Re: How to get new Debian gpg keys?
Nate Bargmann wrote: > * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006 Jan 03 23:29 -0600]: >> Edward C. Jones wrote: >> > I am getting the following message from synaptic: >> > >> > W: GPG error: http://ftp.us.debian.org unstable Release: The following >> > signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not >> > available: NO_PUBKEY 010908312D230C5F >> > >> > From what I have read, this is going to happen every January. What do I >> > do? Where in the Debian documentation is the procedure I need to use >> > documented? >> >> wget http://ftp-master.debian.org/ziyi_key_2006.asc -O - | sudo apt-key >> add - > > Okay, I ran that and here is my output: > > # wget http://ftp-master.debian.org/ziyi_key_2006.asc -O - | apt-key add - > --16:34:23-- http://ftp-master.debian.org/ziyi_key_2006.asc >=> `-' > Resolving ftp-master.debian.org... 140.211.166.43 > Connecting to ftp-master.debian.org|140.211.166.43|:80... connected. > HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK > Length: 2,017 (2.0K) [text/plain] > > 100%[==>] > 2,017 --.--K/s > > 16:34:24 (66.33 MB/s) - `-' saved [2017/2017] > > gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found > OK > > > Aptitude doesn't complain any more so I guess the last line output by > gpg can safely be ignored. Shrug. > > - Nate >> I had the same happen. I copied the command line literally, sudo and all, but I was root. I repeated the command w/o "sudo" and it all went fine. Now, I don't know if removing the "sudo" fixed it, or repeating the command did. Seeing that you haven't used sudo, it's probably a matter of the key not being trusted in the first download. If you execute the command again, since the key is already tagged "trusted", it downloads and "adds" it w/o warning. Iñaki -- I h8 foreignas cuz they're grammer sux. Iñaki Silanes Chemistry Faculty UPV-EHU Donostia http://www.sc.ehu.es/powgep99/dcytp/teoricos/staff/inaki/inaki.htm On Intelligent Design: http://www.venganza.org/ About MS Windows: http://www.vanwensveen.nl/rants/microsoft/IhateMS.html Europe against DMCA-like laws: http://makeashorterlink.com/?Y28633E4C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: HELP
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all ,
>
> I'm very sorry for disturbing you
Why should you be sorry? The aim of this list is to share knowledge and help
each other.
> but I had a serious problem when I tried
> to installing qt3-3.0.4-3.1mdk.src.rpm.
You are running Mandrake? You should know that this list is devoted to
Debian (and probably there are other lists that could help you better).
However, I'll do my best...
> I digited "rpm -i qt3-3.0.4-3.1mdk.src.rpm"
Is this a source package ("src.rpm")? Are you sure you need it? Isn't there
a binary package?
> and then it compaired :
>
> warning: user juanma does not exist - using root
> warning: group juanma does not exist - using root
[snip]
Looks like juanma/juanma is the username/groupname under which the RPM was
created. Are you running "rpm -i" as root? The package manager (rpm),
should take care of changing ownerships of files extracted from a
package...
> Please help me .
> Thank you for you patience.
You are most welcome. Anyway, some suggestions:
Try to make the subject of the post more appealing, and informative for the
readers, than just "HELP". E.g., "Strange warning when installing .src.rpm
file" could be better.
If the problem regards some other Linux distro, post to the corresponding
list. I don't mean to be harsh, it's just better for you, because they'll
know how to help you better.
If some message, like "warning: user juanma [...]", is repeated many times,
you can just write down the two lines that are original ([...]user juanma
[...]" and "[...] group juanma [...]", and then say that they are repeated.
It makes for shorter posts, easier to read, no need to scroll down because
the post is long, and the reader doesn't need to read all the lines
thinking to him/herself ", they look identical to me" :^)
HTH.
--
Iñaki Silanes
Chemistry Faculty UPV-EHU Donostia
http://www.sc.ehu.es/powgep99/dcytp/teoricos/staff/inaki/inaki.htm
On Intelligent Design: http://www.venganza.org/
About MS Windows: http://www.vanwensveen.nl/rants/microsoft/IhateMS.html
Europe against DMCA-like laws: http://makeashorterlink.com/?Y28633E4C
Re: sort amarok playlists on multiple fields?
Matt Price wrote: > anyone know a way to sort amarok playlists on multiple fields? so, > for instance, can one sort > First by Artist >Then by Album >Then by track number > > so that the playlist goes through your collection album by album? I am using amaroK 1.3, and I think that if you sort by "Artist", it does just the above. I /think/ amaroK sorts by the column you choose, and then consecutively by the following columns (which turn out to be "Album" and "Track"). However, there are some caveats... If you have albums with songs by different artists, these songs won't appear together in the list. If you switch to sort by "Album" (to have multi-author album songs correctly grouped), then (and since the "Artist" column /precedes/ the "Album" one), two consecutive albums will not necessarily (read "almost never") belong to the same artist. However, inside each album block, the songs _will_ be ordered by track number. -- Iñaki Silanes / Chemistry Faculty UPV-EHU Donostia http://www.sc.ehu.es/powgep99/dcytp/teoricos/staff/inaki/inaki.htm On Intelligent Design: http://www.venganza.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: dist-upgrade: why "remove"?
Roby wrote: [snip] > gparted was still on the "will be REMOVED" list and really was removed. > > As an experiment, I entered "apt-get install gparted" ... expecting apt to > complain and abort. Instead, it installed gparted and two libraries. [snip] Maybe gparted had been installed as a requirement by another package, not by itself, then this package was somehow removed, and gparted was no more "needed". I expect (and see) this trait in "aptitude", but not in "apt-get", though. BTW, using "aptitude", instead of "apt-get" seems to be the new recommended way. -- Iñaki Silanes / Chemistry Faculty UPV-EHU Donostia http://www.sc.ehu.es/powgep99/dcytp/teoricos/staff/inaki/inaki.htm On Intelligent Design: http://www.venganza.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: umsdos under 2.6
Martin Lefebvre wrote: > On 12/9/05, Iñaki Silanes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I have a USB pendrive formatted as umsdos (I think), and I just can't >> mount it with my Debian Etch 2.6 kernel machine. >> > > Try vfat... works with my 2 usbdrives Thanks, Martin. I mention in my post that I have tried "-t msdos" and it doesn't work. "-t vfat" gives the very same error: Bart:~# mount /dev/autousb /mnt/usb/ -t msdos mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/autousb, missing codepage or other error In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try dmesg | tail or so which gives: Bart:~# dmesg | tail -2 FAT: invalid media value (0xb9) VFS: Can't find a valid FAT filesystem on dev sdf1. Any suggestion? -- Iñaki Silanes / Chemistry Faculty UPV-EHU Donostia http://www.sc.ehu.es/powgep99/dcytp/teoricos/staff/inaki/inaki.htm On Intelligent Design: http://www.venganza.org/
umsdos under 2.6
Hi all, I have a USB pendrive formatted as umsdos (I think), and I just can't mount it with my Debian Etch 2.6 kernel machine. The pendrive mounts flawlessly under a Slakware 2.4 kernel machine, with a fstab entry of: /dev/sda1 /mnt/flash autonoauto,user 0 0 So, "auto" for fs. Im the Slackware machine the dmesg entry reads: WARNING: USB Mass Storage data integrity not assured USB Mass Storage device found at 9 SCSI device sda: 501760 512-byte hdwr sectors (257 MB) sda: Write Protect is off sda: sda1 UMSDOS 0.86k (compatibility level 0.4, fast msdos) usb.c: USB disconnect on device 00:1d.7-7 address 9 So, it says something about UMSDOS fs, right? But in my machine I get the following (I have an udev rule that creates the "autousb" dev for this pendrive): Bart:~# mount /dev/autousb /mnt/usb/ -t umsdos mount: unknown filesystem type 'umsdos' and: Bart:~# mount /dev/autousb /mnt/usb/ -t msdos mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/autousb, missing codepage or other error In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try dmesg | tail or so which gives: Bart:~# dmesg | tail -2 FAT: invalid media value (0xb9) VFS: Can't find a valid FAT filesystem on dev sdf1. (sdf is synonym for autousb in this case). Also fdisk says the following: Bart:/boot# fdisk /dev/autousb The number of cylinders for this disk is set to 7943412. There is nothing wrong with that, but this is larger than 1024, and could in certain setups cause problems with: 1) software that runs at boot time (e.g., old versions of LILO) 2) booting and partitioning software from other OSs (e.g., DOS FDISK, OS/2 FDISK) Command (m for help): p Disk /dev/autousb: 2082.3 GB, 2082317979648 bytes 16 heads, 32 sectors/track, 7943412 cylinders Units = cylinders of 512 * 512 = 262144 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/autousb1 * 1 980 250864e W95 FAT16 (LBA) Aside from the "2082.3 GB" thing (cfdisk says it's free space, which it isn't, because there isn't such space, of course), it means that "-t vfat" or "-t msdos" should work... right? Is there any issue with umsdos and the 2.6 kernel (it's deprecated or something)? Because searching for umsdos in the packages gives the following: Bart:/boot# wajig whichpkg umsdos File Path Package ===-= /lib/modules/2.4.27-2-686-smp/kernel/fs/umsdos/umsdos.o kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686-smp /lib/modules/2.4.27-2-686-smp/kernel/fs/umsdos kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686-smp [...] Some more lines with 2.4 stuff have been omitted, but no line with 2.6 stuff appeared. I have also found that there is an "umsdos" package for stable and oldstable, but not for Etch... has it been deprecated/superseded? If so, by what? I have also tried to find the kernel .config settings for umsdos, an got the following: Bart:~# grep -i umsdos /boot/* /boot/config-2.4.27-2-686-smp:CONFIG_UMSDOS_FS=m So there's some umsdos module (configured as manually loadable in this case) for my 2.4.27-2-686-smp kernel, but not for my 2.6 kernel. I also found out about it by: Bart:~# modprobe umsdos FATAL: Module umsdos not found. So, please, anyone knows how to mount the damned thing in my computer? -- Iñaki Silanes / Chemistry Faculty UPV-EHU Donostia http://www.sc.ehu.es/powgep99/dcytp/teoricos/staff/inaki/inaki.htm On Intelligent Design: http://www.venganza.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tar over ssh (SOLVED!!!!)
Kaixo Colin Watson!!! > tar cvz directories_to_tar | ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'cat > file_in_server1.tgz' This is the solution Thanks to everybody who answer! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tar over ssh
HI!!! i have 2 servers, server1 and server2, and i want to make a "tar" of some directories in server2, but storing the tar_file in server1, as in server2 there is NOT space left. NOTE: i do NOT want to use NFS. If i do the following: server1$ ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] tar cvz directories_to_tar > file_in_server1.tgz it is OK, i make the tar file remotely, BUT i need to do it in reverse order. Then what i need it is something like this: server2$ tar cvz directories_to_tar | ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] > file_in_server1.tgz but THIS NOT WORK :-( Any idea, helkp, tip Thanks in advance! Please, CC: my address. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lynx problem with /etc/hosts file!!!!!
Hi!! Well, when i put a domain name with a diferent dns IP in the /etc/hosts file, then Mozilla uses the IP in the /etc/hosts file like i want to, but when i use lynx, ALWAYS uses the DNS IP instead of the IP in the /etc/hosts file. WHY?? Is there a solution? Is this a bug Thanks in advance. NOTE: links also uses DNS IP instead of the IP in the /etc/hosts file. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: problem with \n and variables in bash script
Hi!!! Thank you both... Colin, Quote correctly. Also, you can probably drop the -e. echo "$SALIDA" really i feel no words.. :-( > > So my question is how to get \n processed with variables. > > You need to set the IFS variable. Read 'man bash'. Just put > > IFS=' \t' > > at the front of your script. (no need for the -e switch to echo then) Well, this solves the "\n" problem but if the out has TABs they are cut and the out is diferent, i do not understand very well what do that variable (IFS) Any way, i drop -e and put quotes... Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
problem with \n and variables in bash script
HI I have this bash script: #!/bin/bash SALIDA=$(diff file1 file2) if [ $? == 1 ] then echo -e $SALIDA | mail -s variable my_email diff file1 file2 | mail -s directly my_email fi Well, when i get the emails, the one with subject "variable" it is in ONE line but the one with subject "directly" is display correctly. So my question is how to get \n processed with variables. Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Strange behavior of HOME and END keys in a bash terminal in Xwindow (Potato)
Hi!! I recently upgraded my potato (apt-get upgrade) and all is OK but HOME and END keys in a bash terminal in Xwindow DO NOT work only beep. In any other program (Abiword, gnumeric, Netscape, etc) the keys work fine. What is the problem? Bash i do not think so... in console is OK. Keyboard in Xwindow i do not think so in other programs is OK Any solution Thanks
Install Debian on Amiga 1200... HELP!!!
Kaixo!!! I need to intall Debian 1.3.x on Amiga 1200, so i need info.. I have Debian installed on Pentium (i386 platform), but i have no idea about amiga. I have an Amiga 1200 with an IDE 240 HD, PCMCIA SCSI, IDE Cd-ROM... Can anybody help me Thanks. -- Agur.. The Basque Madness / / (_)__ __ __ I.M.D. Computing / /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] //_/_//_// /_/\_\ http://www.geocities.com/sunssetstrip/alley/8071 -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
