Re: Release Candidate for AOO 4.1.7?
Hi, so far no issues under Ubuntu 19.04 64 bit. Installed orcale-java and openjre 11.04 are recognized. Regards Am 03.09.19 um 12:18 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Hi all, I think it is time to do our (first) Release Candidate for AOO 4.1.7. Unofficial test builds for Windows are already here [1] and those for macOS and Linux here [2]. Please test, so we can decide to build an RC. Regards, Matthias [1] https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-417-Test/ [2] https://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/AOO417-test/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Building AOO 4.2.0 for Windows with AdoptOpenJDK
Hi, Am 31.08.19 um 10:23 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Hi all, At the moment I am doing my test builds (trunk and 42X) for Windows with the latest Oracle JDK (8u221). I am still able to download, but Oracle changed its licensing. I am not a lawyer and would prefer to move away from it. Why move away? https://www.java.com -> The new license permits certain uses, such as personal use and development use, at no cost. Regards - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: 32-bit buildbots
Hi, what's about the 64 bit builds? They are outdated > 1 month. Regards Josef Am 25.06.19 um 15:31 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi all, > > Infra does not provide 32-bit slaves anymore, so we will not have new > builds for Linux32 here: > > https://www.openoffice.org/download/devbuilds.html > > I will update the page but leave the links to the most recent builds for > a while. > > Regards, > > Matthias > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Java 12 not recognized by AOO
Hi, locations in Ubuntu 19.04, where java 11 is marked as supported: /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64 In java 11 there is no folder .../jre. For me, it seems that the path to java is hard coded. Regards Josef Am 09.05.19 um 19:42 schrieb Larry Gusaas: > On 2019-05-09 1:13 a.m., FR web forum wrote: >>> The location on my Mac is: >>> HD/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk-12.0.1.jdk/Contents/Home >> Java parameters are read by AOO in javasettings_MacOSX_X86_64.xml >> Location in: >> HD > Library > Application Support > OpenOffice > 4 > User > config >> Could you post the content of this file? > > HD > (user name) > Library > Application Support > OpenOffice > 4 > User >> config > > > > http://openoffice.org/2004/java/framework/1.0"; > xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";> > true > > > > file:///Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.8.0_101.jdk/Contents/Home/jre > > file:///Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.8.0_144.jdk/Contents/Home/jre > > file:///Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk-11.0.1.jdk/Contents/Home > > file:///Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk-11.0.2.jdk/Contents/Home > > > > Oracle Corporation > file:///Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk-12.0.1.jdk/Contents/Home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o unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
[vote] OpenOffice Release Candidate 4.1.6 RC1
+1 Ubuntu 64 bit Regards Josef Am 06.11.18 um 11:45 schrieb Pedro Lino: -- The Release Candidate 1 for 4.1.6 has passed my tests. [x ] yes / +1 I have tested Windows Release [ x] binary Installed the Full Portuguese (pt) installer plus the en_US Language Pack Linux Release 64 bit [ x] source / binding [ x] binary Compiled and tested the resulting en_US x64 binaries Downloaded and tested the x64 deb en_US binaries Best regards, Pedro - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website
Hi, Am 15.04.2014 14:13, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > Josef Latt wrote: >> there is still AOO 4.1.0 Beta to download. Meanwhile we have the RC3. > > You were referring to http://www.openoffice.org/download/ right? > > It's intentional that the two prominent items are 4.0.1 and 4.1.0-beta. > Use the (now updated) "Development Builds" link on the same page for > latest snapshots. Intentional? IMHO it's misleading if someone wants to test a developer build (Beta, RC) and find an outdated version at a prominent place. What's about bugs in the Beta (unnecessary issues), which are corrected in later versions (RC). It would be better (IMO) to place the URL to those developer versions with an appropiate comment. Regards - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website
Hi, there is still AOO 4.1.0 Beta to download. Meanwhile we have the RC3. Regards - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Report Builder, bug
Hi, there seems to be a problem with the version of Report Builder in the extension site. See below. Regards Josef --- Original-Nachricht Betreff: Re: Report Builder Datum: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 14:04:12 -0300 Von: Ariel Constenla-Haile An: Josef Latt Hi, On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 05:25:50PM +0200, Josef Latt wrote: Hi, AOO 4.0.0 wants to upgrade the Report Builder to version 1.2.1-rev2. After installing from the AOO extension site version is still 1.2.1. Therefore I downloaded it from your site (http://people.apache.org/~arielch/extensions/reportbuilder/) meaning that this should be the 1.2.1-rev2. But the extension manager still offers the upgrade. In the file 'description.xml' you find If I change this to 1.2.1-rev2 is not a valid version number... anyway, it seems to be this http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/projectrelease/oracle-report-builder-121-rev2 but the version value inside the extension is still 1.2.1 This looks like a bug caused with extension's site update, feel free to report it on dev@openoffice.apache.org Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina --- Nachrichtenteil als Anhang Description: PGP signature - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org