Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
Hi Paul, I'll build the DEB files, no problem! The RPMs is something I have no infra for. Could you upload them? Wido On 11/22/18 9:16 AM, Paul Angus wrote: > Hi Wido, > > We're in a position to upload the 4.11.2.0 binaries to > download.cloudstack.org could you build the RPMs and DEBs please? > If it helps we can build the RPMs and put them up for you to sign. > > > Kind regards, > > Paul Angus > > paul.an...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK > @shapeblue > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Rohit Yadav > Sent: 21 November 2018 16:26 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 > > Hi Andrija, > > In 4.11.2 VR we've restricted the maximum size of systemd/journald files so > you should not see any significant memory increase than say 25-50MBs. In my > local testing with kvm, xenserver and vmware, I was never able to reproduce > the memory issue on VRs. > > Regards, > Rohit Yadav > > ____ > From: Andrija Panic > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 6:24:30 PM > To: dev > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 > > FYI, I also t tested this on KVM (ssh into VR many times with while true..do > ...as Rene suggested) and also observed small increase in memory, after > 10min of script running, it went up by 10-20MB...but not sure how significant > this is... > > Andrija > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018, 13:27 Zehnder, Samuel >> Hi Rohit >> >> I think I've found something regarding memory issues with vmware: >> Schema-update only updates default system-vm, but not newly registered >> ones: >> >> >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/engine/schema/src/mai >> n/resources/META-INF/db/schema-41000to41100.sql >> : >> 448: -- Use 'Other Linux 64-bit' as guest os for the default >> systemvmtemplate for VMware >> 449: -- This fixes a memory allocation issue to systemvms on >> VMware/ESXi >> 450: UPDATE `cloud`.`vm_template` SET guest_os_id=99 WHERE id=8; >> >> When I registered the new templates I selected Debian something as OS >> type. I now changed this to "Other Linux (64bit)", which is what above >> update is doing, and I can see significantly less memory used by VRs. >> I do not understand the reasons behind this behavior, I tried also >> other settings (Debian 9 64-bit, Other 3.x Linux), neither seem to >> handle memory well... >> >> As for the VPN part, you suggested >>> you can build a custom systemvm.iso file with those settings. >> Is it possible to simply replace the systemvm.iso file on mgmt-server, >> remove it from secondary and restart mgmt-server? Maybe you can point >> me here in the right direction. >> >> Thanks, >> Sam >> >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Rohit Yadav >>> Sent: Dienstag, 20. November 2018 12:55 >>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 >>> >>> Hi Samuel, >>> >>> >>> Thanks for your email. I've opened this ticket for your first issue: >>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3039 >>> >>> Please follow René's advice to (a) try increase the VR memory and >>> see if >> it >>> helps, (b) have a script for reducing memory over time. We'll also >>> work >> with >>> the systemd project to see if they can fix and backport this for >>> Debian >> 9.6+. >>> >>> >>> For your second issue, in 4.9 which used a Debian7 based VR and >>> openswan for VPN, we've moved to strongswan. If your external Cisco >>> endpoint/integration can work with strongswan, please create a VPC >>> VR and manipulate the strongswan configs in that VR and share your >>> results or >> send >>> a PR, the changes need to be in one of the python files such as >> configure.py. >>> The #2 issue is very specific to your environment and is not a >>> general >> error, if >>> you're able to optimize the configuration for a VR, you can build a >> custom >>> systemvm.iso file with those settings. In addition, you can send a >>> PR or submit a Github issue with details, logs, configurations etc: >>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues >>> >>> >>> I think both the issues are not general blockers and should not void >> 4.11.2.0 >>> voting. >>> >
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
Hi Paul, yes, SSL offloading in VR is not implemented in 4.11.2.0. it is only applicable for netscaler. The button should be hidden it if there is no netscaler in use, same as "health-check" and "autoScale" see line 3421-3451 in ui/scripts/network.js -Wei Paul Angus 于2018年11月22日周四 下午1:51写道: > Thanks Wei, > I'll create a 4.11.2.1 milestone with a very limited scope. > As well as this there seems to be an SSL cert column that has been put in > by Accelerite that only pertains to NetScalers but appears for all > networks, which is very confusing (well it confused me anyway). > > > > Kind regards, > > Paul Angus > > paul.an...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK > @shapeblue > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Wei ZHOU > Sent: 22 November 2018 11:56 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 > > Hi Rohit, > > Thanks for your reply. > > I do not object to show these value to users. However, user should not be > able to change/remove the settings, at least we can enable/disable it by > some settings. > > If we can fix it in next minor release, this is not a blocker for me. > > -Wei > > > > > Rohit Yadav 于2018年11月22日周四 下午12:19写道: > > > Hi Wei, > > > > > > I think the details were available via the list API in past releases > > (certainly 4.11.0, 4.11.1), and update API also existed therefore I > > think it is not a blocker but could be major security issue. As a > > workaround, admins may set the display field of keys in > > user_vm_details details to 0, or hide the tab in UI and even disable > > access to the update API (I get that it may not be ideal). > > > > > > Let's plan to fix this and other bugs that we'll discover from > > 4.11.2.0 towards 4.11.3.0 and we can work on 4.11.3.0's release effort > > in next 1-2 months? > > > > > > - Rohit > > > > <https://cloudstack.apache.org> > > > > > > > > > > From: Wei ZHOU > > Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2018 4:32:07 PM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 > > > > found one blocker issue > > > > users can see the setting tab of vms, and change the value of > > settings.. > > for example, memoryOvercommitRatio, cpuOvercommitRatio, SSH.PublicKey > > > > -Wei > > > > Wei ZHOU 于2018年11月22日周四 上午11:46写道: > > > > > +0 > > > > > > tested with 4.11.2.0-rc6 > > > > > > the following operations are ok on Ubuntu 16.04 > > > > > > (0) build packages with the PR Rohit created > > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3038. (also works on > > > Ubuntu > > > 18.04) > > > (1) installation > > > (2) created advanced zone with security groups by Marvin 4.11.2.0 > > > (3) system vms are Up. > > > (4) upload ssl certificate, vm console works > > > (5) install template > > > (6) create vm > > > (7) create vm with rootdisksize and datadisk > > > (8) add domain/user, move vm to new user > > > (9) change ip/mac, add new ip in vm, new ip/mac do not work. that's > > > fine > > > > > > Found some issues below > > > (1) upgrade from 4.7.1 to 4.11.2.0, need to copy > > > /etc/default/cloudstack-management.dpkg-dist to > > > /etc/default/cloudstack-management. otherwise mgt server will not be > > > up > > > (2) create L2 network will get error "Unable to execute API command > > > listnetworkofferings due to invalid value.". zoneid is not passed to > > > UI > > > (3) reset sshkey will reset password. new password not in response, > > > and not shown on UI. cannot find new password anywhere > > > (4) add network to vm, the second nic will not work. vm will be > > > stuck at start up after reboot. We should disable it if it is not > > > supported by cloudstack > > > > > > I will test advanced zone (without security groups) later. > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > Wei > > > > > > > > > > > > Paul Angus 于2018年11月22日周四 上午9:16写道: > > > > > >> Hi Wido, > > >> > > >> We're in a position to upload the 4.11.2.0 binaries to > > >> download.cloudstack.org could you build the RPMs and DEBs please? > > >> If it helps we
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
Thanks Wei, I'll create a 4.11.2.1 milestone with a very limited scope. As well as this there seems to be an SSL cert column that has been put in by Accelerite that only pertains to NetScalers but appears for all networks, which is very confusing (well it confused me anyway). Kind regards, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue -Original Message- From: Wei ZHOU Sent: 22 November 2018 11:56 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 Hi Rohit, Thanks for your reply. I do not object to show these value to users. However, user should not be able to change/remove the settings, at least we can enable/disable it by some settings. If we can fix it in next minor release, this is not a blocker for me. -Wei Rohit Yadav 于2018年11月22日周四 下午12:19写道: > Hi Wei, > > > I think the details were available via the list API in past releases > (certainly 4.11.0, 4.11.1), and update API also existed therefore I > think it is not a blocker but could be major security issue. As a > workaround, admins may set the display field of keys in > user_vm_details details to 0, or hide the tab in UI and even disable > access to the update API (I get that it may not be ideal). > > > Let's plan to fix this and other bugs that we'll discover from > 4.11.2.0 towards 4.11.3.0 and we can work on 4.11.3.0's release effort > in next 1-2 months? > > > - Rohit > > <https://cloudstack.apache.org> > > > > > From: Wei ZHOU > Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2018 4:32:07 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 > > found one blocker issue > > users can see the setting tab of vms, and change the value of > settings.. > for example, memoryOvercommitRatio, cpuOvercommitRatio, SSH.PublicKey > > -Wei > > Wei ZHOU 于2018年11月22日周四 上午11:46写道: > > > +0 > > > > tested with 4.11.2.0-rc6 > > > > the following operations are ok on Ubuntu 16.04 > > > > (0) build packages with the PR Rohit created > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3038. (also works on > > Ubuntu > > 18.04) > > (1) installation > > (2) created advanced zone with security groups by Marvin 4.11.2.0 > > (3) system vms are Up. > > (4) upload ssl certificate, vm console works > > (5) install template > > (6) create vm > > (7) create vm with rootdisksize and datadisk > > (8) add domain/user, move vm to new user > > (9) change ip/mac, add new ip in vm, new ip/mac do not work. that's > > fine > > > > Found some issues below > > (1) upgrade from 4.7.1 to 4.11.2.0, need to copy > > /etc/default/cloudstack-management.dpkg-dist to > > /etc/default/cloudstack-management. otherwise mgt server will not be > > up > > (2) create L2 network will get error "Unable to execute API command > > listnetworkofferings due to invalid value.". zoneid is not passed to > > UI > > (3) reset sshkey will reset password. new password not in response, > > and not shown on UI. cannot find new password anywhere > > (4) add network to vm, the second nic will not work. vm will be > > stuck at start up after reboot. We should disable it if it is not > > supported by cloudstack > > > > I will test advanced zone (without security groups) later. > > > > Kind regards, > > Wei > > > > > > > > Paul Angus 于2018年11月22日周四 上午9:16写道: > > > >> Hi Wido, > >> > >> We're in a position to upload the 4.11.2.0 binaries to > >> download.cloudstack.org could you build the RPMs and DEBs please? > >> If it helps we can build the RPMs and put them up for you to sign. > >> > >> > >> Kind regards, > >> > >> Paul Angus > >> > >> paul.an...@shapeblue.com > >> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > >> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Rohit Yadav > >> Sent: 21 November 2018 16:26 > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 > >> > >> Hi Andrija, > >> > >> In 4.11.2 VR we've restricted the maximum size of systemd/journald files > >> so you should not see any significant memory increase than say > 25-50MBs. In > >> my local testing with kvm, xenserver and vmware, I was never able to > >> reproduce the memory is
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
Hi Rohit, Thanks for your reply. I do not object to show these value to users. However, user should not be able to change/remove the settings, at least we can enable/disable it by some settings. If we can fix it in next minor release, this is not a blocker for me. -Wei Rohit Yadav 于2018年11月22日周四 下午12:19写道: > Hi Wei, > > > I think the details were available via the list API in past releases > (certainly 4.11.0, 4.11.1), and update API also existed therefore I think > it is not a blocker but could be major security issue. As a workaround, > admins may set the display field of keys in user_vm_details details to 0, > or hide the tab in UI and even disable access to the update API (I get that > it may not be ideal). > > > Let's plan to fix this and other bugs that we'll discover from 4.11.2.0 > towards 4.11.3.0 and we can work on 4.11.3.0's release effort in next 1-2 > months? > > > - Rohit > > <https://cloudstack.apache.org> > > > > > From: Wei ZHOU > Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2018 4:32:07 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 > > found one blocker issue > > users can see the setting tab of vms, and change the value of > settings.. > for example, memoryOvercommitRatio, cpuOvercommitRatio, SSH.PublicKey > > -Wei > > Wei ZHOU 于2018年11月22日周四 上午11:46写道: > > > +0 > > > > tested with 4.11.2.0-rc6 > > > > the following operations are ok on Ubuntu 16.04 > > > > (0) build packages with the PR Rohit created > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3038. (also works on Ubuntu > > 18.04) > > (1) installation > > (2) created advanced zone with security groups by Marvin 4.11.2.0 > > (3) system vms are Up. > > (4) upload ssl certificate, vm console works > > (5) install template > > (6) create vm > > (7) create vm with rootdisksize and datadisk > > (8) add domain/user, move vm to new user > > (9) change ip/mac, add new ip in vm, new ip/mac do not work. that's fine > > > > Found some issues below > > (1) upgrade from 4.7.1 to 4.11.2.0, need to > > copy /etc/default/cloudstack-management.dpkg-dist to > > /etc/default/cloudstack-management. otherwise mgt server will not be up > > (2) create L2 network will get error "Unable to execute API command > > listnetworkofferings due to invalid value.". zoneid is not passed to UI > > (3) reset sshkey will reset password. new password not in response, and > > not shown on UI. cannot find new password anywhere > > (4) add network to vm, the second nic will not work. vm will be stuck at > > start up after reboot. We should disable it if it is not supported by > > cloudstack > > > > I will test advanced zone (without security groups) later. > > > > Kind regards, > > Wei > > > > > > > > Paul Angus 于2018年11月22日周四 上午9:16写道: > > > >> Hi Wido, > >> > >> We're in a position to upload the 4.11.2.0 binaries to > >> download.cloudstack.org could you build the RPMs and DEBs please? > >> If it helps we can build the RPMs and put them up for you to sign. > >> > >> > >> Kind regards, > >> > >> Paul Angus > >> > >> paul.an...@shapeblue.com > >> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > >> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK > >> @shapeblue > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Rohit Yadav > >> Sent: 21 November 2018 16:26 > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 > >> > >> Hi Andrija, > >> > >> In 4.11.2 VR we've restricted the maximum size of systemd/journald files > >> so you should not see any significant memory increase than say > 25-50MBs. In > >> my local testing with kvm, xenserver and vmware, I was never able to > >> reproduce the memory issue on VRs. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Rohit Yadav > >> > >> > >> From: Andrija Panic > >> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 6:24:30 PM > >> To: dev > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 > >> > >> FYI, I also t tested this on KVM (ssh into VR many times with while > >> true..do ...as Rene suggested) and also observed small increase in > memory, > >> after 10min of script running, it went up by 10-20MB...but not sure how > >> significant th
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
Hi Wei, I think the details were available via the list API in past releases (certainly 4.11.0, 4.11.1), and update API also existed therefore I think it is not a blocker but could be major security issue. As a workaround, admins may set the display field of keys in user_vm_details details to 0, or hide the tab in UI and even disable access to the update API (I get that it may not be ideal). Let's plan to fix this and other bugs that we'll discover from 4.11.2.0 towards 4.11.3.0 and we can work on 4.11.3.0's release effort in next 1-2 months? - Rohit <https://cloudstack.apache.org> From: Wei ZHOU Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2018 4:32:07 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 found one blocker issue users can see the setting tab of vms, and change the value of settings.. for example, memoryOvercommitRatio, cpuOvercommitRatio, SSH.PublicKey -Wei Wei ZHOU 于2018年11月22日周四 上午11:46写道: > +0 > > tested with 4.11.2.0-rc6 > > the following operations are ok on Ubuntu 16.04 > > (0) build packages with the PR Rohit created > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3038. (also works on Ubuntu > 18.04) > (1) installation > (2) created advanced zone with security groups by Marvin 4.11.2.0 > (3) system vms are Up. > (4) upload ssl certificate, vm console works > (5) install template > (6) create vm > (7) create vm with rootdisksize and datadisk > (8) add domain/user, move vm to new user > (9) change ip/mac, add new ip in vm, new ip/mac do not work. that's fine > > Found some issues below > (1) upgrade from 4.7.1 to 4.11.2.0, need to > copy /etc/default/cloudstack-management.dpkg-dist to > /etc/default/cloudstack-management. otherwise mgt server will not be up > (2) create L2 network will get error "Unable to execute API command > listnetworkofferings due to invalid value.". zoneid is not passed to UI > (3) reset sshkey will reset password. new password not in response, and > not shown on UI. cannot find new password anywhere > (4) add network to vm, the second nic will not work. vm will be stuck at > start up after reboot. We should disable it if it is not supported by > cloudstack > > I will test advanced zone (without security groups) later. > > Kind regards, > Wei > > > > Paul Angus 于2018年11月22日周四 上午9:16写道: > >> Hi Wido, >> >> We're in a position to upload the 4.11.2.0 binaries to >> download.cloudstack.org could you build the RPMs and DEBs please? >> If it helps we can build the RPMs and put them up for you to sign. >> >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Paul Angus >> >> paul.an...@shapeblue.com >> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> >> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK >> @shapeblue >> >> >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Rohit Yadav >> Sent: 21 November 2018 16:26 >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 >> >> Hi Andrija, >> >> In 4.11.2 VR we've restricted the maximum size of systemd/journald files >> so you should not see any significant memory increase than say 25-50MBs. In >> my local testing with kvm, xenserver and vmware, I was never able to >> reproduce the memory issue on VRs. >> >> Regards, >> Rohit Yadav >> >> >> From: Andrija Panic >> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 6:24:30 PM >> To: dev >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 >> >> FYI, I also t tested this on KVM (ssh into VR many times with while >> true..do ...as Rene suggested) and also observed small increase in memory, >> after 10min of script running, it went up by 10-20MB...but not sure how >> significant this is... >> >> Andrija >> >> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018, 13:27 Zehnder, Samuel > >> > Hi Rohit >> > >> > I think I've found something regarding memory issues with vmware: >> > Schema-update only updates default system-vm, but not newly registered >> > ones: >> > >> > >> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/engine/schema/src/mai >> > n/resources/META-INF/db/schema-41000to41100.sql >> > : >> > 448: -- Use 'Other Linux 64-bit' as guest os for the default >> > systemvmtemplate for VMware >> > 449: -- This fixes a memory allocation issue to systemvms on >> > VMware/ESXi >> > 450: UPDATE `cloud`.`vm_template` SET guest_os_id=99 WHERE id=8; >> > >> > When I registered the new templates I selected Debian something as OS >>
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
found one blocker issue users can see the setting tab of vms, and change the value of settings.. for example, memoryOvercommitRatio, cpuOvercommitRatio, SSH.PublicKey -Wei Wei ZHOU 于2018年11月22日周四 上午11:46写道: > +0 > > tested with 4.11.2.0-rc6 > > the following operations are ok on Ubuntu 16.04 > > (0) build packages with the PR Rohit created > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3038. (also works on Ubuntu > 18.04) > (1) installation > (2) created advanced zone with security groups by Marvin 4.11.2.0 > (3) system vms are Up. > (4) upload ssl certificate, vm console works > (5) install template > (6) create vm > (7) create vm with rootdisksize and datadisk > (8) add domain/user, move vm to new user > (9) change ip/mac, add new ip in vm, new ip/mac do not work. that's fine > > Found some issues below > (1) upgrade from 4.7.1 to 4.11.2.0, need to > copy /etc/default/cloudstack-management.dpkg-dist to > /etc/default/cloudstack-management. otherwise mgt server will not be up > (2) create L2 network will get error "Unable to execute API command > listnetworkofferings due to invalid value.". zoneid is not passed to UI > (3) reset sshkey will reset password. new password not in response, and > not shown on UI. cannot find new password anywhere > (4) add network to vm, the second nic will not work. vm will be stuck at > start up after reboot. We should disable it if it is not supported by > cloudstack > > I will test advanced zone (without security groups) later. > > Kind regards, > Wei > > > > Paul Angus 于2018年11月22日周四 上午9:16写道: > >> Hi Wido, >> >> We're in a position to upload the 4.11.2.0 binaries to >> download.cloudstack.org could you build the RPMs and DEBs please? >> If it helps we can build the RPMs and put them up for you to sign. >> >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Paul Angus >> >> paul.an...@shapeblue.com >> www.shapeblue.com >> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK >> @shapeblue >> >> >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Rohit Yadav >> Sent: 21 November 2018 16:26 >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 >> >> Hi Andrija, >> >> In 4.11.2 VR we've restricted the maximum size of systemd/journald files >> so you should not see any significant memory increase than say 25-50MBs. In >> my local testing with kvm, xenserver and vmware, I was never able to >> reproduce the memory issue on VRs. >> >> Regards, >> Rohit Yadav >> >> >> From: Andrija Panic >> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 6:24:30 PM >> To: dev >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 >> >> FYI, I also t tested this on KVM (ssh into VR many times with while >> true..do ...as Rene suggested) and also observed small increase in memory, >> after 10min of script running, it went up by 10-20MB...but not sure how >> significant this is... >> >> Andrija >> >> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018, 13:27 Zehnder, Samuel > >> > Hi Rohit >> > >> > I think I've found something regarding memory issues with vmware: >> > Schema-update only updates default system-vm, but not newly registered >> > ones: >> > >> > >> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/engine/schema/src/mai >> > n/resources/META-INF/db/schema-41000to41100.sql >> > : >> > 448: -- Use 'Other Linux 64-bit' as guest os for the default >> > systemvmtemplate for VMware >> > 449: -- This fixes a memory allocation issue to systemvms on >> > VMware/ESXi >> > 450: UPDATE `cloud`.`vm_template` SET guest_os_id=99 WHERE id=8; >> > >> > When I registered the new templates I selected Debian something as OS >> > type. I now changed this to "Other Linux (64bit)", which is what above >> > update is doing, and I can see significantly less memory used by VRs. >> > I do not understand the reasons behind this behavior, I tried also >> > other settings (Debian 9 64-bit, Other 3.x Linux), neither seem to >> > handle memory well... >> > >> > As for the VPN part, you suggested >> > > you can build a custom systemvm.iso file with those settings. >> > Is it possible to simply replace the systemvm.iso file on mgmt-server, >> > remove it from secondary and restart mgmt-server? Maybe you can point >> > me here in the right direction. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Sam >> > >> > >> &g
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
+0 tested with 4.11.2.0-rc6 the following operations are ok on Ubuntu 16.04 (0) build packages with the PR Rohit created https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3038. (also works on Ubuntu 18.04) (1) installation (2) created advanced zone with security groups by Marvin 4.11.2.0 (3) system vms are Up. (4) upload ssl certificate, vm console works (5) install template (6) create vm (7) create vm with rootdisksize and datadisk (8) add domain/user, move vm to new user (9) change ip/mac, add new ip in vm, new ip/mac do not work. that's fine Found some issues below (1) upgrade from 4.7.1 to 4.11.2.0, need to copy /etc/default/cloudstack-management.dpkg-dist to /etc/default/cloudstack-management. otherwise mgt server will not be up (2) create L2 network will get error "Unable to execute API command listnetworkofferings due to invalid value.". zoneid is not passed to UI (3) reset sshkey will reset password. new password not in response, and not shown on UI. cannot find new password anywhere (4) add network to vm, the second nic will not work. vm will be stuck at start up after reboot. We should disable it if it is not supported by cloudstack I will test advanced zone (without security groups) later. Kind regards, Wei Paul Angus 于2018年11月22日周四 上午9:16写道: > Hi Wido, > > We're in a position to upload the 4.11.2.0 binaries to > download.cloudstack.org could you build the RPMs and DEBs please? > If it helps we can build the RPMs and put them up for you to sign. > > > Kind regards, > > Paul Angus > > paul.an...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK > @shapeblue > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Rohit Yadav > Sent: 21 November 2018 16:26 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 > > Hi Andrija, > > In 4.11.2 VR we've restricted the maximum size of systemd/journald files > so you should not see any significant memory increase than say 25-50MBs. In > my local testing with kvm, xenserver and vmware, I was never able to > reproduce the memory issue on VRs. > > Regards, > Rohit Yadav > > ________ > From: Andrija Panic > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 6:24:30 PM > To: dev > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 > > FYI, I also t tested this on KVM (ssh into VR many times with while > true..do ...as Rene suggested) and also observed small increase in memory, > after 10min of script running, it went up by 10-20MB...but not sure how > significant this is... > > Andrija > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018, 13:27 Zehnder, Samuel > > Hi Rohit > > > > I think I've found something regarding memory issues with vmware: > > Schema-update only updates default system-vm, but not newly registered > > ones: > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/engine/schema/src/mai > > n/resources/META-INF/db/schema-41000to41100.sql > > : > > 448: -- Use 'Other Linux 64-bit' as guest os for the default > > systemvmtemplate for VMware > > 449: -- This fixes a memory allocation issue to systemvms on > > VMware/ESXi > > 450: UPDATE `cloud`.`vm_template` SET guest_os_id=99 WHERE id=8; > > > > When I registered the new templates I selected Debian something as OS > > type. I now changed this to "Other Linux (64bit)", which is what above > > update is doing, and I can see significantly less memory used by VRs. > > I do not understand the reasons behind this behavior, I tried also > > other settings (Debian 9 64-bit, Other 3.x Linux), neither seem to > > handle memory well... > > > > As for the VPN part, you suggested > > > you can build a custom systemvm.iso file with those settings. > > Is it possible to simply replace the systemvm.iso file on mgmt-server, > > remove it from secondary and restart mgmt-server? Maybe you can point > > me here in the right direction. > > > > Thanks, > > Sam > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Rohit Yadav > > > Sent: Dienstag, 20. November 2018 12:55 > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 > > > > > > Hi Samuel, > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your email. I've opened this ticket for your first issue: > > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3039 > > > > > > Please follow René's advice to (a) try increase the VR memory and > > > see if > > it > > > helps, (b) have a script for reducing memory over time. We'll also > > > work > > with > > > the systemd project to see
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
Hi Wido, We're in a position to upload the 4.11.2.0 binaries to download.cloudstack.org could you build the RPMs and DEBs please? If it helps we can build the RPMs and put them up for you to sign. Kind regards, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav Sent: 21 November 2018 16:26 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 Hi Andrija, In 4.11.2 VR we've restricted the maximum size of systemd/journald files so you should not see any significant memory increase than say 25-50MBs. In my local testing with kvm, xenserver and vmware, I was never able to reproduce the memory issue on VRs. Regards, Rohit Yadav From: Andrija Panic Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 6:24:30 PM To: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 FYI, I also t tested this on KVM (ssh into VR many times with while true..do ...as Rene suggested) and also observed small increase in memory, after 10min of script running, it went up by 10-20MB...but not sure how significant this is... Andrija On Wed, Nov 21, 2018, 13:27 Zehnder, Samuel Hi Rohit > > I think I've found something regarding memory issues with vmware: > Schema-update only updates default system-vm, but not newly registered > ones: > > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/engine/schema/src/mai > n/resources/META-INF/db/schema-41000to41100.sql > : > 448: -- Use 'Other Linux 64-bit' as guest os for the default > systemvmtemplate for VMware > 449: -- This fixes a memory allocation issue to systemvms on > VMware/ESXi > 450: UPDATE `cloud`.`vm_template` SET guest_os_id=99 WHERE id=8; > > When I registered the new templates I selected Debian something as OS > type. I now changed this to "Other Linux (64bit)", which is what above > update is doing, and I can see significantly less memory used by VRs. > I do not understand the reasons behind this behavior, I tried also > other settings (Debian 9 64-bit, Other 3.x Linux), neither seem to > handle memory well... > > As for the VPN part, you suggested > > you can build a custom systemvm.iso file with those settings. > Is it possible to simply replace the systemvm.iso file on mgmt-server, > remove it from secondary and restart mgmt-server? Maybe you can point > me here in the right direction. > > Thanks, > Sam > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Rohit Yadav > > Sent: Dienstag, 20. November 2018 12:55 > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 > > > > Hi Samuel, > > > > > > Thanks for your email. I've opened this ticket for your first issue: > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3039 > > > > Please follow René's advice to (a) try increase the VR memory and > > see if > it > > helps, (b) have a script for reducing memory over time. We'll also > > work > with > > the systemd project to see if they can fix and backport this for > > Debian > 9.6+. > > > > > > For your second issue, in 4.9 which used a Debian7 based VR and > > openswan for VPN, we've moved to strongswan. If your external Cisco > > endpoint/integration can work with strongswan, please create a VPC > > VR and manipulate the strongswan configs in that VR and share your > > results or > send > > a PR, the changes need to be in one of the python files such as > configure.py. > > The #2 issue is very specific to your environment and is not a > > general > error, if > > you're able to optimize the configuration for a VR, you can build a > custom > > systemvm.iso file with those settings. In addition, you can send a > > PR or submit a Github issue with details, logs, configurations etc: > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues > > > > > > I think both the issues are not general blockers and should not void > 4.11.2.0 > > voting. > > > > > > - Rohit > > > > <https://cloudstack.apache.org> > > > > > > > > > > From: Zehnder, Samuel > > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 9:13:04 PM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 > > > > > > Hi Group > > > > First, sorry that I wasn't able to use the mailto-link for the > > reply. It > somehow > > did not work.. > > > > > > > > After Upgrading from 4.9 to 4.11 we are seeing two issues with > > vRouter > > systemVMs: > > &g
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
Hi Rohit, Yes exactly, I didn't see any significant rise, as said 10-20MB no more, and that is after at least 10min of this script running - so I don't find it significant. Cheers On Wed, Nov 21, 2018, 17:26 Rohit Yadav Hi Andrija, > > In 4.11.2 VR we've restricted the maximum size of systemd/journald files > so you should not see any significant memory increase than say 25-50MBs. In > my local testing with kvm, xenserver and vmware, I was never able to > reproduce the memory issue on VRs. > > Regards, > Rohit Yadav > > > From: Andrija Panic > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 6:24:30 PM > To: dev > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 > > FYI, I also t tested this on KVM (ssh into VR many times with while > true..do ...as Rene suggested) and also observed small increase in memory, > after 10min of script running, it went up by 10-20MB...but not sure how > significant this is... > > Andrija > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018, 13:27 Zehnder, Samuel > > Hi Rohit > > > > I think I've found something regarding memory issues with vmware: > > Schema-update only updates default system-vm, but not newly registered > > ones: > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/engine/schema/src/main/resources/META-INF/db/schema-41000to41100.sql > > : > > 448: -- Use 'Other Linux 64-bit' as guest os for the default > > systemvmtemplate for VMware > > 449: -- This fixes a memory allocation issue to systemvms on VMware/ESXi > > 450: UPDATE `cloud`.`vm_template` SET guest_os_id=99 WHERE id=8; > > > > When I registered the new templates I selected Debian something as OS > > type. I now changed this to "Other Linux (64bit)", which is what above > > update is doing, and I can see significantly less memory used by VRs. I > do > > not understand the reasons behind this behavior, I tried also other > > settings (Debian 9 64-bit, Other 3.x Linux), neither seem to handle > memory > > well... > > > > As for the VPN part, you suggested > > > you can build a custom systemvm.iso file with those settings. > > Is it possible to simply replace the systemvm.iso file on mgmt-server, > > remove it from secondary and restart mgmt-server? Maybe you can point me > > here in the right direction. > > > > Thanks, > > Sam > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Rohit Yadav > > > Sent: Dienstag, 20. November 2018 12:55 > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 > > > > > > Hi Samuel, > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your email. I've opened this ticket for your first issue: > > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3039 > > > > > > Please follow René's advice to (a) try increase the VR memory and see > if > > it > > > helps, (b) have a script for reducing memory over time. We'll also work > > with > > > the systemd project to see if they can fix and backport this for Debian > > 9.6+. > > > > > > > > > For your second issue, in 4.9 which used a Debian7 based VR and > openswan > > > for VPN, we've moved to strongswan. If your external Cisco > > > endpoint/integration can work with strongswan, please create a VPC VR > and > > > manipulate the strongswan configs in that VR and share your results or > > send > > > a PR, the changes need to be in one of the python files such as > > configure.py. > > > The #2 issue is very specific to your environment and is not a general > > error, if > > > you're able to optimize the configuration for a VR, you can build a > > custom > > > systemvm.iso file with those settings. In addition, you can send a PR > or > > > submit a Github issue with details, logs, configurations etc: > > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues > > > > > > > > > I think both the issues are not general blockers and should not void > > 4.11.2.0 > > > voting. > > > > > > > > > - Rohit > > > > > > <https://cloudstack.apache.org> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Zehnder, Samuel > > > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 9:13:04 PM > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 > > > > > > > > > Hi Group > > > > > > First, sorry that I wasn't able to use the mai
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
Samuel, We'll need to check if Debian8/9 guestos mappings even exist (last time I checked these oses were not available in drop down) as for older vmware versions these recent guest os are not supported/known. I'll help rectify this in the upgrade notes. Rene, thanks please test and keep us posted. Regards, Rohit Yadav From: Zehnder, Samuel Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 10:05:51 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 Rohit > The upgrade notes do mention that you need to use Other Linux (64bit) for > vmware systemvmtemplate while registering the template prior to upgrade > (pl see docs website). The reason for this is because newer vmware versions > have deprecated older guets os like debian7 The doc says to use Other Linux (64 bit) or Debian 8.0 or 9.0 64-bit. I will do some tests with strongswan and cisco and let you know about the findings. Regards, Samuel rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
We used "Debian GNU/Linux 8 (64-bit)" and in the release notes I see a "OS Type: Other Linux 64-bit (or Debian 8.0 or 9.0 64-bit)" for vmware [1]. However, let me change this to "Other Linux 64-bit" and verify if it makes any difference here. René [1] http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/4.11.1.0/upgrading/upgrade/upgrade-4.5.html#update-system-vm-templates
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
Rohit > The upgrade notes do mention that you need to use Other Linux (64bit) for > vmware systemvmtemplate while registering the template prior to upgrade > (pl see docs website). The reason for this is because newer vmware versions > have deprecated older guets os like debian7 The doc says to use Other Linux (64 bit) or Debian 8.0 or 9.0 64-bit. I will do some tests with strongswan and cisco and let you know about the findings. Regards, Samuel smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
Hi Andrija, In 4.11.2 VR we've restricted the maximum size of systemd/journald files so you should not see any significant memory increase than say 25-50MBs. In my local testing with kvm, xenserver and vmware, I was never able to reproduce the memory issue on VRs. Regards, Rohit Yadav From: Andrija Panic Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 6:24:30 PM To: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 FYI, I also t tested this on KVM (ssh into VR many times with while true..do ...as Rene suggested) and also observed small increase in memory, after 10min of script running, it went up by 10-20MB...but not sure how significant this is... Andrija On Wed, Nov 21, 2018, 13:27 Zehnder, Samuel Hi Rohit > > I think I've found something regarding memory issues with vmware: > Schema-update only updates default system-vm, but not newly registered > ones: > > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/engine/schema/src/main/resources/META-INF/db/schema-41000to41100.sql > : > 448: -- Use 'Other Linux 64-bit' as guest os for the default > systemvmtemplate for VMware > 449: -- This fixes a memory allocation issue to systemvms on VMware/ESXi > 450: UPDATE `cloud`.`vm_template` SET guest_os_id=99 WHERE id=8; > > When I registered the new templates I selected Debian something as OS > type. I now changed this to "Other Linux (64bit)", which is what above > update is doing, and I can see significantly less memory used by VRs. I do > not understand the reasons behind this behavior, I tried also other > settings (Debian 9 64-bit, Other 3.x Linux), neither seem to handle memory > well... > > As for the VPN part, you suggested > > you can build a custom systemvm.iso file with those settings. > Is it possible to simply replace the systemvm.iso file on mgmt-server, > remove it from secondary and restart mgmt-server? Maybe you can point me > here in the right direction. > > Thanks, > Sam > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Rohit Yadav > > Sent: Dienstag, 20. November 2018 12:55 > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 > > > > Hi Samuel, > > > > > > Thanks for your email. I've opened this ticket for your first issue: > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3039 > > > > Please follow René's advice to (a) try increase the VR memory and see if > it > > helps, (b) have a script for reducing memory over time. We'll also work > with > > the systemd project to see if they can fix and backport this for Debian > 9.6+. > > > > > > For your second issue, in 4.9 which used a Debian7 based VR and openswan > > for VPN, we've moved to strongswan. If your external Cisco > > endpoint/integration can work with strongswan, please create a VPC VR and > > manipulate the strongswan configs in that VR and share your results or > send > > a PR, the changes need to be in one of the python files such as > configure.py. > > The #2 issue is very specific to your environment and is not a general > error, if > > you're able to optimize the configuration for a VR, you can build a > custom > > systemvm.iso file with those settings. In addition, you can send a PR or > > submit a Github issue with details, logs, configurations etc: > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues > > > > > > I think both the issues are not general blockers and should not void > 4.11.2.0 > > voting. > > > > > > - Rohit > > > > <https://cloudstack.apache.org> > > > > > > > > > > From: Zehnder, Samuel > > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 9:13:04 PM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 > > > > > > Hi Group > > > > First, sorry that I wasn't able to use the mailto-link for the reply. It > somehow > > did not work.. > > > > > > > > After Upgrading from 4.9 to 4.11 we are seeing two issues with vRouter > > systemVMs: > > > > > > > > 1) Memory Consumption on vSphere > > > > vRouter are starting to swap with low memory available, this also starts > > happening after increasing memory size to 512m. Interestingly, there's no > > process nor cache using the memory as far as "top", "ps", or other tools > > report. > > > > > > > > 2) Site-2-Site VPN > > > > a) After a restart of the VPC (vRouter rebuild) VPN Tunnels are not > > configured on vRouter. This has to be triggered manually with a call to > > resetVpnCo
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
Hi Samuel, The upgrade notes do mention that you need to use Other Linux (64bit) for vmware systemvmtemplate while registering the template prior to upgrade (pl see docs website). The reason for this is because newer vmware versions have deprecated older guets os like debian7. Glad you're finding that provide remedy to your VR memory issue. For your VPN issue, can you first tune and share the strongswan config that works for you. I can then help you with the next steps on creating a bugfix for 4.11.30 and advise you how to create and apply a custom systemvm.iso file. Regards, Rohit Yadav From: Zehnder, Samuel Sent: Wednesday, 21 November, 5:57 PM Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Hi Rohit I think I've found something regarding memory issues with vmware: Schema-update only updates default system-vm, but not newly registered ones: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/engine/schema/src/main/resources/META-INF/db/schema-41000to41100.sql: 448: -- Use 'Other Linux 64-bit' as guest os for the default systemvmtemplate for VMware 449: -- This fixes a memory allocation issue to systemvms on VMware/ESXi 450: UPDATE `cloud`.`vm_template` SET guest_os_id=99 WHERE id=8; When I registered the new templates I selected Debian something as OS type. I now changed this to "Other Linux (64bit)", which is what above update is doing, and I can see significantly less memory used by VRs. I do not understand the reasons behind this behavior, I tried also other settings (Debian 9 64-bit, Other 3.x Linux), neither seem to handle memory well... As for the VPN part, you suggested > you can build a custom systemvm.iso file with those settings. Is it possible to simply replace the systemvm.iso file on mgmt-server, remove it from secondary and restart mgmt-server? Maybe you can point me here in the right direction. Thanks, Sam > -Original Message- > From: Rohit Yadav > Sent: Dienstag, 20. November 2018 12:55 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 > > Hi Samuel, > > > Thanks for your email. I've opened this ticket for your first issue: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3039 > > Please follow René's advice to (a) try increase the VR memory and see if it > helps, (b) have a script for reducing memory over time. We'll also work with > the systemd project to see if they can fix and backport this for Debian 9.6+. > > > For your second issue, in 4.9 which used a Debian7 based VR and openswan > for VPN, we've moved to strongswan. If your external Cisco > endpoint/integration can work with strongswan, please create a VPC VR and > manipulate the strongswan configs in that VR and share your results or send > a PR, the changes need to be in one of the python files such as configure.py. > The #2 issue is very specific to your environment and is not a general error, if > you're able to optimize the configuration for a VR, you can build a custom > systemvm.iso file with those settings. In addition, you can send a PR or > submit a Github issue with details, logs, configurations etc: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues > > > I think both the issues are not general blockers and should not void 4.11.2.0 > voting. > > > - Rohit > > > > > > ________ > From: Zehnder, Samuel > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 9:13:04 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 > > > Hi Group > > First, sorry that I wasn't able to use the mailto-link for the reply. It somehow > did not work.. > > > > After Upgrading from 4.9 to 4.11 we are seeing two issues with vRouter > systemVMs: > > > > 1) Memory Consumption on vSphere > > vRouter are starting to swap with low memory available, this also starts > happening after increasing memory size to 512m. Interestingly, there's no > process nor cache using the memory as far as "top", "ps", or other tools > report. > > > > 2) Site-2-Site VPN > > a) After a restart of the VPC (vRouter rebuild) VPN Tunnels are not > configured on vRouter. This has to be triggered manually with a call to > resetVpnConnection API. > > b) StrongSwan configuration does not work well with Cisco endpoints, I've > found following inputs: > > - multiple "rightsubnet=" entries are not supported with ikev1 [1], so > multiple conns should be configured instead > > - multiple subnets are supported with ikev2, but not with Cisco endpoints, > use multiple conns as well [2] > > > > For me it is unclear, what script should be modified for above issues, one of > those look promising: > > https://github
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
FYI, I also t tested this on KVM (ssh into VR many times with while true..do ...as Rene suggested) and also observed small increase in memory, after 10min of script running, it went up by 10-20MB...but not sure how significant this is... Andrija On Wed, Nov 21, 2018, 13:27 Zehnder, Samuel Hi Rohit > > I think I've found something regarding memory issues with vmware: > Schema-update only updates default system-vm, but not newly registered > ones: > > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/engine/schema/src/main/resources/META-INF/db/schema-41000to41100.sql > : > 448: -- Use 'Other Linux 64-bit' as guest os for the default > systemvmtemplate for VMware > 449: -- This fixes a memory allocation issue to systemvms on VMware/ESXi > 450: UPDATE `cloud`.`vm_template` SET guest_os_id=99 WHERE id=8; > > When I registered the new templates I selected Debian something as OS > type. I now changed this to "Other Linux (64bit)", which is what above > update is doing, and I can see significantly less memory used by VRs. I do > not understand the reasons behind this behavior, I tried also other > settings (Debian 9 64-bit, Other 3.x Linux), neither seem to handle memory > well... > > As for the VPN part, you suggested > > you can build a custom systemvm.iso file with those settings. > Is it possible to simply replace the systemvm.iso file on mgmt-server, > remove it from secondary and restart mgmt-server? Maybe you can point me > here in the right direction. > > Thanks, > Sam > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Rohit Yadav > > Sent: Dienstag, 20. November 2018 12:55 > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 > > > > Hi Samuel, > > > > > > Thanks for your email. I've opened this ticket for your first issue: > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3039 > > > > Please follow René's advice to (a) try increase the VR memory and see if > it > > helps, (b) have a script for reducing memory over time. We'll also work > with > > the systemd project to see if they can fix and backport this for Debian > 9.6+. > > > > > > For your second issue, in 4.9 which used a Debian7 based VR and openswan > > for VPN, we've moved to strongswan. If your external Cisco > > endpoint/integration can work with strongswan, please create a VPC VR and > > manipulate the strongswan configs in that VR and share your results or > send > > a PR, the changes need to be in one of the python files such as > configure.py. > > The #2 issue is very specific to your environment and is not a general > error, if > > you're able to optimize the configuration for a VR, you can build a > custom > > systemvm.iso file with those settings. In addition, you can send a PR or > > submit a Github issue with details, logs, configurations etc: > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues > > > > > > I think both the issues are not general blockers and should not void > 4.11.2.0 > > voting. > > > > > > - Rohit > > > > <https://cloudstack.apache.org> > > > > > > > > > > From: Zehnder, Samuel > > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 9:13:04 PM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 > > > > > > Hi Group > > > > First, sorry that I wasn't able to use the mailto-link for the reply. It > somehow > > did not work.. > > > > > > > > After Upgrading from 4.9 to 4.11 we are seeing two issues with vRouter > > systemVMs: > > > > > > > > 1) Memory Consumption on vSphere > > > > vRouter are starting to swap with low memory available, this also starts > > happening after increasing memory size to 512m. Interestingly, there's no > > process nor cache using the memory as far as "top", "ps", or other tools > > report. > > > > > > > > 2) Site-2-Site VPN > > > > a) After a restart of the VPC (vRouter rebuild) VPN Tunnels are not > > configured on vRouter. This has to be triggered manually with a call to > > resetVpnConnection API. > > > > b) StrongSwan configuration does not work well with Cisco endpoints, I've > > found following inputs: > > > > - multiple "rightsubnet=" entries are not supported with ikev1 [1], so > > multiple conns should be configured instead > > > > - multiple subnets are supported with ikev2, but not with Cisco > endpoints, > > use multiple conns as well [2] > > &
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
Hi Rohit I think I've found something regarding memory issues with vmware: Schema-update only updates default system-vm, but not newly registered ones: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/engine/schema/src/main/resources/META-INF/db/schema-41000to41100.sql: 448: -- Use 'Other Linux 64-bit' as guest os for the default systemvmtemplate for VMware 449: -- This fixes a memory allocation issue to systemvms on VMware/ESXi 450: UPDATE `cloud`.`vm_template` SET guest_os_id=99 WHERE id=8; When I registered the new templates I selected Debian something as OS type. I now changed this to "Other Linux (64bit)", which is what above update is doing, and I can see significantly less memory used by VRs. I do not understand the reasons behind this behavior, I tried also other settings (Debian 9 64-bit, Other 3.x Linux), neither seem to handle memory well... As for the VPN part, you suggested > you can build a custom systemvm.iso file with those settings. Is it possible to simply replace the systemvm.iso file on mgmt-server, remove it from secondary and restart mgmt-server? Maybe you can point me here in the right direction. Thanks, Sam > -Original Message- > From: Rohit Yadav > Sent: Dienstag, 20. November 2018 12:55 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 > > Hi Samuel, > > > Thanks for your email. I've opened this ticket for your first issue: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3039 > > Please follow René's advice to (a) try increase the VR memory and see if it > helps, (b) have a script for reducing memory over time. We'll also work with > the systemd project to see if they can fix and backport this for Debian 9.6+. > > > For your second issue, in 4.9 which used a Debian7 based VR and openswan > for VPN, we've moved to strongswan. If your external Cisco > endpoint/integration can work with strongswan, please create a VPC VR and > manipulate the strongswan configs in that VR and share your results or send > a PR, the changes need to be in one of the python files such as configure.py. > The #2 issue is very specific to your environment and is not a general error, > if > you're able to optimize the configuration for a VR, you can build a custom > systemvm.iso file with those settings. In addition, you can send a PR or > submit a Github issue with details, logs, configurations etc: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues > > > I think both the issues are not general blockers and should not void 4.11.2.0 > voting. > > > - Rohit > > <https://cloudstack.apache.org> > > > > ________ > From: Zehnder, Samuel > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 9:13:04 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 > > > Hi Group > > First, sorry that I wasn't able to use the mailto-link for the reply. It > somehow > did not work.. > > > > After Upgrading from 4.9 to 4.11 we are seeing two issues with vRouter > systemVMs: > > > > 1) Memory Consumption on vSphere > > vRouter are starting to swap with low memory available, this also starts > happening after increasing memory size to 512m. Interestingly, there's no > process nor cache using the memory as far as "top", "ps", or other tools > report. > > > > 2) Site-2-Site VPN > > a) After a restart of the VPC (vRouter rebuild) VPN Tunnels are not > configured on vRouter. This has to be triggered manually with a call to > resetVpnConnection API. > > b) StrongSwan configuration does not work well with Cisco endpoints, I've > found following inputs: > > - multiple "rightsubnet=" entries are not supported with ikev1 [1], so > multiple conns should be configured instead > > - multiple subnets are supported with ikev2, but not with Cisco endpoints, > use multiple conns as well [2] > > > > For me it is unclear, what script should be modified for above issues, one of > those look promising: > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/systemvm/debian/opt/ > cloud/bin/ipsectunnel.sh > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/systemvm/debian/opt/ > cloud/bin/configure.py > > > > Regards, > > Sam > > > > [1] > https://wiki.strongswan.org/projects/strongswan/wiki/ConnSection#leftrigh > t-End-Parameters > > [2] https://serverfault.com/questions/904028/strongswan-to-cisco-asa-with- > multiple-right-subnet > > > > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue > > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
Hi Samuel, Thanks for your email. I've opened this ticket for your first issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3039 Please follow René's advice to (a) try increase the VR memory and see if it helps, (b) have a script for reducing memory over time. We'll also work with the systemd project to see if they can fix and backport this for Debian 9.6+. For your second issue, in 4.9 which used a Debian7 based VR and openswan for VPN, we've moved to strongswan. If your external Cisco endpoint/integration can work with strongswan, please create a VPC VR and manipulate the strongswan configs in that VR and share your results or send a PR, the changes need to be in one of the python files such as configure.py. The #2 issue is very specific to your environment and is not a general error, if you're able to optimize the configuration for a VR, you can build a custom systemvm.iso file with those settings. In addition, you can send a PR or submit a Github issue with details, logs, configurations etc: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues I think both the issues are not general blockers and should not void 4.11.2.0 voting. - Rohit <https://cloudstack.apache.org> From: Zehnder, Samuel Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 9:13:04 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 Hi Group First, sorry that I wasn't able to use the mailto-link for the reply. It somehow did not work…. After Upgrading from 4.9 to 4.11 we are seeing two issues with vRouter systemVMs: 1) Memory Consumption on vSphere vRouter are starting to swap with low memory available, this also starts happening after increasing memory size to 512m. Interestingly, there's no process nor cache using the memory as far as "top", "ps", or other tools report. 2) Site-2-Site VPN a) After a restart of the VPC (vRouter rebuild) VPN Tunnels are not configured on vRouter. This has to be triggered manually with a call to resetVpnConnection API. b) StrongSwan configuration does not work well with Cisco endpoints, I've found following inputs: - multiple "rightsubnet=" entries are not supported with ikev1 [1], so multiple conns should be configured instead - multiple subnets are supported with ikev2, but not with Cisco endpoints, use multiple conns as well [2] For me it is unclear, what script should be modified for above issues, one of those look promising: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/systemvm/debian/opt/cloud/bin/ipsectunnel.sh https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/systemvm/debian/opt/cloud/bin/configure.py Regards, Sam [1] https://wiki.strongswan.org/projects/strongswan/wiki/ConnSection#leftright-End-Parameters [2] https://serverfault.com/questions/904028/strongswan-to-cisco-asa-with-multiple-right-subnet rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
Hi On 11/19/18 4:43 PM, Zehnder, Samuel wrote: > 1) Memory Consumption on vSphere > > vRouter are starting to swap with low memory available, this also starts > happening after increasing memory size to 512m. Interestingly, there's > no process nor cache using the memory as far as "top", "ps", or other > tools report. We are seeing the same, looks like a memory leak to us but we assumed that it might be related to our way we monitor the routers. vSphere 5.5. We also increased the memory to 1gb but it only "takes more time" to fill. To us, it seems to be related to SSH connections or logins, and we found a potential related issue on github indicating a memory leak in systemd-logind https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/8015 We were able to force the memory going down very quickly (200MB withing minutes) by using, 2 parallel executions of the following commands ssh in into a VR from the managemnt host (Sometimes a ctrl-c and restart is required to enforce it) while true; do ssh 'free'; done with the following config # cat .ssh/config IdentityFile /var/cloudstack/management/.ssh/id_rsa Port 3922 ControlPath ~/.ssh/master-%l-%r@%h:%p ControlMaster auto Host 10.100.10.* StrictHostKeyChecking no UserKnownHostsFile=/dev/null Regards René
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
Hi Group First, sorry that I wasn't able to use the mailto-link for the reply. It somehow did not work After Upgrading from 4.9 to 4.11 we are seeing two issues with vRouter systemVMs: 1) Memory Consumption on vSphere vRouter are starting to swap with low memory available, this also starts happening after increasing memory size to 512m. Interestingly, there's no process nor cache using the memory as far as "top", "ps", or other tools report. 2) Site-2-Site VPN a) After a restart of the VPC (vRouter rebuild) VPN Tunnels are not configured on vRouter. This has to be triggered manually with a call to resetVpnConnection API. b) StrongSwan configuration does not work well with Cisco endpoints, I've found following inputs: - multiple "rightsubnet=" entries are not supported with ikev1 [1], so multiple conns should be configured instead - multiple subnets are supported with ikev2, but not with Cisco endpoints, use multiple conns as well [2] For me it is unclear, what script should be modified for above issues, one of those look promising: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/systemvm/debian/opt/cloud/bin/ipsectunnel.sh https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/systemvm/debian/opt/cloud/bin/configure.py Regards, Sam [1] https://wiki.strongswan.org/projects/strongswan/wiki/ConnSection#leftright-End-Parameters [2] https://serverfault.com/questions/904028/strongswan-to-cisco-asa-with-multiple-right-subnet smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
+1 (binding) from me As a result of smoke testing with VMware6.5, Ubuntu KVM 16.04 (basic zone), XS7.1, XCP7.4, CentOS 7.4 KVM and CentOS 6.9 KVM. Kind regards, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue -Original Message- From: Rene Moser Sent: 17 November 2018 08:18 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 +0 Won't have a chance to test it, but RC4 look already not too bad to me. Thanks for all the works! On 11/13/18 2:59 PM, Paul Angus wrote: > Hi All, > > I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following artefacts up for > testing and a vote: > > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs > /heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924 > Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same > location): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/ > > PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS > > The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 16th Nov. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate > "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Additional information: > > For users' convenience, I've built packages from > 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 and published RC5 repository here: > http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/41120rc5/ > > The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvm template > upgrade section has been updated. > > 4.11.2.0 systemvm templates are available from here: > http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/systemvm/41120rc5/ > > Only the following changes have been added to RC5: > > +-+--+---+--++ > | Version | Github | Type | Priority | Description >| > +=+==+===+==+= > +===+ > | 4.11.2.0| `#3018`_ | | | Prevent > error on GroupAnswers on VR creation | > +-+--+---+--++ > | 4.11.2.0| `#3007`_ | | | Add missing > ConfigDrive entries on existing zones after| > | | | | | upgrade >| > +-+--+---+--++ > | 4.11.2.0| `#2980`_ | | | [4.11] Fix > set initial reservation on public IP ranges | > +-+--+---+--++ > | 4.11.2.0| `#3010`_ | | | Fix > DirectNetworkGuru canHandle checks for lowercase | > | | | | | isolation > methods | > +-+--+---+--++ > > .. _`#3012`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3012 > .. _`#3018`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3018 > .. _`#3007`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3007 > .. _`#2980`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2980 > .. _`#3010`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3010 > > > > Kind regards, > > Paul Angus > > > paul.an...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue > > >
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
+0 Won't have a chance to test it, but RC4 look already not too bad to me. Thanks for all the works! On 11/13/18 2:59 PM, Paul Angus wrote: > Hi All, > > I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following artefacts up for > testing and a vote: > > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924 > Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same > location): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/ > > PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS > > The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 16th Nov. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate > "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Additional information: > > For users' convenience, I've built packages from > 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 and published RC5 repository here: > http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/41120rc5/ > > The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvm template > upgrade section has been updated. > > 4.11.2.0 systemvm templates are available from here: > http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/systemvm/41120rc5/ > > Only the following changes have been added to RC5: > > +-+--+---+--++ > | Version | Github | Type | Priority | Description >| > +=+==+===+==++ > | 4.11.2.0| `#3018`_ | | | Prevent > error on GroupAnswers on VR creation | > +-+--+---+--++ > | 4.11.2.0| `#3007`_ | | | Add missing > ConfigDrive entries on existing zones after| > | | | | | upgrade >| > +-+--+---+--++ > | 4.11.2.0| `#2980`_ | | | [4.11] Fix > set initial reservation on public IP ranges | > +-+--+---+--++ > | 4.11.2.0| `#3010`_ | | | Fix > DirectNetworkGuru canHandle checks for lowercase | > | | | | | isolation > methods | > +-+--+---+--++ > > .. _`#3012`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3012 > .. _`#3018`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3018 > .. _`#3007`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3007 > .. _`#2980`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2980 > .. _`#3010`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3010 > > > > Kind regards, > > Paul Angus > > > paul.an...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK > @shapeblue > > >
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
+1 (binding) I performed manual testing of a Basic Zone making use of vSphere and XenServer. On 11/16/18, 5:49 AM, "Paul Angus" wrote: NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. We're looking good so far, but I'd still like some more votes (hopefully +1s ), Please do test and cast your vote. Thanks. Kind regards, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue -Original Message- From: Andrija Panic Sent: 16 November 2018 12:12 To: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 +1 Tested: - KVM environment - building DEB packages for Ubuntu - advanced and basic zone deployment, MGMT srv on Ubuntu 14.04, KVM Ubuntu 14.04 (qemu versions equivalent to Ubuntu 16.04) - a bunch of integration tests done from in-house suite of tests (system and user tests) - online and offline storage migration from NFS/CEPH to SolidFire On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 at 10:13, Dag Sonstebo wrote: > +1 > > Various customer related configurations and lifecycle operations, all > looking good. > > Environment: > - Mgmt: CentOS7.5 > - HV: VMware 5.5 > - Advanced zone > > Regards, > Dag Sonstebo > Cloud Architect > ShapeBlue > > On 16/11/2018, 08:48, "Boris Stoyanov" > wrote: > > +1 > > I’ve did an upgrade all the way from 4.6 to rc5 and it was > successful, I’ve also managed to run some basic lifecycle operation > and it was looking good. > > Regards, > Bobby. > > > boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK > @shapeblue > > > > > dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue > > > > > On 15 Nov 2018, at 21:44, Gabriel Beims Bräscher > wrote: > > > > +1 Deployed local environment and tested VM/host/storage lifecycles. > > > > Hosts: KVM running on Ubuntu 16.04 > > Management server and database: running on Ubuntu 16.04 > > - create/use/delete system and user VMs > > - register new template > > - register service offering > > - work with hosts (add, maintenance, remove) > > > > Em qui, 15 de nov de 2018 às 03:21, Tutkowski, Mike < > > mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> escreveu: > > > >> Thanks, Rohit! > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Rohit Yadav > >> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 9:07 PM > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 > >> > >> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click > links or > >> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the > content is > >> safe. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Hi Mike, Paul, everyone, > >> > >> > >> I tested the same on a 4.9.3.1 based VMware 5.5u3 + svs + basic > zone and > >> could see the same behaviour. Therefore, it's not a regression but a > >> limitation from the past. Basic zone provides L3 isolation by means > of > >> security group (host-level firewall) which is not supported for > VMware. I > >> think nobody reported this in the past because nobody uses > VMware+basic > >> zone, I've opened an issue for this issue: > >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3031 > >> > >> > >> Let's continue testing and voting for RC5, and let's aim to fix for > this > >> limitation in future 4.11.3+, 4.12.0+. > >> > >> > >> - Rohit > >> > >> <https://cloudstack.apache.org> > >> > >> > >> > >>
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
We're looking good so far, but I'd still like some more votes (hopefully +1s ), Please do test and cast your vote. Thanks. Kind regards, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue -Original Message- From: Andrija Panic Sent: 16 November 2018 12:12 To: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 +1 Tested: - KVM environment - building DEB packages for Ubuntu - advanced and basic zone deployment, MGMT srv on Ubuntu 14.04, KVM Ubuntu 14.04 (qemu versions equivalent to Ubuntu 16.04) - a bunch of integration tests done from in-house suite of tests (system and user tests) - online and offline storage migration from NFS/CEPH to SolidFire On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 at 10:13, Dag Sonstebo wrote: > +1 > > Various customer related configurations and lifecycle operations, all > looking good. > > Environment: > - Mgmt: CentOS7.5 > - HV: VMware 5.5 > - Advanced zone > > Regards, > Dag Sonstebo > Cloud Architect > ShapeBlue > > On 16/11/2018, 08:48, "Boris Stoyanov" > wrote: > > +1 > > I’ve did an upgrade all the way from 4.6 to rc5 and it was > successful, I’ve also managed to run some basic lifecycle operation > and it was looking good. > > Regards, > Bobby. > > > boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK > @shapeblue > > > > > dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue > > > > > On 15 Nov 2018, at 21:44, Gabriel Beims Bräscher > wrote: > > > > +1 Deployed local environment and tested VM/host/storage lifecycles. > > > > Hosts: KVM running on Ubuntu 16.04 > > Management server and database: running on Ubuntu 16.04 > > - create/use/delete system and user VMs > > - register new template > > - register service offering > > - work with hosts (add, maintenance, remove) > > > > Em qui, 15 de nov de 2018 às 03:21, Tutkowski, Mike < > > mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> escreveu: > > > >> Thanks, Rohit! > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Rohit Yadav > >> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 9:07 PM > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 > >> > >> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click > links or > >> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the > content is > >> safe. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Hi Mike, Paul, everyone, > >> > >> > >> I tested the same on a 4.9.3.1 based VMware 5.5u3 + svs + basic > zone and > >> could see the same behaviour. Therefore, it's not a regression but a > >> limitation from the past. Basic zone provides L3 isolation by means > of > >> security group (host-level firewall) which is not supported for > VMware. I > >> think nobody reported this in the past because nobody uses > VMware+basic > >> zone, I've opened an issue for this issue: > >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3031 > >> > >> > >> Let's continue testing and voting for RC5, and let's aim to fix for > this > >> limitation in future 4.11.3+, 4.12.0+. > >> > >> > >> - Rohit > >> > >> <https://cloudstack.apache.org> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Tutkowski, Mike > >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 4:24:46 AM > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 > >> > >> I should note that I’m running vSphere 5.5, by the way. I believe > that’s > >> still supported in CS 4.11. > >> > >> On 11/14/18, 3:52 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" > wrote: > >> > >> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click > links or > >> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the > content is > >> safe. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> The VR doesn’t show as having an IP address. &g
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
+1 Tested: - KVM environment - building DEB packages for Ubuntu - advanced and basic zone deployment, MGMT srv on Ubuntu 14.04, KVM Ubuntu 14.04 (qemu versions equivalent to Ubuntu 16.04) - a bunch of integration tests done from in-house suite of tests (system and user tests) - online and offline storage migration from NFS/CEPH to SolidFire On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 at 10:13, Dag Sonstebo wrote: > +1 > > Various customer related configurations and lifecycle operations, all > looking good. > > Environment: > - Mgmt: CentOS7.5 > - HV: VMware 5.5 > - Advanced zone > > Regards, > Dag Sonstebo > Cloud Architect > ShapeBlue > > On 16/11/2018, 08:48, "Boris Stoyanov" > wrote: > > +1 > > I’ve did an upgrade all the way from 4.6 to rc5 and it was successful, > I’ve also managed to run some basic lifecycle operation and it was looking > good. > > Regards, > Bobby. > > > boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK > @shapeblue > > > > > dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK > @shapeblue > > > > > On 15 Nov 2018, at 21:44, Gabriel Beims Bräscher > wrote: > > > > +1 Deployed local environment and tested VM/host/storage lifecycles. > > > > Hosts: KVM running on Ubuntu 16.04 > > Management server and database: running on Ubuntu 16.04 > > - create/use/delete system and user VMs > > - register new template > > - register service offering > > - work with hosts (add, maintenance, remove) > > > > Em qui, 15 de nov de 2018 às 03:21, Tutkowski, Mike < > > mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> escreveu: > > > >> Thanks, Rohit! > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Rohit Yadav > >> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 9:07 PM > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 > >> > >> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click > links or > >> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the > content is > >> safe. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Hi Mike, Paul, everyone, > >> > >> > >> I tested the same on a 4.9.3.1 based VMware 5.5u3 + svs + basic > zone and > >> could see the same behaviour. Therefore, it's not a regression but a > >> limitation from the past. Basic zone provides L3 isolation by means > of > >> security group (host-level firewall) which is not supported for > VMware. I > >> think nobody reported this in the past because nobody uses > VMware+basic > >> zone, I've opened an issue for this issue: > >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3031 > >> > >> > >> Let's continue testing and voting for RC5, and let's aim to fix for > this > >> limitation in future 4.11.3+, 4.12.0+. > >> > >> > >> - Rohit > >> > >> <https://cloudstack.apache.org> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Tutkowski, Mike > >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 4:24:46 AM > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 > >> > >> I should note that I’m running vSphere 5.5, by the way. I believe > that’s > >> still supported in CS 4.11. > >> > >> On 11/14/18, 3:52 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" > wrote: > >> > >> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click > links or > >> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the > content is > >> safe. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> The VR doesn’t show as having an IP address. > >> > >> On 11/14/18, 3:50 PM, "Paul Angus" > wrote: > >> > >> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click > links or > >> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the > content is > >> safe. > >> > >> > >> > >>
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
+1 Various customer related configurations and lifecycle operations, all looking good. Environment: - Mgmt: CentOS7.5 - HV: VMware 5.5 - Advanced zone Regards, Dag Sonstebo Cloud Architect ShapeBlue On 16/11/2018, 08:48, "Boris Stoyanov" wrote: +1 I’ve did an upgrade all the way from 4.6 to rc5 and it was successful, I’ve also managed to run some basic lifecycle operation and it was looking good. Regards, Bobby. boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue > On 15 Nov 2018, at 21:44, Gabriel Beims Bräscher wrote: > > +1 Deployed local environment and tested VM/host/storage lifecycles. > > Hosts: KVM running on Ubuntu 16.04 > Management server and database: running on Ubuntu 16.04 > - create/use/delete system and user VMs > - register new template > - register service offering > - work with hosts (add, maintenance, remove) > > Em qui, 15 de nov de 2018 às 03:21, Tutkowski, Mike < > mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> escreveu: > >> Thanks, Rohit! >> >> >> >> From: Rohit Yadav >> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 9:07 PM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 >> >> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or >> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is >> safe. >> >> >> >> >> Hi Mike, Paul, everyone, >> >> >> I tested the same on a 4.9.3.1 based VMware 5.5u3 + svs + basic zone and >> could see the same behaviour. Therefore, it's not a regression but a >> limitation from the past. Basic zone provides L3 isolation by means of >> security group (host-level firewall) which is not supported for VMware. I >> think nobody reported this in the past because nobody uses VMware+basic >> zone, I've opened an issue for this issue: >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3031 >> >> >> Let's continue testing and voting for RC5, and let's aim to fix for this >> limitation in future 4.11.3+, 4.12.0+. >> >> >> - Rohit >> >> <https://cloudstack.apache.org> >> >> >> >> >> From: Tutkowski, Mike >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 4:24:46 AM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 >> >> I should note that I’m running vSphere 5.5, by the way. I believe that’s >> still supported in CS 4.11. >> >> On 11/14/18, 3:52 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: >> >> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or >> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is >> safe. >> >> >> >> >> The VR doesn’t show as having an IP address. >> >> On 11/14/18, 3:50 PM, "Paul Angus" wrote: >> >> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or >> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is >> safe. >> >> >> >> >> Mgmt. server should ssh into VR. >> I'll fire a similar build in out lab. >> >> >> paul.an...@shapeblue.com >> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> >> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK >> @shapeblue >> >> >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Tutkowski, Mike >> Sent: 14 November 2018 22:41 >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 >> >> Right, I’ve compiled and run with –Dnoredist. The SSVM and CPVM come up >> fine. They both show the VM and agent running. The VR boots up. I can see >> it at the login prompt in vSphere Client. I don’t see any obvious errors in >> cloud.log. Maybe a port is blocked and it can’t talk to the management >
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
+1 I’ve did an upgrade all the way from 4.6 to rc5 and it was successful, I’ve also managed to run some basic lifecycle operation and it was looking good. Regards, Bobby. boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue > On 15 Nov 2018, at 21:44, Gabriel Beims Bräscher wrote: > > +1 Deployed local environment and tested VM/host/storage lifecycles. > > Hosts: KVM running on Ubuntu 16.04 > Management server and database: running on Ubuntu 16.04 > - create/use/delete system and user VMs > - register new template > - register service offering > - work with hosts (add, maintenance, remove) > > Em qui, 15 de nov de 2018 às 03:21, Tutkowski, Mike < > mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> escreveu: > >> Thanks, Rohit! >> >> >> >> From: Rohit Yadav >> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 9:07 PM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 >> >> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or >> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is >> safe. >> >> >> >> >> Hi Mike, Paul, everyone, >> >> >> I tested the same on a 4.9.3.1 based VMware 5.5u3 + svs + basic zone and >> could see the same behaviour. Therefore, it's not a regression but a >> limitation from the past. Basic zone provides L3 isolation by means of >> security group (host-level firewall) which is not supported for VMware. I >> think nobody reported this in the past because nobody uses VMware+basic >> zone, I've opened an issue for this issue: >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3031 >> >> >> Let's continue testing and voting for RC5, and let's aim to fix for this >> limitation in future 4.11.3+, 4.12.0+. >> >> >> - Rohit >> >> <https://cloudstack.apache.org> >> >> >> >> >> From: Tutkowski, Mike >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 4:24:46 AM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 >> >> I should note that I’m running vSphere 5.5, by the way. I believe that’s >> still supported in CS 4.11. >> >> On 11/14/18, 3:52 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: >> >> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or >> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is >> safe. >> >> >> >> >> The VR doesn’t show as having an IP address. >> >> On 11/14/18, 3:50 PM, "Paul Angus" wrote: >> >> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or >> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is >> safe. >> >> >> >> >> Mgmt. server should ssh into VR. >> I'll fire a similar build in out lab. >> >> >> paul.an...@shapeblue.com >> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> >> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK >> @shapeblue >> >> >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Tutkowski, Mike >> Sent: 14 November 2018 22:41 >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 >> >> Right, I’ve compiled and run with –Dnoredist. The SSVM and CPVM come up >> fine. They both show the VM and agent running. The VR boots up. I can see >> it at the login prompt in vSphere Client. I don’t see any obvious errors in >> cloud.log. Maybe a port is blocked and it can’t talk to the management >> server? >> >> On 11/14/18, 3:10 PM, "Paul Angus" wrote: >> >> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or >> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is >> safe. >> >> >> >> >> I've tested in an ubuntu16 basic zone but not vmware basic zone - I guess >> that it goes without say that you know to use build nonoss from vmware... >> have you used the 6.5 sdk ? >> I think that it always says requires upgrade until the VR checks in. >> Have the SSVM and CPVM checked in ok? If you go on the VR through the >> vCenter console what do you see? >> >> paul.an...@shapeblue.com >> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> >> Amadeus House, Floral Street, L
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
+1 Deployed local environment and tested VM/host/storage lifecycles. Hosts: KVM running on Ubuntu 16.04 Management server and database: running on Ubuntu 16.04 - create/use/delete system and user VMs - register new template - register service offering - work with hosts (add, maintenance, remove) Em qui, 15 de nov de 2018 às 03:21, Tutkowski, Mike < mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> escreveu: > Thanks, Rohit! > > > > From: Rohit Yadav > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 9:07 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 > > NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or > open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is > safe. > > > > > Hi Mike, Paul, everyone, > > > I tested the same on a 4.9.3.1 based VMware 5.5u3 + svs + basic zone and > could see the same behaviour. Therefore, it's not a regression but a > limitation from the past. Basic zone provides L3 isolation by means of > security group (host-level firewall) which is not supported for VMware. I > think nobody reported this in the past because nobody uses VMware+basic > zone, I've opened an issue for this issue: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3031 > > > Let's continue testing and voting for RC5, and let's aim to fix for this > limitation in future 4.11.3+, 4.12.0+. > > > - Rohit > > <https://cloudstack.apache.org> > > > > > From: Tutkowski, Mike > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 4:24:46 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 > > I should note that I’m running vSphere 5.5, by the way. I believe that’s > still supported in CS 4.11. > > On 11/14/18, 3:52 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: > > NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or > open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is > safe. > > > > > The VR doesn’t show as having an IP address. > > On 11/14/18, 3:50 PM, "Paul Angus" wrote: > > NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or > open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is > safe. > > > > > Mgmt. server should ssh into VR. > I'll fire a similar build in out lab. > > > paul.an...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK > @shapeblue > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Tutkowski, Mike > Sent: 14 November 2018 22:41 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 > > Right, I’ve compiled and run with –Dnoredist. The SSVM and CPVM come up > fine. They both show the VM and agent running. The VR boots up. I can see > it at the login prompt in vSphere Client. I don’t see any obvious errors in > cloud.log. Maybe a port is blocked and it can’t talk to the management > server? > > On 11/14/18, 3:10 PM, "Paul Angus" wrote: > > NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or > open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is > safe. > > > > > I've tested in an ubuntu16 basic zone but not vmware basic zone - I guess > that it goes without say that you know to use build nonoss from vmware... > have you used the 6.5 sdk ? > I think that it always says requires upgrade until the VR checks in. > Have the SSVM and CPVM checked in ok? If you go on the VR through the > vCenter console what do you see? > > paul.an...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK > @shapeblue > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Tutkowski, Mike > Sent: 14 November 2018 21:16 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 > > I’m having a hard time getting the VR with vSphere to come up successfully. > > I built the code from source (the specified commit) and am using the > system VM template specified in this e-mail chain. > > I’m running in a Basic Zone. When I look at the details for the VR in the > GUI, it says Requires Upgrade is Yes. When I click the button to upgrade > the template, the operation fails. > > Thoughts? > > On 11/13/18, 6:59 AM, "Paul Angus" wrote: > > NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or > open attachments unless you recognize the sender and
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
Thanks, Rohit! From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 9:07 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Mike, Paul, everyone, I tested the same on a 4.9.3.1 based VMware 5.5u3 + svs + basic zone and could see the same behaviour. Therefore, it's not a regression but a limitation from the past. Basic zone provides L3 isolation by means of security group (host-level firewall) which is not supported for VMware. I think nobody reported this in the past because nobody uses VMware+basic zone, I've opened an issue for this issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3031 Let's continue testing and voting for RC5, and let's aim to fix for this limitation in future 4.11.3+, 4.12.0+. - Rohit <https://cloudstack.apache.org> From: Tutkowski, Mike Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 4:24:46 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 I should note that I’m running vSphere 5.5, by the way. I believe that’s still supported in CS 4.11. On 11/14/18, 3:52 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. The VR doesn’t show as having an IP address. On 11/14/18, 3:50 PM, "Paul Angus" wrote: NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Mgmt. server should ssh into VR. I'll fire a similar build in out lab. paul.an...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue -Original Message- From: Tutkowski, Mike Sent: 14 November 2018 22:41 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 Right, I’ve compiled and run with –Dnoredist. The SSVM and CPVM come up fine. They both show the VM and agent running. The VR boots up. I can see it at the login prompt in vSphere Client. I don’t see any obvious errors in cloud.log. Maybe a port is blocked and it can’t talk to the management server? On 11/14/18, 3:10 PM, "Paul Angus" wrote: NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I've tested in an ubuntu16 basic zone but not vmware basic zone - I guess that it goes without say that you know to use build nonoss from vmware... have you used the 6.5 sdk ? I think that it always says requires upgrade until the VR checks in. Have the SSVM and CPVM checked in ok? If you go on the VR through the vCenter console what do you see? paul.an...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue -Original Message- From: Tutkowski, Mike Sent: 14 November 2018 21:16 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 I’m having a hard time getting the VR with vSphere to come up successfully. I built the code from source (the specified commit) and am using the system VM template specified in this e-mail chain. I’m running in a Basic Zone. When I look at the details for the VR in the GUI, it says Requires Upgrade is Yes. When I click the button to upgrade the template, the operation fails. Thoughts? On 11/13/18, 6:59 AM, "Paul Angus" wrote: NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi All, I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following artefacts up for testing and a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924 Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 16th Nov. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Additional information: For users' convenience, I've built packages from 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 and published RC5 repository here: http://packages.shapeblue
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
Hi Mike, Paul, everyone, I tested the same on a 4.9.3.1 based VMware 5.5u3 + svs + basic zone and could see the same behaviour. Therefore, it's not a regression but a limitation from the past. Basic zone provides L3 isolation by means of security group (host-level firewall) which is not supported for VMware. I think nobody reported this in the past because nobody uses VMware+basic zone, I've opened an issue for this issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3031 Let's continue testing and voting for RC5, and let's aim to fix for this limitation in future 4.11.3+, 4.12.0+. - Rohit <https://cloudstack.apache.org> From: Tutkowski, Mike Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 4:24:46 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 I should note that I’m running vSphere 5.5, by the way. I believe that’s still supported in CS 4.11. On 11/14/18, 3:52 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. The VR doesn’t show as having an IP address. On 11/14/18, 3:50 PM, "Paul Angus" wrote: NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Mgmt. server should ssh into VR. I'll fire a similar build in out lab. paul.an...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue -Original Message- From: Tutkowski, Mike Sent: 14 November 2018 22:41 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 Right, I’ve compiled and run with –Dnoredist. The SSVM and CPVM come up fine. They both show the VM and agent running. The VR boots up. I can see it at the login prompt in vSphere Client. I don’t see any obvious errors in cloud.log. Maybe a port is blocked and it can’t talk to the management server? On 11/14/18, 3:10 PM, "Paul Angus" wrote: NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I've tested in an ubuntu16 basic zone but not vmware basic zone - I guess that it goes without say that you know to use build nonoss from vmware... have you used the 6.5 sdk ? I think that it always says requires upgrade until the VR checks in. Have the SSVM and CPVM checked in ok? If you go on the VR through the vCenter console what do you see? paul.an...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue -Original Message- From: Tutkowski, Mike Sent: 14 November 2018 21:16 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 I’m having a hard time getting the VR with vSphere to come up successfully. I built the code from source (the specified commit) and am using the system VM template specified in this e-mail chain. I’m running in a Basic Zone. When I look at the details for the VR in the GUI, it says Requires Upgrade is Yes. When I click the button to upgrade the template, the operation fails. Thoughts? On 11/13/18, 6:59 AM, "Paul Angus" wrote: NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi All, I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following artefacts up for testing and a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924 Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 16th Nov. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
I'm seeing the same thing. VR has a guest IP, but no management IP. If I cat /var/cache/cloud/cmdline I can see that the eth1 ip=0.0.0.0 and eth1mask=0.0.0.0 which is nonsense... I'll get someone to look into it. Thanks mike paul.an...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue -Original Message- From: Tutkowski, Mike Sent: 14 November 2018 22:58 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 The VR’s IP address was not being reported on the main GUI window, but I found it in the VR details (and also via ifconfig on the VR itself). I can ping both ways successfully: From the management server to the VR and vice versa. On 11/14/18, 3:52 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. The VR doesn’t show as having an IP address. On 11/14/18, 3:50 PM, "Paul Angus" wrote: NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Mgmt. server should ssh into VR. I'll fire a similar build in out lab. paul.an...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue -Original Message- From: Tutkowski, Mike Sent: 14 November 2018 22:41 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 Right, I’ve compiled and run with –Dnoredist. The SSVM and CPVM come up fine. They both show the VM and agent running. The VR boots up. I can see it at the login prompt in vSphere Client. I don’t see any obvious errors in cloud.log. Maybe a port is blocked and it can’t talk to the management server? On 11/14/18, 3:10 PM, "Paul Angus" wrote: NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I've tested in an ubuntu16 basic zone but not vmware basic zone - I guess that it goes without say that you know to use build nonoss from vmware... have you used the 6.5 sdk ? I think that it always says requires upgrade until the VR checks in. Have the SSVM and CPVM checked in ok? If you go on the VR through the vCenter console what do you see? paul.an...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue -Original Message- From: Tutkowski, Mike Sent: 14 November 2018 21:16 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 I’m having a hard time getting the VR with vSphere to come up successfully. I built the code from source (the specified commit) and am using the system VM template specified in this e-mail chain. I’m running in a Basic Zone. When I look at the details for the VR in the GUI, it says Requires Upgrade is Yes. When I click the button to upgrade the template, the operation fails. Thoughts? On 11/13/18, 6:59 AM, "Paul Angus" wrote: NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi All, I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following artefacts up for testing and a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924 Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 16th Nov. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Additional inform
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
I should note that I’m running vSphere 5.5, by the way. I believe that’s still supported in CS 4.11. On 11/14/18, 3:52 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. The VR doesn’t show as having an IP address. On 11/14/18, 3:50 PM, "Paul Angus" wrote: NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Mgmt. server should ssh into VR. I'll fire a similar build in out lab. paul.an...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue -Original Message- From: Tutkowski, Mike Sent: 14 November 2018 22:41 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 Right, I’ve compiled and run with –Dnoredist. The SSVM and CPVM come up fine. They both show the VM and agent running. The VR boots up. I can see it at the login prompt in vSphere Client. I don’t see any obvious errors in cloud.log. Maybe a port is blocked and it can’t talk to the management server? On 11/14/18, 3:10 PM, "Paul Angus" wrote: NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I've tested in an ubuntu16 basic zone but not vmware basic zone - I guess that it goes without say that you know to use build nonoss from vmware... have you used the 6.5 sdk ? I think that it always says requires upgrade until the VR checks in. Have the SSVM and CPVM checked in ok? If you go on the VR through the vCenter console what do you see? paul.an...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue -Original Message- From: Tutkowski, Mike Sent: 14 November 2018 21:16 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 I’m having a hard time getting the VR with vSphere to come up successfully. I built the code from source (the specified commit) and am using the system VM template specified in this e-mail chain. I’m running in a Basic Zone. When I look at the details for the VR in the GUI, it says Requires Upgrade is Yes. When I click the button to upgrade the template, the operation fails. Thoughts? On 11/13/18, 6:59 AM, "Paul Angus" wrote: NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi All, I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following artefacts up for testing and a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924 Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 16th Nov. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Additional information: For users' convenience, I've built packages from 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 and published RC5 repository here: http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/41120rc5/ The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvm template upgrade section has been updated. 4.11.2.0 systemvm templates are available from here: http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/systemvm/41120rc5/
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
The VR’s IP address was not being reported on the main GUI window, but I found it in the VR details (and also via ifconfig on the VR itself). I can ping both ways successfully: From the management server to the VR and vice versa. On 11/14/18, 3:52 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. The VR doesn’t show as having an IP address. On 11/14/18, 3:50 PM, "Paul Angus" wrote: NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Mgmt. server should ssh into VR. I'll fire a similar build in out lab. paul.an...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue -Original Message- From: Tutkowski, Mike Sent: 14 November 2018 22:41 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 Right, I’ve compiled and run with –Dnoredist. The SSVM and CPVM come up fine. They both show the VM and agent running. The VR boots up. I can see it at the login prompt in vSphere Client. I don’t see any obvious errors in cloud.log. Maybe a port is blocked and it can’t talk to the management server? On 11/14/18, 3:10 PM, "Paul Angus" wrote: NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I've tested in an ubuntu16 basic zone but not vmware basic zone - I guess that it goes without say that you know to use build nonoss from vmware... have you used the 6.5 sdk ? I think that it always says requires upgrade until the VR checks in. Have the SSVM and CPVM checked in ok? If you go on the VR through the vCenter console what do you see? paul.an...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue -Original Message- From: Tutkowski, Mike Sent: 14 November 2018 21:16 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 I’m having a hard time getting the VR with vSphere to come up successfully. I built the code from source (the specified commit) and am using the system VM template specified in this e-mail chain. I’m running in a Basic Zone. When I look at the details for the VR in the GUI, it says Requires Upgrade is Yes. When I click the button to upgrade the template, the operation fails. Thoughts? On 11/13/18, 6:59 AM, "Paul Angus" wrote: NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi All, I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following artefacts up for testing and a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924 Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 16th Nov. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Additional information: For users' convenience, I've built packages from 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 and published RC5 repository here: http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/41120rc5/ The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvm template upgrade section has been updated. 4.11.2.0 systemvm templates are available from here: http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/systemvm/41120rc5/
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
The VR doesn’t show as having an IP address. On 11/14/18, 3:50 PM, "Paul Angus" wrote: NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Mgmt. server should ssh into VR. I'll fire a similar build in out lab. paul.an...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue -Original Message- From: Tutkowski, Mike Sent: 14 November 2018 22:41 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 Right, I’ve compiled and run with –Dnoredist. The SSVM and CPVM come up fine. They both show the VM and agent running. The VR boots up. I can see it at the login prompt in vSphere Client. I don’t see any obvious errors in cloud.log. Maybe a port is blocked and it can’t talk to the management server? On 11/14/18, 3:10 PM, "Paul Angus" wrote: NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I've tested in an ubuntu16 basic zone but not vmware basic zone - I guess that it goes without say that you know to use build nonoss from vmware... have you used the 6.5 sdk ? I think that it always says requires upgrade until the VR checks in. Have the SSVM and CPVM checked in ok? If you go on the VR through the vCenter console what do you see? paul.an...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue -Original Message- From: Tutkowski, Mike Sent: 14 November 2018 21:16 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 I’m having a hard time getting the VR with vSphere to come up successfully. I built the code from source (the specified commit) and am using the system VM template specified in this e-mail chain. I’m running in a Basic Zone. When I look at the details for the VR in the GUI, it says Requires Upgrade is Yes. When I click the button to upgrade the template, the operation fails. Thoughts? On 11/13/18, 6:59 AM, "Paul Angus" wrote: NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi All, I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following artefacts up for testing and a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924 Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 16th Nov. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Additional information: For users' convenience, I've built packages from 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 and published RC5 repository here: http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/41120rc5/ The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvm template upgrade section has been updated. 4.11.2.0 systemvm templates are available from here: http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/systemvm/41120rc5/ Only the following changes have been added to RC5: +-+--+---+--++ | Version | Github | Type | Priority | Description| +=+==+===+==++ | 4.11.2.0| `#3018`_ | | | Prev
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
Mgmt. server should ssh into VR. I'll fire a similar build in out lab. paul.an...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue -Original Message- From: Tutkowski, Mike Sent: 14 November 2018 22:41 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 Right, I’ve compiled and run with –Dnoredist. The SSVM and CPVM come up fine. They both show the VM and agent running. The VR boots up. I can see it at the login prompt in vSphere Client. I don’t see any obvious errors in cloud.log. Maybe a port is blocked and it can’t talk to the management server? On 11/14/18, 3:10 PM, "Paul Angus" wrote: NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I've tested in an ubuntu16 basic zone but not vmware basic zone - I guess that it goes without say that you know to use build nonoss from vmware... have you used the 6.5 sdk ? I think that it always says requires upgrade until the VR checks in. Have the SSVM and CPVM checked in ok? If you go on the VR through the vCenter console what do you see? paul.an...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue -Original Message- From: Tutkowski, Mike Sent: 14 November 2018 21:16 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 I’m having a hard time getting the VR with vSphere to come up successfully. I built the code from source (the specified commit) and am using the system VM template specified in this e-mail chain. I’m running in a Basic Zone. When I look at the details for the VR in the GUI, it says Requires Upgrade is Yes. When I click the button to upgrade the template, the operation fails. Thoughts? On 11/13/18, 6:59 AM, "Paul Angus" wrote: NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi All, I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following artefacts up for testing and a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924 Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 16th Nov. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Additional information: For users' convenience, I've built packages from 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 and published RC5 repository here: http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/41120rc5/ The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvm template upgrade section has been updated. 4.11.2.0 systemvm templates are available from here: http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/systemvm/41120rc5/ Only the following changes have been added to RC5: +-+--+---+--++ | Version | Github | Type | Priority | Description| +=+==+===+==++ | 4.11.2.0| `#3018`_ | | | Prevent error on GroupAnswers on VR creation | +-+--+---+--++ | 4.11.2.0| `#3007`_ | | | Add missing ConfigDrive entries on existing zones after| | | | | | upgrade| +-+--+---+--++ | 4.11.2.0| `#2980`_ | | | [4.11] Fix set initial r
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
Right, I’ve compiled and run with –Dnoredist. The SSVM and CPVM come up fine. They both show the VM and agent running. The VR boots up. I can see it at the login prompt in vSphere Client. I don’t see any obvious errors in cloud.log. Maybe a port is blocked and it can’t talk to the management server? On 11/14/18, 3:10 PM, "Paul Angus" wrote: NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I've tested in an ubuntu16 basic zone but not vmware basic zone - I guess that it goes without say that you know to use build nonoss from vmware... have you used the 6.5 sdk ? I think that it always says requires upgrade until the VR checks in. Have the SSVM and CPVM checked in ok? If you go on the VR through the vCenter console what do you see? paul.an...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue -Original Message- From: Tutkowski, Mike Sent: 14 November 2018 21:16 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 I’m having a hard time getting the VR with vSphere to come up successfully. I built the code from source (the specified commit) and am using the system VM template specified in this e-mail chain. I’m running in a Basic Zone. When I look at the details for the VR in the GUI, it says Requires Upgrade is Yes. When I click the button to upgrade the template, the operation fails. Thoughts? On 11/13/18, 6:59 AM, "Paul Angus" wrote: NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi All, I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following artefacts up for testing and a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924 Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 16th Nov. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Additional information: For users' convenience, I've built packages from 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 and published RC5 repository here: http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/41120rc5/ The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvm template upgrade section has been updated. 4.11.2.0 systemvm templates are available from here: http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/systemvm/41120rc5/ Only the following changes have been added to RC5: +-+--+---+--++ | Version | Github | Type | Priority | Description| +=+==+===+==++ | 4.11.2.0| `#3018`_ | | | Prevent error on GroupAnswers on VR creation | +-+--+---+--++ | 4.11.2.0| `#3007`_ | | | Add missing ConfigDrive entries on existing zones after| | | | | | upgrade| +-+--+---+--++ | 4.11.2.0| `#2980`_ | | | [4.11] Fix set initial reservation on public IP ranges | +-+--+---+--++ | 4.11.2.0| `#3010`_ | | | Fix DirectNetworkGuru canHandle checks for lowercase | | | | |
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
I've tested in an ubuntu16 basic zone but not vmware basic zone - I guess that it goes without say that you know to use build nonoss from vmware... have you used the 6.5 sdk ? I think that it always says requires upgrade until the VR checks in. Have the SSVM and CPVM checked in ok? If you go on the VR through the vCenter console what do you see? paul.an...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue -Original Message- From: Tutkowski, Mike Sent: 14 November 2018 21:16 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 I’m having a hard time getting the VR with vSphere to come up successfully. I built the code from source (the specified commit) and am using the system VM template specified in this e-mail chain. I’m running in a Basic Zone. When I look at the details for the VR in the GUI, it says Requires Upgrade is Yes. When I click the button to upgrade the template, the operation fails. Thoughts? On 11/13/18, 6:59 AM, "Paul Angus" wrote: NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi All, I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following artefacts up for testing and a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924 Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 16th Nov. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Additional information: For users' convenience, I've built packages from 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 and published RC5 repository here: http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/41120rc5/ The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvm template upgrade section has been updated. 4.11.2.0 systemvm templates are available from here: http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/systemvm/41120rc5/ Only the following changes have been added to RC5: +-+--+---+--++ | Version | Github | Type | Priority | Description| +=+==+===+==++ | 4.11.2.0| `#3018`_ | | | Prevent error on GroupAnswers on VR creation | +-+--+---+--++ | 4.11.2.0| `#3007`_ | | | Add missing ConfigDrive entries on existing zones after| | | | | | upgrade | +-+--+---+--++ | 4.11.2.0| `#2980`_ | | | [4.11] Fix set initial reservation on public IP ranges | +-+--+---+--++ | 4.11.2.0| `#3010`_ | | | Fix DirectNetworkGuru canHandle checks for lowercase | | | | | | isolation methods | +-+--+---+--++ .. _`#3012`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3012 .. _`#3018`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3018 .. _`#3007`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3007 .. _`#2980`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2980 .. _`#3010`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3010 Kind regards, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
I’m having a hard time getting the VR with vSphere to come up successfully. I built the code from source (the specified commit) and am using the system VM template specified in this e-mail chain. I’m running in a Basic Zone. When I look at the details for the VR in the GUI, it says Requires Upgrade is Yes. When I click the button to upgrade the template, the operation fails. Thoughts? On 11/13/18, 6:59 AM, "Paul Angus" wrote: NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi All, I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following artefacts up for testing and a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924 Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 16th Nov. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Additional information: For users' convenience, I've built packages from 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 and published RC5 repository here: http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/41120rc5/ The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvm template upgrade section has been updated. 4.11.2.0 systemvm templates are available from here: http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/systemvm/41120rc5/ Only the following changes have been added to RC5: +-+--+---+--++ | Version | Github | Type | Priority | Description| +=+==+===+==++ | 4.11.2.0| `#3018`_ | | | Prevent error on GroupAnswers on VR creation | +-+--+---+--++ | 4.11.2.0| `#3007`_ | | | Add missing ConfigDrive entries on existing zones after| | | | | | upgrade | +-+--+---+--++ | 4.11.2.0| `#2980`_ | | | [4.11] Fix set initial reservation on public IP ranges | +-+--+---+--++ | 4.11.2.0| `#3010`_ | | | Fix DirectNetworkGuru canHandle checks for lowercase | | | | | | isolation methods | +-+--+---+--++ .. _`#3012`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3012 .. _`#3018`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3018 .. _`#3007`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3007 .. _`#2980`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2980 .. _`#3010`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3010 Kind regards, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
+1 (binding) Verified signed source tarball, deployed a local kvm based env in advanced zone and was able to validate vm, volume and network lifecycles tests. - Rohit <https://cloudstack.apache.org> From: Paul Angus Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2018 7:29:33 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 Hi All, I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following artefacts up for testing and a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924 Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 16th Nov. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Additional information: For users' convenience, I've built packages from 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 and published RC5 repository here: http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/41120rc5/ The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvm template upgrade section has been updated. 4.11.2.0 systemvm templates are available from here: http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/systemvm/41120rc5/ Only the following changes have been added to RC5: +-+--+---+--++ | Version | Github | Type | Priority | Description | +=+==+===+==++ | 4.11.2.0| `#3018`_ | | | Prevent error on GroupAnswers on VR creation | +-+--+---+--++ | 4.11.2.0| `#3007`_ | | | Add missing ConfigDrive entries on existing zones after| | | | | | upgrade | +-+--+---+--++ | 4.11.2.0| `#2980`_ | | | [4.11] Fix set initial reservation on public IP ranges | +-+--+---+--++ | 4.11.2.0| `#3010`_ | | | Fix DirectNetworkGuru canHandle checks for lowercase | | | | | | isolation methods | +-+--+---+--++ .. _`#3012`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3012 .. _`#3018`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3018 .. _`#3007`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3007 .. _`#2980`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2980 .. _`#3010`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3010 Kind regards, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue
[VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
Hi All, I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following artefacts up for testing and a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924 Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 16th Nov. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Additional information: For users' convenience, I've built packages from 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 and published RC5 repository here: http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/41120rc5/ The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvm template upgrade section has been updated. 4.11.2.0 systemvm templates are available from here: http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/systemvm/41120rc5/ Only the following changes have been added to RC5: +-+--+---+--++ | Version | Github | Type | Priority | Description | +=+==+===+==++ | 4.11.2.0| `#3018`_ | | | Prevent error on GroupAnswers on VR creation | +-+--+---+--++ | 4.11.2.0| `#3007`_ | | | Add missing ConfigDrive entries on existing zones after| | | | | | upgrade | +-+--+---+--++ | 4.11.2.0| `#2980`_ | | | [4.11] Fix set initial reservation on public IP ranges | +-+--+---+--++ | 4.11.2.0| `#3010`_ | | | Fix DirectNetworkGuru canHandle checks for lowercase | | | | | | isolation methods | +-+--+---+--++ .. _`#3012`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3012 .. _`#3018`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3018 .. _`#3007`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3007 .. _`#2980`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2980 .. _`#3010`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3010 Kind regards, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue