Batch upgrade of PETSc Sundials MUMPS libraries
Hi all. I'm preparing (1) following updates for Fedora 41: PETSc-3.21.1 (https://petsc.org/release/changes/321/) MUMPS-5.7.1 (https://mumps-solver.org/index.php?page=dwnld#cl) Sundials-7.0.0 (https://github.com/LLNL/sundials/releases/tag/v7.0.0) All dependent packages can be rebuilt with these new releases except bout++-5.1.0 that it's incompatible with Sundials-7; bout++ upstream already modified their code to work with Sundials-7 but it's unreleased yet (https://github.com/boutproject/BOUT-dev/tree/next). 1- https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/builds/ -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x40FDA7B70789A9CD GPG keys server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL9 updates obsoleted
Yes, but i can't because the side-tag is already used. On 08/04/24 09:52, Sandro wrote: On 07-04-2024 19:04, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: Can this update be re-activated or i have to rebuild everything? https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-c154b725ab Have you tried re-submitting the side tag to Bodhi? -- ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x40FDA7B70789A9CD GPG keys server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
EPEL9 updates obsoleted
Hi all. Can this update be re-activated or i have to rebuild everything? https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-c154b725ab Regards -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x40FDA7B70789A9CD GPG keys server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[EPEL-devel] EPEL9 updates obsoleted
Hi all. Can this update be re-activated or i have to rebuild everything? https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-c154b725ab Regards -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x40FDA7B70789A9CD GPG keys server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: openclonk: undefined reference to `zmemcpy'
Hi all. I'm seriously thinking to abandon 'openclonk' rpm. The project is currently unmaintained. On 08/03/24 16:01, Martin Gansser wrote: Hi, when compiling openclonk [1] on rawhide it fails with this error message [2]: /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_link_script CMakeFiles/c4group.dir/link.txt --verbose=1 /usr/bin/g++ -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Wno-complain-wrong-lang -Wno-error=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -Wall -Wextra -Wredundant-decls -Wendif-labels -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-qual -Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Winit-self -Wsign-promo -Wno-reorder -Wno-unused-parameter -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Woverloaded-virtual -Wformat-security -Werror=delete-incomplete -DNDEBUG -flto=auto -fno-fat-lto-objects -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,pack-relative-relocs -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld-errors -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -W l,--build-id=sha1 -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-package-notes CMakeFiles/c4group.dir/c4group_autogen/mocs_compilation.cpp.o CMakeFiles/c4group.dir/src/c4group/C4GroupMain.cpp.o -o c4group liblibmisc.a /usr/lib64/libz.so -lpthread -lrt make[2]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/openclonk-701bcf38c9f3c4877e1b4a8651b9ce922b15969e/build' /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccgvFyfu.ltrans1.ltrans.o: in function `c4_gzread': /builddir/build/BUILD/openclonk-701bcf38c9f3c4877e1b4a8651b9ce922b15969e/src/zlib/gzio.c:450:(.text+0x3fd0): undefined reference to `zmemcpy' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status How can this be fixed ?? [1] https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/ErrorReports/openclonk/openclonk-8.1-24.20210103git701bcf3.fc39.src.rpm [2] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/5278/114665278/build.log Thanks Martin -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x40FDA7B70789A9CD GPG keys server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Dropping libdv i686
Hi all. libdv is currently failing in i686 architectures, it could be dropped. Does anyone still need libdv-1686? $ fedrq whatrequires libdv -F source dvgrab gstreamer1-plugins-good xawtv Recent scratch f41 build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=114030172 RHBZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261310 Regards. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x40FDA7B70789A9CD GPG keys server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Upgrade to Sundials-6.7.0
Hi all. Next release of Sundials is coming in Rawhide in some days. Related dependent packages are: cantera octave bout++ Probably, the following one will be a major release (the 7.0) Best regards. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x40FDA7B70789A9CD GPG keys server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Retirement of sundials2 seqan seqan2 wise2
Hi all. Following packages will be retired in Rawhide branch: seqan (deprecated by seqan3), https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/seqan seqan2 (deprecated by seqan3), https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/seqan2 wise2 (unmaintained by upstream, no longer needed in Fedora), https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/wise2 sundials2 (oldest version of current sundials-6*, no longer needed in Fedora), https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sundials2 Regards. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x40FDA7B70789A9CD GPG keys server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
MUMPS update to the 5.6.2 version
Hi all. In January, i will update MUMPS solver to the release 5.6.2 in Rawhide branch. The packages needing a rebuild are: amg4psblas coin-or-Cbc coin-or-Clp coin-or-Ipopt freefem++ petsc MUMPS's changelog is at the bottom of Upstream webpage https://mumps-solver.org/index.php?page=dwnld Regards. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x40FDA7B70789A9CD GPG keys server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
SCons-4.6.0
Hi all. SCons-4.6.0 will be built in Rawhide. Here there are testing builds if you need to try your packages with it: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/build/6771118/ Regards. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x40FDA7B70789A9CD GPG keys server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
superlu_dist update to the release 8.2.0
Hi all. I will update superlu_dist to the release 8.2.0 soon; all related dependencies will be rebuilt. $ fedrq wrsrc superlu_dist amg4psblas-1.1.0-7.fc39.src freefem++-4.13-7.fc40.src hypre-2.24.0-8.fc40.src petsc-3.20.1-2.fc40.src Regards -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x40FDA7B70789A9CD GPG keys server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Upgrades of Sundials and PETSc
Hi all. In 1 week, i will upgrade Sundials and PETSc to their related newer versions: PETSc-3.20.0 https://petsc.org/release/changes/320/ sundials-6.6.1 https://github.com/LLNL/sundials/releases Following packages will be rebuilt: bout++ freefem++ octave cantera dolfin Regards. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x40FDA7B70789A9CD GPG keys server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
PETSc upgrade to the release 3.19.4
Hi all. In some days (7 days al least), i will upgrade PETSc libraries to the release 3.19.4 in Rawhide (waiting for PETSc-3.20). All related dependencies will be rebuilt in a f39-side-tag build tree. Best regards. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x40FDA7B70789A9CD GPG keys server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
SuperLU updated to the release 6.0
Hi all In some days, i will update SuperLU to the release 6.0.0 All related dependent packages will be rebuilt in a side-tag: $ repoquery --whatrequires 'libsuperlu.so.5()(64bit)' SuperLU-devel-0:5.3.0-4.fc38.x86_64 amg4psblas-serial-0:1.1.0-5.fc38.x86_64 armadillo-0:10.8.2-3.fc38.x86_64 freefem++-0:4.12-2.fc38.x86_64 freefem++-0:4.13-2.fc38.x86_64 hypre-0:2.24.0-3.fc37.x86_64 octave-iso2mesh-0:1.9.6-8.fc37.x86_64 opentoonz-0:1.6.0-11.fc38.x86_64 petsc-0:3.17.4-15.fc38.x86_64 Best Regards -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x40FDA7B70789A9CD GPG keys server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Reportlab-4.0.0
Hi all. Reportlab-4.0.4 is coming in Rawhide branch in some days. Release notes: https://docs.reportlab.com/releases/notes/whats-new-40/ It looks like this new release is installed in python-sitelib paths instead of older python-sitearch paths. Best regards. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x40FDA7B70789A9CD GPG keys server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Multiple soname bumps Scotch PETSc Sundials Bout++
Hi all. We are ready to upgrade multiple libraries: Scotch-7.0.3 PETSc-3.18.5 Sundials-6.5.1 Bout++-5.0.0 In one week at least, these libraries + related dependencies + a new Python package (python-zoidberg, needed by bout++) will be built in a f39 side-tag Best Regards -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x40FDA7B70789A9CD GPG keys server: https://keyserver.dcc.sib.swiss/ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Version number of python-future
Thank you On 16/01/23 06:19, Lumír Balhar wrote: Hi Antonio. The problem is in the project metadata. When I open the SRPM this package is built from and the take a look at the source tarball, I find this in the src/future/__init__.py: __ver_major__ = 0 __ver_minor__ = 18 __ver_patch__ = 2 So it seems that they released version 0.18.3 with the wrong version in this file. This is already fixed upstream and when I download the tarball again, it also has a different hash. I did a mock rebuild with the new tarball and the result contains: Provides: future = 0:0.18.3-2.fc38 future-python3 = 0:0.18.3-2.fc38 python-future = 0.18.3-2.fc38 python3-future = 0.18.3-2.fc38 python3.11-future = 0.18.3-2.fc38 python3.11dist(future) = 0.18.3 python3dist(future) = 0.18.3 Have a nice day. Lumír On 1/13/23 21:52, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: Hi all. Latest release of `future`, the 0.18.3 (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=32957279), is generating future = 0:0.18.3-2.fc38 future-python3 = 0:0.18.3-2.fc38 python-future = 0.18.3-2.fc38 python3-future = 0.18.3-2.fc38 python3.11-future = 0.18.3-2.fc38 python3.11dist(future) = 0.18.2 <--- python3dist(future) = 0.18.2 <--- Can you help to understand why? Regards. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto:sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x40FDA7B70789A9CD GPG keys server:https://keyserver.dcc.sib.swiss/ ___ python-devel mailing list --python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email topython-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it:https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x40FDA7B70789A9CD GPG keys server: https://keyserver.dcc.sib.swiss/ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Version number of python-future
Hi all. Latest release of `future`, the 0.18.3 (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=32957279), is generating future = 0:0.18.3-2.fc38 future-python3 = 0:0.18.3-2.fc38 python-future = 0.18.3-2.fc38 python3-future = 0.18.3-2.fc38 python3.11-future = 0.18.3-2.fc38 python3.11dist(future) = 0.18.2 <--- python3dist(future) = 0.18.2 <--- Can you help to understand why? Regards. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto:sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x40FDA7B70789A9CD GPG keys server:https://keyserver.dcc.sib.swiss/ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Retiring qwtplot3d-qt4
Hi all. Current and older 'qwtplot3d' sub-packages (0.2.7) will be obsoleted by newer Qt5/Qt6 rpms of 'qwtplot3d' (0.3.0) The rpm 'qwtplot3d-qt5' will be retired because replaced by 'qwtplot3d' sub-packages. Please, let me know if anyone still needs qwtplot3d (Qt4) 0.2.7 Regards. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto:sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x40FDA7B70789A9CD GPG keys server:https://keyserver.dcc.sib.swiss/ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Qt6 qwtplot3d review
Hi all. qwtplot3d-qt6 is a new package and needs a review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2156091 I will glad to review another package in return of your courteousness. Best regards -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto:sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x40FDA7B70789A9CD GPG keys server:https://keyserver.dcc.sib.swiss/ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Scotch-7.0/PETSc-3.18.1 upgrade
Okay. I'm rebuilding your package in my Copr project (https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/); please, require builder permissions inside it to build all Scotch dependent packages you maintain. Same thing i will do with those mine. When all RPMs will be ready, we will can push them in Rawhide. On 12/11/22 16:56, Sandro Mani wrote: On 12.11.22 12:19, Antonio Trande wrote: Hi Some time ago I've started working on updating to scotch-7.x, with some initial test builds here [1]. To finalize the update, I'd like to gather some opinions (potentially affected maintainers in CC): Hi all. Hi Sandro. PETSc is ready/tested for Scotch-7* with the release 3.18.1 They could be compiled in Rawhide now. Do you agree to syncronize the upgrades of these libraries and related dependencies? Hi Antonio Yes sure - I've just checked where I left off, I'd have this build [1] ready, with scotchmetis disabled by default. Let me know how you want to proceed. Thanks Sandro [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=94094209 -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x40FDA7B70789A9CD GPG keys server: https://keyserver.dcc.sib.swiss/ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Scotch-7.0/PETSc-3.18.1 upgrade
> Hi > > Some time ago I've started working on updating to scotch-7.x, with some > initial test builds here [1]. To finalize the update, I'd like to gather > some opinions (potentially affected maintainers in CC): Hi all. Hi Sandro. PETSc is ready/tested for Scotch-7* with the release 3.18.1 They could be compiled in Rawhide now. Do you agree to syncronize the upgrades of these libraries and related dependencies? > > - Should metis get retired? Scotch has a scotchmetis compatibility > library which is advertised as a faster drop-in replacement for metis, > and indeed ships a metis.h which would conflict with the one from the > original metis package. > - Should I be adding 64-bit index builds for i686? There is a metis64 > package, but since i686 is expected to go away soonish, is it worth the > effort? This is of interest to petsc which currently BRs metis64-devel. > > Side note: I don't really recall how I ended up maintaining scotch, but > if someone who is actively using the package is willing to step up and > (co-)maintain it, please let me know! > > Thanks > Sandro > > [1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/smani/scotch-7.0.0 Metis is not a "dead project", its maintainers have a GitHub project https://github.com/KarypisLab/METIS but an absent support. I would avoid to activate the Metis code in Scotch. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: OpenMPI tests blocked
Great! Thank you all. On 11/11/22 16:13, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 11/11/22 07:52, Christoph Junghans wrote: On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 10:27 PM Orion Poplawski wrote: On 11/6/22 07:31, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Saturday, 05 November 2022 at 21:27, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: Hi all. Many OpenMPI tests in RPM packaging are blocked for unknown reason, no output or error, just hanged until test timeout. For example, PETSc test is blocked with this message: Executing: /usr/lib64/openmpi/bin/mpiexec -n 8 --mca btl_base_warn_component_unused 0 -n 1 /tmp/petsc-p7fo3olx/config.packages.MPI/conftest Running Executable with threads to time it out at 120 Executing: /usr/lib64/openmpi/bin/mpiexec -n 8 --mca btl_base_warn_component_unused 0 -n 1 /tmp/petsc-p7fo3olx/config.packages.MPI/conftest Runaway process exceeded time limit of 120 ERROR while running executable: Could not execute "['/usr/lib64/openmpi/bin/mpiexec -n 8 --mca btl_base_warn_component_unused 0 -n 1 /tmp/petsc-p7fo3olx/config.packages.MPI/conftest']": Runaway process exceeded time limit of 120 Something like this happened with Sundials and Ipopt, when OpenMPI is used, not with MPICH. At this time, these tests in Rawhide (and ELN) cannot be executed. I've got the same issue with elpa. OpenMPI hangs, MPICH works fine. Let's open a bug against OpenMPI and compare notes. ;) Regards, Dominik We have: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2141137 I've reported it upstream as well. Hopefully they can help. openSUSE had a similar bug: https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1205139 Maybe that is related. Christoph Thank you! I believe that is it exactly. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x40FDA7B70789A9CD GPG keys server: https://keyserver.dcc.sib.swiss/ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
OpenMPI tests blocked
Hi all. Many OpenMPI tests in RPM packaging are blocked for unknown reason, no output or error, just hanged until test timeout. For example, PETSc test is blocked with this message: Executing: /usr/lib64/openmpi/bin/mpiexec -n 8 --mca btl_base_warn_component_unused 0 -n 1 /tmp/petsc-p7fo3olx/config.packages.MPI/conftest Running Executable with threads to time it out at 120 Executing: /usr/lib64/openmpi/bin/mpiexec -n 8 --mca btl_base_warn_component_unused 0 -n 1 /tmp/petsc-p7fo3olx/config.packages.MPI/conftest Runaway process exceeded time limit of 120 ERROR while running executable: Could not execute "['/usr/lib64/openmpi/bin/mpiexec -n 8 --mca btl_base_warn_component_unused 0 -n 1 /tmp/petsc-p7fo3olx/config.packages.MPI/conftest']": Runaway process exceeded time limit of 120 Something like this happened with Sundials and Ipopt, when OpenMPI is used, not with MPICH. At this time, these tests in Rawhide (and ELN) cannot be executed. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto:sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x40FDA7B70789A9CD GPG keys server:https://keyserver.dcc.sib.swiss/ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Handle sysroot.readyonly=true migration in other rpm-ostree Fedora(s)
Hi folks, in rpm-ostree based systems like fedora iot I would love to handle the migration process similar to what happens today in silverblue et all wrt sysroot.readonly https://pagure.io/workstation-ostree-config/blob/main/f/postprocess.sh - unfortunately that systemd service and script aren't packaged anywhere and I'd love to have it versioned in RPMs to be used by other spins too. I couldn't find any other conversations around this so I'm opening this one to discuss how and where such a migration should be handled/shipped/run in other systems. Thanks a lot in advance ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Adding subpackages to EPEL
Hi everyone,
I'm the maintainer of the FreeRADIUS package in Fedora and RHEL. This
package contains multiple subpackages that are shipped in Fedora while
In RHEL9 we removed some of these. There are some users requesting
these subpackages to be available in RHEL9, so I would like to add
them to EPEL9.
All these subpackages are shipped in Fedora but not in RHEL9:
freeradius-{mysql,postgresql,sqlite,unixODBC}
freeradius-perl
freeradius-rest
I tried to create an EPEL9 branch but I can't since "This package is
already an EL package, therefore it cannot be in EPEL". This is true
for the base freeradius package and some subpackages, but not all. How
can I add these to EPEL?
Thanks!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
SCons-4.4.0
Hi all. SCons-4.4.0 (or later) is coming on Rawhide branch. Changelog: https://github.com/SCons/scons/releases/tag/4.4.0 Best regards. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
MUMPS 5.5.0
Hi all. Next release of MUMPS is the 5.5.0, it will be built in Rawhide within 7 days together with related dependencies. Changelog: http://mumps.enseeiht.fr/index.php?page=dwnld Best regards. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
superlu_dist-8.0.0
Hi all. Next release of superlu_dist will be in Rawhide not before next seven days. All dependent packages will be rebuilt. Changelog: https://github.com/xiaoyeli/superlu_dist/releases/tag/v8.0.0 Regards. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Missing dependency in Fedora 35 - bug 2097817
Hi all. I need to downgrade python-reportlab in Fedora 35 for a missing runtime dependency. What's the most accurate way? Bug ticket: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097817 Update: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-23aefe21ad Regards. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Archive value is out of time_t range
Hi Mamoru. Could be useful changing timestamp of that file when i create the IceCat source archive to resolve this problem? On 6/2/22 16:50, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: Antonio T. sagitter wrote on 2022/06/02 23:33: Hi all. rpmuncompress is failing in Rawhide i686 architecture only with: /usr/bin/tar: Archive value 4027676192 is out of time_t range -2147483648..2147483647 /usr/bin/tar: icecat-91.10.0/extensions/gnu/jid1-KtlZuoiikVfFew@jetpack/bundle.js: implausibly old time stamp 1969-12-31 23:59:59 ... (https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1685/87811685/build.log) If it was an archive issue, it should happen in all architectures. Anyone know why this occurs? Best, Perhaps it is 32 bit architecture. Actually: [tasaka1@localhost icecat-91.10.0]$ ls -al extensions/gnu/jid1-KtlZuoiikVfFew@jetpack/bundle.js -rw-r--r--. 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 433208 Jul 29 2114 extensions/gnu/jid1-KtlZuoiikVfFew@jetpack/bundle.js This is above year 2038. (Anyway the timestamp on this file seems strange.) Regards, Mamoru ___ -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Archive value is out of time_t range
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2092964 On 6/2/22 17:46, Petr Pisar wrote: I recommend you to file a bug against tar in Fedora's Bugzilla. However, this proposed solution would require rebuilding in the same way all libraries which tar uses and which pass time_t and similar types in their interface. That would probably break other packages. So maybe more realisic fix will enhancing tar to ignore these time stamps when unpacking an archive. -- Petr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Archive value is out of time_t range
Hi all. rpmuncompress is failing in Rawhide i686 architecture only with: /usr/bin/tar: Archive value 4027676192 is out of time_t range -2147483648..2147483647 /usr/bin/tar: icecat-91.10.0/extensions/gnu/jid1-KtlZuoiikVfFew@jetpack/bundle.js: implausibly old time stamp 1969-12-31 23:59:59 ... (https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1685/87811685/build.log) If it was an archive issue, it should happen in all architectures. Anyone know why this occurs? Best, -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
rdkit package re-review
Hi all. rdkit package is under re-review for unretiring. Please, take a look if you can. Bug ticket: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081113 Regards -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Batch updates PETSc-3.17 hypre-2.24.0 superlu_dist-7.2.0
I will push these updates next weekend. On 4/6/22 18:58, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: Hi all. This is the upgrade of some libraries in Rawhide: petsc-3.17: $ dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libpetsc*.so*' --source | sort -u bout++-4.4.0-2.fc35.src.rpm dolfin-2019.1.0.post0-21.fc35.src.rpm getdp-3.3.0-12.fc35.src.rpm PETSc-3.17 needs superlu_dist-6.3.0 at least, so i prepared a new recent release of superlu_dist-7.2.0 that uses CMake as configuration tool (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/superlu_dist/pull-request/1): $ dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libsuperlu_dist*.so*' --source | sort -u amg4psblas-1.0.0-4.fc35.src.rpm hypre-2.18.2-4.fc35.src.rpm petsc-3.15.3-2.fc35.src.rpm Current Hypre release does not compile against superlu_dist-7.2, so i built Hypre-2.24.0, the last one. $ dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libHYPRE*.so*' --source | sort -u petsc-3.15.3-2.fc35.src.rpm sundials-5.7.0-3.fc35.src.rpm The circle of the dependencies should be closed: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/builds/ If all maintainers agree, i can create a side-tag for these new builds. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Batch updates PETSc-3.17 hypre-2.24.0 superlu_dist-7.2.0
If bout++ and Octave are ready for Sundials 6, we can. On 4/6/22 22:26, David wrote: On 4/6/22 18:58, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: Hi all. This is the upgrade of some libraries in Rawhide: petsc-3.17: $ dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libpetsc*.so*' --source | sort -u bout++-4.4.0-2.fc35.src.rpm dolfin-2019.1.0.post0-21.fc35.src.rpm getdp-3.3.0-12.fc35.src.rpm PETSc-3.17 needs superlu_dist-6.3.0 at least, so i prepared a new recent release of superlu_dist-7.2.0 that uses CMake as configuration tool (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/superlu_dist/pull-request/1): $ dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libsuperlu_dist*.so*' --source | sort -u amg4psblas-1.0.0-4.fc35.src.rpm hypre-2.18.2-4.fc35.src.rpm petsc-3.15.3-2.fc35.src.rpm Current Hypre release does not compile against superlu_dist-7.2, so i built Hypre-2.24.0, the last one. $ dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libHYPRE*.so*' --source | sort -u petsc-3.15.3-2.fc35.src.rpm sundials-5.7.0-3.fc35.src.rpm The circle of the dependencies should be closed: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/builds/ If all maintainers agree, i can create a side-tag for these new builds. Why not update sundials as well? Is only BOUT++ blocking that? Thanks for working on this, David ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Batch updates PETSc-3.17 hypre-2.24.0 superlu_dist-7.2.0
Hi all. This is the upgrade of some libraries in Rawhide: petsc-3.17: $ dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libpetsc*.so*' --source | sort -u bout++-4.4.0-2.fc35.src.rpm dolfin-2019.1.0.post0-21.fc35.src.rpm getdp-3.3.0-12.fc35.src.rpm PETSc-3.17 needs superlu_dist-6.3.0 at least, so i prepared a new recent release of superlu_dist-7.2.0 that uses CMake as configuration tool (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/superlu_dist/pull-request/1): $ dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libsuperlu_dist*.so*' --source | sort -u amg4psblas-1.0.0-4.fc35.src.rpm hypre-2.18.2-4.fc35.src.rpm petsc-3.15.3-2.fc35.src.rpm Current Hypre release does not compile against superlu_dist-7.2, so i built Hypre-2.24.0, the last one. $ dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libHYPRE*.so*' --source | sort -u petsc-3.15.3-2.fc35.src.rpm sundials-5.7.0-3.fc35.src.rpm The circle of the dependencies should be closed: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/builds/ If all maintainers agree, i can create a side-tag for these new builds. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
NativeJIT/function.h error with GCC12
Hi all.
I need help for following error due to the new GCC12:
make[2]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/COPASI-Build-251/build'
*** WARNING *** there are active plugins, do not report this as a bug
unless you can reproduce it without enabling any plugins.
Event| Plugins
PLUGIN_FINISH_UNIT | annobin: Generate final annotations
PLUGIN_START_UNIT| annobin: Generate global annotations
PLUGIN_ALL_PASSES_START | annobin: Generate per-function
annotations
PLUGIN_ALL_PASSES_END| annobin: Register per-function end
symbols
In file included from
/builddir/build/BUILD/COPASI-Build-251/copasi/math/CJitCompiler.h:15,
from
/builddir/build/BUILD/COPASI-Build-251/copasi/math/CMathContainer.h:35,
from
/builddir/build/BUILD/COPASI-Build-251/copasi/function/CEvaluationNodeOperator.cpp:35:
/usr/include/NativeJIT/Function.h: In constructor
'NativeJIT::FunctionP4>::Function(Allocators::IAllocator&, NativeJIT::FunctionBuffer&)':
/usr/include/NativeJIT/Function.h:192:44: internal compiler error: in
cp_parser_template_id, at cp/parser.cc:18367
192 | m_p1 = >template Parameter(slotAllocator);
|^
Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source (by using
-freport-bug).
Should be related to this GCC bug:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104235
Regards
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org
GPG key: 0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE
GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/
// The MIT License (MIT)
// Copyright (c) 2016, Microsoft
// Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
// of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
// in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
// to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
// copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
// furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
// The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
// all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
// THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
// IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
// FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
// AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
// LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
// OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN
// THE SOFTWARE.
#pragma once
#include "NativeJIT/ExecutionPreconditionTest.h"
#include "NativeJIT/ExpressionNodeFactory.h"
#include "NativeJIT/TypePredicates.h"
namespace NativeJIT
{
template
class FunctionBase : public ExpressionNodeFactory
{
public:
FunctionBase(Allocators::IAllocator& allocator, FunctionBuffer& code);
template
void AddExecuteOnlyIfStatement(FlagExpressionNode& condition,
ImmediateNode& otherwiseValue);
private:
Allocators::IAllocator& m_allocator;
};
template
class Function : public FunctionBase
{
public:
Function(Allocators::IAllocator& allocator, FunctionBuffer& code);
ParameterNode& GetP1() const;
ParameterNode& GetP2() const;
ParameterNode& GetP3() const;
ParameterNode& GetP4() const;
typedef R (*FunctionType)(P1, P2, P3, P4);
FunctionType Compile(Node& expression);
FunctionType GetEntryPoint() const;
private:
ParameterNode* m_p1;
ParameterNode* m_p2;
ParameterNode* m_p3;
ParameterNode* m_p4;
};
template
class Function : public FunctionBase
{
public:
Function(Allocators::IAllocator& allocator, FunctionBuffer& code);
ParameterNode& GetP1() const;
ParameterNode& GetP2() const;
ParameterNode& GetP3() const;
typedef R (*FunctionType)(P1, P2, P3);
FunctionType Compile(Node& expression);
FunctionType GetEntryPoint() const;
private:
ParameterNode* m_p1;
ParameterNode* m_p2;
ParameterNode* m_p3;
};
template
class Function : public FunctionBase
{
public:
Function(Allocators::IAllocator& allocator, FunctionBuffer& code);
ParameterNode& GetP1() const;
ParameterNode& GetP2() const;
typedef R (*FunctionType)(P1, P2);
FunctionType Compile(Node& expression);
FunctionType GetEntryPoint() const;
private:
ParameterNode* m_p1;
ParameterNode* m_p2
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
I'm taking PyQt4 -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Sundials 6.0.0
What about bout++ ? On 12/19/21 20:17, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: Hi all. Sundials-6.0.0 is available, it's a major release that includes many changes (https://github.com/LLNL/sundials/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md) I compiled the new packages in Copr, rebuilt bout++ and octave which need attention before we can push them in Rawhide: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/builds/ -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Sundials 6.0.0
Hi all. Sundials-6.0.0 is available, it's a major release that includes many changes (https://github.com/LLNL/sundials/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md) I compiled the new packages in Copr, rebuilt bout++ and octave which need attention before we can push them in Rawhide: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/builds/ -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
SCons-4.3.0 in Rawhide
Hi all. SCons-4.3.0 will be built in Rawhide in seven days. Changelog: https://github.com/SCons/scons/blob/rel_4.3.0/CHANGES.txt Regards. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
sdsl-lite package review
Hi all. I need a packager for the review request of 'sdsl-lite' package. Open to review another package in turn. Regards. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide
IQmol isn't compatible with openbabel3. Latest 2.15.0 release (compiled in Fedora) is missing in upstream's repository (but available for Windows/Mac, Linux abandoned?) On 11/6/21 14:01, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: side-tag: f36-build-side-47471 On 11/5/21 21:33, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 9:23 PM Antonio T. sagitter wrote: On 10/24/21 15:11, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: Hello Antonio, On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 3:05 PM Antonio T. sagitter wrote: We are ready to push openbabel3 in Rawhide Will it be just Rawhide? Will you please let us know when the build is done in order to rebuild dependent packages? Within 24 hours i will create a side-tag in Rawhide. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide
side-tag: f36-build-side-47471 On 11/5/21 21:33, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 9:23 PM Antonio T. sagitter wrote: On 10/24/21 15:11, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: Hello Antonio, On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 3:05 PM Antonio T. sagitter wrote: We are ready to push openbabel3 in Rawhide Will it be just Rawhide? Will you please let us know when the build is done in order to rebuild dependent packages? Within 24 hours i will create a side-tag in Rawhide. Thanks Antonio, I'll probably be able to do the rebuild on Sunday night. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide
On 10/24/21 15:11, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: Hello Antonio, On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 3:05 PM Antonio T. sagitter wrote: We are ready to push openbabel3 in Rawhide Will it be just Rawhide? Will you please let us know when the build is done in order to rebuild dependent packages? Within 24 hours i will create a side-tag in Rawhide. Are we saying goodbye to Avogadro 1.x? Thank you for all the work you've put into this, A. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Impossible to upgrade to F35 due to dependency issues with pam_mount and cryptsetup
On 10/31/21 12:57, Julian Sikorski wrote: Hello, I had some time today so I decided to try updating to F35 ahead of the release. It did not work unfortunately: Error: Problem 1: package mupen64plus-qt-1.12-1.20200226git1709647.fc31.x86_64 requires libquazip5.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - quazip-qt5-0.7.6-10.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package mupen64plus-qt-1.12-1.20200226git1709647.fc31.x86_64 fc31 ? Problem 2: problem with installed package pam_mount-2.16-12.fc34.x86_64 - package pam_mount-2.16-12.fc34.x86_64 requires cryptsetup-luks-libs >= 1.1.2, but none of the providers can be installed - cryptsetup-libs-2.3.6-1.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 1 I can fix myself since it is my own local package, but problem 2 I am not sure how to fix. Is it a bug with pam_mount, or with cryptsetup? Best regards, Julian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: [Rawhide] ImageMagick-6.9.12-26 available
Use a side-tag (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Update_Guide/#multiple_packages), please. On 10/27/21 01:42, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: Hello team, I would like to let you know ImageMagick-6.9.12-26 recently landed upstream. Learning from the previous experiences, I or my co-maintainer are planning to commit and build this package for Rawhide only in about a week, so the following maintainers of the respective packages will need to get in sync: NsCDE a2ps anyremote c-graph caja-image-converter chordpro-abc conky-manager darktable-tools-noise devedeng dvd-slideshow epix fbida ffmulticonverter freewrl geeqie gscan2pdf gyazo jumpnbump-menu latex2rtf libpst lives lyx mediawiki mtpaint nautilus-image-converter nemo-image-converter perl-Graphics-TIFF-tests perl-PDF-API2-tests perl-PDF-Builder-tests perl-Panotools-Script playonlinux rubygem-mini_magic rubygem-rmagick shutter texlive-graphicxpsd variety vfrnav-utils w3m-img wdune The scratch-build is successful on https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=77869076 meaning proven packagers are welcome to commit the changes. Let know if anyone has a question. Regards, -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide
On 10/24/21 15:11, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: Hello Antonio, Hi Alexander. On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 3:05 PM Antonio T. sagitter wrote: We are ready to push openbabel3 in Rawhide Will it be just Rawhide? Yes. Will you please let us know when the build is done in order to rebuild dependent packages? Not before one week at least. I will mail you again just before i have created a side-tag in Rawhide. Are we saying goodbye to Avogadro 1.x? Well, Avogadro 1 is no longer under active development since September 2021. We have Avogadro 2 now. Thank you for all the work you've put into this, A. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide
Hi all. We are ready to push openbabel3 in Rawhide, all packages (except chemtool that requires openbabel in runtime) have been rebuilt: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/Openbabel-3/builds/ -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
SuperLU-5.3.0 in Rawhide
Hi all. Next release of SuperLU is the 5.3.0, in 7 days it will be built in Rawhide including its related dependencies. Changelog: https://portal.nersc.gov/project/sparse/superlu/#superlu -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide
Hi all. Even Kalzium (new release) is rebuilt against openbabel3 -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
PETSc/sundials updates
Hi all. PETSc-3.16.0 and Sundials-5.8.0 will be built in Rawhide not before one week. PETSc release note: https://petsc.org/release/docs/changes/316/ Sundials release note: https://github.com/LLNL/sundials/releases/tag/v5.8.0 Regards. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide
On 9/26/21 10:22, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: On 9/26/21 01:10, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 5:05 PM Alexander Ploumistos wrote: I will try with a Fedora 34 VM later and report back. I got pretty much the same results on F34. I think xdrawchem works better with Open Babel 3 than it does with Open Babel 2, at least as far as structure cleanup goes (I installed the current version in F34). With Open Babel 2, SMILES output is also asterisks and trying InChi output crashes the program, so nothing changed there. gnome-chemistry-utils programs can't find the required shared object files in F34 either. I moved the openbabel's libraries under a private lib directory. 'desktop' files are modified for working in this sense. Sorry, i meant gchemistry's libraries under a private lib directory. Let me check again Avogadro2. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide
I have rebuilt Avogadro2* against openbabel3 The package provides two desktop files, for Wayland and x11 with different environment variables. That was a bug: https://github.com/OpenChemistry/avogadroapp/issues/167 I will apply the patch and try again. On 9/25/21 17:05, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: Hello Antonio, * Avogadro2: Avogadro appears to be working, but I can't see anything on the canvas, it displays whatever window is behind it on the screen, or the wallpaper if there's nothing else there. Maybe a Wayland bug? I will try with a Fedora 34 VM later and report back. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide
On 9/26/21 01:10, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 5:05 PM Alexander Ploumistos wrote: I will try with a Fedora 34 VM later and report back. I got pretty much the same results on F34. I think xdrawchem works better with Open Babel 3 than it does with Open Babel 2, at least as far as structure cleanup goes (I installed the current version in F34). With Open Babel 2, SMILES output is also asterisks and trying InChi output crashes the program, so nothing changed there. gnome-chemistry-utils programs can't find the required shared object files in F34 either. I moved the openbabel's libraries under a private lib directory. 'desktop' files are modified for working in this sense. Let me check again Avogadro2. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide
Even the porting to openbabel3 of 'xdrawchem' is done. Please, can anyone that uses these software test them? https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/Openbabel-3/builds/ On 9/1/21 10:35, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:> xdrawchem https://github.com/bryanherger/xdrawchem/pull/17 Best regards. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide
'ghemical' and 'libghemical' should be okay, too. On 9/1/21 10:35, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: On 8/31/21 8:05 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 6:08 PM Antonio T. sagitter wrote: On 8/31/21 5:27 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: We must decide if go forward with most recent software or stay stationary. Which software are not ready for openbabel-3 yet? Almost two years ago (how time flies!), when the subject had been first broached, Dominik provided this list: Link-time dependencies: IQmol avogadro ghemical Okay with debian patch: https://sources.debian.org/src/ghemical/3.0.0-5/debian/patches/openbabel3.patch/ I've applied this to Fedora git source. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide
I have not used this patch for getting 'gnome-chemistry-utils' working
in x11 and Wayland:
diff --git a/programs/3d/main.cc b/programs/3d/main.cc
index 9bd59a4..aa18e3e 100644
--- a/programs/3d/main.cc
+++ b/programs/3d/main.cc
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
GError *error = NULL;
GOptionContext *context;
+ gdk_set_allowed_backends ("wayland,x11");
gtk_init (, );
gcu::Element::LoadBODR ();
diff --git a/programs/crystal/main.cc b/programs/crystal/main.cc
index e688c3d..55fd8b9 100644
--- a/programs/crystal/main.cc
+++ b/programs/crystal/main.cc
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
GOptionContext *context;
GError *error = NULL;
+ gdk_set_allowed_backends ("wayland,x11");
gtk_init (, );
Element::LoadRadii ();
if (argc > 1 && argv[1][0] == '-') {
because i don't know if it's correct. Some tools need to be ran by
setting the GDK_BACKEND environment variable.
On 9/24/21 07:41, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 3:37 PM Antonio T. sagitter
wrote:
gnome-chemistry-utils is ready for openbabel3; it's in my Copr project.
Well done Antonio!
I will give it a try this weekend.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org
GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F
GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/
OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide
gnome-chemistry-utils is ready for openbabel3; it's in my Copr project. On 9/1/21 10:35, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: gnome-chemistry-utils debian says only a small modification is needed: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=946263#20 -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Ipopt-3.14.3 in Rawhide
Hi all. Ipopt-3.14* is ready for Rawhide (release notes: https://github.com/coin-or/Ipopt/releases) Even if it should not be a problem with related dependencies, i will rebuild the packages that need Ipopt: coin-or-Bonmin coin-or-Couenne coin-or-OS coin-or-Dip -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide
@fedora These are some information for upgrading to openbabel3. @epel7 It's also opened a bugzilla ticket (#1628243) for building openbabel-2.4.1 on epel7 Are we definitely interested? Links of Copr projects to get srpms for testing: openbabel3-3.1.1: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/Openbabel-3/ openbabel2-2.4.1: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/ On 9/1/21 10:35 AM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: Antonio T. sagitter wrote on 2021/09/01 16:58: You're right, i underestimated the issue. Probably, Avogadro is not compatible with openbabel3 but Avogadro2 should be. I try to keep a separated 'openbabel2' package as new rpm, and then upgrade current 'openbabel' to the release 3+ Thank you. There is useful information on debian: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=946263 On 8/31/21 8:05 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 6:08 PM Antonio T. sagitter wrote: On 8/31/21 5:27 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: We must decide if go forward with most recent software or stay stationary. Which software are not ready for openbabel-3 yet? Almost two years ago (how time flies!), when the subject had been first broached, Dominik provided this list: Link-time dependencies: IQmol avogadro ghemical Okay with debian patch: https://sources.debian.org/src/ghemical/3.0.0-5/debian/patches/openbabel3.patch/ I've applied this to Fedora git source. gnome-chemistry-utils debian says only a small modification is needed: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=946263#20 kalzium molsketch xdrawchem https://github.com/bryanherger/xdrawchem/pull/17 Run-time dependencies: avogadro2 chemtool molsketch At the time, I think only Molsketch was compatible with Open Babel 3. After getting version 3.1.1 to build[1], I spent a few weekends trying to modify gnome-chemistry-utils, but due to lack of time I didn't go very far and looking at the code in my files, I'm not really sure what I've actually done, I don't remember much. Personally, I use avogadro* a lot, which you maintain (and therefore I don't worry about it ;) ) and GChemCalc (almost daily) and sometimes GSpectrum from g-c-u, neither of which is indispensable, though both are quite handy. I haven't checked any of the other programs on that list recently, but about a year ago, not much had changed. I can leave to you an openbabel-3 srpm or Copr builds of it for your tests. One week is a minimal time, no problem if you need more time. As far as I can tell, Molsketch will use whichever version of Open Babel is installed on the system and users of a couple of other distros have been building it against v3 without any problems, so I don't expect any either. Just please let me know when you've built it in Rawhide and I'll do the rebuild then - hopefully the new version will also be out by that time. Best regards, A. 1. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/alexpl/openbabel/builds/ -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[EPEL-devel] openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide
@fedora These are some information for upgrading to openbabel3. @epel7 It's also opened a bugzilla ticket (#1628243) for building openbabel-2.4.1 on epel7 Are we definitely interested? Links of Copr projects to get srpms for testing: openbabel3-3.1.1: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/Openbabel-3/ openbabel2-2.4.1: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/ On 9/1/21 10:35 AM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: Antonio T. sagitter wrote on 2021/09/01 16:58: You're right, i underestimated the issue. Probably, Avogadro is not compatible with openbabel3 but Avogadro2 should be. I try to keep a separated 'openbabel2' package as new rpm, and then upgrade current 'openbabel' to the release 3+ Thank you. There is useful information on debian: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=946263 On 8/31/21 8:05 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 6:08 PM Antonio T. sagitter wrote: On 8/31/21 5:27 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: We must decide if go forward with most recent software or stay stationary. Which software are not ready for openbabel-3 yet? Almost two years ago (how time flies!), when the subject had been first broached, Dominik provided this list: Link-time dependencies: IQmol avogadro ghemical Okay with debian patch: https://sources.debian.org/src/ghemical/3.0.0-5/debian/patches/openbabel3.patch/ I've applied this to Fedora git source. gnome-chemistry-utils debian says only a small modification is needed: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=946263#20 kalzium molsketch xdrawchem https://github.com/bryanherger/xdrawchem/pull/17 Run-time dependencies: avogadro2 chemtool molsketch At the time, I think only Molsketch was compatible with Open Babel 3. After getting version 3.1.1 to build[1], I spent a few weekends trying to modify gnome-chemistry-utils, but due to lack of time I didn't go very far and looking at the code in my files, I'm not really sure what I've actually done, I don't remember much. Personally, I use avogadro* a lot, which you maintain (and therefore I don't worry about it ;) ) and GChemCalc (almost daily) and sometimes GSpectrum from g-c-u, neither of which is indispensable, though both are quite handy. I haven't checked any of the other programs on that list recently, but about a year ago, not much had changed. I can leave to you an openbabel-3 srpm or Copr builds of it for your tests. One week is a minimal time, no problem if you need more time. As far as I can tell, Molsketch will use whichever version of Open Babel is installed on the system and users of a couple of other distros have been building it against v3 without any problems, so I don't expect any either. Just please let me know when you've built it in Rawhide and I'll do the rebuild then - hopefully the new version will also be out by that time. Best regards, A. 1. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/alexpl/openbabel/builds/ -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide
'openbabel2' and 'openbabel3' cannot co-exist if installed because they have same binary files, it's a "binary name conflicts". Is it acceptable an openbabel2/openbabel(3) conflict in Fedora? On 9/1/21 10:35 AM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: Antonio T. sagitter wrote on 2021/09/01 16:58: You're right, i underestimated the issue. Probably, Avogadro is not compatible with openbabel3 but Avogadro2 should be. I try to keep a separated 'openbabel2' package as new rpm, and then upgrade current 'openbabel' to the release 3+ Thank you. There is useful information on debian: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=946263 -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide
You're right, i underestimated the issue. Probably, Avogadro is not compatible with openbabel3 but Avogadro2 should be. I try to keep a separated 'openbabel2' package as new rpm, and then upgrade current 'openbabel' to the release 3+ Thank you. On 8/31/21 8:05 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 6:08 PM Antonio T. sagitter wrote: On 8/31/21 5:27 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: We must decide if go forward with most recent software or stay stationary. Which software are not ready for openbabel-3 yet? Almost two years ago (how time flies!), when the subject had been first broached, Dominik provided this list: Link-time dependencies: IQmol avogadro ghemical gnome-chemistry-utils kalzium molsketch xdrawchem Run-time dependencies: avogadro2 chemtool molsketch At the time, I think only Molsketch was compatible with Open Babel 3. After getting version 3.1.1 to build[1], I spent a few weekends trying to modify gnome-chemistry-utils, but due to lack of time I didn't go very far and looking at the code in my files, I'm not really sure what I've actually done, I don't remember much. Personally, I use avogadro* a lot, which you maintain (and therefore I don't worry about it ;) ) and GChemCalc (almost daily) and sometimes GSpectrum from g-c-u, neither of which is indispensable, though both are quite handy. I haven't checked any of the other programs on that list recently, but about a year ago, not much had changed. I can leave to you an openbabel-3 srpm or Copr builds of it for your tests. One week is a minimal time, no problem if you need more time. As far as I can tell, Molsketch will use whichever version of Open Babel is installed on the system and users of a couple of other distros have been building it against v3 without any problems, so I don't expect any either. Just please let me know when you've built it in Rawhide and I'll do the rebuild then - hopefully the new version will also be out by that time. Best regards, A. 1. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/alexpl/openbabel/builds/ -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide
On 8/31/21 5:27 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: Hello Antonio, Hi Alexander. On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 5:03 PM Antonio T. sagitter wrote: openbabel-3.1.1 is ready for Rawhide branch. 'libopenbabel' soname is updated from 5 to 7, all dependent packages will need a rebuild at least: What about the packages that haven't been ported to work with Open Babel 3.* yet? We must decide if go forward with most recent software or stay stationary. Which software are not ready for openbabel-3 yet? > Do you intend to keep v2 around in some form? No. $ repoquery --whatrequires openbabel-devel --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=*-source molsketch-0:0.7.2-1.fc34.src I'm waiting for Hendrik to release a new version sometime soon, at worst let it FTBFS and I'll deal with it in time. I can leave to you an openbabel-3 srpm or Copr builds of it for your tests. One week is a minimal time, no problem if you need more time. All the best, A. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide
Hi all. openbabel-3.1.1 is ready for Rawhide branch. 'libopenbabel' soname is updated from 5 to 7, all dependent packages will need a rebuild at least: $ repoquery --whatrequires openbabel-devel --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=*-source IQmol-0:2.15.0-3.fc34.src ghemical-0:3.0.0-16.fc34.src molsketch-0:0.7.2-1.fc34.src xdrawchem-0:1.10.2-4.fc34.src I'm waiting some days (one week around) before creating a side-tag. Ragards. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: orphaning openbabel
Hi Dominik. 'openbabel' is still developed, i see. I take it On 8/23/21 1:53 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: Hi! Last year, I announced my intention to orphan openbabel. Several folks replied, but nobody said they wanted to take over as primary maintainer. In the end, I didn't actually orphan the package, but I didn't do any maintenance on it, either. So, this time I'm actually orphaning it in a week. It's pending an update to the next major version and I haven't looked at that at all. If anyone wants to take it before I hit the 'orphan' button, let me know this week. Regards, Dominik -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Updating quazip to version 1.1 in rawhide - rebuild of several packages in side-tag needed
Hi Ondrej. On 8/18/21 10:45 AM, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote: Hello, I would like to update quazip to version 1.1 in rawhide (i.e. future F36) [1][2], but since this update will change sonames (libquazip.so -> libquazip1-qt4.so and libquazip5.so -> libquazip1-qt5.so), I will need the dependent packages' maintainers (in Bcc) to rebuild them in a side tag (I'm not a provenpackager, so I can't do that myself, although Nicolas (@kwizart) offered to help if needed). Affected packages: bletchmame ckb-next fritzing gimagereader GLC_lib keepassxc krita nomacs qcad qmapshack texstudio Even though the library/include/CMake paths changed, there seem to be no breaking API changes and I added compat symlinks/files to the -devel packages so that all packages using the old paths will still build (and link against the new soname) without modification (I tested this in COPR, see [3]). So a simple release bump + rebuild into the side tag should be enough. After the side tag is merged, I will try to gradually submit PRs to migrate the dependent packages to use the new paths (either via pkgconfig or the CMake modules). Once all dependent packages are migrated, it will be possible to remove the compat hacks from -devel packages (though we might want to keep them longer for user convenience). Current plan: 1. I request a side tag, merge [2], and build the new quazip in the side tag. 2. I announce the side-tag in this thread and ask for dependent packages to be rebuilt in it. 3. Once all the packages are successfully built in the side tag, I get the side tag merged. If there are no objections, I will execute steps 1 and 2 sometime next week (or sooner if I get a positive acknowledgement for all packages). Maintainers, please let me know if you are ready to do the side-tag rebuild, or if you'd prefer to defer this a bit (for example due to a conflict with other group rebuild). I agree to do the side-tag and rebuild the related packages. I maintain qcad that looks okay with quazip-1.1 Thanks! [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895170 [2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/quazip/pull-request/2 [3] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/omos/quazip/monitor/ -- Ondrej Mosnacek Software Engineer, Linux Security - SELinux kernel Red Hat, Inc. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure Regards. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: IceCat build error: no matching function for call to ‘ArrayEnd(uint8_t [])’
Thank you Bruno. We'll need an updated patch therefore. On 8/4/21 7:31 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 05:08:40 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 12:51:41 +0200, "Antonio T. sagitter" wrote: Hi all. I need help for failed builds of IceCat bacause of this error (in x86_64 and i386 architectures only): Thanks for working on that. The last good icecat in rawhide doesn't work with the latest glibc. Because I use icecat a lot I'm holding back glibc and a bunch of packages that depend on the newer glibc. icecat-78.13.0-0.1.rh1.fc35.x86_64 finished building successfully this morning but it still is broken (tabs crash) with glibc 2.34-1.fc35, but works with glibc 2.33.9000-43.fc35. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
IceCat build error: no matching function for call to ‘ArrayEnd(uint8_t [])’
Hi all. I need help for failed builds of IceCat bacause of this error (in x86_64 and i386 architectures only): 18:10.81 /builddir/build/BUILD/icecat-78.13.0/security/sandbox/linux/launch/SandboxLaunch.cpp:496:28: error: no matching function for call to ‘ArrayEnd(uint8_t [])’ 18:10.81 496 | void* stackPtr = ArrayEnd(miniStack); 18:10.81 |^~~ Also the latest release (derived by Firefox-78.13.0ESR) is affected like the 78.12.0ESR. Build log in Rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=73165362 Regards. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
SCons 4.2.0
Hi all. SCons will be updated in Rawhide to the release 4.2.0 in a week. If you need to test it, use these rpms: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/build/2356678/ SCons-4.2.0 release notes: https://github.com/SCons/scons/blob/rel_4.2.0/CHANGES.txt Regards. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: MUMPS-5.4.0 in Rawhide
Thank you Sérgio. On 7/20/21 4:08 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hi, On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 11:48 +0200, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: Hi all. In a week i will compile MUMPS-5.4.0 in Rawhide; this implicates the rebuilds of dependent packages: $ repoquery --whatrequires MUMPS-openmpi-devel --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=*-source Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:14 ago on Tue 06 Jul 2021 11:32:14 AM CEST. amg4psblas-0:1.0.0-2.fc34.src coin-or-Ipopt-0:3.13.0-11.fc34.src freefem++-0:4.7-3.fc34.src mld2p4-0:2.2.2-8.fc34.src petsc-0:3.14.4-1.fc34.src we also need rebuild coin-or-Clp [1], I found it when install opencv-devel [2] [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/coin-or-Clp/blob/rawhide/f/coin-or-Clp.spec#_18 BuildRequires: MUMPS-devel [2] DEBUG util.py:444: Error: DEBUG util.py:444: Problem: package opencv-devel-4.5.3-1.fc35.x86_64 requires opencv-contrib(x86-64) = 4.5.3-1.fc35, but none of the providers can be installed DEBUG util.py:444:- package opencv-contrib-4.5.3-1.fc35.x86_64 requires libClp.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed DEBUG util.py:444:- conflicting requests DEBUG util.py:444:- nothing provides libdmumps-5.3.so()(64bit) needed by coin-or-Clp-1.17.6-3.fc34.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:444:- nothing provides libmpiseq-5.3.so()(64bit) needed by coin-or-Clp-1.17.6-3.fc34.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:446: (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) Except 'freefem++', they are all packages that i maintain; if the maintainer of freefem++ is agree, i will rebuild it independently in the MUMPS side-tag. Regards. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
MUMPS-5.4.0 in Rawhide
Hi all. In a week i will compile MUMPS-5.4.0 in Rawhide; this implicates the rebuilds of dependent packages: $ repoquery --whatrequires MUMPS-openmpi-devel --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=*-source Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:14 ago on Tue 06 Jul 2021 11:32:14 AM CEST. amg4psblas-0:1.0.0-2.fc34.src coin-or-Ipopt-0:3.13.0-11.fc34.src freefem++-0:4.7-3.fc34.src mld2p4-0:2.2.2-8.fc34.src petsc-0:3.14.4-1.fc34.src Except 'freefem++', they are all packages that i maintain; if the maintainer of freefem++ is agree, i will rebuild it independently in the MUMPS side-tag. Regards. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.10 (and what to do)
On 6/8/21 3:58 PM, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: Hello. As you might already know, we have recently merged in the Python 3.10side tagto Rawhide, despite several builds not succeeding.We always aim for some compromise between having the side tag open for too long and having too many failures. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.10 <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.10> The packages, when not rebuilt, are not installable in rawhide, hence fixing them should be our top priority. If you need help with Python-related issues, we (the Python Maintenance team at Red Hat) are happy to help. Unfortunately, several packages fail to build for Python-unrelated reasons. Most of the packages only fail to build because their dependencies were not yet rebuilt. Chances are, you already got an automated F35FailsToInstall bugzilla from Miro, that your package fails to install. It would be really helpful if you could find the missing dependency and mark the bugzilla for your package dependingon the bugzilla for the missing dep. Weslowly progress to do that as well, but your help is crucial here. If your package fails because there isanon-dependency problem, you might have already received a bugzilla from us in the past. If the build failure is related to changes in Python 3.10, it should contain some hints about the problem. # What to do? General advice: If you are aware of the problem and working towards fixing it, set your bugzilla to ASSIGNED to avoid further automated reminders. If blocked by dependencies, do not close the bugzillas as NOTABUG or DUPLICATE just because it is "not a problem in your package". The automation will file new ones anyway. ## My package fails to build because it has test failures in %check Please, try to resolve the failures. If you are confident that the package works fine, but the tests are wrong, skip some failing tests, ideally with a link to an upstream issue. Do not disable (e.g. comment out) all tests just to unblock the rebuild of your package, it usually only hides the problem. ## My package fails to build because it has broken build dependencies Please try to track the missing build dependencies in Bugzilla. If possible, help the maintainers of your dependencies to get them rebuilt. When in need of escalation, ask us for provenpackager help (ideally with pull requests to be merged). Once possible, rebuild your package (no need to bump the release, we already did that). When you do, the bugzilla will eventually get automatically closed, but you can do that manually as well. ## My package was rebuilt with Python 3.10 but it has broken runtime dependencies Please try to track the missing runtime dependencies in Bugzilla. If possible, help the maintainers of your dependencies to get them rebuilt. When in need of escalation, ask us for provenpackager help (ideally with pull requests to be merged). When the dependencies are rebuilt, your package will install successfully once again and the bugzilla will eventually get automatically closed, but you can do that manually as well. ## My package failed to build but installs just fine Some packages that only require libpython3.9.so.1.0 will successfully pull in the python3.9 package as a dependency and hence they don't have installation issues. They need to be rebuilt with Python 3.10 anyway, we don't want Fedora users to pull in two Python versions unless they need them for development purposes. ## How to run things locally? You can use mock. Make sure to: 1. Clear all caches first: $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64--scrub=all 2. Use the Koji repo: $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --enablerepo=local ... ## Where to get help Reply to this thread or find us (thrnciar, mhroncok) on #fedora-python IRC channel (libera.chat). --- Let usknow if you have other questions. > ... petsc sagitter I need help for PETSC, please. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959088 -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.10 (and what to do)
On 6/8/21 3:58 PM, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: Hello. As you might already know, we have recently merged in the Python 3.10side tagto Rawhide, despite several builds not succeeding.We always aim for some compromise between having the side tag open for too long and having too many failures. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.10 <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.10> The packages, when not rebuilt, are not installable in rawhide, hence fixing them should be our top priority. If you need help with Python-related issues, we (the Python Maintenance team at Red Hat) are happy to help. Unfortunately, several packages fail to build for Python-unrelated reasons. Most of the packages only fail to build because their dependencies were not yet rebuilt. Chances are, you already got an automated F35FailsToInstall bugzilla from Miro, that your package fails to install. It would be really helpful if you could find the missing dependency and mark the bugzilla for your package dependingon the bugzilla for the missing dep. Weslowly progress to do that as well, but your help is crucial here. If your package fails because there isanon-dependency problem, you might have already received a bugzilla from us in the past. If the build failure is related to changes in Python 3.10, it should contain some hints about the problem. # What to do? General advice: If you are aware of the problem and working towards fixing it, set your bugzilla to ASSIGNED to avoid further automated reminders. If blocked by dependencies, do not close the bugzillas as NOTABUG or DUPLICATE just because it is "not a problem in your package". The automation will file new ones anyway. ## My package fails to build because it has test failures in %check Please, try to resolve the failures. If you are confident that the package works fine, but the tests are wrong, skip some failing tests, ideally with a link to an upstream issue. Do not disable (e.g. comment out) all tests just to unblock the rebuild of your package, it usually only hides the problem. ## My package fails to build because it has broken build dependencies Please try to track the missing build dependencies in Bugzilla. If possible, help the maintainers of your dependencies to get them rebuilt. When in need of escalation, ask us for provenpackager help (ideally with pull requests to be merged). Once possible, rebuild your package (no need to bump the release, we already did that). When you do, the bugzilla will eventually get automatically closed, but you can do that manually as well. ## My package was rebuilt with Python 3.10 but it has broken runtime dependencies Please try to track the missing runtime dependencies in Bugzilla. If possible, help the maintainers of your dependencies to get them rebuilt. When in need of escalation, ask us for provenpackager help (ideally with pull requests to be merged). When the dependencies are rebuilt, your package will install successfully once again and the bugzilla will eventually get automatically closed, but you can do that manually as well. ## My package failed to build but installs just fine Some packages that only require libpython3.9.so.1.0 will successfully pull in the python3.9 package as a dependency and hence they don't have installation issues. They need to be rebuilt with Python 3.10 anyway, we don't want Fedora users to pull in two Python versions unless they need them for development purposes. ## How to run things locally? You can use mock. Make sure to: 1. Clear all caches first: $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64--scrub=all 2. Use the Koji repo: $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --enablerepo=local ... ## Where to get help Reply to this thread or find us (thrnciar, mhroncok) on #fedora-python IRC channel (libera.chat). --- Let usknow if you have other questions. > ... petsc sagitter I need help for PETSC, please. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959088 -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Package review #1961174
Hi all. I have a new package in review (rhbz#1961174) that will obsolete 'mld2p4' Please, take a look if you can; i'll review one in exchange. Thanks. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Sundials-5.7.0
On 5/17/21 11:13 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote: On Sat, May 15, 2021 11:43:09 +0200, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: Hello everyone. Hi Antonio, python-steps-0:3.5.0-7.fc34.src Unfortunately this currently fails to build in the side-tag: /builddir/build/BUILD/STEPS-3.5.0/src/steps/tetode/tetode.cpp:205:45: error: 'CV_FUNCTIONAL' was not declared in this scope 205 | cvode_mem_code = CVodeCreate(CV_ADAMS, CV_FUNCTIONAL) ; | ^ Would you have some information on what has changed in the new Sundials version please? https://github.com/LLNL/sundials/releases/tag/v5.7.0 It's incompatible with Sundials-5.7.0, i guess. STEPS still embeds cvode-2.6.0 as bundled Sundials code. (There's a new version of steps out too, so that may fix it already. I'll have to take a look.) -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Sundials-5.7.0
Hello everyone. I wish to complete the updating of Sundials in Rawhide, so these packages will be rebuilt in the next days by existing side-tag f35-build-side-37890: $ repoquery --whatrequires sundials*-devel --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=*-source Last metadata expiration check: 0:19:21 ago on Sat 15 May 2021 11:17:36 AM CEST. bout++-0:4.3.2-6.fc34.src dolfin-0:2019.1.0.post0-15.fc34.src octave-6:5.2.0-11.fc34.src octave-6:6.1.0-1.module_f34+11129+457484d3.src python-steps-0:3.5.0-7.fc34.src $ koji list-tagged --latest f35-build-side-37890 Build Tag Built by bout++-4.3.2-7.fc35 f35-build-side-37890 davidsch sundials-5.7.0-1.fc35 f35-build-side-37890 sagitter If maintainers are disagree, please let me know. On 2/22/21 7:13 PM, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: Hi all. 'sundials-5.7.0' is coming in Rawhide branch. Is reasonable pushing it in f34 too? Release notes: https://computing.llnl.gov/projects/sundials/release-history ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure Regards. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: PETSc 3.15
This side-tag is obsolete because of recent rebuild of PETSc-3.15 rebuild #2 for cgnslib: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1741817 I'm removing the side-tag f35-build-side-40112 Must i untag the related builds in this case? (bout++-4.3.2-8.fc35 and python-steps-3.5.0-8.fc35) On 4/25/21 6:16 PM, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: $ koji list-tagged --latest f35-build-side-40112 Build Tag Built by bout++-4.3.2-8.fc35 f35-build-side-40112 davidsch petsc-3.15.0-1.fc35 f35-build-side-40112 sagitter python-steps-3.5.0-8.fc35 f35-build-side-40112 ankursinha On 4/10/21 7:30 PM, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: Also dolfin-0:2019.1.0.post0-10.fc33.src getdp-0:3.3.0-6.fc33.src On 4/10/21 7:26 PM, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: Hi all. PETSc 3.15 is coming in Rawhide branch. Release notes: https://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/documentation/changes/315.html Dependencies in Fedora: $ repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=fedora*-source --whatrequires petsc-openmpi-devel bout++-0:4.3.1-7.fc33.src freefem++-0:4.6-6.fc33.src petsc4py-0:3.13.0-5.fc33.src python-steps-0:3.5.0-5.fc33.src -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: PETSc 3.15
$ koji list-tagged --latest f35-build-side-40112 Build Tag Built by bout++-4.3.2-8.fc35 f35-build-side-40112 davidsch petsc-3.15.0-1.fc35 f35-build-side-40112 sagitter python-steps-3.5.0-8.fc35f35-build-side-40112 ankursinha On 4/10/21 7:30 PM, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: Also dolfin-0:2019.1.0.post0-10.fc33.src getdp-0:3.3.0-6.fc33.src On 4/10/21 7:26 PM, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: Hi all. PETSc 3.15 is coming in Rawhide branch. Release notes: https://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/documentation/changes/315.html Dependencies in Fedora: $ repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=fedora*-source --whatrequires petsc-openmpi-devel bout++-0:4.3.1-7.fc33.src freefem++-0:4.6-6.fc33.src petsc4py-0:3.13.0-5.fc33.src python-steps-0:3.5.0-5.fc33.src -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: PETSc 3.15
PETSc-3.15 is built in side-tag f35-build-side-40112 Please, rebuild your own related package. On 4/10/21 7:26 PM, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: Hi all. PETSc 3.15 is coming in Rawhide branch. Release notes: https://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/documentation/changes/315.html Dependencies in Fedora: $ repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=fedora*-source --whatrequires petsc-openmpi-devel bout++-0:4.3.1-7.fc33.src freefem++-0:4.6-6.fc33.src petsc4py-0:3.13.0-5.fc33.src python-steps-0:3.5.0-5.fc33.src -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: 2021-04-15 dnf broken in rawhide?
See https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-d90b379f35 On 4/15/21 7:35 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote: Hiya, I'm trying to build a new package for rawhide but keep running into this error on koji: Error: Problem: package dnf-plugins-core-4.0.19-1.fc34.noarch requires python3-dnf-plugins-core = 4.0.19-1.fc34, but none of the providers can be installed - package dnf-4.7.0-1.fc35.noarch conflicts with python3-dnf-plugins-core < 4.0.20 provided by python3-dnf-plugins-core-4.0.19-1.fc34.noarch - conflicting requests (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) Anyone else running into this? Known issue? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: PETSc 3.15
Also dolfin-0:2019.1.0.post0-10.fc33.src getdp-0:3.3.0-6.fc33.src On 4/10/21 7:26 PM, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: Hi all. PETSc 3.15 is coming in Rawhide branch. Release notes: https://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/documentation/changes/315.html Dependencies in Fedora: $ repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=fedora*-source --whatrequires petsc-openmpi-devel bout++-0:4.3.1-7.fc33.src freefem++-0:4.6-6.fc33.src petsc4py-0:3.13.0-5.fc33.src python-steps-0:3.5.0-5.fc33.src -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
PETSc 3.15
Hi all. PETSc 3.15 is coming in Rawhide branch. Release notes: https://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/documentation/changes/315.html Dependencies in Fedora: $ repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=fedora*-source --whatrequires petsc-openmpi-devel bout++-0:4.3.1-7.fc33.src freefem++-0:4.6-6.fc33.src petsc4py-0:3.13.0-5.fc33.src python-steps-0:3.5.0-5.fc33.src -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Packager's activities
Ops! Thank you Fabio. On 02/04/21 21:00, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 3:38 PM Antonio T. sagitter wrote: Hi all. The activities in my Fedora Package Sources page are no longer highlighted. Do you know why? https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/sagitter It looks like the email address associated with your commits changed, from:sagit...@fedoraproject.org to: 3974791-anto.tra...@users.noreply.gitlab.com And I assume that pagure / src.fp.o does not know to associate the second one with your account. Fabio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Packager's activities
Hi all. The activities in my Fedora Package Sources page are no longer highlighted. Do you know why? https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/sagitter -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Sundials-5.7.0
Hi all. This update is still pending. On 24/02/21 20:07, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: Side-tag is ready for building the related dependencies: f35-build-side-37890 On 22/02/21 19:13, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: Hi all. 'sundials-5.7.0' is coming in Rawhide branch. Is reasonable pushing it in f34 too? Release notes: https://computing.llnl.gov/projects/sundials/release-history ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Package reviews
Hi all. I have two reviews in pending [1][2]; they're new packages needed by next COPASI [3] release. If someone checks them, i can review other software in exchange. [1] google-cpu_features, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933412 [2] nativejit, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933988 [3] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/COPASI Regards. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Sundials-5.7.0
Side-tag is ready for building the related dependencies: f35-build-side-37890 On 22/02/21 19:13, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: Hi all. 'sundials-5.7.0' is coming in Rawhide branch. Is reasonable pushing it in f34 too? Release notes: https://computing.llnl.gov/projects/sundials/release-history ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Sundials-5.7.0
Hi all. 'sundials-5.7.0' is coming in Rawhide branch. Is reasonable pushing it in f34 too? Release notes: https://computing.llnl.gov/projects/sundials/release-history -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Orphaning dianara
Hi all. I've orphaned 'dianara' [1]; feel free to adopt it. [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dianara Regards. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Retiring fido-pi
Hi all. 'fido-pi' [1] package is no longer supported since it's now integrated into 'percolator' [2]. So, i'm retiring it in Fedora 34 and Fedora 35. [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fido-pi [2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/percolator Regards. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: /usr/include/c++/11/type_traits:3164:1: error: template with C linkage
These errors are solved in IceCat with following patch: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/icecat/blob/902a94597e0d48bbe3e1ebc3184787f7b6fe9242/f/icecat-78.7.1-fix_error_template_with_C_linkage.patch On 2/6/21 11:04 PM, Germano Massullo wrote: Also this build seems to be related to this problem https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=61482059 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
/usr/include/c++/11/type_traits:3164:1: error: template with C linkage
Hi all. I can't compile IceCat on Fedora 33+ since some days because of these errors: ... /usr/include/c++/11/type_traits:3164:1: error: template with C linkage .. Any idea why they occur? Rawhide build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=61460307 Thanks. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
SCons-4.1.0
Hi all. scons-4.1.0 rpm [1] is ready to be pushed in Rawhide branch; not before next 7 days i will build it. Release note of SCons-4.1.0 [2]. Packages which require SCons: boswars-0:2.7-24.svn160110.fc33.src compat-tolua++-0:1.0.93-14.fc33.src galera-0:26.4.6-1.fc34.src glob2-0:0.9.4.4-53.fc33.src godot-0:3.2.1-1.fc33.1.src gpsd-1:3.22-1.fc34.src libffado-0:2.4.4-2.fc34.src libserf-0:1.3.9-17.fc33.src mingw-nsis-0:3.06.1-1.fc33.src mypaint-0:2.0.1-1.fc34.src netpanzer-0:0.8.7-16.fc33.src pingus-0:0.7.6-37.fc33.src powdertoy-0:95.0-3.fc33.src sunpinyin-0:3.0.0-0.4.20190805git.fc33.src tolua++-0:1.0.93-30.fc33.src vdrift-0:20141020-22.fc33.src wesnoth-0:1.15.8-1.fc34.src [1] https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/SCons/scons-4.1.0-1.fc33.src.rpm [2] https://github.com/SCons/scons/releases/tag/4.1.0 -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Release 5.6.1 of Sundials
Thank you Orion. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Obsolete font-package macros
Hi all. From what are activated these rpmlint warnings of pioneer.spec file [1]? pioneer.spec: E: specfile-error warning: This package uses obsolete macros that will go away soon. Please convert to the spec templates provided by fonts-rpm-templates! pioneer.spec: E: specfile-error warning: This package uses obsolete macros that will go away soon. Please convert to the spec templates provided by fonts-rpm-templates! pioneer.spec: E: specfile-error warning: This package uses obsolete macros that will go away soon. Please convert to the spec templates provided by fonts-rpm-templates! pioneer.spec: E: specfile-error warning: This package uses obsolete macros that will go away soon. Please convert to the spec templates provided by fonts-rpm-templates! pioneer.spec: E: specfile-error warning: This package uses obsolete macros that will go away soon. Please convert to the spec templates provided by fonts-rpm-templates! pioneer.spec: E: specfile-error warning: This package uses obsolete macros that will go away soon. Please convert to the spec templates provided by fonts-rpm-templates! [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pioneer/blob/master/f/pioneer.spec Thanks. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Release 5.6.1 of Sundials
bout++ package is still missing. Please, rebuild it. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
On 11/01/21 13:56, Peter Lemenkov wrote: пн, 11 янв. 2021 г. в 13:10, Antonio T. sagitter : On 11/01/21 11:47, Peter Lemenkov wrote: Taking opal, ptlib пн, 11 янв. 2021 г. в 11:37, Miro Hrončok : ekiga mcrha, orphan5 weeks ago I'm taking Ekiga. It would be a shame letting die the rpm. Might not be a good idea. Ekiga is dead long time ago, lacks behind standards and RFCs, and might not be usable in some modern cases. I personally advice you to let it go and look around for modern alternatives. We'd better have Jitsi (Java-based, beware!) or Jami in repos. > I checked upstream, the current version is from 2013 and this repo > https://github.com/ismaell/ekiga have 1585 commits ahead , 663 changed > files with 155,735 additions and 168,142 deletions. > > IMHO will not be easy Okay. Thanks. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
