[GitHub] [openoffice] oooforum commented on pull request #151: Fix for Issue 114497
oooforum commented on PR #151: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/151#issuecomment-1151995625 Simple, read the BZ report https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=114497 and apply instructions from comment #37 Before, we can not use smtp with SSL protocol (like GMail account). After, access works. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
[GitHub] [openoffice] cbmarcum commented on pull request #151: Fix for Issue 114497
cbmarcum commented on PR #151: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/151#issuecomment-1151602055 Hi Cyril, could you provide some simple steps we can use to test this before and after the fix for those who have not used the mail merge feature before. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
[GitHub] [openoffice] cbmarcum merged pull request #150: Refs #i112383#, #i117960#, and #i126272# - Basic lang backports
cbmarcum merged PR #150: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/150 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
[GitHub] [openoffice] cbmarcum commented on pull request #150: Refs #i112383#, #i117960#, and #i126272# - Basic lang backports
cbmarcum commented on PR #150: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/150#issuecomment-1151455289 Based on this email thread [1] on dev@ I'm going to pull this in. [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/21vgh6ovcp7mnf82j7nz6rngzx7yvztn -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] Fixes for Basic lang in 4.1 line
On 6/9/22 11:46 AM, Carl Marcum wrote: Hi All, I have a PR-150 [1] that fixes a few issues with the Basic lang in AOO41X. These were fixes by Damjan back in 2015 in trunk and AOO42X. What I'm not sure is if leaving them out of 4.1.x was intentional or not due to not wanting to change API's or whatever. To me these seem more like bug fixes and not API changes so I think we should bring them in. The third issue was pointed out on the QA list recently by Lucien Mathay **so I included it as well. [2]. The example provided was the inspiration for the unit test I included for it. One fix is a bug in the CLng (convert to Long) function and the other two fix issues with single line if statements. For discussion: Should we included these fixes in 4.1.x? [1] https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/150 [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/hx09t5f4c4jt3x3fxn5sfkj2g0q9d56w Best regards, Carl Based on the positive responses thus far I'm going to pull them in. Best regards, Carl - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] Fixes for Basic lang in 4.1 line
Hi Damjan, On 6/9/22 1:20 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 5:46 PM Carl Marcum wrote: For discussion: Should we included these fixes in 4.1.x? The only reason I didn't include them myself, is that back then I expected 4.2.0 to be out soon, and didn't want to waste time backporting to 4.1.x which was about to be EOL. Thanks for the explanation! I just wanted to make sure there wasn't another reason. Best regards, Carl Regards Damjan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] Fixes for Basic lang in 4.1 line
Marcus wrote: Am 09.06.22 um 19:20 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 5:46 PM Carl Marcum wrote: For discussion: Should we included these fixes in 4.1.x? +1 from me. The only reason I didn't include them myself, is that back then I expected 4.2.0 to be out soon, and didn't want to waste time backporting to 4.1.x which was about to be EOL. Just to prevent any misunderstanding: 4.1.x is EOL when a 4.2.0 release is finally published. And even then we can decide to have both branches in parallel for some time. But as we have no date for 4.2.0, 4.1.x is and will be the most current release branch. Marcus Based on Damjan's explanation of why he didn't backport them a +1 from me as well. Regards Keith - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] Fixes for Basic lang in 4.1 line
Am 09.06.22 um 19:20 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 5:46 PM Carl Marcum wrote: For discussion: Should we included these fixes in 4.1.x? +1 from me. The only reason I didn't include them myself, is that back then I expected 4.2.0 to be out soon, and didn't want to waste time backporting to 4.1.x which was about to be EOL. Just to prevent any misunderstanding: 4.1.x is EOL when a 4.2.0 release is finally published. And even then we can decide to have both branches in parallel for some time. But as we have no date for 4.2.0, 4.1.x is and will be the most current release branch. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Size limits on mwiki for uploaded files are too small
Peter Kovacs wrote: Hi all, I set the upload size to 50MB all the best Peter Thank you very much Peter, it is greatly appreciated. Regards Keith Am 09.06.22 um 00:02 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi Keith, Am 07.06.22 um 23:29 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: Hi Matthias Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi Keith, Am 07.06.22 um 05:06 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: I found a way to reduce the size of the PDF by not using PDF-1A. Thank you for looking at this. While not using PDF-1A may reduce the size because fonts etc. are not embedded in the PDF we lose the control over the appearance of the PDF on the user side. The problem with PDF/A-1A is that it does not allow transparencies and converts them to a graphic. For the Getting Started Guide, this results in a 3 page ToC graphic, as well as changes to many of the graphics used. If we are going to loose control anyway, I would rather do it and gain smaller file size right now. You are right regarding transparency... I didn't think of that. But then we should at least embed the used font(s). However, this brings up the question is it time to explore other means of creating the PDF than what we have today? Have we ever looked at PDFBox? Depending on your OS you could also test one of these PDF "printer". I often use PDF24 on Windows... Regards, Matthias What I have done for the PDF is to delete the TOC from the ODT and create the PDF\A-1a and export the bookmarks as active links. It is still a bit larger than I would like, but it does embed the fonts as well give the user usable TOC. Regards Keith - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] Fixes for Basic lang in 4.1 line
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 5:46 PM Carl Marcum wrote: > For discussion: > Should we included these fixes in 4.1.x? > The only reason I didn't include them myself, is that back then I expected 4.2.0 to be out soon, and didn't want to waste time backporting to 4.1.x which was about to be EOL. Regards Damjan
Re: Smart tags
Hi Czesław, Am 09.06.22 um 18:13 schrieb Czesław Wolański: > Hi Dick, Matthias, > > The "OpenOffice Smarttags" topic on the English forum > https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?t=83377 > > You might check an example extension provided by Hanya. Thanks for the pointer to the example! I still think this could be an interesting feature... Regards, Matthias > > Best regards, > Czesław > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [DISCUSS] Fixes for Basic lang in 4.1 line
Hi Carl, all, Am 09.06.22 um 17:46 schrieb Carl Marcum: > Hi All, > > I have a PR-150 [1] that fixes a few issues with the Basic lang in > AOO41X. > These were fixes by Damjan back in 2015 in trunk and AOO42X. > > What I'm not sure is if leaving them out of 4.1.x was intentional or > not due to not wanting to change API's or whatever. > To me these seem more like bug fixes and not API changes so I think we > should bring them in. > > The third issue was pointed out on the QA list recently by Lucien > Mathay **so I included it as well. [2]. > The example provided was the inspiration for the unit test I included > for it. > > One fix is a bug in the CLng (convert to Long) function and the other > two fix issues with single line if statements. > > For discussion: > Should we included these fixes in 4.1.x? Personally, I also think these are bugfixes. So +1 for merging into AOO41X. Regards, Matthias > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/150 > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/hx09t5f4c4jt3x3fxn5sfkj2g0q9d56w > > Best regards, > Carl > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Smart tags
Hi Dick, Matthias, The "OpenOffice Smarttags" topic on the English forum https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?t=83377 You might check an example extension provided by Hanya. Best regards, Czesław - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
[DISCUSS] Fixes for Basic lang in 4.1 line
Hi All, I have a PR-150 [1] that fixes a few issues with the Basic lang in AOO41X. These were fixes by Damjan back in 2015 in trunk and AOO42X. What I'm not sure is if leaving them out of 4.1.x was intentional or not due to not wanting to change API's or whatever. To me these seem more like bug fixes and not API changes so I think we should bring them in. The third issue was pointed out on the QA list recently by Lucien Mathay **so I included it as well. [2]. The example provided was the inspiration for the unit test I included for it. One fix is a bug in the CLng (convert to Long) function and the other two fix issues with single line if statements. For discussion: Should we included these fixes in 4.1.x? [1] https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/150 [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/hx09t5f4c4jt3x3fxn5sfkj2g0q9d56w Best regards, Carl - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Linux VM
4GB is a bit low... But I have Windows 10 running on a 2GB machine. Am 09.06.22 um 16:13 schrieb Bidouille: > My computer has just 4Gb under Windows 7 > If I try to create a VM, the system crash. > > - Mail original - >> De: "Matthias Seidel" >> À: dev@openoffice.apache.org >> Envoyé: Jeudi 9 Juin 2022 15:58:13 >> Objet: Re: Linux VM >> >> My Linux VM needs 2 GB... >> >> Am 09.06.22 um 15:55 schrieb Bidouille: On the other hand: A Linux VM e.g. in VirtualBox is set up in 15 minutes... >>> Possible if your computer has enough RAM >>> Not my case >>> >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> >> > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Linux VM
My computer has just 4Gb under Windows 7 If I try to create a VM, the system crash. - Mail original - > De: "Matthias Seidel" > À: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Envoyé: Jeudi 9 Juin 2022 15:58:13 > Objet: Re: Linux VM > > My Linux VM needs 2 GB... > > Am 09.06.22 um 15:55 schrieb Bidouille: > >> On the other hand: A Linux VM e.g. in VirtualBox is set up in 15 > >> minutes... > > Possible if your computer has enough RAM > > Not my case > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
[GitHub] [openoffice] oooforum opened a new pull request, #151: Fix for Issue 114497
oooforum opened a new pull request, #151: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/151 Thanks to hanya for this patch -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Linux VM
My Linux VM needs 2 GB... Am 09.06.22 um 15:55 schrieb Bidouille: >> On the other hand: A Linux VM e.g. in VirtualBox is set up in 15 >> minutes... > Possible if your computer has enough RAM > Not my case > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Linux VM
> On the other hand: A Linux VM e.g. in VirtualBox is set up in 15 > minutes... Possible if your computer has enough RAM Not my case - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Linux VM
Hi, Someone would have to host that Linux VM somewhere... On the other hand: A Linux VM e.g. in VirtualBox is set up in 15 minutes... Regards, Matthias Am 06.06.22 um 18:30 schrieb Bidouille: > Hello > > I use MacStadium VM for testing my AOO extensions. > Do you think is possible to have a same machine with Linux (Debian or other > distro)? > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature