'openbabel2' and 'openbabel3' cannot co-exist if installed because they have same binary files, it's a "binary name conflicts".

Is it acceptable an openbabel2/openbabel(3) conflict in Fedora?

On 9/1/21 10:35 AM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Antonio T. sagitter wrote on 2021/09/01 16:58:
You're right, i underestimated the issue.
Probably, Avogadro is not compatible with openbabel3 but Avogadro2 should be.

I try to keep a separated 'openbabel2' package as new rpm, and then upgrade current 'openbabel' to the release 3+

Thank you.

There is useful information on debian:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=946263


--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org
GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F
GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/

Attachment: OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to