package is currently not installable in unstable due to
various library transitions:

# aptitude install ohphone
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading extended state information   
Initializing package states... Done
Reading task descriptions... Done  
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
E: Unable to correct dependencies, some packages cannot be installed
E: Unable to resolve some dependencies!
Some packages had unmet dependencies.  This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  ohphone: Depends: libopenh323-1.15.2 (= 1.15.3) but it is not installable
   Depends: libpt-1.8.3 but it is not installable
#

The package should only require a rebuild to fix the problem.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#326581: [hppa] glibc-2.3.5 let's python builds FTBFS

[Matthias Klose]

Package: glibc
Version: 2.3.5-6
Severity: grave

The python2.3 package (as well as the 2.2 and 2.4 package) FTBFS on
hppa (see the buildd logs). The failures do not occur when downgrading
glibc to 2.3.2 from sarge, or using breezy's glibc. Not further
tracked down.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#326582: t38modem_0.8.0+20050304-2 (m68k/unstable): FTBFS: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

[Steve Langasek]

Package: t38modem
Version: 0.8.0+20050304-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS

The t38modem package currently fails to build on m68k with the following
error:

[...]
g++  -D_REENTRANT -fno-exceptions -Wall  -I/usr/share/pwlib//include -DPTRACING 
-I/usr/include/openh323 -DHAS_OSS -Os  -Wall -g -O2 -felide-constructors -x c++ 
-c fcs.cxx -o obj_linux_m68k_r/fcs.o
/usr/lib/gcc/m68k-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../include/c++/4.0.2/bits/stl_map.h:133:
 internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions.
For Debian GNU/Linux specific bug reporting instructions,
see URL:file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.0/README.Bugs.
make[1]: *** [obj_linux_m68k_r/fcs.o] Error 1
[...]

A full build log can be found at
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=t38modemver=0.8.0%2B20050304-2arch=m68kstamp=1124063015file=logas=raw.

Of course, this gives every indication that it's a toolchain problem,
not a problem with your sources; nevertheless, your package fails to
build, and there's a long queue of new ICEs with gcc-4.0 that will take
a while to all get fixed, so you may want to see if using gcc-3.4 on
m68k is a possible workaround for this problem.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#326588: yate-openh323: uninstallable in sid: please rebuild for the C++ transition

[Steve Langasek]

Package: yate-openh323
Version: 0.8.7+cvs20050604-1
Severity: grave

The yate-openh323 package is currently not installable in unstable due
to various library transitions:

# aptitude install yate-openh323
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading extended state information   
Initializing package states... Done
Reading task descriptions... Done  
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
E: Unable to correct dependencies, some packages cannot be installed
E: Unable to resolve some dependencies!
Some packages had unmet dependencies.  This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  yate-openh323: Depends: libopenh323-1.15.2 (= 1.15.3) but it is not 
installable
 Depends: libpt-1.8.3 but it is not installable
#

The package should only require a rebuild to fix the problem, though
additional fixes will be needed for bug #303028.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#326585: openam: uninstallable in sid: rebuild for C++ transition

[Steve Langasek]

Package: openam
Version: 1.1.18+20050304-1
Severity: grave

The openam package is currently not installable in unstable due to
various library transitions:

# aptitude install openam
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Done
Reading task descriptions... Done
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
E: Unable to correct dependencies, some packages cannot be installed
E: Unable to resolve some dependencies!
Some packages had unmet dependencies.  This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  openam: Depends: libopenh323-1.15.2 (= 1.15.3) but it is not installable
  Depends: libpt-1.8.3 but it is not installable
#

The package should only require a rebuild to fix the problem.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#326586: openmcu: uninstallable in sid: please rebuild for the C++ transition

[Steve Langasek]

Package: openmcu
Version: 2.1.0-1
Severity: grave

The openmcu package is currently not installable in unstable due to
various library transitions:

# aptitude install openmcu
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Done
Reading task descriptions... Done
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
E: Unable to correct dependencies, some packages cannot be installed
E: Unable to resolve some dependencies!
Some packages had unmet dependencies.  This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  openmcu: Depends: libopenh323-1.15.2 (= 1.15.3) but it is not installable
   Depends: libpt-1.8.3 but it is not installable
#

The package should only require a rebuild to fix the problem.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#326587: pstngw: uninstallable in sid: please rebuild for the C++ transition

[Steve Langasek]

Package: pstngw
Version: 1.3.1-3
Severity: grave

The pstngw package is currently not installable in unstable due to
various library transitions:

# aptitude install pstngw
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Done
Reading task descriptions... Done
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
E: Unable to correct dependencies, some packages cannot be installed
E: Unable to resolve some dependencies!
Some packages had unmet dependencies.  This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  pstngw: Depends: libopenh323-1.15.2 (= 1.15.3) but it is not installable
  Depends: libpt-1.8.3 but it is not installable
#

The package should only require a rebuild to fix the problem.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#326589: unison: is confused about its own name

[Andreas Koenig]

Package: unison
Version: 2.13.16-1
Severity: serious

The recent upgrade to 2.13.16 broke unison in many ways simultaneously
and only the help of strace, my instinct, and definitely not the error
messages helped me get it running again. Maybe I have an installation
that the developers did not test?

I'm not sure which version of unison I upgraded *from*. I do have
2.13.16 no on both servers. Both are Debian.

I have only the package unison installed. I never cared about
unison-gtk and never installed it. Maybe this is a situation that the
developers had not expected?

When I started unison-latest-stable, it complained

Usage: unison-2.13.16-gtk [options]
or unison-2.13.16-gtk root1 root2 [options]
or unison-2.13.16-gtk profilename [options]

For a list of options, type unison-2.13.16-gtk -help.
For a tutorial on basic usage, type unison-2.13.16-gtk -doc tutorial.
For other documentation, type unison-2.13.16-gtk -doc topics.
zsh: exit 1 unison-latest-stable

Note, the ubiquitous suffix -gtk. Of course, as I said above, I do
and did not have the unison-2.13.16-gtk installed, so it is bug #1
that the Usage output tells me to use a program that I have not
installed.

I found out that the unison-latest-stable call had created a
~/.unison-2.13.16-gtk/ directory. Watching strace I came to the
conclusion that I would have to move the contents of my ~/.unison/
directory into that new directory and so I did. Is it intentional that
the ~/.unison/ directory is ignored completely? I'd call this bug #2.

So then I called

11:16:47 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% unison-latest-stable default 
Contacting server...
zsh: command not found: unison-2.13.16-gtk
Fatal error: Lost connection with the server

Oh my, same thing here. I do not have installed the -gtk stuff on the
remote server either. Why does my local version of unison suppose that
I have? This seems to me bug #3.

I went to the remote server and created a symlink from
/usr/bin/unison-2.13.16 to unison-2.13.16-gtk and this resolved the
issue completely.

I hope, my descriptions help to find the root of the evil. Thanks for
providing unison!

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages unison depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

Versions of packages unison recommends:
ii  ssh   1:4.1p1-7  Secure shell client and server (tr

-- no debconf information

-- 
andreas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: mergeant: FTBFS

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tags 325814 + unreproducible
Bug#325814: mergeant: FTBFS
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325643: libcurl and moc

[Paul TBBle Hampson]

On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 05:02:14AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
 On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 08:16:48AM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
 As far as packaging goes, this means you get the following packages:

 libcurl3, providing libcurl3-openssl (linked against OpenSSL to avoid 
 breaking
  sarge packages that use this functionality)
 libcurl3-gnutls (linked against gnuTLS, doesn't support SSL_CTX_FUNCTION)
 libcurl3-dev (Do we need a second -dev? Static linking maybe requires it? If
  this becomes a testable feature, then a second -dev is definately 
 needed.)

 Packages which don't use SSL_CTX_FUNCTION can Depend on either libcurl3 |
 libcurl3-gnutls, or if they're GPL'd can depend on libcurl3-gnutls only.

 Packages which need SSL_CTX_FUNCTION can depend on libcurl3-openssl

 grepping the source of libcurl3's direct rdepends should tell you which
 packages in Debian need SSL_CTX_FUNCTION.

 GPL'd packages which need SSL_CTX_FUNCTION are out of luck. And have always
 been so.

 Before etch ships, no package should depend on libcurl3, they should depend 
 on
 libcurl3-openssl or libcurl3 | libcurl3-gnutls or libcurl3-gnutls.

 After etch ships, upload:
 libcurl3, providing libcurl3-gnutls (linked against gnuTLS)
 libcurl3-openssl, providing libcurl3 (linked against openSSL)
 libcurl3-dev

 At this point, packages who don't like having libcurl3-gnutls is their
 Depends line can do a versioned depends on libcurl3, which won't match
 the libcurl3 virtual dependancy provide by libcurl3-openssl, and will
 also prevent them accidentally linking against an openSSL version of
 libcurl3. (At least, I _think_ that's how versioned dependancies on
 virtual packages work. Possibly they'll _always_ match, in which case a
 Conflicts is in order instead.)

 Do libcurl3 and libcurl3-gnutls provide different sonames to allow
 co-installability of the packages, or does libcurl3 use diversions to
 override the libcurl.so.3 that lacks SSL_CTX_FUNCTION support (if any)
 when installing?  (We know that directly conflicting between the two
 packages is not really an option, unless we're doing this like the C++
 ABI transition and we either don't believe there are any packages in
 Debian which will need to retain SSL_CTX_FUNCTION support or we assume
 they're packages that we don't care about co-installability of -- which
 seems far-fetched to me.)

Ooops. I forgot about diversions.

And yes, I'm expecting them to conflict. If they don't want to conflict,
I believe the suggestion I posted much earlier about changing coname for
the gnuTLS version would do it, but it makes the transition more painful
in my opinion.

 It may be worthwhile to simply survey all the curl-using packages in
 sarge, though, and find out if there is a non-zero number of them that
 need SSL_CTX_FUNCTION.  If *not*, then I don't think there's much sense
 in going through a multi-stage transition: just switch libcurl3 directly
 to gnutls, and add libcurl3-openssl which provides libcurl-openssl.so.3?

Very true...

apt-cache rdepends libcurl3:
libcurl3
Reverse Depends:
  python-mapscript
  php4-mapscript
  perl-mapscript
  openoffice.org2-core
  mapserver-bin
  cgi-mapserver
  ida
  xmms-scrobbler
  xine-ui
  xen
  xastir
  wmweather
  wmget
  vorbis-tools
  telak
  tclcurl
  sylpheed-claws-gtk2-clamav
  streamtuner
  rtorrent
  redland-utils
  rasqal-utils
  raptor-utils
  python2.4-pycurl
  python2.3-pycurl
  python2.3-librdf
  python2.2-librdf
  python-mapscript
  php5-curl
  php4-curl
  perl-mapscript
  paintlib2c2
  openoffice.org-bin
  moc
  metar
  mapserver-bin
  logjam
  linuxtrade
  libwww-curl-perl
  libsword5
  libstonith0
  librdf0
  librdf-ruby
  librdf-perl
  librasqal0
  libraptor1
  libofx2
  libmultisync-plugin-opie
  liblrdf0
  libcurl3-gssapi
  libcurl3-gssapi
  libcurl3-gnutls
  libcurl3-dev
  libcurl3-dbg
  libcurl-ocaml
  libclamav1
  libapache2-webkdc
  libapache2-webauth
  jigdo
  jabber-msn
  icecast2
  grip
  gnomesword
  gambas-gb-net-curl
  freepops
  fbi
  drivel
  diatheke
  darcs-server
  darcs
  curl
  cogito
  clamcour
  clamav-milter
  clamav-freshclam
  clamav-daemon
  clamav
  cgi-mapserver
  centericq-utf8
  centericq-fribidi
  centericq
  cduce
  came
  bzflag-server
  bzflag
  bidwatcher
  bibletime
  beep-media-player-scrobbler
  ardour-gtk-i686
  ardour-gtk
  apt-spy
  approx
  aegis-web
  aegis

apt-get source `apt-cache rdepends libcurl3 |grep '^ '` --download-only

Move the following out of the way:

  curl_7.14.0-5
  fbi_2.01-1.2
  gnomesword_2.1.2-2
  ida_2.01-1.2
  libwww-curl-perl_2.0-8
  openoffice.org_1.1.4-7
  openoffice.org2_1.9.125-1
  pycurl_7.14.0-2
  sword_1.5.8-2
  tclcurl_0.13.2-1

for d in *.dsc; do dpkg-source -x $d; done

grep -r CURLOPT_SSL_CTX_ */.
gives just two hits, curl_lua in freepops, and they just return
'unimplemented' when called.

So apart from the above 10 pacakges, no one in the archive
is using CURLOPT_SSL_CTX_* that I can see.

As for the rest:

BINDINGS:
* curl itself only uses 

Bug#326597: FTBFS: does not find ftheaders.h

[Jerome Warnier]

Package: poppler
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source

poppler 0.4.0-1 fails to build from source on Sid.
See the log attached.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)


poppler_0.4.0-1_i386.build.gz
Description: Binary data

Bug#325814: mergeant: FTBFS

[Roger Leigh]

tags 325814 + unreproducible
thanks

I can't reproduce the failure on a powerpc system.  The log is here:
http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/mergeant_0.52-1_20050904-1025

Did you build in a clean and up-to-date chroot?

The only problem I found was this:

dh_shlibdeps -pmergeant  
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libmergeant-2.so.1
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libmergeant_handlers-2.so.1
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libmergeant_graph-2.so.1
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libmergeant-2.so.1
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libmergeant_handlers-2.so.1
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libmergeant_graph-2.so.1
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libmergeant-2.so.1
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libmergeant_handlers-2.so.1
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libmergeant_graph-2.so.1
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libmergeant-2.so.1
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libmergeant_handlers-2.so.1
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libmergeant_graph-2.so.1
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libmergeant-2.so.1
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libmergeant_handlers-2.so.1
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libmergeant_graph-2.so.1
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libmergeant-2.so.1
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libmergeant_handlers-2.so.1
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libmergeant_graph-2.so.1
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libmergeant-2.so.1
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libmergeant_handlers-2.so.1
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libmergeant_graph-2.so.1
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libmergeant-2.so.1
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libmergeant_handlers-2.so.1
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libmergeant_graph-2.so.1
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libmergeant-2.so.1
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libmergeant_handlers-2.so.1
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libmergeant_graph-2.so.1
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libmergeant-2.so.1
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libmergeant_handlers-2.so.1
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libmergeant_graph-2.so.1
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libmergeant-2.so.1
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libmergeant_handlers-2.so.1
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libmergeant_graph-2.so.1
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libmergeant-2.so.1
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libmergeant_handlers-2.so.1
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libmergeant_graph-2.so.1
dh_gencontrol -pmergeant 
dpkg-gencontrol: warning: unknown substitution variable ${misc:Depends}


Regards,
Roger

-- 
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux?  http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848.  Please sign and encrypt your mail.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#319162: NMU patch

[Steve Langasek]

On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 11:42:25AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
 Le samedi 03 septembre 2005 à 00:31 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
  Yeah, right.  binutils is unmaintained; the issue couldn't possibly be
  that you've made poor design decisions in your packages by making them
  dependent on kludgy, non-default toolchain options that policy doesn't
  require the toolchain to support at all...

 Policy? What does binutils working properly have to do with policy?
 Policy documents existing practice, and existing practice is to use this
 option. This is a regression in the toolchain for some architectures. No
 more, no less. If there aren't enough skilled people to fix the
 toolchain for some architectures, this isn't a good sign for the health
 of that port.

If you're going to blame build failures on the toolchain, then policy
(and release policy) is quite relevant.  There are in fact quite a few
toolchain options that *are* specified in policy: -O2, -O1, -O0, -g,
-Wl,-z,-defs, -Wall... and -shared is implied, of course... if a compile
fails when using one of these options, you have grounds for demanding
that the toolchain be fixed instead of trying to work around it in your
package. If you're using other, exotic toolchain options like -O3 or
-Wl,--as-needed, I believe the burden must lie primarily with the
package maintainer, not with the toolchain maintainer.

 Today, --as-needed can't be fixed, obviously because nobody skilled
 enough is willing to work on it. What are you going to do if default
 linker options are broken tomorrow?

Alternate explanation: the breakage in --as-needed wasn't noticed
upstream because it's a fringe option that isn't even clearly a good
idea, so it wasn't until Ubuntu and Debian packages started building
with binutils 2.16 that anyone noticed it was broken, so the breakage is
not a reflection on the viability of the porter teams for those archs.
(AIUI, there is actually activity upstream on getting a fix for this
bug; I just don't think the binutils maintainers should drop everything
else they work on to fix --as-needed, and I don't think you should wait
on binutils before fixing these build failures in your packages.)

 And after all, you're the release manager, so you'll be the one to deal
 with the horrible mess of gnome-games dependencies when all indirect
 dependencies are explicit. Great to see how you welcome design decisions
 taken to ease your work.

Yes, library dependencies are a major concern of mine, as I wrote at
http://people.debian.org/~vorlon/dependency-hell/.  But two design
kludges don't make a good solution, as they say (paraphrased); I believe
this is a problem we need to be fixing at the root, which is libtool and
pkg-config, instead of painting over it.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#326585: marked as done (openam: uninstallable in sid: rebuild for C++ transition)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 03:17:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#326585: fixed in openam 1.1.18+20050304-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 09:18:26 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 02:18:26 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (tennyson.dodds.net) 
[66.93.39.86] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBqdu-000685-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 02:18:26 -0700
Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1003)
id 8DE0A7046; Sun,  4 Sep 2005 02:18:26 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 02:18:26 -0700
From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: openam: uninstallable in sid: rebuild for C++ transition
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=FkmkrVfFsRoUs1wW
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--FkmkrVfFsRoUs1wW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: openam
Version: 1.1.18+20050304-1
Severity: grave

The openam package is currently not installable in unstable due to
various library transitions:

# aptitude install openam
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Done
Reading task descriptions... Done
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
E: Unable to correct dependencies, some packages cannot be installed
E: Unable to resolve some dependencies!
Some packages had unmet dependencies.  This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  openam: Depends: libopenh323-1.15.2 (=3D 1.15.3) but it is not installab=
le
  Depends: libpt-1.8.3 but it is not installable
#

The package should only require a rebuild to fix the problem.   =20

--=20
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/

--FkmkrVfFsRoUs1wW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDGrviKN6ufymYLloRAidFAJ4rsCsz3nhJSvNlhDXkXu1e7RbExgCeMtNy
B9ORn4buNppsNWzvxDu4ZWw=
=taPz
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--FkmkrVfFsRoUs1wW--

---
Received: (at 326585-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 10:19:58 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 03:19:58 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBrYi-0002Rs-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 03:17:08 -0700
From: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#326585: fixed in openam 1.1.18+20050304-2
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 03:17:08 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: openam
Source-Version: 1.1.18+20050304-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
openam, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

openam_1.1.18+20050304-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/o/openam/openam_1.1.18+20050304-2.diff.gz
openam_1.1.18+20050304-2.dsc
  to pool/main/o/openam/openam_1.1.18+20050304-2.dsc
openam_1.1.18+20050304-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openam/openam_1.1.18+20050304-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this 

Bug#326584: marked as done (ohphone: uninstallable in sid: rebuild for C++ transition)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 03:17:06 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#326584: fixed in ohphone 1:1.4.3+20050304-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 09:16:47 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 02:16:47 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (tennyson.dodds.net) 
[66.93.39.86] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBqcJ-0005v1-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 02:16:47 -0700
Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1003)
id B69AB7046; Sun,  4 Sep 2005 02:16:46 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 02:16:46 -0700
From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ohphone: uninstallable in sid: rebuild for C++ transition
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: ohphone
Version: 1:1.4.3+20050304-3
Severity: grave

The ohphone package is currently not installable in unstable due to
various library transitions:

# aptitude install ohphone
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading extended state information  =20
Initializing package states... Done
Reading task descriptions... Done =20
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
E: Unable to correct dependencies, some packages cannot be installed
E: Unable to resolve some dependencies!
Some packages had unmet dependencies.  This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  ohphone: Depends: libopenh323-1.15.2 (=3D 1.15.3) but it is not installa=
ble
   Depends: libpt-1.8.3 but it is not installable
#

The package should only require a rebuild to fix the problem.

--=20
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/

--PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDGrt+KN6ufymYLloRAmsUAJ9TCqXut3fr7a4uma1gUtESAg6+0wCfbOhI
ZVmER38CdbxJ0LFuueT3ePY=
=4mP5
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9--

---
Received: (at 326584-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 10:18:43 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 03:18:43 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBrYg-0002Qy-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 03:17:06 -0700
From: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#326584: fixed in ohphone 1:1.4.3+20050304-4
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 03:17:06 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: ohphone
Source-Version: 1:1.4.3+20050304-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ohphone, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

ohphone-basic_1.4.3+20050304-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/ohphone/ohphone-basic_1.4.3+20050304-4_i386.deb
ohphone_1.4.3+20050304-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/o/ohphone/ohphone_1.4.3+20050304-4.diff.gz
ohphone_1.4.3+20050304-4.dsc
  to pool/main/o/ohphone/ohphone_1.4.3+20050304-4.dsc

Bug#326586: marked as done (openmcu: uninstallable in sid: please rebuild for the C++ transition)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 03:32:10 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#326586: fixed in openmcu 2.1.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 09:19:32 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 02:19:32 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (tennyson.dodds.net) 
[66.93.39.86] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBqey-0006Pu-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 02:19:32 -0700
Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1003)
id D09497046; Sun,  4 Sep 2005 02:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 02:19:31 -0700
From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: openmcu: uninstallable in sid: please rebuild for the C++ transition
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=dkEUBIird37B8yKS
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--dkEUBIird37B8yKS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: openmcu
Version: 2.1.0-1
Severity: grave

The openmcu package is currently not installable in unstable due to
various library transitions:

# aptitude install openmcu
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Done
Reading task descriptions... Done
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
E: Unable to correct dependencies, some packages cannot be installed
E: Unable to resolve some dependencies!
Some packages had unmet dependencies.  This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  openmcu: Depends: libopenh323-1.15.2 (=3D 1.15.3) but it is not installa=
ble
   Depends: libpt-1.8.3 but it is not installable
#

The package should only require a rebuild to fix the problem.

--=20
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/

--dkEUBIird37B8yKS
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDGrwjKN6ufymYLloRAouuAJ9kVIhtZqui4FCol/E6Tl+HM5ktJgCdF+eF
JBkqOzVCsUlajScVbQLyZCY=
=SSCe
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--dkEUBIird37B8yKS--

---
Received: (at 326586-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 10:38:23 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 03:38:23 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBrnG-000665-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 03:32:10 -0700
From: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#326586: fixed in openmcu 2.1.0-2
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 03:32:10 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: openmcu
Source-Version: 2.1.0-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
openmcu, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

openmcu_2.1.0-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/o/openmcu/openmcu_2.1.0-2.diff.gz
openmcu_2.1.0-2.dsc
  to pool/main/o/openmcu/openmcu_2.1.0-2.dsc
openmcu_2.1.0-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openmcu/openmcu_2.1.0-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will 

Bug#325643: libcurl and moc

[Richard Atterer]

FWIW, I've started work on implementing the solution outlined in
http://curl.haxx.se/legal/distro-dilemma.html. However, my spare time is 
very limited, so I can't promise anything about when (or even whether) I 
can finish this.

  Richard

-- 
  __   _
  |_) /|  Richard Atterer |  GnuPG key:
  | \/¯|  http://atterer.net  |  0x888354F7
  ¯ '` ¯

Bug#326587: marked as done (pstngw: uninstallable in sid: please rebuild for the C++ transition)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 03:32:11 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#326587: fixed in pstngw 1.3.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 09:22:38 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 02:22:38 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (tennyson.dodds.net) 
[66.93.39.86] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBqhy-0007BZ-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 02:22:38 -0700
Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1003)
id 3FE217046; Sun,  4 Sep 2005 02:22:38 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 02:22:38 -0700
From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: pstngw: uninstallable in sid: please rebuild for the C++ transition
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=cHMo6Wbp1wrKhbfi
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--cHMo6Wbp1wrKhbfi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: pstngw
Version: 1.3.1-3
Severity: grave

The pstngw package is currently not installable in unstable due to
various library transitions:

# aptitude install pstngw
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Done
Reading task descriptions... Done
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
E: Unable to correct dependencies, some packages cannot be installed
E: Unable to resolve some dependencies!
Some packages had unmet dependencies.  This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  pstngw: Depends: libopenh323-1.15.2 (=3D 1.15.3) but it is not installab=
le
  Depends: libpt-1.8.3 but it is not installable
#

The package should only require a rebuild to fix the problem.

--=20
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/

--cHMo6Wbp1wrKhbfi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDGrzeKN6ufymYLloRAn1bAJ4kG4Bm5PX+4kf3TrsjmxwnMBXZAgCfdntz
i24iGRgeSLJAPnxwZnjPTc8=
=PJD6
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--cHMo6Wbp1wrKhbfi--

---
Received: (at 326587-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 10:38:41 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 03:38:41 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBrnH-00066S-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 03:32:11 -0700
From: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#326587: fixed in pstngw 1.3.1-4
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 03:32:11 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: pstngw
Source-Version: 1.3.1-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
pstngw, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

pstngw_1.3.1-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/pstngw/pstngw_1.3.1-4.diff.gz
pstngw_1.3.1-4.dsc
  to pool/main/p/pstngw/pstngw_1.3.1-4.dsc
pstngw_1.3.1-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pstngw/pstngw_1.3.1-4_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If 

Processed: patch for #310669

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tags 310669 + patch
Bug#310669: krusader: [m68k, mipsel] FTBFS: autoconf: command not found
Tags were: sid
Tags added: patch

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#317863: marked as done (Loops forever processing bbdb.texinfo)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#317863: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jul 2005 03:25:26 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 11 20:25:26 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DsBOg-0004vk-00; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:25:26 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain 
(pool-71-104-165-253.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.165.253])
(authenticated bits=0)
by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6C3PPQC073152
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:25:26 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ds6fE-0002It-52
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 15:22:12 -0700
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 15:22:12 -0700
From: Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Loops forever processing bbdb.texinfo
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=muT+E17Lr9urPYYJ
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.85.1, clamav-milter version 0.85 on 
zoot.lafn.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--muT+E17Lr9urPYYJ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: texi2html
Version: 1.76-1
Severity: serious

bbdb fails to build because texi2html loops forever on bbdb.texinfo:

 cd texinfo  /usr/bin/texi2html -split=3Dchapter bbdb.texinfo

It loops forever on lines 10606 to 10613, trying to set the following
field for the Other database manipulation functions subsection.
Changing the loop test to use

 $up ne $element_top

instead of

 $up-{'up'}

fixes the problem, but I'm not sure that there isn't a better way.

--=20
Matt

--muT+E17Lr9urPYYJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC0vETfNdgYxVXvBARAi7GAJ9uAukqIqEYDg5+aov9reXTIUysEwCfWN/9
TjM5mDJBMxILKXfLXsvUsyc=
=Ip7R
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--muT+E17Lr9urPYYJ--

---
Received: (at 317863-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 11:38:29 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 04:38:29 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBsjI-0002kQ-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
From: Nigel Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#317863: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: texi2html
Source-Version: 1.76-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
texi2html, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

texi2html_1.76-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/texi2html/texi2html_1.76-2.diff.gz
texi2html_1.76-2.dsc
  to pool/main/t/texi2html/texi2html_1.76-2.dsc
texi2html_1.76-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/texi2html/texi2html_1.76-2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Nigel Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated texi2html 

Bug#326048: marked as done (gnugo: FTBFS: Undefined subroutine main::normalize_space called at /usr/bin/texi2html line 13756.)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#318536: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Sep 2005 13:09:03 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 01 06:09:03 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from c129237.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) 
[213.39.129.237] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EAooR-0006PU-00; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 06:09:03 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1EAooP-0001W4-Ta; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 15:09:01 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gnugo: FTBFS: Undefined subroutine main::normalize_space called at 
/usr/bin/texi2html line 13756.
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 15:09:01 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: gnugo
Version: 3.7.4-1
Severity: serious

When building 'gnugo' on unstable, I get the following error:

# including ./regression.texi
# including ./copying.texi
# end of pass texi
# end of pass structure
# Writing elements:
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo.html .[Top]
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo_1.html ..
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo_2.html ..
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo_3.html 
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo_4.html ...Undefined subroutine 
main::normalize_space called at /usr/bin/texi2html line 13756.
make: *** [build] Error 25

Regards
Andreas Jochens

---
Received: (at 318536-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 11:38:14 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 04:38:14 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBsjI-0002kS-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
From: Nigel Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#318536: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3

Source: texi2html
Source-Version: 1.76-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
texi2html, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

texi2html_1.76-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/texi2html/texi2html_1.76-2.diff.gz
texi2html_1.76-2.dsc
  to pool/main/t/texi2html/texi2html_1.76-2.dsc
texi2html_1.76-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/texi2html/texi2html_1.76-2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Nigel Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated texi2html package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun,  4 Sep 2005 22:37:39 +1200
Source: texi2html
Binary: texi2html
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.76-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Nigel Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Nigel Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 texi2html  - Convert Texinfo files to HTML
Closes: 314843 317863 318536 321586 326048
Changes: 
 texi2html (1.76-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Closes: #318536: Chokes on gnugo.texi
   * Closes: #317863: Loops forever processing bbdb.texinfo
   * Closes: #321586: Includes non-free images - Fixed by dual GPL/CC agreement
   * New maintainer. (Closes: #314843: ITA: texi2html -- Convert Texinfo
 files to HTML)
   * Closes: #326048: gnugo: FTBFS: Undefined
 subroutine 

Bug#318536: marked as done (texi2html: Chokes on gnugo.texi)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#318536: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jul 2005 03:14:05 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 15 20:14:05 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from pop06.mail.atl.earthlink.net [207.69.200.40] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1Dtd7t-0004bp-00; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 20:14:05 -0700
Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3] 
helo=frobnitz.homelinux.net)
by pop06.mail.atl.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #10)
id 1Dtd7s-00015u-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 23:14:04 -0400
Received: from daniel by frobnitz.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1Dtd7q-0007Yg-A6
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 20:14:03 -0700
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: texi2html: Chokes on gnugo.texi
From: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 20:13:55 -0700
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: texi2html
Version: 1.76-1
Severity: serious
Justification: causes gnugo package to FTBFS

From my gnugo build log:

...
cd doc  texi2html -split_chapter -Verbose gnugo.texi
# Expanded: verbatim ifnotinfo ifnotxml documentdescription ifnotplaintext html 
ifnotdocbook titlepage ifset menu copying ifnottex ifclear ifhtml 
# created directory gnugo
# putting result files into directory gnugo/
# reading from gnugo.texi
# using 'en' as document language
# including ./introduction.texi
# including ./install.texi
# including ./using.texi
# including ./overview.texi
# including ./analyze.texi
# including ./move_generation.texi
# including ./dragon.texi
# including ./eyes.texi
# including ./patterns.texi
# including ./dfa.texi
# including ./reading.texi
# including ./owl.texi
# including ./influence.texi
# including ./moyo.texi
# including ./board.texi
# including ./sgf.texi
# including ./api.texi
# including ./utils.texi
# including ./gtp.texi
# including ./gtp-commands.texi
# including ./regression.texi
# including ./copying.texi
# end of pass texi
# end of pass structure
# Writing elements:
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo.html .[Top]
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo_1.html ..
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo_2.html ..
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo_3.html 
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo_4.html ...Undefined subroutine 
main::normalize_space called at /usr/bin/texi2html line 13756.
make: *** [build] Error 25

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-9-amd64-k8
Locale: LANG=en, LC_CTYPE=en (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to 
en_US.UTF-8)

Versions of packages texi2html depends on:
ii  perl  5.8.7-4Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

texi2html recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
Daniel Schepler  Please don't disillusion me.  I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet.
 -- Orson Scott Card

---
Received: (at 318536-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 11:38:14 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 04:38:14 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBsjI-0002kS-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
From: Nigel Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#318536: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3

Source: texi2html
Source-Version: 1.76-2

We believe that the bug you 

Bug#321586: marked as done (texi2html: Includes non-free image)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#321586: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Aug 2005 11:22:30 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 06 04:22:30 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.205] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E1Ml4-0007Kk-00; Sat, 06 Aug 2005 04:22:30 -0700
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 67so337958wri
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 06 Aug 2005 04:21:59 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;

h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition;

b=GIuqTrL2g3jCgdoQenOAtWpC49pVZtOYdXB27rsB1+egl3jtv5ggRAH0dvW0xhSoexopwo55+3yEgS03eqX9sPQF3NctBvF+Kz2tvLYf8q8lmdal0lAl8FalmF8lUGTfdhB/3zAIGQtQiZptwAdAG29ZoNG0+v/Vjn23hu3ge5Q=
Received: by 10.54.54.39 with SMTP id c39mr3385229wra;
Sat, 06 Aug 2005 04:21:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.49.56 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 04:21:59 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 23:21:59 +1200
From: Nigel Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: texi2html: Includes non-free image
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Subject: texi2html: Includes non-free images
Package: texi2html
Version: 1.76-2
Severity: serious
Justification: CC Images are not compatible with DFSG

From my report at
https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?func=3Ddetailitemitem_id=3D1405=
2


Is it possible for the images in texi2html to be replaced from
CC-Attr-Sharealike to a more compatible license that Debian will accept.

As the matter stands it seems you are actually claiming GPL'ed images to
be CC'ed, hence meaning we can't keep texi2html in the mainstream debian
which would mean a complete break down in quite a few of the packages.
The singular project which you got the images from claims it's all GPL,
which means that the images in texi2html is too.

As it stands, this problem is blocking the update of texi2html on Debian
which fixes 2 RC bugs (which are actually still unreplied to here).



To fix this we could split texi2html and have a -data package in
non-free (and the main package in contrib).  But this would mean 92
packages directly affected, and thousands more indirectly (glibc
build-deps on texi2html).

Will await upstream response for decision however.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.3
Locale: LANG=3Den_NZ, LC_CTYPE=3Den_NZ (charmap=3DISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages texi2html depends on:
ii  perl  5.8.7-3Larry Wall's Practical Extract=
ion

texi2html recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 321586-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 11:38:30 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 04:38:30 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBsjI-0002kU-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
From: Nigel Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#321586: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4

Source: texi2html
Source-Version: 1.76-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
texi2html, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP 

Bug#326048: marked as done (gnugo: FTBFS: Undefined subroutine main::normalize_space called at /usr/bin/texi2html line 13756.)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#326048: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Sep 2005 13:09:03 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 01 06:09:03 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from c129237.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) 
[213.39.129.237] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EAooR-0006PU-00; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 06:09:03 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1EAooP-0001W4-Ta; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 15:09:01 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gnugo: FTBFS: Undefined subroutine main::normalize_space called at 
/usr/bin/texi2html line 13756.
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 15:09:01 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: gnugo
Version: 3.7.4-1
Severity: serious

When building 'gnugo' on unstable, I get the following error:

# including ./regression.texi
# including ./copying.texi
# end of pass texi
# end of pass structure
# Writing elements:
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo.html .[Top]
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo_1.html ..
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo_2.html ..
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo_3.html 
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo_4.html ...Undefined subroutine 
main::normalize_space called at /usr/bin/texi2html line 13756.
make: *** [build] Error 25

Regards
Andreas Jochens

---
Received: (at 326048-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 11:38:14 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 04:38:14 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBsjI-0002kW-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
From: Nigel Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#326048: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5

Source: texi2html
Source-Version: 1.76-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
texi2html, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

texi2html_1.76-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/texi2html/texi2html_1.76-2.diff.gz
texi2html_1.76-2.dsc
  to pool/main/t/texi2html/texi2html_1.76-2.dsc
texi2html_1.76-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/texi2html/texi2html_1.76-2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Nigel Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated texi2html package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun,  4 Sep 2005 22:37:39 +1200
Source: texi2html
Binary: texi2html
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.76-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Nigel Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Nigel Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 texi2html  - Convert Texinfo files to HTML
Closes: 314843 317863 318536 321586 326048
Changes: 
 texi2html (1.76-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Closes: #318536: Chokes on gnugo.texi
   * Closes: #317863: Loops forever processing bbdb.texinfo
   * Closes: #321586: Includes non-free images - Fixed by dual GPL/CC agreement
   * New maintainer. (Closes: #314843: ITA: texi2html -- Convert Texinfo
 files to HTML)
   * Closes: #326048: gnugo: FTBFS: Undefined
 subroutine 

Bug#318536: marked as done (texi2html: Chokes on gnugo.texi)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#326048: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jul 2005 03:14:05 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 15 20:14:05 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from pop06.mail.atl.earthlink.net [207.69.200.40] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1Dtd7t-0004bp-00; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 20:14:05 -0700
Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3] 
helo=frobnitz.homelinux.net)
by pop06.mail.atl.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #10)
id 1Dtd7s-00015u-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 23:14:04 -0400
Received: from daniel by frobnitz.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1Dtd7q-0007Yg-A6
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 20:14:03 -0700
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: texi2html: Chokes on gnugo.texi
From: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 20:13:55 -0700
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: texi2html
Version: 1.76-1
Severity: serious
Justification: causes gnugo package to FTBFS

From my gnugo build log:

...
cd doc  texi2html -split_chapter -Verbose gnugo.texi
# Expanded: verbatim ifnotinfo ifnotxml documentdescription ifnotplaintext html 
ifnotdocbook titlepage ifset menu copying ifnottex ifclear ifhtml 
# created directory gnugo
# putting result files into directory gnugo/
# reading from gnugo.texi
# using 'en' as document language
# including ./introduction.texi
# including ./install.texi
# including ./using.texi
# including ./overview.texi
# including ./analyze.texi
# including ./move_generation.texi
# including ./dragon.texi
# including ./eyes.texi
# including ./patterns.texi
# including ./dfa.texi
# including ./reading.texi
# including ./owl.texi
# including ./influence.texi
# including ./moyo.texi
# including ./board.texi
# including ./sgf.texi
# including ./api.texi
# including ./utils.texi
# including ./gtp.texi
# including ./gtp-commands.texi
# including ./regression.texi
# including ./copying.texi
# end of pass texi
# end of pass structure
# Writing elements:
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo.html .[Top]
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo_1.html ..
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo_2.html ..
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo_3.html 
# Writing to gnugo/gnugo_4.html ...Undefined subroutine 
main::normalize_space called at /usr/bin/texi2html line 13756.
make: *** [build] Error 25

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-9-amd64-k8
Locale: LANG=en, LC_CTYPE=en (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to 
en_US.UTF-8)

Versions of packages texi2html depends on:
ii  perl  5.8.7-4Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

texi2html recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
Daniel Schepler  Please don't disillusion me.  I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet.
 -- Orson Scott Card

---
Received: (at 326048-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 11:38:14 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 04:38:14 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBsjI-0002kW-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
From: Nigel Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#326048: fixed in texi2html 1.76-2
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:32:08 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5

Source: texi2html
Source-Version: 1.76-2

We believe that the bug you 

Bug#325681: marked as done (ipy: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev')

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:47:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#325681: fixed in ipy 0.42-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Aug 2005 08:12:45 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 30 01:12:45 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from c147112.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) 
[213.39.147.112] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EA1Eb-0005dk-00; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 01:12:45 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1EA1EL-0003Jx-DO; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 10:12:32 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ipy: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev'
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 10:12:29 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: ipy
Version: 0.42-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

When building 'ipy' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:

dh_python -ppython-ipy
dh_python: Python is not installed, aborting. (Probably forgot to Build-Depend 
on python.)
make: *** [binary-install/python-ipy] Error 1

Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev'
to debian/control.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/ipy-0.42/debian/control ./debian/control
--- ../tmp-orig/ipy-0.42/debian/control 2005-08-30 07:52:12.0 +
+++ ./debian/control2005-08-30 07:52:04.0 +
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: python
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Morten Werner Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (= 4.1.0), cdbs, python2.3, python2.3-dev, 
python2.4, python2.4-dev
+Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (= 4.1.0), cdbs, python-dev, python2.3, 
python2.3-dev, python2.4, python2.4-dev
 Standards-Version: 3.6.2
 
 Package: python-ipy

---
Received: (at 325681-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 11:49:21 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 04:49:21 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBsxn-0007vR-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:47:07 -0700
From: Morten Werner Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#325681: fixed in ipy 0.42-3
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:47:07 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: ipy
Source-Version: 0.42-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ipy, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

ipy_0.42-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/i/ipy/ipy_0.42-3.diff.gz
ipy_0.42-3.dsc
  to pool/main/i/ipy/ipy_0.42-3.dsc
python-ipy_0.42-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/i/ipy/python-ipy_0.42-3_all.deb
python2.3-ipy_0.42-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/i/ipy/python2.3-ipy_0.42-3_all.deb
python2.4-ipy_0.42-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/i/ipy/python2.4-ipy_0.42-3_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Morten Werner Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated ipy package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun,  4 Sep 2005 11:31:48 +0200
Source: ipy
Binary: python-ipy python2.3-ipy python2.4-ipy
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.42-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Morten Werner Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Morten Werner Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 python-ipy - Python module for 

Bug#325142: alsa-utils: udev 0.6* and kernel-2.6.12 in odd state

[Harri Haataja]

Package: alsa-utils
Version: 1.0.9a-3
Followup-For: Bug #325142


Just dropping a note here that the udev in unstable is .. in a nasty state.
Many udev bugs show this. I believe that currently installing the new
udev will break (along with large parts of the system) when booting into
2.6.8 kernels. Older udev OTOH no longer has a working alsa-utils
available (this bug). No idea how that deals with a newer kernel.

The responses to most if not all bugs on udev seem very hostile and
there doesn't seem to be a sane fix in sight. Not to alsa, 1394(?) or
.8 vs .12 issues nor to who knows what.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (400, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: LANG=en_GB, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages alsa-utils depends on:
ii  dialog1.0-20050306-1 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe
ii  libasound21.0.9-3ALSA library
ii  libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libncurses5   5.4-9  Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  linux-sound-base  1.0.9b-4   base package for ALSA and OSS soun
ii  module-init-tools 3.2-pre1-2 tools for managing Linux kernel mo
ii  modutils  2.4.26-1.2 Linux module utilities
ii  pciutils  1:2.1.11-15Linux PCI Utilities
ii  whiptail  0.51.6-30  Displays user-friendly dialog boxe

alsa-utils recommends no packages.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#317493: liquidwar: makes awful noise on start and crashes on exit

[Petter Reinholdtsen]

Could this problem be related to the problems reported when running
liquidwar in valgrind?  I saw several issues when running the binary
from the package, and the program refused to start.  I decided to
rebuild with debug info and do a new test.  This is the result:

reading past allocated memory seem to be fairly common, as well as
other issues.

% valgrind ./src/liquidwar
==3395== Memcheck, a memory error detector.
==3395== Copyright (C) 2002-2005, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==3395== Using LibVEX rev 1367, a library for dynamic binary translation.
==3395== Copyright (C) 2004-2005, and GNU GPL'd, by OpenWorks LLP.
==3395== Using valgrind-3.0.1, a dynamic binary instrumentation framework.
==3395== Copyright (C) 2000-2005, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==3395== For more details, rerun with: -v
==3395==
==3395== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==3395==at 0x1B8ECB13: (within /lib/ld-2.3.5.so)
==3395==by 0x1B8E631C: (within /lib/ld-2.3.5.so)
==3395==by 0x1B8F2BDD: (within /lib/ld-2.3.5.so)
==3395==by 0x1B8E7675: (within /lib/ld-2.3.5.so)
==3395==by 0x1B8E47C6: (within /lib/ld-2.3.5.so)
==3395==
==3395== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==3395==at 0x1B8EC7D3: (within /lib/ld-2.3.5.so)
==3395==by 0x1B8E631C: (within /lib/ld-2.3.5.so)
==3395==by 0x1B8F2BDD: (within /lib/ld-2.3.5.so)
==3395==by 0x1B8E7675: (within /lib/ld-2.3.5.so)
==3395==by 0x1B8E47C6: (within /lib/ld-2.3.5.so)
==3395==
==3395== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==3395==at 0x1B8EC6B6: (within /lib/ld-2.3.5.so)
==3395==by 0x1B8E6376: (within /lib/ld-2.3.5.so)
==3395==by 0x1B8F2BDD: (within /lib/ld-2.3.5.so)
==3395==by 0x1B8E7675: (within /lib/ld-2.3.5.so)
==3395==by 0x1B8E47C6: (within /lib/ld-2.3.5.so)
==3395==
==3395== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==3395==at 0x1B8EC6C2: (within /lib/ld-2.3.5.so)
==3395==by 0x1B8E6376: (within /lib/ld-2.3.5.so)
==3395==by 0x1B8F2BDD: (within /lib/ld-2.3.5.so)
==3395==by 0x1B8E7675: (within /lib/ld-2.3.5.so)
==3395==by 0x1B8E47C6: (within /lib/ld-2.3.5.so)
==3395==
==3395== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==3395==at 0x1B8EC7D3: (within /lib/ld-2.3.5.so)
==3395==by 0x1B8E6376: (within /lib/ld-2.3.5.so)
==3395==by 0x1B8F2BDD: (within /lib/ld-2.3.5.so)
==3395==by 0x1B8E7675: (within /lib/ld-2.3.5.so)
==3395==by 0x1B8E47C6: (within /lib/ld-2.3.5.so)
==3395==
==3395== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==3395==at 0x1B8EC6B6: (within /lib/ld-2.3.5.so)
==3395==by 0x1BC3BCAC: dl_open_worker (dl-open.c:343)
==3395==by 0x1B8EF026: (within /lib/ld-2.3.5.so)
==3395==by 0x1BC3C2F4: _dl_open (dl-open.c:577)
==3395==by 0x1BB4FD2E: dlopen_doit (dlopen.c:59)
==3395==by 0x1B8EF026: (within /lib/ld-2.3.5.so)
==3395==by 0x1BB502FF: _dlerror_run (dlerror.c:162)
==3395==by 0x1BB4FD9C: dlopen@@GLIBC_2.1 (dlopen.c:78)
==3395==by 0x1B9940BE: _unix_load_modules (umodules.c:129)
==3395==by 0x1B99DF8B: _xwin_sysdrv_init (xsystem.c:183)
==3395==by 0x1B92B3EB: install_allegro (allegro.c:359)
==3395==by 0x805A9DD: init_all (init.c:125)
==3395==
==3395== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==3395==at 0x1B8EC955: (within /lib/ld-2.3.5.so)
==3395==by 0x1BC3BCAC: dl_open_worker (dl-open.c:343)
==3395==by 0x1B8EF026: (within /lib/ld-2.3.5.so)
==3395==by 0x1BC3C2F4: _dl_open (dl-open.c:577)
==3395==by 0x1BB4FD2E: dlopen_doit (dlopen.c:59)
==3395==by 0x1B8EF026: (within /lib/ld-2.3.5.so)
==3395==by 0x1BB502FF: _dlerror_run (dlerror.c:162)
==3395==by 0x1BB4FD9C: dlopen@@GLIBC_2.1 (dlopen.c:78)
==3395==by 0x1B9940BE: _unix_load_modules (umodules.c:129)
==3395==by 0x1B99DF8B: _xwin_sysdrv_init (xsystem.c:183)
==3395==by 0x1B92B3EB: install_allegro (allegro.c:359)
==3395==by 0x805A9DD: init_all (init.c:125)
==3395==
==3395== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==3395==at 0x1B8ECAE6: (within /lib/ld-2.3.5.so)
==3395==by 0x1BC3BCAC: dl_open_worker (dl-open.c:343)
==3395==by 0x1B8EF026: (within /lib/ld-2.3.5.so)
==3395==by 0x1BC3C2F4: _dl_open (dl-open.c:577)
==3395==by 0x1BB4FD2E: dlopen_doit (dlopen.c:59)
==3395==by 0x1B8EF026: (within /lib/ld-2.3.5.so)
==3395==by 0x1BB502FF: _dlerror_run (dlerror.c:162)
==3395==by 0x1BB4FD9C: dlopen@@GLIBC_2.1 (dlopen.c:78)
==3395==by 0x1B9940BE: _unix_load_modules (umodules.c:129)
==3395==by 0x1B99DF8B: _xwin_sysdrv_init (xsystem.c:183)
==3395==by 0x1B92B3EB: install_allegro (allegro.c:359)
==3395==by 0x805A9DD: init_all (init.c:125)
==3395==
==3395== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==3395==at 0x1B8ECB13: (within /lib/ld-2.3.5.so)
==3395==by 0x1BC3BCAC: dl_open_worker (dl-open.c:343)
==3395==by 0x1B8EF026: (within 

Processed: severity of 319297 is serious

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.5
 severity 319297 serious
Bug#319297: bigloo: missing build-dep on zip for jvm
Severity set to `serious'.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#319162: NMU patch

[Josselin Mouette]

Le dimanche 04 septembre 2005 à 03:04 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
 If you're going to blame build failures on the toolchain, then policy
 (and release policy) is quite relevant.  There are in fact quite a few
 toolchain options that *are* specified in policy: -O2, -O1, -O0, -g,
 -Wl,-z,-defs, -Wall... and -shared is implied, of course... if a compile
 fails when using one of these options, you have grounds for demanding
 that the toolchain be fixed instead of trying to work around it in your
 package. If you're using other, exotic toolchain options like -O3 or
 -Wl,--as-needed, I believe the burden must lie primarily with the
 package maintainer, not with the toolchain maintainer.

Sure. However, when you try to rely on these options for a package,
things are not that easy. -O3 doesn't really bring anything and you can
drop it anytime, but -Wl,--as-needed is a feature. If a feature isn't
guaranteed to work across versions, you can't start to rely on it, so it
shouldn't even be here.

 (AIUI, there is actually activity upstream on getting a fix for this
 bug; I just don't think the binutils maintainers should drop everything
 else they work on to fix --as-needed, and I don't think you should wait
 on binutils before fixing these build failures in your packages.)

As most of GNOME 2.10 is ready to enter testing, and as I don't have the
skills to fix binutils, I don't really have a choice, and will also
upload a gnome-session without --as-needed, but this isn't a good
long-term solution. Time spent re-uploading stuff and checking complex
dependencies isn't spent fixing other bugs.

  And after all, you're the release manager, so you'll be the one to deal
  with the horrible mess of gnome-games dependencies when all indirect
  dependencies are explicit. Great to see how you welcome design decisions
  taken to ease your work.
 
 Yes, library dependencies are a major concern of mine, as I wrote at
 http://people.debian.org/~vorlon/dependency-hell/.  But two design
 kludges don't make a good solution, as they say (paraphrased); I believe
 this is a problem we need to be fixing at the root, which is libtool and
 pkg-config, instead of painting over it.

The fix for libtool is available, but requires relibtoolizing packages
at each version, so it's even more work, and it's tedious work no one is
willing to do. The GNOME team manages to handle so many packages only
because we made simple packaging operations, like new upstream versions,
a trivial operation.

I'm not aware of any solution for pkg-config. It would probably need a
large rework, e.g. separating --shared-libs and --static-libs. And even
with both of them fixed, I'm afraid we'd still have issues with random
libraries added to the linkage without the need for them, or badly
written foo-config scripts. Except in some weird cases, --as-needed
solves all these issues. It may not be the Right Thing(tm), but it makes
good packages in the end.

Regards,
-- 
 .''`.   Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' :   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  `-  Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#326607: libqca1c2: shares files with libqca1 without conflicts

[Peter Palfrader]

Package: libqca1c2
Version: 1.0-7
Severity: serious

libqca1 has these files:

usr/lib/libqca.so.1
usr/lib/libqca.so.1.0
usr/lib/libqca.so.1.0.0
usr/share/doc/libqca1/changelog.Debian.gz
usr/share/doc/libqca1/copyright


and libqca1c2 has these:
usr/lib/libqca.so.1
usr/lib/libqca.so.1.0
usr/lib/libqca.so.1.0.0
usr/share/doc/libqca1c2/changelog.Debian.gz
usr/share/doc/libqca1c2/copyright


And the packages don't conflict/replaces.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#326610: kde-i18n-de: shares files with khangman (3.4.2-1)

[Peter Palfrader]

Package: kde-i18n-de
Version: 4:3.4.2-3
Severity: serious

Unpacking replacement kde-i18n-de ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/kde-i18n-de_4%3a3.4.2-3_all.deb 
(--unpack):
 trying to overwrite `/usr/share/apps/khangman/de.txt', which is also in 
package khangman

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp$ dpkg --fsys-tarfile khangman_3.3.2-3_i386.deb | tar tf 
- | grep khangman/de.txt
./usr/share/apps/khangman/de.txt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp$ dpkg --fsys-tarfile khangman_3.4.2-1_i386.deb | tar tf 
- | grep khangman/de.txt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp$ 

kde-i18n-de probably needs a versioned conflicts/replaces.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#326037: Preconfiguring: No `START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY' and no `This file documents'

[Clint Adams]

 Yes but its empty:
 ls -l /usr/share/info/sed.info
 -rw-r--r--  1 root root 0 2004-11-17 12:57 /usr/share/info/sed.info

Any idea where it came from?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#318285: marked as done (CAN-2005-2240 symlink attack in xpvm.tcl)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 06:17:09 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#318285: fixed in xpvm 1.2.5-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2005 14:26:51 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 14 07:26:51 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dt4fq-0003MT-00; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 07:26:51 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (kitenet.net [127.0.0.1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F4217DD1
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 14:26:50 + (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 38F306E134; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 17:27:33 +0300 (EEST)
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 17:27:33 +0300
From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CAN-2005-2240 symlink attack in xpvm.tcl
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=0F1p//8PRICkK4MW
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.15
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--0F1p//8PRICkK4MW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: xpvm
Severity: serious
Tags: security

According to http://secunia.com/advisories/16040:

  Eric Romang has reported a vulnerability in xpvm, which can be exploited =
by
  malicious, local users to perform certain actions on a vulnerable system =
with
  escalated privileges.

  The vulnerability is caused due to the temporary file /tmp/xpvm.trace.$u=
ser
  being created insecurely by src/xpvm.tcl. This can be exploited via sym=
link
  attacks to create or overwrite arbitrary files with the privileges of the=
 user
  running the affected application.

This is CAN-2005-2240.

--=20
see shy jo

--0F1p//8PRICkK4MW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC1nZVd8HHehbQuO8RAhk+AKC0cRmtdAkkp8x10Nt4zqTi1M49sQCgiP57
cxquqi0Uu12YUEbwq02YKwo=
=EjuF
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--0F1p//8PRICkK4MW--

---
Received: (at 318285-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 13:18:50 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 06:18:50 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBuMv-0007rF-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 06:17:09 -0700
From: Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#318285: fixed in xpvm 1.2.5-8
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 06:17:09 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: xpvm
Source-Version: 1.2.5-8

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xpvm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

xpvm_1.2.5-8.diff.gz
  to pool/main/x/xpvm/xpvm_1.2.5-8.diff.gz
xpvm_1.2.5-8.dsc
  to pool/main/x/xpvm/xpvm_1.2.5-8.dsc
xpvm_1.2.5-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xpvm/xpvm_1.2.5-8_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated xpvm package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it 

Bug#326611: amarok: Doesn't build from source

[Christian Marillat]

Package: amarok
Version: 1.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS

Hi,

I really want to know how you are doing this package when I try to compile
amarok I see :

 
 ===  amaroK - ERROR  ==
 
 =
 = amaroK cannot be built because your TagLib version is too old. Please
 = obtain the version 1.4.0 from: http://ktown.kde.org/~wheeler/taglib/
 =

May be updating libtag to this version will solve bug like #326562.

Christian

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (900, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages amarok depends on:
ii  amarok-gstreamer [amarok- 1.3.0-1GStreamer engine for the amaroK au
ii  kdelibs4c24:3.4.2-3  core libraries for all KDE applica
ii  libaudio2 1.7-3  The Network Audio System (NAS). (s
ii  libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libfontconfig12.3.2-1generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6  2.1.10-1   FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgcc1   1:4.0.1-6  GCC support library
ii  libice6   6.8.2.dfsg.1-6 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libmysqlclient14  4.1.13a-3  mysql database client library
ii  libpng12-01.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime
ii  libqt3-mt 3:3.3.4-7  Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v
ii  libsm66.8.2.dfsg.1-6 X Window System Session Management
ii  libsqlite3-0  3.2.5-1SQLite 3 shared library
ii  libstdc++64.0.1-6The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libtag1c2 1.3.1-1.1  TagLib Audio Meta-Data Library
ii  libtunepimp2c20.3.0-8MusicBrainz tagging library and si
ii  libx11-6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-6 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxcursor1   1.1.3-1X cursor management library
ii  libxext6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-6 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxft2   2.1.7-1FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxinerama1  6.8.2.dfsg.1-6 X Window System multi-head display
ii  libxrandr26.8.2.dfsg.1-6 X Window System Resize, Rotate and
ii  libxrender1   1:0.9.0-2  X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  libxt66.8.2.dfsg.1-6 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  xlibmesa-gl [libgl1]  6.8.2.dfsg.1-6 Mesa 3D graphics library [X.Org]
ii  xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6 X Window System client libraries m
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.3-4  compression library - runtime

Versions of packages amarok recommends:
ii  kdemultimedia-kio-plugins 4:3.4.2-1  enables the browsing of audio CDs 

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#318285: CAN-2005-2240 symlink attack in xpvm.tcl

[Matej Vela]

tag 318285 patch
thanks

Hi,

Here's the CAN-2005-2240 fix for woody and sarge (sid upload is already
in incoming).

Cheers,

Matej
diff -u xpvm-1.2.5/src/xpvm.tcl xpvm-1.2.5/src/xpvm.tcl
--- xpvm-1.2.5/src/xpvm.tcl
+++ xpvm-1.2.5/src/xpvm.tcl
@@ -831,7 +831,7 @@
 
 set tfck [ info exists trace_file ]
 
-if { $tfck == 0 } { set trace_file /tmp/xpvm.trace.$user }
+if { $tfck == 0 } { set trace_file [ file join [ glob ~ ] .xpvm_trace ] }
 
 $CTRL.file_entry insert 0 $trace_file
 
diff -u xpvm-1.2.5/debian/changelog xpvm-1.2.5/debian/changelog
--- xpvm-1.2.5/debian/changelog
+++ xpvm-1.2.5/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+xpvm (1.2.5-7.2woody1) oldstable-security; urgency=high
+
+  * QA upload.
+  * Use ~/.xpvm_trace instead of /tmp/xpvm.trace.$USER to prevent symlink
+attacks.  (Trace files are meant to be semi-persistent, so this is more
+in line with user expectations than creating unique temporary files.)
+[src/xpvm.tcl, src/help/traces.help, debian/xpvm.1, CAN-2005-2240]
+Closes: #318285.
+
+ -- Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Sun,  4 Sep 2005 14:44:07 +0200
+
 xpvm (1.2.5-7.2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * NMU
diff -u xpvm-1.2.5/debian/xpvm.1 xpvm-1.2.5/debian/xpvm.1
--- xpvm-1.2.5/debian/xpvm.1
+++ xpvm-1.2.5/debian/xpvm.1
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
 .BI \-T\  trace
 .B xpvm
 will normally create and store a trace file in the 
-.I /tmp
+user's home
 directory. To have the 
 .I trace
 file stored in some other location, use this option.
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- xpvm-1.2.5.orig/src/help/traces.help
+++ xpvm-1.2.5/src/help/traces.help
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
 { to have a valid, writable trace file to work with, and so XPVM }
 { assumes a default trace file name: }
 {}
-{  /tmp/xpvm.trace.$(USER) }
+{  ~/.xpvm_trace }
 {}
 { On the first execution of XPVM, this trace file will not yet exist, }
 { and so XPVM will proceed to write traces into this file and read }
diff -u xpvm-1.2.5/src/xpvm.tcl xpvm-1.2.5/src/xpvm.tcl
--- xpvm-1.2.5/src/xpvm.tcl
+++ xpvm-1.2.5/src/xpvm.tcl
@@ -831,7 +831,7 @@
 
 set tfck [ info exists trace_file ]
 
-if { $tfck == 0 } { set trace_file /tmp/xpvm.trace.$user }
+if { $tfck == 0 } { set trace_file [ file join [ glob ~ ] .xpvm_trace ] }
 
 $CTRL.file_entry insert 0 $trace_file
 
diff -u xpvm-1.2.5/debian/changelog xpvm-1.2.5/debian/changelog
--- xpvm-1.2.5/debian/changelog
+++ xpvm-1.2.5/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+xpvm (1.2.5-7.3sarge1) stable-security; urgency=high
+
+  * QA upload.
+  * Use ~/.xpvm_trace instead of /tmp/xpvm.trace.$USER to prevent symlink
+attacks.  (Trace files are meant to be semi-persistent, so this is more
+in line with user expectations than creating unique temporary files.)
+[src/xpvm.tcl, src/help/traces.help, debian/xpvm.1, CAN-2005-2240]
+Closes: #318285.
+
+ -- Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Sun,  4 Sep 2005 14:44:07 +0200
+
 xpvm (1.2.5-7.3) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Uploading with maintainer set to QA Group
diff -u xpvm-1.2.5/debian/xpvm.1 xpvm-1.2.5/debian/xpvm.1
--- xpvm-1.2.5/debian/xpvm.1
+++ xpvm-1.2.5/debian/xpvm.1
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
 .BI \-T\  trace
 .B xpvm
 will normally create and store a trace file in the 
-.I /tmp
+user's home
 directory. To have the 
 .I trace
 file stored in some other location, use this option.
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- xpvm-1.2.5.orig/src/help/traces.help
+++ xpvm-1.2.5/src/help/traces.help
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
 { to have a valid, writable trace file to work with, and so XPVM }
 { assumes a default trace file name: }
 {}
-{  /tmp/xpvm.trace.$(USER) }
+{  ~/.xpvm_trace }
 {}
 { On the first execution of XPVM, this trace file will not yet exist, }
 { and so XPVM will proceed to write traces into this file and read }

Processed: Bug#318285: CAN-2005-2240 symlink attack in xpvm.tcl

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tag 318285 patch
Bug#318285: CAN-2005-2240 symlink attack in xpvm.tcl
Tags were: security
Tags added: patch

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#262671: marked as done (oleo: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: label at end of compound statement)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:17:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#262671: fixed in oleo 1.99.16-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Aug 2004 13:08:03 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 01 06:08:02 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from c204006.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost) [213.39.204.6] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BrG4I-0006Hu-00; Sun, 01 Aug 2004 06:08:02 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1BrG4H-0002IF-9l; Sun, 01 Aug 2004 15:08:01 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: oleo: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: label at end of compound statement
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2004 15:08:01 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: oleo
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

When building 'oleo' with gcc-3.4 I get the following error:

gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I. -I../lib -I../intl -g -O2 
-DLOCALEDIR=\/usr/share/locale\   -DBUILD_PREFIX=''/usr'' -c plotter.c
plotter.c: In function `sp_plot_point':
plotter.c:2644: error: label at end of compound statement
plotter.c: In function `sp_begin_plot':
plotter.c:2775: error: label at end of compound statement
plotter.c: In function `sp_end_plot':
plotter.c:2795: error: label at end of compound statement
plotter.c:3310:9: warning: extra tokens at end of #undef directive
plotter.c:3311:9: warning: extra tokens at end of #undef directive
plotter.c:3312:11: warning: extra tokens at end of #undef directive
plotter.c:3313:10: warning: extra tokens at end of #undef directive
make[3]: *** [plotter.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/oleo-1.99.16/src'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/oleo-1.99.16'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/oleo-1.99.16'
make: *** [build] Error 2

With the attached patch 'oleo' can be compiled using gcc-3.4.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/oleo-1.99.16/src/plotter.c ./src/plotter.c
--- ../tmp-orig/oleo-1.99.16/src/plotter.c  2000-11-22 20:33:01.0 
+0100
+++ ./src/plotter.c 2004-08-01 14:55:15.569259536 +0200
@@ -2640,7 +2640,7 @@
sp_pie_plot_point(mg, point);
break;
default:
-   /* ?? */
+   break; /* ?? */
}
 }
 
@@ -2771,7 +2771,7 @@
sp_pie_begin_graph(mg, scale, trans_x, trans_y);
break;
default:
-   /* ??? */
+   break; /* ??? */
}
 
sp_first_dataset(mg);
@@ -2791,7 +2791,7 @@
sp_pie_end_graph(mg);
break;
default:
-   /* ??? */
+   break; /* ??? */
}
 }
 

---
Received: (at 262671-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 14:18:58 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 07:18:58 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBvIx-0002fG-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:17:07 -0700
From: Mario Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#262671: fixed in oleo 1.99.16-8
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:17:07 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: oleo
Source-Version: 1.99.16-8

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
oleo, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

oleo_1.99.16-8.diff.gz
  to pool/main/o/oleo/oleo_1.99.16-8.diff.gz
oleo_1.99.16-8.dsc
  to pool/main/o/oleo/oleo_1.99.16-8.dsc
oleo_1.99.16-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/oleo/oleo_1.99.16-8_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, 

Bug#322233: marked as done (oleo: uninstallable in sid (depends on libplot2 which is UNAVAILABLE))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:17:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#322233: fixed in oleo 1.99.16-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Aug 2005 21:17:36 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 09 14:17:36 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from (localhost.localdomain) [82.160.30.103] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E2bTc-0004XK-00; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:17:36 -0700
Received: from miernik by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E2bSm-0002lv-Gx; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 23:16:44 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Miernik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: oleo: uninstallable in sid (depends on libplot2 which is UNAVAILABLE)
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 23:16:44 +0200
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: oleo
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

oleo in version 1.99.16-7 which is in sid depends on libplot2
which is UNAVAILABLE, making oleo uninstallable.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-386
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---
Received: (at 322233-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 14:18:31 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 07:18:31 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBvIx-0002fe-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:17:07 -0700
From: Mario Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#322233: fixed in oleo 1.99.16-8
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:17:07 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4

Source: oleo
Source-Version: 1.99.16-8

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
oleo, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

oleo_1.99.16-8.diff.gz
  to pool/main/o/oleo/oleo_1.99.16-8.diff.gz
oleo_1.99.16-8.dsc
  to pool/main/o/oleo/oleo_1.99.16-8.dsc
oleo_1.99.16-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/oleo/oleo_1.99.16-8_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Mario Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated oleo package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun,  4 Sep 2005 13:55:29 +0200
Source: oleo
Binary: oleo
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.99.16-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mario Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Mario Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 oleo   - GNU spreadsheet program
Closes: 262671 287854 300294 322233
Changes: 
 oleo (1.99.16-8) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Fix several GCC-4 related build failures (thanks to Andreas Jochens)
 (Closes: #262671, #287854, #300294).
   * Rebuild with ABI-transited libplot (Closes: #322233).
   * For some reason, io-x11.c fails compilation, probably xorg related,
 disable X11 support completely for now, oleo is ncurses/terminal
 based only until I can figure out more.
Files: 
 bd9f3dcd0bc692397d9b928101799003 663 math optional oleo_1.99.16-8.dsc
 

Bug#287854: marked as done (oleo: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:17:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#287854: fixed in oleo 1.99.16-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Dec 2004 14:58:08 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 30 06:58:08 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from d020125.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [80.171.20.125] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ck1kd-0002lH-00; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 06:58:08 -0800
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1Ck1pt-0005ql-0K; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 16:03:33 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: oleo: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 16:03:33 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: oleo
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

When building 'oleo' on amd64 with gcc-4.0,
I get the following error:

gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I. -I../lib -I../intl -g -O2 
-DLOCALEDIR=\/usr/share/locale\   -DBUILD_PREFIX=''/usr'' -c io-term.c
In file included from io-term.c:68:
mdi.h:35:8: warning: extra tokens at end of #endif directive
io-term.c: In function 'do_set_option':
io-term.c:237: error: invalid lvalue in assignment
make[3]: *** [io-term.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/oleo-1.99.16/src'

With the attached patch 'oleo' can be compiled
on amd64 using gcc-4.0.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/oleo-1.99.16/src/basic.h ./src/basic.h
--- ../tmp-orig/oleo-1.99.16/src/basic.h2000-08-10 23:02:49.0 
+0200
+++ ./src/basic.h   2004-12-30 15:31:20.0 +0100
@@ -36,9 +36,6 @@
 
 extern const int colmagic[9];
 extern  const int rowmagic[9];
-extern char * motion_name[9];
-extern enum motion_magic complementary_motion[9];
-extern enum motion_magic opposite_motion[9];
 
 extern int run_load_hooks;
 
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/oleo-1.99.16/src/global.h ./src/global.h
--- ../tmp-orig/oleo-1.99.16/src/global.h   2004-12-30 15:46:27.744848880 
+0100
+++ ./src/global.h  2004-12-30 15:32:06.0 +0100
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@
 
 extern unsigned short current_cycle;
 extern int ioerror;
-extern int errno;
+#include errno.h
 extern const char oleo_version_string[];
 
 extern double astof (char **);
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/oleo-1.99.16/src/io-term.c ./src/io-term.c
--- ../tmp-orig/oleo-1.99.16/src/io-term.c  2001-02-14 00:38:06.0 
+0100
+++ ./src/io-term.c 2004-12-30 15:46:17.649383624 +0100
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@
 
if (Preferences[i].copynext) {
ptr += strlen(Preferences[i].name) + 1;
-   ((char *)Preferences[i].var) = strdup(ptr);
+   Preferences[i].var = strdup(ptr);
} else if (Preferences[i].var)
*((int *)Preferences[i].var) = Preferences[i].value;
 
@@ -1023,7 +1023,7 @@
  case 'v':
  case 'V':
printf(_(%s %s\n), GNU_PACKAGE, VERSION);
-printf(_(Copyright © 1992-2000 Free Software Foundation, 
Inc.\n));
+printf(_(Copyright (C) 1992-2000 Free Software Foundation, 
Inc.\n));
 printf(_(%s comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.\n), GNU_PACKAGE);
 printf(_(You may redistribute copies of %s\n), PACKAGE);
 printf(_(under the terms of the GNU General Public License.\n));
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/oleo-1.99.16/src/plotter.c ./src/plotter.c
--- ../tmp-orig/oleo-1.99.16/src/plotter.c  2000-11-22 20:33:01.0 
+0100
+++ ./src/plotter.c 2004-12-30 15:31:44.0 +0100
@@ -2639,8 +2639,6 @@
case SP_PLOT_PIE:
sp_pie_plot_point(mg, point);
break;
-   default:
-   /* ?? */
}
 }
 
@@ -2770,8 +2768,6 @@
case SP_PLOT_PIE:
sp_pie_begin_graph(mg, scale, trans_x, trans_y);
break;
-   default:
-   /* ??? */
}
 
sp_first_dataset(mg);
@@ -2790,8 +2786,6 @@
case SP_PLOT_PIE:
sp_pie_end_graph(mg);
break;
-   

Bug#300294: marked as done (oleo: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): array type has incomplete element type)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:17:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#300294: fixed in oleo 1.99.16-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Mar 2005 19:55:34 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 18 11:55:33 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from c223012.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.223.12] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DCNZF-0006oM-00; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 11:55:33 -0800
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1DCNZD-0003qC-O1; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 20:55:31 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: oleo: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): array type has incomplete element type
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 20:55:31 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: oleo
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

When building 'oleo' on amd64 with gcc-4.0,
I get the following error:

In file included from regions.c:42:
io-term.h:47: error: array type has incomplete element type
make[3]: *** [regions.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/oleo-1.99.16/src'

With the attached patch 'oleo' can be compiled
on amd64 using gcc-4.0.

The patch contains fixes which were already necessary for earlier
gcc versions.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/oleo-1.99.16/src/basic.h ./src/basic.h
--- ../tmp-orig/oleo-1.99.16/src/basic.h2000-08-10 23:02:49.0 
+0200
+++ ./src/basic.h   2005-03-18 20:42:30.963398869 +0100
@@ -36,9 +36,6 @@
 
 extern const int colmagic[9];
 extern  const int rowmagic[9];
-extern char * motion_name[9];
-extern enum motion_magic complementary_motion[9];
-extern enum motion_magic opposite_motion[9];
 
 extern int run_load_hooks;
 
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/oleo-1.99.16/src/global.h ./src/global.h
--- ../tmp-orig/oleo-1.99.16/src/global.h   2005-03-18 20:45:06.300809009 
+0100
+++ ./src/global.h  2005-03-18 20:42:30.963398869 +0100
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@
 
 extern unsigned short current_cycle;
 extern int ioerror;
-extern int errno;
+#include errno.h
 extern const char oleo_version_string[];
 
 extern double astof (char **);
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/oleo-1.99.16/src/io-term.c ./src/io-term.c
--- ../tmp-orig/oleo-1.99.16/src/io-term.c  2001-02-14 00:38:06.0 
+0100
+++ ./src/io-term.c 2005-03-18 20:43:36.991391876 +0100
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@
 
if (Preferences[i].copynext) {
ptr += strlen(Preferences[i].name) + 1;
-   ((char *)Preferences[i].var) = strdup(ptr);
+   Preferences[i].var = strdup(ptr);
} else if (Preferences[i].var)
*((int *)Preferences[i].var) = Preferences[i].value;
 
@@ -770,6 +770,8 @@
 }
 }
 
+extern struct cmd_func cmd_funcs[];
+
 static void
 init_maps (void)
 {
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/oleo-1.99.16/src/io-term.h ./src/io-term.h
--- ../tmp-orig/oleo-1.99.16/src/io-term.h  2001-02-10 09:27:04.0 
+0100
+++ ./src/io-term.h 2005-03-18 20:43:06.794338687 +0100
@@ -44,8 +44,6 @@
 extern int default_lock;
 
 
-extern struct cmd_func cmd_funcs[];
-
 /* When printing ascii output, this controls page width. */
 extern int modified;
 
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/oleo-1.99.16/src/plotter.c ./src/plotter.c
--- ../tmp-orig/oleo-1.99.16/src/plotter.c  2000-11-22 20:33:01.0 
+0100
+++ ./src/plotter.c 2005-03-18 20:42:30.965398475 +0100
@@ -2639,8 +2639,6 @@
case SP_PLOT_PIE:
sp_pie_plot_point(mg, point);
break;
-   default:
-   /* ?? */
}
 }
 
@@ -2770,8 +2768,6 @@
case SP_PLOT_PIE:
sp_pie_begin_graph(mg, scale, trans_x, trans_y);
break;
-   default:
-   /* ??? */
}
 
sp_first_dataset(mg);
@@ -2790,8 +2786,6 @@
case SP_PLOT_PIE:
sp_pie_end_graph(mg);
break;
-   default:
-   /* ??? */
}
 }
 
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/oleo-1.99.16/src/xrdb.c ./src/xrdb.c
--- ../tmp-orig/oleo-1.99.16/src/xrdb.c 2000-08-10 

Bug#326580: marked as done (raidutils: ftbfs [sparc] 'volatile void exit(int)' conflicts with /usr/include/stdlib.h)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:47:03 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#326580: fixed in raidutils 0.0.4-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 08:56:34 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 01:56:34 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.59] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBqIk-0001cr-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 01:56:34 -0700
Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff.nat.blars.org [172.16.2.7])
by renig.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id 
j848uVMl019471
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 01:56:31 -0700
Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff [127.0.0.1])
by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id 
j848r0fD018337;
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 01:53:00 -0700
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j848r0SQ018335;
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 01:53:00 -0700
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 01:53:00 -0700
From: Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: raidutils: ftbfs [sparc] 'volatile void exit(int)' conflicts with 
/usr/include/stdlib.h
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: raidutils
Version: 0.0.4-6
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source

raidutils failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc
pbuilder:


if sparc-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../include -O3 -DMESSAGES 
-D_DPT_ACTIVE_ALIGNMENT -Dtrue=1 -Dfalse=0 -DHORIZONTAL -DNEW_RSC_MGR 
-DNEW_RSC_HDR -D_DPT_FLASH   -g -O2 -MT raidutil-command.o -MD -MP -MF 
.deps/raidutil-command.Tpo -c -o raidutil-command.o `test -f 'command.cpp' || 
echo './'`command.cpp; \
then mv -f .deps/raidutil-command.Tpo .deps/raidutil-command.Po; else rm -f 
.deps/raidutil-command.Tpo; exit 1; fi
command.cpp:2246: error: declaration of C function 'volatile void exit(int)' 
conflicts with
/usr/include/stdlib.h:640: error: previous declaration 'void exit(int)' here
make[3]: *** [raidutil-command.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/raidutils-0.0.4/raidutil'

---
Received: (at 326580-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 14:50:59 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 07:50:59 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBvlv-0008Jy-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:47:03 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Barak A. Pearlmutter)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#326580: fixed in raidutils 0.0.4-7
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:47:03 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: raidutils
Source-Version: 0.0.4-7

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
raidutils, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

raidutils_0.0.4-7.diff.gz
  to pool/main/r/raidutils/raidutils_0.0.4-7.diff.gz
raidutils_0.0.4-7.dsc
  to pool/main/r/raidutils/raidutils_0.0.4-7.dsc
raidutils_0.0.4-7_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/raidutils/raidutils_0.0.4-7_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Barak A. Pearlmutter [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated raidutils package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe 

Processed: Greylisting config doc is incorrect

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tag #325335 +patch
Bug#325335: Greylisting Config. Doc. ist incorrect
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325335: Greylisting config doc is incorrect

[Clément Stenac]

tag #325335 +patch
thanks

Hello,

As you have spamassassin 3.X, you need to follow the 3.X instructions,
that are around line 190 of README.greylisting.gz, and which tell to use
eval:greylisting and a priority instead of the reseval hack.

However, the file is indeed badly worded, and unclear. The attached
patch hopefully makes this clearer. 
As the 2.X stuff has been deprecated (not included in the package
anymore), it removes references to it.

Regards,

-- 
Clément Stenac

Bug#325763: marked as done (libapache-mod-speedycgi: deletes httpd.conf on removal)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 08:02:10 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#325763: fixed in speedy-cgi-perl 2.22-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Aug 2005 19:35:28 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 30 12:35:27 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from fep01-0.kolumbus.fi (fep01-app.kolumbus.fi) [193.229.0.41] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EABtH-00068U-00; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 12:35:27 -0700
Received: from rebekka ([84.230.153.191]) by fep01-app.kolumbus.fi
  with ESMTP
  id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 22:35:22 +0300
Received: from niko by rebekka with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1EABtC-0003yT-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 22:35:22 +0300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Niko Tyni [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libapache-mod-speedycgi: deletes httpd.conf on removal
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 22:35:22 +0300
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Niko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: libapache-mod-speedycgi
Version: 2.22-1
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss

Hi,

removing libapache-mod-speedycgi leaves /etc/apache/httpd.conf
zero-sized. This happens because the postrm script tries to comment
out references to the module like this:

cat /etc/apache$1/httpd.conf |\
 sed 's/^(LoadModule.*mod_speedycgi\.so)/#\1/'  $tmpfile || true
mv -f $tmpfile /etc/apache$1/httpd.conf

but the correct sed grouping markers are '\(' and '\)' instead of '(' and ')'.
Then sed bails out:

sed: -e expression #1, char 39: invalid reference \1 on `s' command's RHS

and $tmpfile ends up empty.

(Furthermore, at least on my system the LoadModule line is in
/etc/apache/modules.conf, not httpd.conf, so the commenting out
wouldn't apparently work anyway.)

Transcript follows:

# ls -l /etc/apache/httpd.conf 
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 35462 2005-08-30 22:17 /etc/apache/httpd.conf
# dpkg -r libapache-mod-speedycgi
(Reading database ... 165864 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing libapache-mod-speedycgi ...
sed: -e expression #1, char 39: invalid reference \1 on `s' command's RHS
An Apache module has been modified.  Restart apache [Y/n]? 
/usr/sbin/apachectl graceful: httpd gracefully restarted
# ls -l /etc/apache/httpd.conf 
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 0 2005-08-30 22:18 /etc/apache/httpd.conf


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages libapache-mod-speedycgi depends on:
ii  apache-common   1.3.33-6 support files for all Apache webse
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdb4.14.1.25-18Berkeley v4.1 Database Libraries [
ii  libexpat1   1.95.8-3 XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii  speedy-cgi-perl 2.22-1   speed up perl scripts by making th

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 325763-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 15:09:12 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 08:09:12 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBw0Y-0005Yk-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 08:02:10 -0700
From: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#325763: fixed in speedy-cgi-perl 2.22-2
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 08:02:10 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: speedy-cgi-perl
Source-Version: 

Bug#287925: (no subject)

[Frank Lichtenheld]

On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 03:44:13PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
 On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 11:33:51PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
  fixed[0], waiting for my sponsor... this package solves *only* this bug,
  I want to get 0.34-1 into 3.1r1 too.
 
 It's been two weeks since then. Problems with the patch or is your
 sponsor just busy?

Just for the record, that mail bounced with unroutable address ...

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325124: segfault visiting any site if no tab is open (e.g. upon startup)

[Alexander Verbovetsky]

Package: kazehakase
Version: 0.3.0-1

In fact, kaze segfaults not only after startup, but after all attempts to open
an url in a new tab (for example, with middle mouse button).

This is really annoying.

The patch fixes the problem for me. Thanks a lot!

I experienced the problem in 0.3.0 and 0.2.9 versions, but not in 0.2.8.

Alex Verbovetsky

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing-proposed-updates
  APT policy: (900, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (900, 'testing'), (600, 
'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27
Locale: LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R (charmap=KOI8-R)

Versions of packages kazehakase depends on:
ii  libatk1.0-0   1.10.1-2   The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1   1:4.0.1-6  GCC support library
ii  libglib2.0-0  2.8.0-1The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2.0-0   2.6.10-1   The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libpango1.0-0 1.8.2-1Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libssl0.9.7   0.9.7g-1   SSL shared libraries
ii  libstdc++64.0.1-6The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  mozilla-browser   2:1.7.10-1 The Mozilla Internet application s
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.3-4  compression library - runtime

Versions of packages kazehakase recommends:
pn  estraier  none (no description available)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#325639: marked as done (gnome-session: FTBFS: depends on -Wl,--as-needed)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 08:02:05 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#325639: fixed in gnome-session 2.10.0-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Aug 2005 22:57:36 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 29 15:57:36 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (tennyson.netexpress.net) 
[66.93.39.86] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E9sZL-0001Qz-00; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 15:57:36 -0700
Received: by tennyson.netexpress.net (Postfix, from userid 1003)
id D90817049; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 15:57:34 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 15:57:34 -0700
From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gnome-session: FTBFS: depends on -Wl,--as-needed
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=4ZLFUWh1odzi/v6L
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--4ZLFUWh1odzi/v6L
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: gnome-session
Version: 2.10.0-6
Severity: serious

The latest version of gnome-session fails to build on alpha and sparc
with the following error:

/bin/sh ../libtool --mode=3Dlink cc  -g -Wall -O2  -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed =
-o logout-test  logout-test.o util.o gsm-multiscreen.o gdm-logout-action.o =
egg-screen-exec.o egg-screen-help.o egg-screen-url.o -lSM -lICE  -L/usr/X11=
R6/lib -lX11  -Wl,--export-dynamic -pthread -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lgnomeui-2 -l=
SM -lICE -lbonoboui-2 -lxml2 -lz -lgnomecanvas-2 -lgnome-2 -lpopt -lart_lgp=
l_2 -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lpangoxft-1.0 -=
lpangox-1.0 -lpangoft2-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lgnomevfs-2 -lbonobo-=
2 -lgconf-2 -lbonobo-activation -lORBit-2 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lgthread-2.0 =
-lglib-2.0 -lesd -laudiofile -lm  =20
cc -g -Wall -O2 -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed -o logout-test logout-test.o util.o=
 gsm-multiscreen.o gdm-logout-action.o egg-screen-exec.o egg-screen-help.o =
egg-screen-url.o -Wl,--export-dynamic  -L/usr/X11R6/lib -pthread /usr/lib/l=
ibgnomeui-2.so -L/usr/lib /usr/lib/libgnome-keyring.so /usr/lib/libjpeg.so =
/usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so -lSM -lICE -lX11 /usr/lib/libgnomecanvas-2.so /us=
r/lib/libgnome-2.so /usr/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so /u=
sr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.=
so /usr/lib/libpangoxft-1.0.so /usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so /usr/lib/libpangof=
t2-1.0.so /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so /usr/lib/libxm=
l2.so /usr/lib/libgnutls.so /usr/lib/libtasn1.so /usr/lib/libgcrypt.so -lns=
l /usr/lib/libgpg-error.so -lz -lresolv -lrt /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so /usr/l=
ib/libgconf-2.so /usr/lib/libbonobo-activation.so /usr/lib/libORBitCosNamin=
g-2.so /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so /usr/lib/libpopt.so /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.s=
o /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so -ldl /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so -lpthread /usr=
/lib/libglib-2.0.so /usr/lib/libesd.so /usr/lib/libaudiofile.so -lm
/usr/lib/gcc/sparc-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../lib/crt1.o:../sysdeps/sparc/=
sparc32/elf/start.S:60: multiple definition of `_PROCEDURE_LINKAGE_TABLE_'
/usr/bin/ld: Disabling relaxation: it will not work with multiple definitio=
ns
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[4]: *** [logout-test] Error 1

Full build logs can be found at
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=3Dgnome-sessionarch=3Dalphaver=3D=
2.10.0-6stamp=3D1125236435file=3Dlog
and
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=3Dgnome-sessionarch=3Dsparcver=3D=
2.10.0-6stamp=3D1125310684file=3Dlog.

This failure occurs because gnome-session relies on -Wl,--as-needed for
linking.  This is a new and fairly experimental option which is
currently broken on alpha and sparc, and one which I would argue it is a
bad idea to use in general.  Please fix your package so that it does not
depend on this linker option for building.

--=20
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the 

Bug#326611: amarok: Doesn't build from source

[Adeodato Simó]

notfound 326611 1.3.0-1
close 326611
thanks

* Christian Marillat [Sun, 04 Sep 2005 15:38:31 +0200]:

 Package: amarok
 Version: 1.3.0-1
 Severity: serious
 Justification: FTBFS

  The amarok 1.3.0-1 package does _not_ FTBFS, see below. I'm hence
  closing this bug.

 I really want to know how you are doing this package when I try to compile
 amarok I see :

  Read the changelog:

* Adjustments to the build-system:

  + do not require TagLib 1.4.0 since it's not in Debian yet (#323280).

  FYI, debian/patches/taglib-1.3.1-suffices.diff in the source package.

 May be updating libtag to this version will solve bug like #326562.

  This is worth investigating. If it ends up being true, I will
  accelerate the process of getting TagLib 1.4 into Debian.

  Cheers,

-- 
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
Listening to: María Jiménez - Te quiero
 
When it is not necessary to make a decision, it is necessary not to make
a decision.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#324555: defrag: FTBFS with gcc-4.0: Signedness warnings with -Werror

[Matthijs Mohlmann]

Hi,

Here is a patch that fixes the signedness errors and some other errors
encountered while fixing.

I couldn't test this patch myself because I don't have any ext2
filesystems anymore. So please test if it still works.

Regards,

Matthijs Mohlmann
#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run
## fix-ftbfs-signedness.dpatch by  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
##
## All lines beginning with `## DP:' are a description of the patch.
## DP: No description.

@DPATCH@
diff -urNad --exclude=CVS --exclude=.svn ./buffers.c 
/tmp/dpep-work.2A48Xa/defrag-0.73pjm1/buffers.c
--- ./buffers.c 2001-07-04 13:08:13.0 +0200
+++ /tmp/dpep-work.2A48Xa/defrag-0.73pjm1/buffers.c 2005-09-04 
17:37:06.906411904 +0200
@@ -427,7 +427,7 @@
/* Don't bother reading here if we are in readonly mode; there
   will be no need to write it back at any time. */
if (!readonly)
-   read_current_block (source, b-data);
+   read_current_block (source, (char *) b-data);
d2n(source) = 0;
n2d(b-dest_zone) = 0;
b-full = 1;
@@ -442,7 +442,7 @@
(unsigned long) b-dest_zone, 
(unsigned long) dest);
assert (b-in_use  b-full);
-   write_current_block (dest, b-data);
+   write_current_block (dest, (char *) b-data);
assert (!n2d(b-dest_zone));
assert (!d2n(dest));
d2n(dest) = b-dest_zone;
diff -urNad --exclude=CVS --exclude=.svn ./display.c 
/tmp/dpep-work.2A48Xa/defrag-0.73pjm1/display.c
--- ./display.c 2001-07-04 13:08:13.0 +0200
+++ /tmp/dpep-work.2A48Xa/defrag-0.73pjm1/display.c 2005-09-04 
17:38:38.431497976 +0200
@@ -46,11 +46,14 @@
 static RETSIGTYPE
 tstp_signal(int dummy)
 {
+sigset_t newset, *newset_p;
UNUSED(dummy);
 
endwin();
signal(SIGTSTP,SIG_DFL);
-   sigsetmask(0);
+newset_p = newset;
+sigemptyset(newset_p);
+sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, newset_p, NULL);
/* Put us to stop */
kill(getpid(),SIGTSTP); 

diff -urNad --exclude=CVS --exclude=.svn ./e2dump.c 
/tmp/dpep-work.2A48Xa/defrag-0.73pjm1/e2dump.c
--- ./e2dump.c  2001-07-04 13:08:13.0 +0200
+++ /tmp/dpep-work.2A48Xa/defrag-0.73pjm1/e2dump.c  2005-09-04 
17:38:53.813159608 +0200
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
 } *gt;
 
 #if defined(__i386__)  defined(__GNUC__)
-static inline int bit_is_set(char * bitmap,unsigned int nr) 
+static inline int bit_is_set(unsigned char * bitmap,unsigned int nr) 
 { 
int __res; 
__asm__ __volatile__(btl %1,%2; adcl $0,%0 
diff -urNad --exclude=CVS --exclude=.svn ./llseek.c 
/tmp/dpep-work.2A48Xa/defrag-0.73pjm1/llseek.c
--- ./llseek.c  2001-07-04 13:08:13.0 +0200
+++ /tmp/dpep-work.2A48Xa/defrag-0.73pjm1/llseek.c  2005-09-04 
17:37:30.058892192 +0200
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
  *   o #include llseek.h, which provides loff_t.
  */
 
-#define _LARGEFILE_SOURCE
+//#define _LARGEFILE_SOURCE
 #define _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE
 
 #include config.h


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Processed: your mail

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 severity 316960 normal
Bug#316960: evolution: Evo doesn't display messages after crash
Severity set to `normal'.

 tags 316960 moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#316960: evolution: Evo doesn't display messages after crash
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible

 thanks,
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#326611: amarok: Doesn't build from source

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 notfound 326611 1.3.0-1
Bug#326611: amarok: Doesn't build from source
Bug marked as not found in version 1.3.0-1.

 close 326611
Bug#326611: amarok: Doesn't build from source
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Christian Marillat [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#322643: marked as done (FTBFS: Cannot find LinuxVNC)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 08:35:54 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#322643: fixed in libvncserver 0.7.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Aug 2005 01:12:57 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 11 18:12:57 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E3O6T-0004aS-00; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 18:12:57 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain 
(pool-71-104-165-253.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.165.253])
(authenticated bits=0)
by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j7C1CuId002611
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 18:12:57 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E3Gzv-wP-Et
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:37:44 -0700
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:37:42 -0700
From: Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FTBFS: Cannot find LinuxVNC
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1011/Tue Aug  9 02:20:28 2005 on zoot.lafn.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: libvncserver
Version: 0.7.1-1
Severity: serious

libvncserver fails to build in a pbuilder chroot because it does not
build LinuxVNC because it decides it is not a GNU/Linux system because
/dev/vcsa1 does not exist:

 dh_movefiles --sourcedir=3Ddebian/libvncserver-dev
 dh_movefiles: debian/libvncserver-dev//usr/bin/LinuxVNC not found (suppos=
ed to put it in linuxvnc)
 tar: /tmp/buildd/libvncserver-0.7.1/debian/movelist: Cannot open: No such=
 file or directory
 tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now
 sh: /tmp/buildd/libvncserver-0.7.1/debian/movelist: No such file or direc=
tory

It should use a better method for detecting whether it is being built
on a GNU/Linux system.

--=20
Matt

--C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC+4zmfNdgYxVXvBARAlwOAJ0blLXTjO3x51qgneOT3bj58QpCegCfVJYH
tzd3FB5onQtQ3VkE2tBFOyQ=
=sHPr
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc--

---
Received: (at 322643-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 15:38:01 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 08:38:01 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBwXC-0003mZ-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 08:35:54 -0700
From: Ludovic Drolez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#322643: fixed in libvncserver 0.7.1-2
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 08:35:54 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: libvncserver
Source-Version: 0.7.1-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libvncserver, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libvncserver-dev_0.7.1-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libv/libvncserver/libvncserver-dev_0.7.1-2_i386.deb
libvncserver_0.7.1-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libv/libvncserver/libvncserver_0.7.1-2.diff.gz
libvncserver_0.7.1-2.dsc
  to pool/main/libv/libvncserver/libvncserver_0.7.1-2.dsc
linuxvnc_0.7.1-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libv/libvncserver/linuxvnc_0.7.1-2_i386.deb
vncommand_0.7.1-2_i386.deb
  to 

Bug#326090: marked as done (cpio -p does not copy dangling symlinks)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 08:47:05 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#326090: fixed in cpio 2.6-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Sep 2005 18:33:11 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 01 11:33:11 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from c129237.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) 
[213.39.129.237] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EAts6-0003UN-00; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 11:33:11 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1EAts4-Y2-Gz; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 20:33:08 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: perl: 'libperl.so' missing in 'libperl-dev' package
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 20:33:08 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: perl
Version: 5.8.7-4
Severity: serious

I just tried to rebuild perl_5.8.7-4 from source on unstable 
and found that the resulting 'libperl-dev' package does not 
contain 'libperl.so':

perl-5.8.7# dpkg-buildpackage -b
[...]
perl-5.8.7# dpkg -c ../libperl-dev_5.8.7-4_i386.deb
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-09-01 18:11:50 ./
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-09-01 18:11:38 ./usr/
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-09-01 18:11:37 ./usr/lib/
-rw-r--r-- root/root   1394096 2005-09-01 18:11:36 ./usr/lib/libperl.a
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-09-01 18:11:38 ./usr/share/
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-09-01 18:11:38 ./usr/share/doc/
lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2005-09-01 18:11:38 ./usr/share/doc/libperl-dev 
- perl
perl-5.8.7#

Without 'libperl.so' some packages which Build-Depend on
'libperl-dev' will FTBFS.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

---
Received: (at 326090-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 15:49:37 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 08:49:37 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBwi1-0006HG-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 08:47:05 -0700
From: Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#326090: fixed in cpio 2.6-5
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 08:47:05 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4

Source: cpio
Source-Version: 2.6-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
cpio, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

cpio_2.6-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/c/cpio/cpio_2.6-5.diff.gz
cpio_2.6-5.dsc
  to pool/main/c/cpio/cpio_2.6-5.dsc
cpio_2.6-5_sparc.deb
  to pool/main/c/cpio/cpio_2.6-5_sparc.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated cpio package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun,  4 Sep 2005 10:44:40 -0400
Source: cpio
Binary: cpio
Architecture: source sparc
Version: 2.6-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 cpio   - GNU cpio -- a program to manage archives of files
Closes: 238177 322608 323141 326090
Changes: 
 cpio (2.6-5) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Fix 'ustar' format mtime overflow.  closes: #238177.
   * Fix symlink dereferencing problem.
 closes: #322608, #323141, #326090.
Files: 
 

Bug#326090: marked as done (cpio -p does not copy dangling symlinks)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 08:47:05 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#323141: fixed in cpio 2.6-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Sep 2005 18:33:11 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 01 11:33:11 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from c129237.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) 
[213.39.129.237] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EAts6-0003UN-00; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 11:33:11 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1EAts4-Y2-Gz; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 20:33:08 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: perl: 'libperl.so' missing in 'libperl-dev' package
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 20:33:08 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: perl
Version: 5.8.7-4
Severity: serious

I just tried to rebuild perl_5.8.7-4 from source on unstable 
and found that the resulting 'libperl-dev' package does not 
contain 'libperl.so':

perl-5.8.7# dpkg-buildpackage -b
[...]
perl-5.8.7# dpkg -c ../libperl-dev_5.8.7-4_i386.deb
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-09-01 18:11:50 ./
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-09-01 18:11:38 ./usr/
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-09-01 18:11:37 ./usr/lib/
-rw-r--r-- root/root   1394096 2005-09-01 18:11:36 ./usr/lib/libperl.a
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-09-01 18:11:38 ./usr/share/
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-09-01 18:11:38 ./usr/share/doc/
lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2005-09-01 18:11:38 ./usr/share/doc/libperl-dev 
- perl
perl-5.8.7#

Without 'libperl.so' some packages which Build-Depend on
'libperl-dev' will FTBFS.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

---
Received: (at 323141-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 15:49:36 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 08:49:36 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBwi1-0006HE-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 08:47:05 -0700
From: Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#323141: fixed in cpio 2.6-5
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 08:47:05 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3

Source: cpio
Source-Version: 2.6-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
cpio, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

cpio_2.6-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/c/cpio/cpio_2.6-5.diff.gz
cpio_2.6-5.dsc
  to pool/main/c/cpio/cpio_2.6-5.dsc
cpio_2.6-5_sparc.deb
  to pool/main/c/cpio/cpio_2.6-5_sparc.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated cpio package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun,  4 Sep 2005 10:44:40 -0400
Source: cpio
Binary: cpio
Architecture: source sparc
Version: 2.6-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 cpio   - GNU cpio -- a program to manage archives of files
Closes: 238177 322608 323141 326090
Changes: 
 cpio (2.6-5) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Fix 'ustar' format mtime overflow.  closes: #238177.
   * Fix symlink dereferencing problem.
 closes: #322608, #323141, #326090.
Files: 
 

Bug#315355: marked as done (evolution crashes when adding an account mail type)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 12:50:52 -0300
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Closing the bug since it wasn't really a bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jun 2005 05:01:39 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 21 22:01:39 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.181] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DkxMp-0003wh-00; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 22:01:39 -0700
Received: from lettuce (ppp27-220.lns1.syd2.internode.on.net [59.167.27.220])
by smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id 
j5M51ZCk010227;
Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:31:36 +0930 (CST)
Received: from robby by lettuce with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1DkxMg-w3-00; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 15:01:30 +1000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Schonberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: evolution crashes when adding an account mail type
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 15:01:30 +1000
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Robert Schonberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: evolution
Version: 2.2.2-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Adding an account mail type (IMAP, POP, maildir) causes the evolution account 
adding wizard to crash, meaning that users cannot use evolution for any mail 
accounts. 

The first pane appears and functions correctly, asking my name   address, the 
pane for mail input type does not.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers experimental
  APT policy: (1002, 'experimental'), (1002, 'unstable'), (550, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-mm4
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages evolution depends on:
ii  evolution-data-serv 1.2.2-5.1evolution database backend server
ii  gconf2  2.10.0-2 GNOME configuration database syste
ii  gnome-icon-theme2.10.1-2 GNOME Desktop icon theme
ii  gtkhtml3.6  3.6.2-1  HTML rendering/editing library - b
ii  libart-2.0-22.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii  libatk1.0-0 1.10.1-2 The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libaudiofile0   0.2.6-6  Open-source version of SGI's audio
ii  libbonobo2-02.8.1-2  Bonobo CORBA interfaces library
ii  libbonoboui2-0  2.8.1-2  The Bonobo UI library
ii  libc6   2.3.5-1  GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libcamel1.2-0   1.2.2-5.1The Evolution MIME message handlin
ii  libcompfaceg1   1989.11.11-24Compress/decompress images for mai
ii  libdb4.14.1.25-18Berkeley v4.1 Database Libraries [
ii  libebook1.2-3   1.2.2-5.1Client library for evolution addre
ii  libecal1.2-21.2.2-5.1Client library for evolution calen
ii  libedataserver1.2-4 1.2.2-5.1Utily library for evolution data s
ii  libedataserverui1.2 1.2.2-5.1GUI utily library for evolution da
ii  libesd0 0.2.35-2.1   Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared 
ii  libfontconfig1  2.3.2-1  generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype62.1.10-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgail-common  1.8.4-1  GNOME Accessibility Implementation
ii  libgail17   1.8.4-1  GNOME Accessibility Implementation
ii  libgal2.4-0 2.4.3-0.1G App Libs (run time library)
ii  libgal2.4-common2.4.3-0.1G App Libs (common files)
ii  libgconf2-4 2.10.0-2 GNOME configuration database syste
ii  libgcrypt11 1.2.0-11.1   LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr
ii  libglade2-0 1:2.5.1-2library to load .glade files at ru
ii  libglib2.0-02.7.0-1  The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgnome-keyring0   0.4.2-1   

Bug#297844: #297844: xdelta: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0)

[Roger Leigh]

Hi,

I have uploaded an NMU to fix this RC bug, as part of the BSP this
weekend.  The diff follows.

BTW, there are also a number of lintian warnings which could use some
attention.


Regards,
Roger


diff -urN xdelta-1.1.3.original/debian/changelog xdelta-1.1.3/debian/changelog
--- xdelta-1.1.3.original/debian/changelog  2005-09-04 16:37:01.0 
+0100
+++ xdelta-1.1.3/debian/changelog   2005-09-04 16:40:52.331504648 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+xdelta (1.1.3-6.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * xdmain.c: declare xd_handle_table static rather than extern
+to fix a build failure with GCC 4.0 (Closes: #297844).
+
+ -- Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Sun,  4 Sep 2005 16:40:36 +0100
+
 xdelta (1.1.3-6) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * fix grammar in descriptions.  Closes: #183789
diff -urN xdelta-1.1.3.original/xdmain.c xdelta-1.1.3/xdmain.c
--- xdelta-1.1.3.original/xdmain.c  2001-09-24 07:59:18.0 +0100
+++ xdelta-1.1.3/xdmain.c   2005-09-04 16:40:34.797170272 +0100
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
 
 #include xdelta.h
 
-extern HandleFuncTable xd_handle_table;
+static HandleFuncTable xd_handle_table;
 
 #define XD_PAGE_SIZE (120)
 


-- 
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux?  http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848.  Please sign and encrypt your mail.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#259912: wmsysmon: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: label at end of compound statement

[Roger Leigh]

Hi,

I have uploaded an NMU to fix this RC bug as part of the BSP this
weekend.  The patch follows.

BTW, there are a number of lintian warnings that could use some
attention, as well as upgrading to a more recent debhelper version.


Regards,
Roger

diff -urN wmsysmon-0.7.7.original/debian/changelog 
wmsysmon-0.7.7/debian/changelog
--- wmsysmon-0.7.7.original/debian/changelog2005-09-04 16:51:44.0 
+0100
+++ wmsysmon-0.7.7/debian/changelog 2005-09-04 16:54:59.802669448 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+wmsysmon (0.7.7-3.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * src/wmsysmon.c: Add break at the end of the default label clause
+of a switch statement to fix a build failure with GCC 4.0.
+Applied patch from Andreas Jochens (closes: #259912).
+
+ -- Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Sun,  4 Sep 2005 16:52:12 +0100
+
 wmsysmon (0.7.7-3) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Manpage fixed (closes: #93475, #165944).
diff -urN wmsysmon-0.7.7.original/src/wmsysmon.c wmsysmon-0.7.7/src/wmsysmon.c
--- wmsysmon-0.7.7.original/src/wmsysmon.c  2001-12-24 07:11:58.0 
+
+++ wmsysmon-0.7.7/src/wmsysmon.c   2005-09-04 16:53:15.572514840 +0100
@@ -288,6 +288,7 @@
 #ifdef MONDEBUG
printf(got: %i\n, Event.type);
 #endif
+   break;
}
}
 

-- 
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux?  http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848.  Please sign and encrypt your mail.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: your mail

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 severity 325571 important
Bug#325571: Evolution crashes on startup
Severity set to `important'.

 severity 321746 important
Bug#321746: evolution: Evolution crashes with new version of libgnomecanvas2-0 
installed
Severity set to `important'.

 merge 321746 325571 310706
Bug#310706: evolution: Crash when switching to calendar or tasks components
Bug#321746: evolution: Evolution crashes with new version of libgnomecanvas2-0 
installed
Bug#325571: Evolution crashes on startup
Merged 310706 321746 325571.

 thanks,
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#323141: marked as done (cpio: symlink cause No such file or directory and don't save symlink)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 08:47:05 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#323141: fixed in cpio 2.6-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Aug 2005 23:27:48 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 14 16:27:48 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.mnsu.edu [134.29.1.12] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E4RtM-00056j-00; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 16:27:48 -0700
Received: from mail.mnsu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.mnsu.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j7ENRHLx006926
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 18:27:17 -0500
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by mail.mnsu.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j7ENRHNP006925
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 18:27:17 -0500
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jeffrey Hundstad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cpio: symlink cause No such file or directory and don't save symlink
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:28:46 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: cpio
Version: 2.6-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Before this version of cpio, cpio would backup broken sylinks (symlinks
that did not actually point to a valid file.)  Since this version it
throws the error No such file or directory, and fails to backup the
link.  We do nightly backups and daily apt-get updates and this problem
started Monday August 8, 2005; which corresponds to the cpio update.

Follow this to see the error:

# #BEGIN
# mkdir t
# cd t
# ln -s not-here dangle-symlink
# find ./ | cpio --create  archive.cpio
cpio: ./dangle-symlink: No such file or directory
1 block
# cpio --list  archive.cpio

1 block

# #END

I marked this as grave because our backups no longer reflect the state
of our filesystem.   Restores would lose data.  Users expecting
full backups are not getting what they expect.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages cpio depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.5-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

cpio recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 323141-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 15:49:36 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 08:49:36 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBwi1-0006HE-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 08:47:05 -0700
From: Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#323141: fixed in cpio 2.6-5
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 08:47:05 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3

Source: cpio
Source-Version: 2.6-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
cpio, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

cpio_2.6-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/c/cpio/cpio_2.6-5.diff.gz
cpio_2.6-5.dsc
  to pool/main/c/cpio/cpio_2.6-5.dsc
cpio_2.6-5_sparc.deb
  to pool/main/c/cpio/cpio_2.6-5_sparc.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated 

Bug#326037: marked as done (Preconfiguring: No `START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY' and no `This file documents')

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 4 Sep 2005 11:53:53 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#326037: Preconfiguring: No `START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY' and no 
`This file documents'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Sep 2005 11:49:28 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 01 04:49:28 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from bigmama.rhoen.de (rhoen.de) [62.80.125.185] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EAnZQ-LL-00; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 04:49:28 -0700
Received: from bigmama.rhoen.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by rhoen.de (8.13.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j81BnJK0017710
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 13:49:20 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bigmama.rhoen.de (8.13.1/8.12.4/Submit) with UUCP id j81BhKc5017634
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 13:43:20 +0200
Received: from root by macbeth.rhoen.de with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1EAnLN-0003nh-00; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 13:34:57 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: boris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Preconfiguring: No `START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY' and no `This file documents'
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 13:34:57 +0200
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-IN-Kompentent-e-V-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more 
information
X-IN-Kompentent-e-V-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-IN-Kompentent-e-V-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: sed
Version: 4.1.4-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

# apt-get -u upgrade
Preconfiguring packages ...
Setting up sed (4.1.4-3) ...

No `START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY' and no `This file documents'.
install-info(/usr/share/info/sed.info): unable to determine description
for `dir' entry - giving up
dpkg: error processing sed (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
 sed
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
  
this looks like the #281601 Bug wich was closed last year.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-rc7-git3
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages sed depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

sed recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 326037-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 15:53:54 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 08:53:54 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from acolyte.scowler.net [216.254.112.45] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBwoc-0007qW-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 08:53:54 -0700
Received: by acolyte.scowler.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id E68F870055; Sun,  4 Sep 2005 11:53:53 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 11:53:53 -0400
From: Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: boris mogwitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#326037: Preconfiguring: No `START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY' and no `This 
file documents'
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

 OK ... when I delete /usr/share/info/sed.info and do
 # dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/sed_4.1.4-3_powerpc.deb
 everything works as expected! 

Okay.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email 

Bug#323141: marked as done (cpio: symlink cause No such file or directory and don't save symlink)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 08:47:05 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#326090: fixed in cpio 2.6-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Aug 2005 23:27:48 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 14 16:27:48 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.mnsu.edu [134.29.1.12] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E4RtM-00056j-00; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 16:27:48 -0700
Received: from mail.mnsu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.mnsu.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j7ENRHLx006926
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 18:27:17 -0500
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by mail.mnsu.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j7ENRHNP006925
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 18:27:17 -0500
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jeffrey Hundstad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cpio: symlink cause No such file or directory and don't save symlink
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:28:46 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: cpio
Version: 2.6-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Before this version of cpio, cpio would backup broken sylinks (symlinks
that did not actually point to a valid file.)  Since this version it
throws the error No such file or directory, and fails to backup the
link.  We do nightly backups and daily apt-get updates and this problem
started Monday August 8, 2005; which corresponds to the cpio update.

Follow this to see the error:

# #BEGIN
# mkdir t
# cd t
# ln -s not-here dangle-symlink
# find ./ | cpio --create  archive.cpio
cpio: ./dangle-symlink: No such file or directory
1 block
# cpio --list  archive.cpio

1 block

# #END

I marked this as grave because our backups no longer reflect the state
of our filesystem.   Restores would lose data.  Users expecting
full backups are not getting what they expect.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages cpio depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.5-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

cpio recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 326090-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 15:49:37 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 08:49:37 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBwi1-0006HG-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 08:47:05 -0700
From: Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#326090: fixed in cpio 2.6-5
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 08:47:05 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4

Source: cpio
Source-Version: 2.6-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
cpio, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

cpio_2.6-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/c/cpio/cpio_2.6-5.diff.gz
cpio_2.6-5.dsc
  to pool/main/c/cpio/cpio_2.6-5.dsc
cpio_2.6-5_sparc.deb
  to pool/main/c/cpio/cpio_2.6-5_sparc.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated 

Bug#326611: amarok: Doesn't build from source

[Christian Marillat]

Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 notfound 326611 1.3.0-1
 close 326611

This close command is deprecated and should not be used.

http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control

[...]

   + do not require TagLib 1.4.0 since it's not in Debian yet (#323280).

   FYI, debian/patches/taglib-1.3.1-suffices.diff in the source package.

Of course upstream is stupid to make a depends on taglib 1.4 ?

 May be updating libtag to this version will solve bug like #326562.

   This is worth investigating. If it ends up being true, I will
   accelerate the process of getting TagLib 1.4 into Debian.

FYI, I did my pakage build with taglib 1.4, and now the database is
populated correctly.

christian

Processed: Merging bugs

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 package: libgal2.4-0
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

 severity 318342 grave
Bug#318342: libgal2.4 causes evolution to crash when viewing message source
Severity set to `grave'.

 severity 310612 grave
Bug#310612: libgnomecanvas2-0: evolution crash when accessing calendar 
(downgrade from 2.10.1* to 2.10.0 fixed it)
Bug#312096: evolution crashes with 2.10.2-1
Severity set to `grave'.

 tags 310612 -experimental
Bug#310612: libgnomecanvas2-0: evolution crash when accessing calendar 
(downgrade from 2.10.1* to 2.10.0 fixed it)
Tags were: fixed experimental
Bug#312096: evolution crashes with 2.10.2-1
Tags removed: experimental

 merge 318342 310612 317283
Bug#310612: libgnomecanvas2-0: evolution crash when accessing calendar 
(downgrade from 2.10.1* to 2.10.0 fixed it)
Bug#317283: libgal 2.4.2 crashes evolution when using libgnomecanvas 2.10
Bug#318342: libgal2.4 causes evolution to crash when viewing message source
Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged:
Values for `done mark' don't match:
 #310612 has `done';
 #318342 has `open'

 thanks.
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in NMU of xdelta 1.1.3-6.1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tag 297844 + fixed
Bug#297844: xdelta: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): 
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed

 quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Processed: Change severity

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 severity 325956 important
Bug#325956: depends on a FLAC library no longer available in unstable
Severity set to `important'.

 severity 325643 important
Bug#325643: moc: uninstallable in sid (depends on libflac6 which is UNAVAILABLE)
Severity set to `important'.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#287925: marked as done (sodipodi: segfault on startup on 64 bit platforms)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 09:02:12 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#287925: fixed in sodipodi 0.34-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Dec 2004 22:44:12 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 30 14:44:11 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from dcn243-97.dcn.davis.ca.us (larry.q-funk.net) [168.150.243.97] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ck91e-0005bQ-00; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 14:44:10 -0800
Received: from fungus.q-funk.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [192.168.42.5])
by larry.q-funk.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id 
iBUMi4NE032254;
Thu, 30 Dec 2004 14:44:09 -0800
Received: from fungus.q-funk.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by fungus.q-funk.net (8.13.2/8.13.2/Debian-1) with ESMTP id 
iBUMi4ek008828;
Thu, 30 Dec 2004 14:44:04 -0800
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by fungus.q-funk.net (8.13.2/8.13.2/Submit) id iBUMi3oi008826;
Thu, 30 Dec 2004 14:44:03 -0800
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Authentication-Warning: fungus.q-funk.net: mike set sender to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] using -f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Mike Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: sodipodi: segfault on startup on 64 bit platforms
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 14:44:03 -0800
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: sodipodi
Version: 0.34-0.1
Severity: important


Sodipodi crashes on startup on 64 bit platforms. See:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=950010group_id=4054atid=104054


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: alpha
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages sodipodi depends on:
ii  libart-2.0-22.3.16-6 Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii  libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4  The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libfontconfig1  2.2.3-4  generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype62.1.7-2.3FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libglib2.0-02.4.8-1  The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2.0-0 2.4.13-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libpango1.0-0   1.6.0-3  Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libpng12-0  1.2.8rel-1   PNG library - runtime
ii  libpopt01.7-5lib for parsing cmdline parameters
ii  libxml2 2.6.11-5 GNOME XML library
ii  zlib1g  1:1.2.2-3compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 287925-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 16:12:32 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 09:12:32 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBwwe-0002AW-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 09:02:12 -0700
From: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#287925: fixed in sodipodi 0.34-1
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 09:02:12 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: sodipodi
Source-Version: 0.34-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
sodipodi, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

sodipodi_0.34-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/sodipodi/sodipodi_0.34-1.diff.gz
sodipodi_0.34-1.dsc
  to pool/main/s/sodipodi/sodipodi_0.34-1.dsc
sodipodi_0.34-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/sodipodi/sodipodi_0.34-1_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and 

Bug#317613: marked as done (bookmarkbridge: mixes C++ ABIs)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 09:02:04 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#317613: fixed in bookmarkbridge 0.72-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jul 2005 06:29:56 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 09 23:29:56 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mx4.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.12.29] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DrVK7-00028R-00; Sat, 09 Jul 2005 23:29:56 -0700
Received: from localhost (loopback [127.0.0.1])
by mx4.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
id E0521132A; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 08:29:23 +0200 (MST)
Received: from mx4.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mx4 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
 id 88648-04; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 08:29:22 +0200 (MST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (semeai.Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De 
[134.2.15.66])
by mx4.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 05BBB10FB; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 08:29:21 +0200 (MST)
Received: from mrvn by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DrVIy-0001zj-FF; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 08:28:44 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Goswin Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bookmarkbridge: mixes C++ ABIs
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 08:28:44 +0200
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: bookmarkbridge
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Hi,

Package: bookmarkbridge
Architecture: i386
Version: 0.72-5
Depends: libqt3c102-mt (= 3:3.3.4), libstdc++6 (= 4.0.0-10)

seems like you didn't read the C++ transition plan. All C++ packages
are in an upload freeze untill all their dependencies have
transitioned to avoid mixing incompatible C++ ABIs.

You must upload your package again once all your dependencies have
transitioned. Till then your package is screwed.

MfG
Goswin

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-frosties-1
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

---
Received: (at 317613-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 16:12:07 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 09:12:07 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBwwW-00022u-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 09:02:04 -0700
From: Masami Ichikawa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#317613: fixed in bookmarkbridge 0.72-6
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 09:02:04 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: bookmarkbridge
Source-Version: 0.72-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
bookmarkbridge, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

bookmarkbridge_0.72-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/b/bookmarkbridge/bookmarkbridge_0.72-6.diff.gz
bookmarkbridge_0.72-6.dsc
  to pool/main/b/bookmarkbridge/bookmarkbridge_0.72-6.dsc
bookmarkbridge_0.72-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/b/bookmarkbridge/bookmarkbridge_0.72-6_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Masami Ichikawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated bookmarkbridge package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED 

Bug#324558: flite: FTBFS with current texi2html

[Clément Stenac]

tag #324558 +patch
thanks

Hello,

The attached patch fixes this bug.

Please note that as we are during a BSP, a 0-day NMU policy is in place.
I will therefore upload a fixed package to DELAYED/0-day. I also attach
the NMU patch.

Regards,

-- 
Zorglub
Clément Stenac
--- Makefile.orig   2005-09-04 17:53:28.0 +0200
+++ Makefile2005-09-04 17:53:47.0 +0200
@@ -52,7 +52,8 @@
 flite.html: flite.texi
@ if [ ! -d html ] ; \
   then mkdir -p html ; fi
-   (cd html; texi2html -number -split_chapter ../flite.texi)
+   (cd html; texi2html -number -split_chapter ../flite.texi; \
+mv flite/*.html .; rm -rf flite)
@ for i in html/*.html ; \
  do \
sed 's/BODY/BODY bgcolor=#ff/' $$i ttt.html; \
diff -ru orig/flite-1.2-release/debian/changelog 
new/flite-1.2-release/debian/changelog
--- orig/flite-1.2-release/debian/changelog 2005-09-04 18:13:54.0 
+0200
+++ new/flite-1.2-release/debian/changelog  2005-09-04 18:19:14.0 
+0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+flite (1.2-release-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload
+  * Fix build of documentation (Closes:#324558)
+  
+ -- Clément Stenac [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Sun, 4 Sep  2005 18:17:17 +0200
+
 flite (1.2-release-2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * include/cst_sts.h:
diff -ru orig/flite-1.2-release/doc/Makefile new/flite-1.2-release/doc/Makefile
--- orig/flite-1.2-release/doc/Makefile 2002-12-30 13:57:30.0 +0100
+++ new/flite-1.2-release/doc/Makefile  2005-09-04 18:16:26.0 +0200
@@ -52,7 +52,8 @@
 flite.html: flite.texi
@ if [ ! -d html ] ; \
   then mkdir -p html ; fi
-   (cd html; texi2html -number -split_chapter ../flite.texi)
+   (cd html; texi2html -number -split_chapter ../flite.texi; \
+mv flite/*.html .; rm -rf flite)
@ for i in html/*.html ; \
  do \
sed 's/BODY/BODY bgcolor=#ff/' $$i ttt.html; \

Processed: flite: FTBFS with current texi2html

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tag #324558 +patch
Bug#324558: flite: FTBFS with current texi2html: Cannot find docs
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#259894: wnn6-sdk: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: conflicting types for 'malloc'

[Roger Leigh]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

Has any progress been made with this bug?

After reviewing the patch patch/malloc.patch, it's clear this is
introducing KRisms which GCC 4.0 won't allow.  These need replacing
with proper prototypes or, preferably, include a header containing the
prototypes.  It's not at all clear that the patch is actually
necessary or desirable given that all it does is wrap the system
malloc() and related functions.

Summary:
1) The patch is written using KR C.  It's 2005, not 1985, and this is
   no longer acceptable.
2) The patch is funtamentally broken.  Have you looked at it closely?

   Example:

   +char *
   +malloc0(size)
   +int size;
   +{
   +if(size == NULL){
   +   size = 1;

   size is an integer, not a pointer, so a comparison to NULL is
   broken...

3) There is no header for the new functions.
4) Modules should not prototype functions from other modules, they
   should use the header.  KR prototypes are even worse!

Have any attempts been made with upstream to completely ANSI-ify the
source?  There are workarounds for SVR2 in there, and that's well
obsolete.  We have had ANSI/ISO C for over 16 years now.


Regards,
Roger

- -- 
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux?  http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848.  Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/

iD8DBQFDGx6BVcFcaSW/uEgRAp/yAJ9zImnPVO7oCovkP903zwJNulMEaQCg5zfD
BAbQc0apx5QEnlUeXYqAIfg=
=1VnW
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in NMU of wmsysmon 0.7.7-3.1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tag 259912 + fixed
Bug#259912: wmsysmon: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: label at end of compound statement
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed

 quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#258798: marked as done (gnome-chess: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: label at end of compound statement)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 09:32:04 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#258798: fixed in gnome-chess 0.3.3-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jul 2004 13:35:23 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 11 06:35:23 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from c147245.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost) [213.39.147.245] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BjeUE-0004nF-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 06:35:23 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1BjeUD-0005BV-Ny; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:35:21 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gnome-chess: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: label at end of compound statement
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:35:21 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: gnome-chess
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

When building 'gnome-chess' with gcc-3.4 I get the following error:

cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/usr/include/gnome-1.0 -DNEED_GNOMESUPPORT_H 
-I/usr/lib/gnome-libs/include -I/usr/include/glib-1.2 -I/usr/lib/glib/include 
-I/usr/include/orbit-1.0 -I/usr/include/gtk-1.2 
   -I/usr/include/gnome-1.0 -DNEED_GNOMESUPPORT_H -I/usr/lib/gnome-libs/include 
-I/usr/include/gtk-1.2 -I/usr/include/glib-1.2 -I/usr/lib/glib/include 
-I/usr/include/libglade-1.0 -I/usr/include/gnome-xml 
-I/usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-1.0  -I/usr/include   
   -I./dialogs 
-DGNOMELOCALEDIR=\/usr/share/locale\
-DGNOMEDATADIR=\/usr/share\ 
-DGNOME_ICONDIR=\/usr/share/pixmaps\  -I/usr/include/gtk-1.2 
-I/usr/include/glib-1.2 -I/usr/lib/glib/include  -g -Wall -O2 -g -Wall   
-Wpointer-arith   -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -c server-term.c
server-term.c: In function `print_raw_text':
server-term.c:351: error: label at end of compound statement
make[4]: *** [server-term.o] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/gnome-chess-0.3.3/src'
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/gnome-chess-0.3.3/src'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/gnome-chess-0.3.3'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/gnome-chess-0.3.3'
make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Error 2

With the attached patch 'gnome-chess' can be compiled using gcc-3.4.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/gnome-chess-0.3.3/src/server-term.c ./src/server-term.c
--- ../tmp-orig/gnome-chess-0.3.3/src/server-term.c 2001-06-16 
21:47:01.0 +0200
+++ ./src/server-term.c 2004-07-11 15:03:12.610320405 +0200
@@ -348,6 +348,7 @@
jump2:
i++;
jump:
+   continue;
}
newtext[j] = 0;
zvt_term_feed (ZVT_TERM (widget), newtext, j);

---
Received: (at 258798-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 16:39:37 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 09:39:37 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBxPY-0005Qx-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 09:32:04 -0700
From: Sebastian Rittau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#258798: fixed in gnome-chess 0.3.3-6
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 09:32:04 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: gnome-chess
Source-Version: 0.3.3-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gnome-chess, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

gnome-chess_0.3.3-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gnome-chess/gnome-chess_0.3.3-6.diff.gz
gnome-chess_0.3.3-6.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gnome-chess/gnome-chess_0.3.3-6.dsc

Bug#326611: amarok: Doesn't build from source

[Adeodato Simó]

* Christian Marillat [Sun, 04 Sep 2005 18:12:42 +0200]:

+ do not require TagLib 1.4.0 since it's not in Debian yet (#323280).

FYI, debian/patches/taglib-1.3.1-suffices.diff in the source package.

 Of course upstream is stupid to make a depends on taglib 1.4 ?

  Is this an irony? Anyway; if the required taglib is not in Debian, I
  can't obviously use it. Unless it is determined that the old one is
  producing buggy behavior...

  May be updating libtag to this version will solve bug like #326562.

This is worth investigating. If it ends up being true, I will
accelerate the process of getting TagLib 1.4 into Debian.

 FYI, I did my pakage build with taglib 1.4, and now the database is
 populated correctly.

  Did you use the internal sqlite copy as well?

% objdump -p /usr/lib/amarok/amarokapp | grep sqlite
NEEDED  libsqlite3.so.0

  Because I'm trying with taglib 1.4, and problem persists here.

-- 
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
Listening to: Alanis Morissette - Perfect
 
And don't get me wrong - I don't mind getting proven wrong. I change my
opinions the way some people change underwear. And I think that's ok.
-- Linus Torvalds



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#297738: uucpsend: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment

[Roger Leigh]

Hi,

I have uploaded an NMU to fix this bug as part of the BSP this
weekend.  This also fixes the usr/doc symlink creation.  The diff
follows.

BTW, the standards-version is out of date, and there are bashisms in
the prerm which need removing.


Regards,
Roger


diff -urN uucpsend-1.1.original/debian/changelog uucpsend-1.1/debian/changelog
--- uucpsend-1.1.original/debian/changelog  2005-09-04 17:21:32.0 
+0100
+++ uucpsend-1.1/debian/changelog   2005-09-04 17:34:25.835977712 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+uucpsend (1.1-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * uucpsend.c: Don't cast lvalue in assignment.  Fix type of
+argument to free_sites() in order to remove unnecessary cast
+(closes: Bug#297738).
+  * debian/postinst: Remove.  This was only used to set the usr/doc
+symlink, which is not no longer required.
+  * debian/rules: Don't install debian/postinst.
+
+ -- Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Sun,  4 Sep 2005 17:34:13 +0100
+
 uucpsend (1.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Added a disclaimer for those people who plan to NMU this package
diff -urN uucpsend-1.1.original/debian/postinst uucpsend-1.1/debian/postinst
--- uucpsend-1.1.original/debian/postinst   2005-09-04 17:21:32.0 
+0100
+++ uucpsend-1.1/debian/postinst1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
@@ -1,9 +0,0 @@
-#! /bin/sh
-
-pkg=uucpsend
-
-if [ $1 = configure ]; then
-   if [ -d /usr/doc -a ! -e /usr/doc/${pkg} -a -d /usr/share/doc/${pkg} ]; then
-  ln -sf ../share/doc/${pkg} /usr/doc/${pkg}
-   fi
-fi
diff -urN uucpsend-1.1.original/debian/rules uucpsend-1.1/debian/rules
--- uucpsend-1.1.original/debian/rules  2005-09-04 17:21:32.0 +0100
+++ uucpsend-1.1/debian/rules   2005-09-04 17:34:10.852255584 +0100
@@ -59,7 +59,6 @@
#
$(installdoc) debian/conffiles debian/tmp/DEBIAN
$(installbin) debian/prerm debian/tmp/DEBIAN/prerm
-   $(installbin) debian/postinst debian/tmp/DEBIAN/postinst 
$(installdoc) debian/changelog 
debian/tmp/usr/share/doc/$(package)/changelog.Debian
$(installdoc) debian/copyright 
debian/tmp/usr/share/doc/$(package)/copyright
$(installdoc) readme debian/tmp/usr/share/doc/$(package)/
diff -urN uucpsend-1.1.original/uucpsend.c uucpsend-1.1/uucpsend.c
--- uucpsend-1.1.original/uucpsend.c2001-11-22 18:03:07.0 +
+++ uucpsend-1.1/uucpsend.c 2005-09-04 17:26:50.485201552 +0100
@@ -281,12 +281,12 @@
 
 void
 free_sites(root)
-struct s_sites *root;
+struct s_site *root;
 {
   struct s_site *act;
   struct s_site *tmp = NULL;
 
-  (struct s_sites *)act = (struct s_sites *)root;
+  act = root;
 
   while (act) {
 tmp = act;

-- 
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux?  http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848.  Please sign and encrypt your mail.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308013: NMU

[Frank Lichtenheld]

NMUed with the trivial (changelog-only) patch:
diff -Naur bonobo-1.0.22.bak/debian/changelog bonobo-1.0.22/debian/changelog
--- bonobo-1.0.22.bak/debian/changelog  2005-09-04 18:15:02.006989936 +0200
+++ bonobo-1.0.22/debian/changelog  2005-09-04 18:17:51.452230344 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+bonobo (1.0.22-2.4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Build with a non-broken liborbit (Closes: #308013)
+
+ -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Sun,  4 Sep 2005 18:17:02 +0200
+
 bonobo (1.0.22-2.3) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * tests/test-any.c: patch from Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED], fix the 
build 

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in NMU of xbsql 0.11-4.1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tag 318974 + fixed
Bug#318974: libxbsql0: CXX 4.0 transition
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed

 quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#326018: marked as done (FTBFS: mlgmp_20021123-6 (unstable/m68k): internal compiler error)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 12:52:43 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line m68k built with -O2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Sep 2005 09:25:58 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 01 02:25:58 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (tennyson.dodds.net) 
[66.93.39.86] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EAlKX-0002FR-00; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 02:25:57 -0700
Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1003)
id E58457049; Thu,  1 Sep 2005 02:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 02:25:56 -0700
From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FTBFS: mlgmp_20021123-6 (unstable/m68k): internal compiler error
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: mlgmp
Version: 20021123-6
Severity: serious

Hi Mike,

It appears that mlgmp is failing to build on m68k with an ICE:

 ocamlc -g  -c gmp.ml
 gcc -Wall -Wno-unused -g -O3 -fPIC -I /usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3-c -o =
mlgmp_z.o mlgmp_z.c
 In file included from mlgmp_z.c:13:
 conversions.c:68: warning: ignoring #pragma inline=20
 conversions.c:92: warning: ignoring #pragma inline=20
 mlgmp_z.c: In function '_mlgmp_z_neg':
 mlgmp_z.c:260: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
 Please submit a full bug report,
 with preprocessed source if appropriate.
 See URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions.
 For Debian GNU/Linux specific bug reporting instructions,
 see URL:file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.0/README.Bugs.
 make[1]: *** [mlgmp_z.o] Error 1

Unfortunately no build log is available for this build since it seems to
have not made it to buildd.debian.org, but you can find the current
wanna-build status of the package (which includes the notes made by the
buildd maintainer) at
http://cerberus.0c3.net/~buildd/package_status.php?arch=3Dm68kpkg=3Dmlgmp=
searchtype=3Dgo.

There appear to be a number of bugs in gcc-4.0 related to -O3
optimization on m68k.  It's possible that you can get mlgmp to build by
lowering this optimization level to -O2, which btw is the recommended
default optimization according to policy.

Since gmp's ABI transition is tied to gcc-4.0 and we're trying to get
both packages moved into testing ASAP after glibc 2.3.5 transitions,
mlgmp will be removed from testing temporarily pending resolution of
this bug.

Thanks,
--=20
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/

--YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDFskkKN6ufymYLloRAm4kAJ9NLRiU2+1Kv02cI7ASZByfift23ACfXhI4
+Oz4rgMfSpevasoSPJLgW3o=
=eh4F
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4--

---
Received: (at 326018-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 16:52:47 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 09:52:47 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mx3out.umbc.edu [130.85.25.12] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBxjb-0004Ip-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 09:52:47 -0700
Received: from [192.168.0.2] (pcp0010373886pcs.howard01.md.comcast.net 
[68.48.97.27])
by mx3out.umbc.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10/UMBC-Central 1.1.2.1  mxout  
1.2.2.3) with ESMTP id j84Gqi5g024267
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO)
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 12:52:44 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 12:52:43 -0400
From: Mike Furr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: 

Processed: Fixed in NMU of bonobo 1.0.22-2.4

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tag 308013 + fixed
Bug#308013: build against broken orbit
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed

 quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in NMU of uucpsend 1.1-2.1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tag 297738 + fixed
Bug#297738: uucpsend: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed

 quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#323903: marked as done (FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on postgresql-dev)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 09:50:25 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#323903: fixed in postgresql-plruby 0.4.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Aug 2005 07:10:39 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 19 00:10:39 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E611T-00015e-00; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 00:10:39 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain 
(pool-71-104-166-233.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.166.233])
(authenticated bits=0)
by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j7J7AbaE018549
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 00:10:38 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E5o6g-yn-OK
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 10:23:11 -0700
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 10:23:10 -0700
From: Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on postgresql-dev
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1034/Thu Aug 18 13:07:58 2005 on zoot.lafn.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: postgresql-plruby
Version: 0.4.3-1
Severity: serious

postgresql-plruby fails to build because the available
postgresql-dev's version is not less than 7.5:

  - Considering  postgresql-dev ( 7.5)
   Tried versions: 7.5.8
- Does not satisfy version, not trying
 E: Could not satisfy build-dependency.

--=20
Matt

--tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDBMP9fNdgYxVXvBARAl32AJwK+unCA10yprsLazntE3iu2VMeAACfXsDn
z4fi886QDIkVP1qvOadCYzs=
=3CoA
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT--

---
Received: (at 323903-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 16:53:46 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 09:53:46 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBxhJ-0003Tc-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 09:50:25 -0700
From: Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#323903: fixed in postgresql-plruby 0.4.3-2
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 09:50:25 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: postgresql-plruby
Source-Version: 0.4.3-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
postgresql-plruby, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

postgresql-7.4-plruby_0.4.3-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/postgresql-plruby/postgresql-7.4-plruby_0.4.3-2_i386.deb
postgresql-plruby_0.4.3-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/postgresql-plruby/postgresql-plruby_0.4.3-2.diff.gz
postgresql-plruby_0.4.3-2.dsc
  to pool/main/p/postgresql-plruby/postgresql-plruby_0.4.3-2.dsc
postgresql-plruby_0.4.3-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/postgresql-plruby/postgresql-plruby_0.4.3-2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Peter 

Bug#326611: amarok: Doesn't build from source

[Christian Marillat]

Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 * Christian Marillat [Sun, 04 Sep 2005 18:12:42 +0200]:

[...]

 Of course upstream is stupid to make a depends on taglib 1.4 ?

   Is this an irony? Anyway; if the required taglib is not in Debian, I
   can't obviously use it. Unless it is determined that the old one is
   producing buggy behavior...

Then package it. You should not downgrade a package dependency because
the package doesn't exist in Debian. If upstream think that 1.4 is
needed, so 1.4 is needed.

[...]

   Because I'm trying with taglib 1.4, and problem persists here.

May be the problem is here, because i've also moved to the real sql.

Christian

Bug#325147: rhythmbox: Crash on startup

[eLShaman]

Hello,

This bug can be closed. Since the upgrade to GTK 2.8.3, the bug has
gone.


Thanks.

-- 
eLShaman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#297973: marked as done (sigcperl: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): explicit qualification in declaration of `std::string SigCPerl::get_string(SV*)')

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 09:53:53 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#297973: fixed in sigcperl 0.2.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Mar 2005 19:16:06 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 03 11:16:06 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from c223012.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.223.12] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D6vnq-cW-00; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 11:16:06 -0800
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1D6wkA-00061Y-6U; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 21:16:22 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: sigcperl: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): explicit qualification in declaration 
of `std::string SigCPerl::get_string(SV*)'
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 21:16:22 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: sigcperl
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

When building 'sigcperl' on amd64 with gcc-4.0,
I get the following error:

x86_64-linux-g++ -DPACKAGE_NAME=\\ -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\\ 
-DPACKAGE_VERSION=\\ -DPACKAGE_STRING=\\ -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\\ 
-DPACKAGE=\sigcperl\ -DVERSION=\0.2.0\ -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 
-DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=1 -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=1 
-DHAVE_MEMORY_H=1 -DHAVE_STRINGS_H=1 -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 
-DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -DHAVE_DLFCN_H=1 -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -I. -I. -I.. -g -O2 -Wall 
-D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -DTHREADS_HAVE_PIDS -DDEBIAN -fno-strict-aliasing 
-I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 
-I/usr/lib/perl/5.8/CORE -I/usr/lib/sigc++-1.2/include 
-I/usr/include/sigc++-1.2 -c signal.cpp  -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/signal.lo
../sigcperl/convert.h:71: error: explicit qualification in declaration of 
`std::string SigCPerl::get_string(SV*)'
make[2]: *** [signal.lo] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/sigcperl-0.2.0/sigcperl'

With the attached patch 'sigcperl' can be compiled
on amd64 using gcc-4.0.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/sigcperl-0.2.0/sigcperl/convert.h ./sigcperl/convert.h
--- ../tmp-orig/sigcperl-0.2.0/sigcperl/convert.h   2002-08-15 
19:29:31.0 +0200
+++ ./sigcperl/convert.h2005-03-03 20:59:05.320344788 +0100
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
 template inline ArgBoxdouble::ArgBox(SV *val) throw()
   : m_val(SvNV(val)) {}
 
-inline std::string SigCPerl::get_string(SV *val) throw()
+inline std::string get_string(SV *val) throw()
 {
   STRLEN len;
   const char *str = SvPV(val, len);

---
Received: (at 297973-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 17:09:42 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 10:09:42 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBxkf-0004Xr-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 09:53:53 -0700
From: Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#297973: fixed in sigcperl 0.2.0-3
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 09:53:53 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: sigcperl
Source-Version: 0.2.0-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
sigcperl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libsigcperl-dev_0.2.0-3_sparc.deb
  to pool/main/s/sigcperl/libsigcperl-dev_0.2.0-3_sparc.deb
libsigcperl1c2_0.2.0-3_sparc.deb
  to pool/main/s/sigcperl/libsigcperl1c2_0.2.0-3_sparc.deb
sigcperl_0.2.0-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/sigcperl/sigcperl_0.2.0-3.diff.gz
sigcperl_0.2.0-3.dsc
  to pool/main/s/sigcperl/sigcperl_0.2.0-3.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer 

Processed: Fixed in NMU of flite 1.2-release-2.1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tag 324558 + fixed
Bug#324558: flite: FTBFS with current texi2html: Cannot find docs
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed

 quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#322591: NMU

[Frank Lichtenheld]

I uploaded mostly Martin's patch with only some changelog adjustments:
(Sorry to Sven for ignoring his patch, but it was easier to edit
Martin's changelog entry to match what I wanted to have than his)

diff -u awstats-6.4/debian/changelog awstats-6.4/debian/changelog
--- awstats-6.4/debian/changelog
+++ awstats-6.4/debian/changelog2005-09-04 19:17:32.971756616 +0200
@@ -1,6 +1,9 @@
-awstats (6.4-1ubuntu1) breezy; urgency=low
+awstats (6.4-1.1) unstable; urgency=high
 
-  * SECURITY UPDATE: Fix arbitrary command injection.
+  * Non-maintainer upload
+  * SECURITY UPDATE: Fix arbitrary command injection. (Closes: #322591)
+Thanks to Martin Pitt for reporting the issue and providing the
+patch.
   * Add debian/patches/03_remove_eval.patch:
 - Replace all eval() calls for dynamically constructed function names with
   soft references. This fixes arbitrary command injection with specially
@@ -10,7 +13,7 @@
 CAN-2005-1527
 http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=290type=vulnerabilities
 
- -- Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Thu, 11 Aug 2005 18:23:09 +0200
+ -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Sun,  4 Sep 2005 19:17:31 +0200
 
 awstats (6.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#326641: wipl: FTBFS: 'parent' was not declared in this scope

[Andreas Jochens]

Package: wipl
Version: 20020601-10
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

When building 'wipl' on unstable, I get the following error:

In file included from /usr/include/arpa/inet.h:23,
 from common.h:5,
 from wiplcSimple.cc:7:
/usr/include/netinet/in.h:50:1: warning: this is the location of the previous 
definition
wiplcSimple.cc:39: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of 'ServerMemClient' with 
no type

With the attached patch 'wipl' can be compiled using gcc-4.0.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/wipl-20020601/src/wiplcSimple.cc ./src/wiplcSimple.cc
--- ../tmp-orig/wipl-20020601/src/wiplcSimple.cc2001-09-07 
06:18:00.0 +
+++ ./src/wiplcSimple.cc2005-09-04 17:30:23.0 +
@@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
 #include common.h
 #include shmem.h
 
+class ServerMemClient;
+
 
//--
 // Overview of this module:
 //


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: lowering severity

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 severity 247846 minor
Bug#247846: gnome-chess: Crashes after a few moves (assertion failed)
Severity set to `minor'.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in NMU of awstats 6.4-1.1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tag 322591 + fixed
Bug#322591: awstats: [CAN-2005-1527] arbitrary command injection
Tags were: patch security
Tags added: fixed

 quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#322591: NMU

[Jonas Smedegaard]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 19:28:04 +0200
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I uploaded mostly Martin's patch with only some changelog adjustments:
 (Sorry to Sven for ignoring his patch, but it was easier to edit
 Martin's changelog entry to match what I wanted to have than his)

Thanks alot!

Sorry that I haven't found time to look at it myself yet :-(


 - Jonas

- -- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDGzIIn7DbMsAkQLgRAsuTAJ9hG6L0rG1pw2EqRZrCYCX22v96DgCeLtbc
KZAx8EVISGQ5SYk5HbEBqCc=
=1JVs
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Bug#322524: marked as done (wmfire: could'nt not install wmfire with libgtop2-5)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 10:47:09 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#322524: fixed in wmfire 1.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Aug 2005 07:04:53 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 11 00:04:53 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E377V-0004GM-00; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 00:04:53 -0700
Received: from paflechien.univ-lille2.fr (localhost.localdomain) [193.51.138.6] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1E377U-0002E2-00; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 02:04:52 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: jerome Brongniart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: wmfire: could'nt not install wmfire with libgtop2-5
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 08:54:42 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: wmfire
Version: 1.2.1-4
Severity: normal
Tags: experimental

wmfire depend on libgtop2-2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages wmfire depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.5-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libglib2.0-0  2.6.6-1The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2.0-0   2.6.9-1The GTK+ graphical user interface 
pn  libgtop2-2none (no description available)
ii  libpango1.0-0 1.8.2-1Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libx11-6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-4 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-4 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-4 X Window System client libraries m

wmfire recommends no packages.

---
Received: (at 322524-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 17:49:12 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 10:49:12 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EByaD-00071a-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 10:47:09 -0700
From: Loic Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#322524: fixed in wmfire 1.2.1-5
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 10:47:09 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: wmfire
Source-Version: 1.2.1-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
wmfire, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

wmfire_1.2.1-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/w/wmfire/wmfire_1.2.1-5.diff.gz
wmfire_1.2.1-5.dsc
  to pool/main/w/wmfire/wmfire_1.2.1-5.dsc
wmfire_1.2.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/w/wmfire/wmfire_1.2.1-5_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Loic Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated wmfire package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun,  4 Sep 2005 10:06:12 +0200
Source: wmfire
Binary: wmfire
Architecture: source i386
Version: