Re: [racket-dev] `take-until' etc
Me too. I like `take-until' as well. 2011/6/8 Jay McCarthy : > I'd really like #:unless as well > > iPhoneから送信 > > On 2011/06/08, at 9:21, Eli Barzilay wrote: > >> Anyone seconds this? >> >> And if so, then maybe for-loops should have an `#:unless' too? (I >> know that this was raised, but now there's more experience using it.) >> >> >> >> Yesterday, Jay McCarthy wrote: >>> I've used them before and I find they "read" better than using negate. >>> >>> 2011/6/7 Eli Barzilay : Does anyone see a need for `take-until' (and `drop-' and `-right' versions), or is `negate' enough to not have that? >> >> -- >> ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: >>http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! > _ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev > -- sam th sa...@ccs.neu.edu _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [racket-dev] `take-until' etc
I'd really like #:unless as well iPhoneから送信 On 2011/06/08, at 9:21, Eli Barzilay wrote: > Anyone seconds this? > > And if so, then maybe for-loops should have an `#:unless' too? (I > know that this was raised, but now there's more experience using it.) > > > > Yesterday, Jay McCarthy wrote: >> I've used them before and I find they "read" better than using negate. >> >> 2011/6/7 Eli Barzilay : >>> Does anyone see a need for `take-until' (and `drop-' and `-right' >>> versions), or is `negate' enough to not have that? > > -- > ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: >http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [racket-dev] `take-until' etc
Anyone seconds this? And if so, then maybe for-loops should have an `#:unless' too? (I know that this was raised, but now there's more experience using it.) Yesterday, Jay McCarthy wrote: > I've used them before and I find they "read" better than using negate. > > 2011/6/7 Eli Barzilay : > > Does anyone see a need for `take-until' (and `drop-' and `-right' > > versions), or is `negate' enough to not have that? -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [racket-dev] `take-until' etc
I've used them before and I find they "read" better than using negate. 2011/6/7 Eli Barzilay : > Does anyone see a need for `take-until' (and `drop-' and `-right' > versions), or is `negate' enough to not have that? > -- > ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: > http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! > _ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev > -- Jay McCarthy Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay "The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93 _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
[racket-dev] `take-until' etc
Does anyone see a need for `take-until' (and `drop-' and `-right' versions), or is `negate' enough to not have that? -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
