Event 8213 in Exchange 2000 SP3
Hello, We just migrated from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2K SP3. I keep getting an Event ID 8213 from MsExchangeFbPublish every 25 minutes. KB Q296151 does not help much as there are no SRS and MSExchangeFBPublish services on our exchange box which is running in native mode. Is there any way to get rid of this event? Thanks, Alexey Ugnevenok System Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5
Yes, probably Veritas Backup Exec v8.6 -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, October 03, 2002 3:09 AM Posted To: SWYNK - Exchange Conversation: Backing up Exchange 5.5 Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 Hi, May i know which third party are you guys talking about on this Backup Exec ? It's Veritas ?? Thanks -Original Message- From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 2:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backing up Exchange 5.5 I know this has come up before but how is everyone else backing up their Exchange servers. We're using Backup Exec and only backing up the mailboxes not the pub.edb or priv.edb. Is it wise to stop those services periodically to back those up? And how often? We're not using the Open File Agent. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Who's there?
I've never seen this error before, but three times this week I've seen this error on one of my smtp servers. The error reported by Microsoft Operations Manager: Severity: Error Status: New Source: MSExchangeIMC Name: Authentication attempt (AUTH %1) from %2 failed: %3() call failed with error: %4 Description: Authentication attempt (AUTH ntlm) from 128.134.25.180 failed: HrAccept() call failed with error: Logon failure: unknown user name or bad password. Has anyone seen this before? Looks to me as though someone's trying to spam. Any thoughts on this. Dot Harris Exchange Administrator William Blair Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC
I've written it in languages older than humanity. Of course, when I say Hello, world!, it has an entirely different meaning... (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I've written Hello World in FORTRAN, Pascal, Turbo Pascal, C, LISP, PDP-11 assembler, 8080 assembler, COBOL, PL/I, Waterloo Script, BASIC, Visual Basic (various versions), VB Script, and who know what else. Don't ask me to do it in XML, though. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 9:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I can write the best Hello World hands down. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I write a mean .bat file -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 8:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC It's just further evidence of the view that you must be a programmer to be a sysadmin. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 === -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Saturday, September 28, 2002 11:51 AM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: MEC Subject: RE: MEC Yeah, TechEd used to have an infrastructure track, then they dropped it and left a developer focus and I quit going. Now it looks like they're putting it back. My experience was that the bulk of the TechEd infrastructure sessions were repeats of MEC or vice-versa anyway. Oh well, I'll be able to say that I attended every MEC! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 5:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Mark Your Calendar To make it as convenient as possible for our customers to learn about the Microsoft platform - how the products work together, how to plan deployments, and how to build solutions - next year, the MEC content will be combined with Tech*Ed. Microsoft will be releasing of a core set of products in 2003 including Windows .NET Server 2003, Exchange, Office, Visual Studio .NET 2003, SharePoint Portal Server, SharePoint Team Services and SQL Server. In order to offer a mix of IT infrastructure and developer content in a single event, Tech*Ed will be significantly expanded and MEC will be discontinued as a stand-alone conference. An additional day and more than 100 new sessions have been added to the Tech*Ed agenda. You'll also receive more information about other Tech*Ed activities that will continue to foster the strong IT professional community. And, as a MEC 2002 attendee, you will receive $500 off the Tech*Ed 2003 registration fee. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I thought they'd already done that more or less. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 4:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Next year should be interesting. This is essentially the last MEC. According to the latest MEC mailing, Next year they will be combining MEC and TechEd into one new conference. -Original Message- From: Don Couch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 1:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Unfortunately, I can not attend - next year, hopefully! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott Force Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I too will be there. Any words of advice for first time attendees? I plan on bringing clean underwear and trying my first fish taco. In addition to that, what else can I expect? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Event Registration Issue
This is one of those brainteasers, right? You want to get the same event at the same time on both servers... OK, here's the solution: put both on the same power strip and then turn the power strip on and off. The servers reboot simultaneously and have a series of events that should match up, provided the machines have identical hardware. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Vijayakumar Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Event Registration Issue hello all i have two exchange server . in one domain , from one exchange server i have to register an event on the mailboxes on both the server nd vice versa can anybody tell me how to do it regards nikhil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Content Filtering
No, but they are kin to Guy Smiley. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Is either related to Percy Dovetonsils? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 5:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Anyone else here remember Herbert Birdsfoot? Or Granny Fanny Nestlerod? Here's a nice site: http://members.tripod.com/Tiny_Dancer/ (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering throws Elmo in trash can -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Insert evil booming laughter here -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 9:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering I think there's a muppet who does this sort of thing. I saw it on Sesame Street. Grover: Oh! I have gotten too much SPAM on my mail server! What will I do? (Puff of smoke and a new muppet appears) Grover: Who are you? Content Filter: They call me... the Content Filter. And do you know *why* they call me the Content Filter? It is because I *love* to filter... content. I will go through your message store now! Grover: Uh, well, you need to first meet with my manager and- Content Filter: SILENCE! (waves hand and Grover stands perplexed) One... one piece of SPAM... (hits Delete key) Two... two pieces of SPAM... (hits Delete key)... (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Schwartz, Jim Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 12:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering You forgot the quack. There have been numerous discussions regarding content filtering and how it works. Decide what you are willing to risk in lost mail, or additional manpower resources versus what you are trying to accomplish. Then go find the tool that meets those requirements. Looking a tools before defining your needs is bass ackwards. -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 1:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Yes you do. I expect a full report on my desk by 8am tomorrow. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering I was going to but haven't had a chance yet. I guess I need to take a look at it. -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 1:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Have you installed or tested 7.0? -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Antigen is great for virus scanning, but they have only recently gotten into content scanning. And their content scanning is very basic so far. -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Sybari Antigen for Exchange is an excellent package. We use it and are very happy with the automatic updates and the content filtering. Also you can create templates to distribute new changes (upgrades are free for the life of your contract). They are releasing their Gold Package at MEC, and were voted Best of Show for their Gold Package -- Antigen 7.0. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Cooke, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Excellent that works for me. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Not what, but who. I am the most reliable content filter for Exchange. For only $375k (plus 125k annual maint) I'll come filter your mail. -Original Message- From: Cooke, Brian To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 10/1/2002 8:52 AM Subject: Content Filtering Hi all, I just had a quick question in regards to a content filter add on and which would be the best to use for Exchange 5.5. Currently we are using NEMX but I would like to explore other options. What
RE: MEC
Dang..I thought you were smart before. Uh so do you like ever sleep or anything, I spend a good deal of time just trying to keep up with exchange, I don't think I could handle all of that. :) -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I've written Hello World in FORTRAN, Pascal, Turbo Pascal, C, LISP, PDP-11 assembler, 8080 assembler, COBOL, PL/I, Waterloo Script, BASIC, Visual Basic (various versions), VB Script, and who know what else. Don't ask me to do it in XML, though. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 9:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I can write the best Hello World hands down. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I write a mean .bat file -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 8:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC It's just further evidence of the view that you must be a programmer to be a sysadmin. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 === -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Saturday, September 28, 2002 11:51 AM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: MEC Subject: RE: MEC Yeah, TechEd used to have an infrastructure track, then they dropped it and left a developer focus and I quit going. Now it looks like they're putting it back. My experience was that the bulk of the TechEd infrastructure sessions were repeats of MEC or vice-versa anyway. Oh well, I'll be able to say that I attended every MEC! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 5:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Mark Your Calendar To make it as convenient as possible for our customers to learn about the Microsoft platform - how the products work together, how to plan deployments, and how to build solutions - next year, the MEC content will be combined with Tech*Ed. Microsoft will be releasing of a core set of products in 2003 including Windows .NET Server 2003, Exchange, Office, Visual Studio .NET 2003, SharePoint Portal Server, SharePoint Team Services and SQL Server. In order to offer a mix of IT infrastructure and developer content in a single event, Tech*Ed will be significantly expanded and MEC will be discontinued as a stand-alone conference. An additional day and more than 100 new sessions have been added to the Tech*Ed agenda. You'll also receive more information about other Tech*Ed activities that will continue to foster the strong IT professional community. And, as a MEC 2002 attendee, you will receive $500 off the Tech*Ed 2003 registration fee. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I thought they'd already done that more or less. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 4:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Next year should be interesting. This is essentially the last MEC. According to the latest MEC mailing, Next year they will be combining MEC and TechEd into one new conference. -Original Message- From: Don Couch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 1:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Unfortunately, I can not attend - next year, hopefully! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott Force Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I too will be there. Any words of advice for first time attendees? I plan on bringing clean underwear and trying my first fish taco. In addition to that, what else can I expect? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:
RE: MEC
Ed hasnt slept since 1979. -Original Message- From: TWU-Durham, Ryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 8:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Dang..I thought you were smart before. Uh so do you like ever sleep or anything, I spend a good deal of time just trying to keep up with exchange, I don't think I could handle all of that. :) -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I've written Hello World in FORTRAN, Pascal, Turbo Pascal, C, LISP, PDP-11 assembler, 8080 assembler, COBOL, PL/I, Waterloo Script, BASIC, Visual Basic (various versions), VB Script, and who know what else. Don't ask me to do it in XML, though. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 9:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I can write the best Hello World hands down. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I write a mean .bat file -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 8:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC It's just further evidence of the view that you must be a programmer to be a sysadmin. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 === -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Saturday, September 28, 2002 11:51 AM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: MEC Subject: RE: MEC Yeah, TechEd used to have an infrastructure track, then they dropped it and left a developer focus and I quit going. Now it looks like they're putting it back. My experience was that the bulk of the TechEd infrastructure sessions were repeats of MEC or vice-versa anyway. Oh well, I'll be able to say that I attended every MEC! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 5:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Mark Your Calendar To make it as convenient as possible for our customers to learn about the Microsoft platform - how the products work together, how to plan deployments, and how to build solutions - next year, the MEC content will be combined with Tech*Ed. Microsoft will be releasing of a core set of products in 2003 including Windows .NET Server 2003, Exchange, Office, Visual Studio .NET 2003, SharePoint Portal Server, SharePoint Team Services and SQL Server. In order to offer a mix of IT infrastructure and developer content in a single event, Tech*Ed will be significantly expanded and MEC will be discontinued as a stand-alone conference. An additional day and more than 100 new sessions have been added to the Tech*Ed agenda. You'll also receive more information about other Tech*Ed activities that will continue to foster the strong IT professional community. And, as a MEC 2002 attendee, you will receive $500 off the Tech*Ed 2003 registration fee. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I thought they'd already done that more or less. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 4:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Next year should be interesting. This is essentially the last MEC. According to the latest MEC mailing, Next year they will be combining MEC and TechEd into one new conference. -Original Message- From: Don Couch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 1:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Unfortunately, I can not attend - next year, hopefully! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott Force Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I too will be there. Any words of advice for first time attendees? I plan on bringing clean underwear and trying my first fish taco. In addition to that, what else can I expect? _ List posting FAQ:
RE: RE : Distribution List
If you have their email addresses just highlight them and open the group in Active Directory (assuming this is a global list) and just paste the names in Members and hit check name. It should resolve the names and add them for you. -Original Message- From: Bourque Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 12:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE : Distribution List I have look at BORK didn't find something that seem usefull in my case. -Message d'origine- De : Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Envoyé : 2 octobre, 2002 11:17 À : Exchange Discussions Objet : Re: Distribution List You could use SED it's a UNIX editor with built in routines for updating the list. As far as updating a DL you might want to look at tools on the Resource kit for Exchange, NT or on BORK - Original Message - From: Bourque Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:48 PM Subject: Distribution List I have an Excel spreadsheet with 600 smtp e-mail address from some of my internal users and I need to semi-automatically create a Distribution List in Exchange. The DL will be update/recreate every month base on this file extract from an Oracle Database. I can cut and paste those smtp adress in an Outlook message to check/validate user resolution and have the application manager correct the list if necessary. What I have been looking for for the last 3 hours is a program to import this list in Exchange 5.5. Any idea of a tool, free if possible? I really don't need at this point a META Directory import/sync tool. Just a small prog/utility. Any idea? Daniel Bourque Analyste - Centre d'Assistance Technique Loto-Québec [EMAIL PROTECTED] (514) 499-5056 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Large Mailing List
Maybe you need a new boss that actually would do some work around the office. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 5:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Large Mailing List Ah ha ha ha hasucks to be youI know I have the same type of person here -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Eric Goforth Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Large Mailing List OK, this is going to sound really stupid. Don't shoot the IT Puppet. I have a supervisor that literally wants A LOT of email. He likes to read through emails on almost any subject. He's one of those people that thinks that the best way to get knowledge is to read other peoples thoughts on the subject (whatever that may be). Can someone recommend a Distro List that I can set him up on that would make him give up on this idea? He had me setup public folders so that the rest of the office can share in his JOY. Whatever. Thanks. Eric J. Goforth _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Large Mailing List
I have an even better idea. Promote him to be the manager of spam department. You can also make some more money for your company by sending him out as a spam consultant to content-scan other people's messages. He is the perfect content-scanning tool that we have been wishing for on another thread of this mailing list. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 5:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Large Mailing List Ah ha ha ha hasucks to be youI know I have the same type of person here -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Eric Goforth Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Large Mailing List OK, this is going to sound really stupid. Don't shoot the IT Puppet. I have a supervisor that literally wants A LOT of email. He likes to read through emails on almost any subject. He's one of those people that thinks that the best way to get knowledge is to read other peoples thoughts on the subject (whatever that may be). Can someone recommend a Distro List that I can set him up on that would make him give up on this idea? He had me setup public folders so that the rest of the office can share in his JOY. Whatever. Thanks. Eric J. Goforth _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Exchange Server
Do you need me to explain it all in small details? I had an Exchange server. Page file was on a separate RAID1 volume. RAID1 broke. Server crashed with a blue screen. Having the page file on RAID1 did not necessarily make it more reliable. Might as well have had the page file on a single drive. Why did I write this? Because I was answering someone else's remark Placing the pagefile on a separate drive sacrifices reliability for performance. Ok now? Can I go? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server What does that have to do with Exchange? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Well once I had a broken RAID1 on the page file volume. RAID did not save me. The server blue-screened. The RAID1 was physical. How about that for reliability? -Original Message- From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 7:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Why? Placing the pagefile on a separate drive sacrifices reliability for performance. This is not normally a choice I would make on a production server. Dennis Depp -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server I would still try to find a way to put page file on a separate drive. Check if you can get a single IDE or SCSI drive and stick it somewhere inside the server. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server What's vitally important is to keep the logs on a separate physical volume from the databases. For 150 users, I agree that combining the OS and logs onto the same physical volume (I recommend separate partitions, though) shouldn't present significant performance problems. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 5:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server The ideal config is as follows 2 Drives, RAID1, OS 2 Drives, RAID1, Logs 3 or more drives, RAID5 (or 1+0 if you have enough drives), Stores Not everyone has the luxury of so many drives. I have 2 drives in RAID1 for OS and Logs, and 4 in a RAID5 for the Store. -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 5:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Exchange Server I am in the process of building a new Exchange server and I have been trying to keep up with the post about configuration, but I will ask again. What is the proper hard drive configuration for setting up a new Exchange 2000 box for about 150 users? On which partition should I put the OS, the database etc. Thanks. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Dial-up problems with Virtual IP address
Even if the cluster has not converged, one of the cluster members should be talking on the virtual IP address. I still think this is a MAC address issue. Some switches and routers do not understand the WLBS virtual MAC addresses. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Dial-up problems with Virtual IP address Does it work from the inside? On one of the NLB servers enter wlbs query. Has the cluster converged? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pennell, Ronald B. Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 6:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Dial-up problems with Virtual IP address I'm running FE/BE with NLB using a single virtual Ip address to get to OWA from the internet. I also have users who dial into the company via an AS5200 and try getting to OWA via IE or Netscape. If they use the Virtual DNS name /or IP address it will not allow them access. But, If they use the IP address of eith Front End servers they get in. Any ideas that might help Ron Pennell Institute For Defense Analyses _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Dial-up problems with Virtual IP address
Yes, works from the inside. Results from wlbs query, Host 1 converged as DEFAULT with the following hosts as part of the cluster: 1, 2 Also, I checked the nlbs prop and have multicast checked. I understand that I might have to put a static entry into ARP cache on the AS5200 for the VIP to match up with the NIC address... Any ideas Ron -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Dial-up problems with Virtual IP address Does it work from the inside? On one of the NLB servers enter wlbs query. Has the cluster converged? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pennell, Ronald B. Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 6:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Dial-up problems with Virtual IP address I'm running FE/BE with NLB using a single virtual Ip address to get to OWA from the internet. I also have users who dial into the company via an AS5200 and try getting to OWA via IE or Netscape. If they use the Virtual DNS name /or IP address it will not allow them access. But, If they use the IP address of eith Front End servers they get in. Any ideas that might help Ron Pennell Institute For Defense Analyses _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly
Just to make sure things are interesting, W32/Opaserv-B Magallanez is supposed to be raised to Level 1 by Fsecure today. Anyone seen this one yet? Still feeling pretty cozy behind Martin's list but curious about attachment extensions for it. -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 4:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly Either that or you're blocking all the files through your file filtering so they're blending in with all the Klez background noise. The way this is ramping up I have a feeling that Bugbear, just like Klez before it, is destined to become a permanent part of our lives. -Peter -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly Gulp! Either it's making it thru Sophos and Antigen or I'm not getting any. I sure hope it's the latter. Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly It's now a neck and neck race which virus is hitting us more Klex or Bugbear-A. Thank the programmers for ScanMail and Nemex. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly http:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly I haven't seen it yet either and I can't find anything on it yet. Anyone have any info on it, (is it an attachment)?? I haven't seen any yet either, but Messagelabs already has it in 3rd place behind Klez and Yaha, so they are out there. -Peter _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Exchange Server
So because you once had a problem with RAID that caused it to stop working must mean that it's always unreliable for everyone else every time? Robert Moir IT Systems Engineer Luton Sixth Form College SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue 0 0 rows returned -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2002 13:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Do you need me to explain it all in small details? I had an Exchange server. Page file was on a separate RAID1 volume. RAID1 broke. Server crashed with a blue screen. Having the page file on RAID1 did not necessarily make it more reliable. Might as well have had the page file on a single drive. Why did I write this? Because I was answering someone else's remark Placing the pagefile on a separate drive sacrifices reliability for performance. Ok now? Can I go? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server What does that have to do with Exchange? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Well once I had a broken RAID1 on the page file volume. RAID did not save me. The server blue-screened. The RAID1 was physical. How about that for reliability? -Original Message- From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 7:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Why? Placing the pagefile on a separate drive sacrifices reliability for performance. This is not normally a choice I would make on a production server. Dennis Depp -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server I would still try to find a way to put page file on a separate drive. Check if you can get a single IDE or SCSI drive and stick it somewhere inside the server. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server What's vitally important is to keep the logs on a separate physical volume from the databases. For 150 users, I agree that combining the OS and logs onto the same physical volume (I recommend separate partitions, though) shouldn't present significant performance problems. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 5:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server The ideal config is as follows 2 Drives, RAID1, OS 2 Drives, RAID1, Logs 3 or more drives, RAID5 (or 1+0 if you have enough drives), Stores Not everyone has the luxury of so many drives. I have 2 drives in RAID1 for OS and Logs, and 4 in a RAID5 for the Store. -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 5:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Exchange Server I am in the process of building a new Exchange server and I have been trying to keep up with the post about configuration, but I will ask again. What is the proper hard drive configuration for setting up a new Exchange 2000 box for about 150 users? On which partition should I put the OS, the database etc. Thanks. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Removing a site (exchange 5.5 sp4)
Is there anything special to do about removing a site other than stopping Directory Replication to the site and removing Site connector(s)? All mailboxes/public folders have been moved to existing servers in other sites. There is just one server in the site. Any advice gratefully received! Regards, Keith. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IMC Error - Again
I'm reposting this again, being pushed here to find an answer for it.
Does this error seem to suggest that someone is trying to get into our smtp
server? This is no evenid listed for this one.
Severity: Error
Status: New
Source: MSExchangeIMC
Name: Authentication attempt (AUTH %1) from %2 failed: %3() call failed
with error: %4
Description: Authentication attempt (AUTH ntlm) from 128.134.25.180 failed:
HrAccept() call failed with error: Logon failure: unknown user name or bad
password.
Domain: BLAIRNET
Agent: EXCHSMTP1
Time: 10/03/2002 01:53:45
Owner:
(view with
http://MOMSRV/OnePointOperations/PropertySheet.asp?database=MOMSRVtarget={4
35762EC-BAA2-4DA8-867F-5122101127FD}t=alert)
Thanks,
Dot Harris
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Exchange Server
If it happened once it will probably happen again. I see no big benefit of putting page file on RAID. If I had a limited number of drive bays, I would rather have a separate RAID1 for transaction logs and a separate RAID5 for informations store database files; and if no more drive array bays are available for the page file volume - I would stick an IDE or SCSI drive in the CD-ROM bay or some other available space and connect it to the onboard controller and achieve better performance instead of perceived reliability. -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server So because you once had a problem with RAID that caused it to stop working must mean that it's always unreliable for everyone else every time? Robert Moir IT Systems Engineer Luton Sixth Form College SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue 0 0 rows returned -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2002 13:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Do you need me to explain it all in small details? I had an Exchange server. Page file was on a separate RAID1 volume. RAID1 broke. Server crashed with a blue screen. Having the page file on RAID1 did not necessarily make it more reliable. Might as well have had the page file on a single drive. Why did I write this? Because I was answering someone else's remark Placing the pagefile on a separate drive sacrifices reliability for performance. Ok now? Can I go? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server What does that have to do with Exchange? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Well once I had a broken RAID1 on the page file volume. RAID did not save me. The server blue-screened. The RAID1 was physical. How about that for reliability? -Original Message- From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 7:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Why? Placing the pagefile on a separate drive sacrifices reliability for performance. This is not normally a choice I would make on a production server. Dennis Depp -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server I would still try to find a way to put page file on a separate drive. Check if you can get a single IDE or SCSI drive and stick it somewhere inside the server. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server What's vitally important is to keep the logs on a separate physical volume from the databases. For 150 users, I agree that combining the OS and logs onto the same physical volume (I recommend separate partitions, though) shouldn't present significant performance problems. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 5:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server The ideal config is as follows 2 Drives, RAID1, OS 2 Drives, RAID1, Logs 3 or more drives, RAID5 (or 1+0 if you have enough drives), Stores Not everyone has the luxury of so many drives. I have 2 drives in RAID1 for OS and Logs, and 4 in a RAID5 for the Store. -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 5:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Exchange Server I am in the process of building a new Exchange server and I have been trying to keep up with the post about configuration, but I will ask again. What is the proper hard drive configuration for setting up a new Exchange 2000 box for about 150 users? On which partition should I put the OS, the database etc. Thanks. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
RE: OWA Dial-up problems with Virtual IP address
I think if you are using multicast, you have to put a static ARP entry. You need to use the virtual MAC address that is displayed in the WLBS properties. Have you tried not using multicast? -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Dial-up problems with Virtual IP address Yes, works from the inside. Results from wlbs query, Host 1 converged as DEFAULT with the following hosts as part of the cluster: 1, 2 Also, I checked the nlbs prop and have multicast checked. I understand that I might have to put a static entry into ARP cache on the AS5200 for the VIP to match up with the NIC address... Any ideas Ron -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Dial-up problems with Virtual IP address Does it work from the inside? On one of the NLB servers enter wlbs query. Has the cluster converged? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pennell, Ronald B. Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 6:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Dial-up problems with Virtual IP address I'm running FE/BE with NLB using a single virtual Ip address to get to OWA from the internet. I also have users who dial into the company via an AS5200 and try getting to OWA via IE or Netscape. If they use the Virtual DNS name /or IP address it will not allow them access. But, If they use the IP address of eith Front End servers they get in. Any ideas that might help Ron Pennell Institute For Defense Analyses _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC Error - Again
Probably someone is trying to hack. Have you tried to investigate who this IP address
could be? I just checked it and it seems to belong to some Korean comrades. Not to
say that they are all bad guys but recently there has been a lot of spam coming from
them. Maybe you should put an explicit deny connection for this address.
whois whois.arin.net 128.134.25.180:
OrgName:Korea Telecom
OrgID: KOREAT
NetRange: 128.134.0.0 - 128.134.255.255
CIDR: 128.134.0.0/16
NetName:SDN
NetHandle: NET-128-134-0-0-1
Parent: NET-128-0-0-0-0
NetType:Direct Assignment
NameServer: NS.KORNET.NET
NameServer: NS.KAIST.AC.KR
Comment:
RegDate:1986-06-30
Updated:1996-05-15
TechHandle: YL71-ARIN
TechName: Lee, Young-il
TechPhone: 82-2-766-5900
TechEmail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IMC Error - Again
I'm reposting this again, being pushed here to find an answer for it.
Does this error seem to suggest that someone is trying to get into our smtp
server? This is no evenid listed for this one.
Severity: Error
Status: New
Source: MSExchangeIMC
Name: Authentication attempt (AUTH %1) from %2 failed: %3() call failed
with error: %4
Description: Authentication attempt (AUTH ntlm) from 128.134.25.180 failed:
HrAccept() call failed with error: Logon failure: unknown user name or bad
password.
Domain: BLAIRNET
Agent: EXCHSMTP1
Time: 10/03/2002 01:53:45
Owner:
(view with
http://MOMSRV/OnePointOperations/PropertySheet.asp?database=MOMSRVtarget={4
35762EC-BAA2-4DA8-867F-5122101127FD}t=alert)
Thanks,
Dot Harris
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC Error - Again
Someone tried to send e-mail using authenticated relay and the
authentication failed. Are you seeing a slew of these?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IMC Error - Again
I'm reposting this again, being pushed here to find an answer for it.
Does this error seem to suggest that someone is trying to get
into our smtp server? This is no evenid listed for this one.
Severity: Error
Status: New
Source: MSExchangeIMC
Name: Authentication attempt (AUTH %1) from %2 failed: %3()
call failed with error: %4
Description: Authentication attempt (AUTH ntlm) from
128.134.25.180 failed:
HrAccept() call failed with error: Logon failure: unknown
user name or bad password.
Domain: BLAIRNET
Agent: EXCHSMTP1
Time: 10/03/2002 01:53:45
Owner:
(view with
http://MOMSRV/OnePointOperations/PropertySheet.asp?database=MO
MSRVtarget={4
35762EC-BAA2-4DA8-867F-5122101127FD}t=alert)
Thanks,
Dot Harris
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange with 2 email address
Add new domain to route table and check your DNS -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange with 2 email address FAQ 3.23 -Original Message- From: Gunanathan, Amir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:15 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Exchange with 2 email address Subject: Exchange with 2 email address Hi, We have a single Exchange 5.5 (ent) with SP3 on NT 4.0 with SP6a. I would like to know how to configure the Exchange to allow it to accept emails for 2 different domains. That is, say currently we have a mail box of [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I would like to add [EMAIL PROTECTED] The reason for this is because we want to change the domain (address name) name. I would forward any emails sent to @a.com to @b.com, this part I know. What I don't know is how to configure the server with @b.com. I would appreciate any help Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC Error - Again
I've seen two, there may have been three, of these. Not ongoing.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Error - Again
Someone tried to send e-mail using authenticated relay and the
authentication failed. Are you seeing a slew of these?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IMC Error - Again
I'm reposting this again, being pushed here to find an answer for it.
Does this error seem to suggest that someone is trying to get
into our smtp server? This is no evenid listed for this one.
Severity: Error
Status: New
Source: MSExchangeIMC
Name: Authentication attempt (AUTH %1) from %2 failed: %3()
call failed with error: %4
Description: Authentication attempt (AUTH ntlm) from
128.134.25.180 failed:
HrAccept() call failed with error: Logon failure: unknown
user name or bad password.
Domain: BLAIRNET
Agent: EXCHSMTP1
Time: 10/03/2002 01:53:45
Owner:
(view with
http://MOMSRV/OnePointOperations/PropertySheet.asp?database=MO
MSRVtarget={4
35762EC-BAA2-4DA8-867F-5122101127FD}t=alert)
Thanks,
Dot Harris
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Exchange Server
Picture this: Your single (let's say IDE) pagefile drive fails, so your system crashes. You run down to your store or computer shop to buy a new drive (system still down) You install the disk in another machine (since Exchange might not start up without page drive) (system still down) You partition/format the drive (system still down) You install the new IDE disk in your exchange server (system still down) You start up Exchange. If you can afford all that downtime, go ahead and use a single drive. But now let's look at RAID1 swap: One of your swap disks fail.. Raid1 is broken so machine keeps running on one disk You take the bad disk Offline and pull it out You stroll and whistle your way down to your store or computer shop to get a new disk, maybe even have a couple of doughnuts on the way... You insert the new disk in your exchange server. run the RAID tools, rebuild the RAID. Pat yourself on the back for 0% downtime. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2002 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server If it happened once it will probably happen again. I see no big benefit of putting page file on RAID. If I had a limited number of drive bays, I would rather have a separate RAID1 for transaction logs and a separate RAID5 for informations store database files; and if no more drive array bays are available for the page file volume - I would stick an IDE or SCSI drive in the CD-ROM bay or some other available space and connect it to the onboard controller and achieve better performance instead of perceived reliability. -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server So because you once had a problem with RAID that caused it to stop working must mean that it's always unreliable for everyone else every time? Robert Moir IT Systems Engineer Luton Sixth Form College SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue 0 0 rows returned -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2002 13:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Do you need me to explain it all in small details? I had an Exchange server. Page file was on a separate RAID1 volume. RAID1 broke. Server crashed with a blue screen. Having the page file on RAID1 did not necessarily make it more reliable. Might as well have had the page file on a single drive. Why did I write this? Because I was answering someone else's remark Placing the pagefile on a separate drive sacrifices reliability for performance. Ok now? Can I go? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server What does that have to do with Exchange? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Well once I had a broken RAID1 on the page file volume. RAID did not save me. The server blue-screened. The RAID1 was physical. How about that for reliability? -Original Message- From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 7:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Why? Placing the pagefile on a separate drive sacrifices reliability for performance. This is not normally a choice I would make on a production server. Dennis Depp -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server I would still try to find a way to put page file on a separate drive. Check if you can get a single IDE or SCSI drive and stick it somewhere inside the server. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server What's vitally important is to keep the logs on a separate physical volume from the databases. For 150 users, I agree that combining the OS and logs onto the same physical volume (I recommend separate partitions, though) shouldn't present significant performance problems. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 5:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server
RE: IMC Error - Again
At this point, I'd probably just watch it and if I were the curious type I
might keep a list of Ips as well... And if it because a more frequent event,
I might follow Andrey's advice and block the specific IPs in question.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Error - Again
I've seen two, there may have been three, of these. Not ongoing.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Error - Again
Someone tried to send e-mail using authenticated relay and
the authentication failed. Are you seeing a slew of these?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IMC Error - Again
I'm reposting this again, being pushed here to find an
answer for it.
Does this error seem to suggest that someone is trying to get
into our smtp server? This is no evenid listed for this one.
Severity: Error
Status: New
Source: MSExchangeIMC
Name: Authentication attempt (AUTH %1) from %2 failed: %3()
call failed with error: %4
Description: Authentication attempt (AUTH ntlm) from
128.134.25.180 failed:
HrAccept() call failed with error: Logon failure: unknown
user name or bad password.
Domain: BLAIRNET
Agent: EXCHSMTP1
Time: 10/03/2002 01:53:45
Owner:
(view with
http://MOMSRV/OnePointOperations/PropertySheet.asp?database=MO
MSRVtarget={4
35762EC-BAA2-4DA8-867F-5122101127FD}t=alert)
Thanks,
Dot Harris
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Event ID 1171 help?
Scenario: NT 4.0 SP6a SRP Exchange 5.5 SP4 I'm in the processing of replacing two servers with a more powerful one. I setup the new server and joined the site. I've moved all of the mailboxes from the first server onto the new one and didn't appear to be having any issues. However, starting on the 25th (which coincides with when I rebooted my bridgehead for the other problem I posted to the group about) I started receiving the below error about every 6-8 hours. SYMPTOMS The Exchange Server 5.5 directory may log the following event in the application event log: Event ID: 1171 Source: MSExchangeDS Description: Exception e0010002 has occurred with parameters 9 and 6 (internal ID 3190022). Contact Microsoft Technical Support for assistance. Based on my reading through newsgroups, etc. I thought it may have been a resolution error. However, I do have an entry in the DNS and was successful with RPC Ping to the bridgehead. I also tried rebooting all the servers just to make sure it wasn't something to do with the bridgehead reboot. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command 29 Palms, CA 92278 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RAS Dial up issues
We currently are having an issue when users dial up by doing a send/receive in Outlook their services hang while Outlook is trying to synchronize their inbox. It looks like data is transferring but there is only like 1 email in their box and it is telling them that they have about 6 hours to go. They are Outlook XP Clients on EX2000 Server with Perle Ras Boxes. We are running RADIUS. This is a huge issue so I hope you can help. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Exchange Server
Eeeeuh, maybe because they had to 'exchange' a disk. Michel -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 5:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server What does that have to do with Exchange? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Well once I had a broken RAID1 on the page file volume. RAID did not save me. The server blue-screened. The RAID1 was physical. How about that for reliability? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Exchange Server
Andrea, I do believe though he said that... 'I had an Exchange server. Page file was on a separate RAID1 volume. RAID1 broke. Server crashed with a blue screen. ' IE he had it on Raid 1 and it still failed (don't know why probably because of a problem with the Raid1 hardware/BIOS or it was the ID0 drive in the mirror? Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2002 15:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Picture this: Your single (let's say IDE) pagefile drive fails, so your system crashes. You run down to your store or computer shop to buy a new drive (system still down) You install the disk in another machine (since Exchange might not start up without page drive) (system still down) You partition/format the drive (system still down) You install the new IDE disk in your exchange server (system still down) You start up Exchange. If you can afford all that downtime, go ahead and use a single drive. But now let's look at RAID1 swap: One of your swap disks fail.. Raid1 is broken so machine keeps running on one disk You take the bad disk Offline and pull it out You stroll and whistle your way down to your store or computer shop to get a new disk, maybe even have a couple of doughnuts on the way... You insert the new disk in your exchange server. run the RAID tools, rebuild the RAID. Pat yourself on the back for 0% downtime. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2002 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server If it happened once it will probably happen again. I see no big benefit of putting page file on RAID. If I had a limited number of drive bays, I would rather have a separate RAID1 for transaction logs and a separate RAID5 for informations store database files; and if no more drive array bays are available for the page file volume - I would stick an IDE or SCSI drive in the CD-ROM bay or some other available space and connect it to the onboard controller and achieve better performance instead of perceived reliability. -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server So because you once had a problem with RAID that caused it to stop working must mean that it's always unreliable for everyone else every time? Robert Moir IT Systems Engineer Luton Sixth Form College SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue 0 0 rows returned -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2002 13:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Do you need me to explain it all in small details? I had an Exchange server. Page file was on a separate RAID1 volume. RAID1 broke. Server crashed with a blue screen. Having the page file on RAID1 did not necessarily make it more reliable. Might as well have had the page file on a single drive. Why did I write this? Because I was answering someone else's remark Placing the pagefile on a separate drive sacrifices reliability for performance. Ok now? Can I go? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server What does that have to do with Exchange? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Well once I had a broken RAID1 on the page file volume. RAID did not save me. The server blue-screened. The RAID1 was physical. How about that for reliability? -Original Message- From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 7:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Why? Placing the pagefile on a separate drive sacrifices reliability for performance. This is not normally a choice I would make on a production server. Dennis Depp -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server I would still try to find a way to put page file on a separate drive. Check if you can get a single IDE or SCSI drive and stick it somewhere inside the server. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server What's vitally important is to keep the logs on a
RE: Who's there?
It appears to be a new attempt to steal passwords. I've also seen them on the POP and IMAP ports. If you've only seen them one or two at a time, it could be a valid user trying to incorrectly configure a client. -Original Message- From: Harris, Dot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 6:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Who's there? I've never seen this error before, but three times this week I've seen this error on one of my smtp servers. The error reported by Microsoft Operations Manager: Severity: Error Status: New Source: MSExchangeIMC Name: Authentication attempt (AUTH %1) from %2 failed: %3() call failed with error: %4 Description: Authentication attempt (AUTH ntlm) from 128.134.25.180 failed: HrAccept() call failed with error: Logon failure: unknown user name or bad password. Has anyone seen this before? Looks to me as though someone's trying to spam. Any thoughts on this. Dot Harris Exchange Administrator William Blair Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RAS Dial up issues
Did it ever work. Is the Perl Ras boxes new? - Original Message - From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:06 AM Subject: RAS Dial up issues We currently are having an issue when users dial up by doing a send/receive in Outlook their services hang while Outlook is trying to synchronize their inbox. It looks like data is transferring but there is only like 1 email in their box and it is telling them that they have about 6 hours to go. They are Outlook XP Clients on EX2000 Server with Perle Ras Boxes. We are running RADIUS. This is a huge issue so I hope you can help. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IMC Error - Again
Could well be a Netscape user; the version before the current one, with
patches, would improperly try to do AUTH if it saw that tag in response to
the EHLO command.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:04 AM
Subject: IMC Error - Again
I'm reposting this again, being pushed here to find an answer for it.
Does this error seem to suggest that someone is trying to get into our
smtp
server? This is no evenid listed for this one.
Severity: Error
Status: New
Source: MSExchangeIMC
Name: Authentication attempt (AUTH %1) from %2 failed: %3() call failed
with error: %4
Description: Authentication attempt (AUTH ntlm) from 128.134.25.180
failed:
HrAccept() call failed with error: Logon failure: unknown user name or bad
password.
Domain: BLAIRNET
Agent: EXCHSMTP1
Time: 10/03/2002 01:53:45
Owner:
(view with
http://MOMSRV/OnePointOperations/PropertySheet.asp?database=MOMSRVtarget={4
35762EC-BAA2-4DA8-867F-5122101127FD}t=alert)
Thanks,
Dot Harris
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Backing up Exchange 5.5
Yes, as a google search would have shown. - Original Message - From: Fioon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:09 AM Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 Hi, May i know which third party are you guys talking about on this Backup Exec ? It's Veritas ?? Thanks -Original Message- From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 2:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backing up Exchange 5.5 I know this has come up before but how is everyone else backing up their Exchange servers. We're using Backup Exec and only backing up the mailboxes not the pub.edb or priv.edb. Is it wise to stop those services periodically to back those up? And how often? We're not using the Open File Agent. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Distribution List
You already have the tool; it's called admin. Do a search in Exchange help for admin import - Original Message - From: Bourque Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:48 PM Subject: Distribution List I have an Excel spreadsheet with 600 smtp e-mail address from some of my internal users and I need to semi-automatically create a Distribution List in Exchange. The DL will be update/recreate every month base on this file extract from an Oracle Database. I can cut and paste those smtp adress in an Outlook message to check/validate user resolution and have the application manager correct the list if necessary. What I have been looking for for the last 3 hours is a program to import this list in Exchange 5.5. Any idea of a tool, free if possible? I really don't need at this point a META Directory import/sync tool. Just a small prog/utility. Any idea? Daniel Bourque Analyste - Centre d'Assistance Technique Loto-Québec [EMAIL PROTECTED] (514) 499-5056 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Exchange Server
Andrea, Please let me disagree. All I have to do is boot without the crashed page drive. Windows will create a temp page file on the C: drive and start (just confirmed this with my hardware guys). Then when time allows, the replacement drive can be added and the page file moved to it, with all the necessary reboots. I also disagree about the 0% downtime according to your scenario #2. Based on my experience, as soon as RAID failed on the page file volume, the server did a blue screen of death. So much for 0% downtime. *In theory* the server *should* have kept running. But it did not. So screw it. If it is going to crash anyway I am not going to spend extra money on it. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Picture this: Your single (let's say IDE) pagefile drive fails, so your system crashes. You run down to your store or computer shop to buy a new drive (system still down) You install the disk in another machine (since Exchange might not start up without page drive) (system still down) You partition/format the drive (system still down) You install the new IDE disk in your exchange server (system still down) You start up Exchange. If you can afford all that downtime, go ahead and use a single drive. But now let's look at RAID1 swap: One of your swap disks fail.. Raid1 is broken so machine keeps running on one disk You take the bad disk Offline and pull it out You stroll and whistle your way down to your store or computer shop to get a new disk, maybe even have a couple of doughnuts on the way... You insert the new disk in your exchange server. run the RAID tools, rebuild the RAID. Pat yourself on the back for 0% downtime. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2002 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server If it happened once it will probably happen again. I see no big benefit of putting page file on RAID. If I had a limited number of drive bays, I would rather have a separate RAID1 for transaction logs and a separate RAID5 for informations store database files; and if no more drive array bays are available for the page file volume - I would stick an IDE or SCSI drive in the CD-ROM bay or some other available space and connect it to the onboard controller and achieve better performance instead of perceived reliability. -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server So because you once had a problem with RAID that caused it to stop working must mean that it's always unreliable for everyone else every time? Robert Moir IT Systems Engineer Luton Sixth Form College SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue 0 0 rows returned -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2002 13:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Do you need me to explain it all in small details? I had an Exchange server. Page file was on a separate RAID1 volume. RAID1 broke. Server crashed with a blue screen. Having the page file on RAID1 did not necessarily make it more reliable. Might as well have had the page file on a single drive. Why did I write this? Because I was answering someone else's remark Placing the pagefile on a separate drive sacrifices reliability for performance. Ok now? Can I go? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server What does that have to do with Exchange? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Well once I had a broken RAID1 on the page file volume. RAID did not save me. The server blue-screened. The RAID1 was physical. How about that for reliability? -Original Message- From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 7:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Why? Placing the pagefile on a separate drive sacrifices reliability for performance. This is not normally a choice I would make on a production server. Dennis Depp -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server I would still try to find a way to put page file on a separate drive. Check if you can get a single IDE
RE: New Exchange Server
-Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2002 15:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server If it happened once it will probably happen again. I see no big benefit of putting page file on RAID. If I had a limited number of drive bays, I would rather have a separate RAID1 for transaction logs and a separate RAID5 for informations store database files; and if no more drive array bays are available for the page file volume - I would stick an IDE or SCSI drive in the CD-ROM bay or some other available space and connect it to the onboard controller and achieve better performance instead of perceived reliability. So when your single pagefile drive fails and you decide that because that isn't reliable enough for you, what next, try to put the pagefile on a ramdisk? Now I remember why I like to build all my own servers. Robert Moir IT Systems Engineer Luton Sixth Form College SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue 0 0 rows returned _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Need help access denied in OWA
I am having issues where I can not get anyone logged into OWA on a new Exchange 2000 server. I have compared all of the settings on it to other servers I have that are working and can not find any differences. It is and Exchange 2000 Enterprise server that is running on W2k as a member server. When you log in you get 3 prompt and then it goes to access is denied. Any thoughts?/ Thanks Todd _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Removing a site (exchange 5.5 sp4)
Before you posted this question, did you explore the Knowledge Base? You'll find the answer there. Probably in Q324340 Darcy -Original Message- From: Keith Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 7:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Removing a site (exchange 5.5 sp4) Is there anything special to do about removing a site other than stopping Directory Replication to the site and removing Site connector(s)? All mailboxes/public folders have been moved to existing servers in other sites. There is just one server in the site. Any advice gratefully received! Regards, Keith. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RAS Dial up issues
Yes and Yes -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: RAS Dial up issues Did it ever work. Is the Perl Ras boxes new? - Original Message - From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:06 AM Subject: RAS Dial up issues We currently are having an issue when users dial up by doing a send/receive in Outlook their services hang while Outlook is trying to synchronize their inbox. It looks like data is transferring but there is only like 1 email in their box and it is telling them that they have about 6 hours to go. They are Outlook XP Clients on EX2000 Server with Perle Ras Boxes. We are running RADIUS. This is a huge issue so I hope you can help. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Missing INBOXES
We are using Exchange 5.5./sp/4. For some reason some users mailbox came up with no mail, once they are in Outlook 2000. I have did the Database clean up utilities for Exchange. Is there something else i can look at. Again nothing was deleted, for some reason they don't have thier mail in the inbox. Thank You _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP to aol.com
What would cause my messages to AOL addresses to be rejected by AOL? I can send reliably to any other domain. Daniel _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Exchange Server
Maybe you should look into getting a better RAID controller. Her theory is right. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 12:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Andrea, Please let me disagree. All I have to do is boot without the crashed page drive. Windows will create a temp page file on the C: drive and start (just confirmed this with my hardware guys). Then when time allows, the replacement drive can be added and the page file moved to it, with all the necessary reboots. I also disagree about the 0% downtime according to your scenario #2. Based on my experience, as soon as RAID failed on the page file volume, the server did a blue screen of death. So much for 0% downtime. *In theory* the server *should* have kept running. But it did not. So screw it. If it is going to crash anyway I am not going to spend extra money on it. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Picture this: Your single (let's say IDE) pagefile drive fails, so your system crashes. You run down to your store or computer shop to buy a new drive (system still down) You install the disk in another machine (since Exchange might not start up without page drive) (system still down) You partition/format the drive (system still down) You install the new IDE disk in your exchange server (system still down) You start up Exchange. If you can afford all that downtime, go ahead and use a single drive. But now let's look at RAID1 swap: One of your swap disks fail.. Raid1 is broken so machine keeps running on one disk You take the bad disk Offline and pull it out You stroll and whistle your way down to your store or computer shop to get a new disk, maybe even have a couple of doughnuts on the way... You insert the new disk in your exchange server. run the RAID tools, rebuild the RAID. Pat yourself on the back for 0% downtime. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2002 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server If it happened once it will probably happen again. I see no big benefit of putting page file on RAID. If I had a limited number of drive bays, I would rather have a separate RAID1 for transaction logs and a separate RAID5 for informations store database files; and if no more drive array bays are available for the page file volume - I would stick an IDE or SCSI drive in the CD-ROM bay or some other available space and connect it to the onboard controller and achieve better performance instead of perceived reliability. -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server So because you once had a problem with RAID that caused it to stop working must mean that it's always unreliable for everyone else every time? Robert Moir IT Systems Engineer Luton Sixth Form College SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue 0 0 rows returned -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2002 13:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Do you need me to explain it all in small details? I had an Exchange server. Page file was on a separate RAID1 volume. RAID1 broke. Server crashed with a blue screen. Having the page file on RAID1 did not necessarily make it more reliable. Might as well have had the page file on a single drive. Why did I write this? Because I was answering someone else's remark Placing the pagefile on a separate drive sacrifices reliability for performance. Ok now? Can I go? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server What does that have to do with Exchange? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Well once I had a broken RAID1 on the page file volume. RAID did not save me. The server blue-screened. The RAID1 was physical. How about that for reliability? -Original Message- From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 7:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Why? Placing the pagefile on a separate drive sacrifices reliability for performance. This is not normally a choice I would make on a production server. Dennis Depp -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Exchange Server
If it fails, it fails. I replace it and go on with my life. No big deal. Please read from the beginning of the thread. I only suggested this solution for those situations when there is a limited number of drive bays. -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 12:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2002 15:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server If it happened once it will probably happen again. I see no big benefit of putting page file on RAID. If I had a limited number of drive bays, I would rather have a separate RAID1 for transaction logs and a separate RAID5 for informations store database files; and if no more drive array bays are available for the page file volume - I would stick an IDE or SCSI drive in the CD-ROM bay or some other available space and connect it to the onboard controller and achieve better performance instead of perceived reliability. So when your single pagefile drive fails and you decide that because that isn't reliable enough for you, what next, try to put the pagefile on a ramdisk? Now I remember why I like to build all my own servers. Robert Moir IT Systems Engineer Luton Sixth Form College SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue 0 0 rows returned _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC Error - Again
That IP address belongs in Korea. Do you have anyone that would be legitimately
connecting with Netscape from Korea?
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 11:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IMC Error - Again
Could well be a Netscape user; the version before the current one, with
patches, would improperly try to do AUTH if it saw that tag in response to
the EHLO command.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:04 AM
Subject: IMC Error - Again
I'm reposting this again, being pushed here to find an answer for it.
Does this error seem to suggest that someone is trying to get into our
smtp
server? This is no evenid listed for this one.
Severity: Error
Status: New
Source: MSExchangeIMC
Name: Authentication attempt (AUTH %1) from %2 failed: %3() call failed
with error: %4
Description: Authentication attempt (AUTH ntlm) from 128.134.25.180
failed:
HrAccept() call failed with error: Logon failure: unknown user name or bad
password.
Domain: BLAIRNET
Agent: EXCHSMTP1
Time: 10/03/2002 01:53:45
Owner:
(view with
http://MOMSRV/OnePointOperations/PropertySheet.asp?database=MOMSRVtarget={4
35762EC-BAA2-4DA8-867F-5122101127FD}t=alert)
Thanks,
Dot Harris
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Need help access denied in OWA
A little more info needed. Are you saying they get the logon screen then immediately goes to access denied screen without any input? - Original Message - From: Todd Youngbauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 11:34 AM Subject: Need help access denied in OWA I am having issues where I can not get anyone logged into OWA on a new Exchange 2000 server. I have compared all of the settings on it to other servers I have that are working and can not find any differences. It is and Exchange 2000 Enterprise server that is running on W2k as a member server. When you log in you get 3 prompt and then it goes to access is denied. Any thoughts?/ Thanks Todd _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Distribution List
Ummm Im no guru with exchnage 55 or 2k But me thinks there is limit of addresses in 55. I seem to remember hitting like a little over 200 is all I could get into a DL. I tried about a year ago to add like 700 to a DL for faxing and remember getting a error from OL.. True this was not a server DL like you mention a Dl in OL2k for a user just 2 cents bill -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Distribution List You already have the tool; it's called admin. Do a search in Exchange help for admin import - Original Message - From: Bourque Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:48 PM Subject: Distribution List I have an Excel spreadsheet with 600 smtp e-mail address from some of my internal users and I need to semi-automatically create a Distribution List in Exchange. The DL will be update/recreate every month base on this file extract from an Oracle Database. I can cut and paste those smtp adress in an Outlook message to check/validate user resolution and have the application manager correct the list if necessary. What I have been looking for for the last 3 hours is a program to import this list in Exchange 5.5. Any idea of a tool, free if possible? I really don't need at this point a META Directory import/sync tool. Just a small prog/utility. Any idea? Daniel Bourque Analyste - Centre d'Assistance Technique Loto-Québec [EMAIL PROTECTED] (514) 499-5056 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Unable to publish form to organizational forms folder
Do you have owner rights to that public folder? - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 8:55 PM Subject: RE: Unable to publish form to organizational forms folder Publish or perish! Well, here's a guess: Q241707. That applies to Exchange 2000, though, so you might try searching TechNet for other suggestions. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Watkins V Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 6:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Unable to publish form to organizational forms folder When I try to publish, I get the message that I am unable to publish due to a mapi error, I do not have owner rights. Have checked on administrator that I have owner rights on the folder and I do. What else could be wrong? Am using Exchange 5.5 sp4 NT4 sp6a etc. Any ideas please, many thanks Vanessa Watkins Royal Holloway, University of London _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Need help access denied in OWA
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;Q317471; Also I would turn off intergrated perms and try using basic. Also go ahead and set the domain name for basic. -Original Message- From: Todd Youngbauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 11:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Need help access denied in OWA I am having issues where I can not get anyone logged into OWA on a new Exchange 2000 server. I have compared all of the settings on it to other servers I have that are working and can not find any differences. It is and Exchange 2000 Enterprise server that is running on W2k as a member server. When you log in you get 3 prompt and then it goes to access is denied. Any thoughts?/ Thanks Todd _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Need help access denied in OWA
try using the domain name when you log in. Double check your default domain in IIS. -Original Message- From: Todd Youngbauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, October 03, 2002 12:35 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Need help access denied in OWA Subject: Need help access denied in OWA I am having issues where I can not get anyone logged into OWA on a new Exchange 2000 server. I have compared all of the settings on it to other servers I have that are working and can not find any differences. It is and Exchange 2000 Enterprise server that is running on W2k as a member server. When you log in you get 3 prompt and then it goes to access is denied. Any thoughts?/ Thanks Todd _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Event ID 1171 help?
Search on support.microsoft.com Plenty of hits -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Parrnelli GS11 Ben T Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Event ID 1171 help? Scenario: NT 4.0 SP6a SRP Exchange 5.5 SP4 I'm in the processing of replacing two servers with a more powerful one. I setup the new server and joined the site. I've moved all of the mailboxes from the first server onto the new one and didn't appear to be having any issues. However, starting on the 25th (which coincides with when I rebooted my bridgehead for the other problem I posted to the group about) I started receiving the below error about every 6-8 hours. SYMPTOMS The Exchange Server 5.5 directory may log the following event in the application event log: Event ID: 1171 Source: MSExchangeDS Description: Exception e0010002 has occurred with parameters 9 and 6 (internal ID 3190022). Contact Microsoft Technical Support for assistance. Based on my reading through newsgroups, etc. I thought it may have been a resolution error. However, I do have an entry in the DNS and was successful with RPC Ping to the bridgehead. I also tried rebooting all the servers just to make sure it wasn't something to do with the bridgehead reboot. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command 29 Palms, CA 92278 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RAS Dial up issues
I have seen this before. But not with your setup. Is it all users or just some. It may have something with the blocking at a firewall somewhere either on where the users are connecting or your Firewall. It seems they connect and authenticate but then something is blocking traffic. Proxy? Not enough info. It would help this group if you explained how the infrastructure is setup. - Original Message - From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 12:02 PM Subject: RE: RAS Dial up issues Yes and Yes -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: RAS Dial up issues Did it ever work. Is the Perl Ras boxes new? - Original Message - From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:06 AM Subject: RAS Dial up issues We currently are having an issue when users dial up by doing a send/receive in Outlook their services hang while Outlook is trying to synchronize their inbox. It looks like data is transferring but there is only like 1 email in their box and it is telling them that they have about 6 hours to go. They are Outlook XP Clients on EX2000 Server with Perle Ras Boxes. We are running RADIUS. This is a huge issue so I hope you can help. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Missing INBOXES
Is it possible that the client has been set to use POP3 and is downloading the mailbox to a PST file? I had a client do this before -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Missing INBOXES We are using Exchange 5.5./sp/4. For some reason some users mailbox came up with no mail, once they are in Outlook 2000. I have did the Database clean up utilities for Exchange. Is there something else i can look at. Again nothing was deleted, for some reason they don't have thier mail in the inbox. Thank You _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP to aol.com
You are blacklisted by several systems. Go to www.dnsstuff.com and check to see what lists you are on and what you can do. First thing, stop relaying. -Original Message- From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP to aol.com What would cause my messages to AOL addresses to be rejected by AOL? I can send reliably to any other domain. Daniel _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP to aol.com
Wow...I didn't know anyone ever got rejected by AOL. Without an NDR, it could one of several reasons: 1. You're sending to an address that is over it's quota. 2. You're sending to an address that has been disabled or deleted. 3. Your organization has been blacklisted by AOL and they are blocking all submissions from your domain. -Original Message- From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP to aol.com What would cause my messages to AOL addresses to be rejected by AOL? I can send reliably to any other domain. Daniel _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP to aol.com
rDNS? William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Daniel L. Miller Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP to aol.com What would cause my messages to AOL addresses to be rejected by AOL? I can send reliably to any other domain. Daniel _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SMTP to aol.com
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, at 10:38am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What would cause my messages to AOL addresses to be rejected by AOL? Error message? -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Exchange Server
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, at 1:39pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe you should look into getting a better RAID controller. Her theory is right. I'll second that. There seem to be a large number of really sh*tty IDE/ATA RAID controllers on the market these days. We had one customer who (against our objections) bought a server from this guy I know. Along with other stupidities, it included a RAID controller from some outfit using the name of StarTech. No management software, just a pre-boot BIOS interface with a four-function menu. Well, last week the server abruptly crashed for no apparent reason. Upon reboot, the controller said reported one of the disks as failed, but refused to tell us which one, or re-mirror with a new drive. Then it trashed part of the filesystem. We spent three days doing recovery -- oh, did I mention they weren't doing backups, either? BTW, that RAID controller is now severely fragmented. I wonder if DEFRAG can fix it? ;-) -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP to aol.com
I finally can answer a question on this list :) AOL sucks! Seriously, the same thing happened here, and it turned out to be that were an open relay. Doug Kassay -Original Message- From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP to aol.com What would cause my messages to AOL addresses to be rejected by AOL? I can send reliably to any other domain. Daniel _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP to aol.com
A number of reasons: AOL frequently is down; AOL is being blocked at your IMC; message too large; attachment too large, etc. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP to aol.com What would cause my messages to AOL addresses to be rejected by AOL? I can send reliably to any other domain. Daniel _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Missing INBOXES
are they using outlook express to read their email or do they use outlook with internet only. Cause if they do by default the option to leave messages on the server is not checked. So if someone goes home to read their email with these options enabled when they get to the office they wont see any messages. rich -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Missing INBOXES We are using Exchange 5.5./sp/4. For some reason some users mailbox came up with no mail, once they are in Outlook 2000. I have did the Database clean up utilities for Exchange. Is there something else i can look at. Again nothing was deleted, for some reason they don't have thier mail in the inbox. Thank You _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP to aol.com
Please include a copy of the NDR. -Original Message- From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP to aol.com What would cause my messages to AOL addresses to be rejected by AOL? I can send reliably to any other domain. Daniel _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP to aol.com
Why don't you post the NDR and we will check out. -Original Message- From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP to aol.com What would cause my messages to AOL addresses to be rejected by AOL? I can send reliably to any other domain. Daniel _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP to aol.com
If you're talking about amfes.com, it's because you don't have any reverse DNS. You can reliably send to any other domain that does not require your server to be represented by a valid reverse-DNS lookup. Which will rule out Earthlink, too, among others. -Original Message- From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, October 03, 2002 12:38 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: SMTP to aol.com Subject: SMTP to aol.com What would cause my messages to AOL addresses to be rejected by AOL? I can send reliably to any other domain. Daniel _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SMTP to aol.com
Lots of reasons. What reason does the NDR give? - Original Message - From: Daniel L. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 12:38 PM Subject: SMTP to aol.com What would cause my messages to AOL addresses to be rejected by AOL? I can send reliably to any other domain. Daniel _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Missing INBOXES
Downloaded via POP3? Held in a local PST file? Is it retrievable via deleted items retention? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Missing INBOXES We are using Exchange 5.5./sp/4. For some reason some users mailbox came up with no mail, once they are in Outlook 2000. I have did the Database clean up utilities for Exchange. Is there something else i can look at. Again nothing was deleted, for some reason they don't have thier mail in the inbox. Thank You _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC Error - Again
Netscape being the server product rather than the client.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Error - Again
That IP address belongs in Korea. Do you have anyone that
would be legitimately connecting with Netscape from Korea?
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 11:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IMC Error - Again
Could well be a Netscape user; the version before the current
one, with patches, would improperly try to do AUTH if it saw
that tag in response to the EHLO command.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:04 AM
Subject: IMC Error - Again
I'm reposting this again, being pushed here to find an
answer for it.
Does this error seem to suggest that someone is trying to
get into our
smtp
server? This is no evenid listed for this one.
Severity: Error
Status: New
Source: MSExchangeIMC
Name: Authentication attempt (AUTH %1) from %2 failed: %3() call
failed with error: %4
Description: Authentication attempt (AUTH ntlm) from 128.134.25.180
failed:
HrAccept() call failed with error: Logon failure: unknown
user name or
bad password.
Domain: BLAIRNET
Agent: EXCHSMTP1
Time: 10/03/2002 01:53:45
Owner:
(view with
http://MOMSRV/OnePointOperations/PropertySheet.asp?database=MO
MSRVtarget={4
35762EC-BAA2-4DA8-867F-5122101127FD}t=alert)
Thanks,
Dot Harris
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Distribution List
You already have the spreadsheet. Add the appropriate column headings and import them into Exchange with Exchange Administrator/Tools/Directory Import. Just make sure you have the correct column headings, or it will turn into a vicious nightmare (or daymare, depending on where you are). Geoff... -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Distribution List Ummm Im no guru with exchnage 55 or 2k But me thinks there is limit of addresses in 55. I seem to remember hitting like a little over 200 is all I could get into a DL. I tried about a year ago to add like 700 to a DL for faxing and remember getting a error from OL.. True this was not a server DL like you mention a Dl in OL2k for a user just 2 cents bill -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Distribution List You already have the tool; it's called admin. Do a search in Exchange help for admin import - Original Message - From: Bourque Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:48 PM Subject: Distribution List I have an Excel spreadsheet with 600 smtp e-mail address from some of my internal users and I need to semi-automatically create a Distribution List in Exchange. The DL will be update/recreate every month base on this file extract from an Oracle Database. I can cut and paste those smtp adress in an Outlook message to check/validate user resolution and have the application manager correct the list if necessary. What I have been looking for for the last 3 hours is a program to import this list in Exchange 5.5. Any idea of a tool, free if possible? I really don't need at this point a META Directory import/sync tool. Just a small prog/utility. Any idea? Daniel Bourque Analyste - Centre d'Assistance Technique Loto-Québec [EMAIL PROTECTED] (514) 499-5056 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Missing INBOXES
Maybe they are not as popular as they think! I have had this problem numerous times. user I have no mail today admin O.K., sorry! user Is something wrong w/ the mail server. admin no user then why do I not have any E-mail messages from today admin pondering a quip, white eating a fish taco, why do you THINK you should have mail? user because I always do. admin I see, well I guess today will be a first for you then user why admin . . . . . .fill in your own response here But I'm sure you get the idea. I have not been able to get MS to write a Q article about it. - John Q - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:33 AM Subject: Missing INBOXES We are using Exchange 5.5./sp/4. For some reason some users mailbox came up with no mail, once they are in Outlook 2000. I have did the Database clean up utilities for Exchange. Is there something else i can look at. Again nothing was deleted, for some reason they don't have thier mail in the inbox. Thank You _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Missing INBOXES
To clarify: Are the Inboxes gone? Or are the contents of the Inboxes gone? If the latter, I would suspect that the users moved or deleted the mail. Check to see if they have accessed their mailbox via a POP client, or if they have set up their Outlook profile to direct all new mail to a .pst file. Those are a couple of quick things to check. Darcy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Missing INBOXES We are using Exchange 5.5./sp/4. For some reason some users mailbox came up with no mail, once they are in Outlook 2000. I have did the Database clean up utilities for Exchange. Is there something else i can look at. Again nothing was deleted, for some reason they don't have thier mail in the inbox. Thank You _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Employee gone, what to do with the maill box
I haveThere is a manager, nit mine, but of a guy he just let go, and he needs some information for this past Employees mailbox. What is the best way to allow this user to access this box. Just give him permissionas and have him add it to his profile? E2K, user is using Outlook 2K. - John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
list really slow today?
any one else noticing the msgs are taking a long time to show up on the list today? (or is this just my personal hell again) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Missing INBOXES
Filter in the view? Vacuumed clean by a POP3 connection? Can they see anything using OWA? -Peter -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Missing INBOXES We are using Exchange 5.5./sp/4. For some reason some users mailbox came up with no mail, once they are in Outlook 2000. I have did the Database clean up utilities for Exchange. Is there something else i can look at. Again nothing was deleted, for some reason they don't have thier mail in the inbox. Thank You _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Need help access denied in OWA
They get a login screen, enter their information it pops up again because it looks like it does not like the password once you enter it 3 times then you get the access denied. I am using basic authentication and I have set the domain into the basic password settings in IIS. Can't think of any other reason why it won't work _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Distribution List
That's an Outlook limit, not an Exchange limit. IIRC the default in 5.5 was 5,000 per DL, but could be changed. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, October 03, 2002 01:38 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Distribution List Subject: RE: Distribution List Ummm Im no guru with exchnage 55 or 2k But me thinks there is limit of addresses in 55. I seem to remember hitting like a little over 200 is all I could get into a DL. I tried about a year ago to add like 700 to a DL for faxing and remember getting a error from OL.. True this was not a server DL like you mention a Dl in OL2k for a user just 2 cents bill -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Distribution List You already have the tool; it's called admin. Do a search in Exchange help for admin import - Original Message - From: Bourque Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:48 PM Subject: Distribution List I have an Excel spreadsheet with 600 smtp e-mail address from some of my internal users and I need to semi-automatically create a Distribution List in Exchange. The DL will be update/recreate every month base on this file extract from an Oracle Database. I can cut and paste those smtp adress in an Outlook message to check/validate user resolution and have the application manager correct the list if necessary. What I have been looking for for the last 3 hours is a program to import this list in Exchange 5.5. Any idea of a tool, free if possible? I really don't need at this point a META Directory import/sync tool. Just a small prog/utility. Any idea? Daniel Bourque Analyste - Centre d'Assistance Technique Loto-Québec [EMAIL PROTECTED] (514) 499-5056 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC Error - Again
Thanks, a place to start.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Error - Again
Probably someone is trying to hack. Have you tried to investigate who this
IP address could be? I just checked it and it seems to belong to some
Korean comrades. Not to say that they are all bad guys but recently there
has been a lot of spam coming from them. Maybe you should put an explicit
deny connection for this address.
whois whois.arin.net 128.134.25.180:
OrgName:Korea Telecom
OrgID: KOREAT
NetRange: 128.134.0.0 - 128.134.255.255
CIDR: 128.134.0.0/16
NetName:SDN
NetHandle: NET-128-134-0-0-1
Parent: NET-128-0-0-0-0
NetType:Direct Assignment
NameServer: NS.KORNET.NET
NameServer: NS.KAIST.AC.KR
Comment:
RegDate:1986-06-30
Updated:1996-05-15
TechHandle: YL71-ARIN
TechName: Lee, Young-il
TechPhone: 82-2-766-5900
TechEmail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IMC Error - Again
I'm reposting this again, being pushed here to find an answer for it.
Does this error seem to suggest that someone is trying to get into our smtp
server? This is no evenid listed for this one.
Severity: Error
Status: New
Source: MSExchangeIMC
Name: Authentication attempt (AUTH %1) from %2 failed: %3() call failed
with error: %4
Description: Authentication attempt (AUTH ntlm) from 128.134.25.180 failed:
HrAccept() call failed with error: Logon failure: unknown user name or bad
password.
Domain: BLAIRNET
Agent: EXCHSMTP1
Time: 10/03/2002 01:53:45
Owner:
(view with
http://MOMSRV/OnePointOperations/PropertySheet.asp?database=MOMSRVtarget={4
35762EC-BAA2-4DA8-867F-5122101127FD}t=alert)
Thanks,
Dot Harris
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC Error - Again
I'll do that. Thanks for your help.
Dot
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Error - Again
At this point, I'd probably just watch it and if I were the curious type I
might keep a list of Ips as well... And if it because a more frequent event,
I might follow Andrey's advice and block the specific IPs in question.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Error - Again
I've seen two, there may have been three, of these. Not ongoing.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Error - Again
Someone tried to send e-mail using authenticated relay and
the authentication failed. Are you seeing a slew of these?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IMC Error - Again
I'm reposting this again, being pushed here to find an
answer for it.
Does this error seem to suggest that someone is trying to get
into our smtp server? This is no evenid listed for this one.
Severity: Error
Status: New
Source: MSExchangeIMC
Name: Authentication attempt (AUTH %1) from %2 failed: %3()
call failed with error: %4
Description: Authentication attempt (AUTH ntlm) from
128.134.25.180 failed:
HrAccept() call failed with error: Logon failure: unknown
user name or bad password.
Domain: BLAIRNET
Agent: EXCHSMTP1
Time: 10/03/2002 01:53:45
Owner:
(view with
http://MOMSRV/OnePointOperations/PropertySheet.asp?database=MO
MSRVtarget={4
35762EC-BAA2-4DA8-867F-5122101127FD}t=alert)
Thanks,
Dot Harris
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC
Didn't he stay at a Holiday Inn Express once? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 5:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Ed hasnt slept since 1979. -Original Message- From: TWU-Durham, Ryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 8:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Dang..I thought you were smart before. Uh so do you like ever sleep or anything, I spend a good deal of time just trying to keep up with exchange, I don't think I could handle all of that. :) -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I've written Hello World in FORTRAN, Pascal, Turbo Pascal, C, LISP, PDP-11 assembler, 8080 assembler, COBOL, PL/I, Waterloo Script, BASIC, Visual Basic (various versions), VB Script, and who know what else. Don't ask me to do it in XML, though. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 9:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I can write the best Hello World hands down. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I write a mean .bat file -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 8:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC It's just further evidence of the view that you must be a programmer to be a sysadmin. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP to aol.com
'Cause AOL is so screwed up -Original Message- From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP to aol.com What would cause my messages to AOL addresses to be rejected by AOL? I can send reliably to any other domain. Daniel _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Need help access denied in OWA
2000 does not have a logon screen -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 2:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Need help access denied in OWA A little more info needed. Are you saying they get the logon screen then immediately goes to access denied screen without any input? - Original Message - From: Todd Youngbauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 11:34 AM Subject: Need help access denied in OWA I am having issues where I can not get anyone logged into OWA on a new Exchange 2000 server. I have compared all of the settings on it to other servers I have that are working and can not find any differences. It is and Exchange 2000 Enterprise server that is running on W2k as a member server. When you log in you get 3 prompt and then it goes to access is denied. Any thoughts?/ Thanks Todd _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP to aol.com
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ip4r.ch?ip=amfes.com You are listed as an open relay also. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP to aol.com If you're talking about amfes.com, it's because you don't have any reverse DNS. You can reliably send to any other domain that does not require your server to be represented by a valid reverse-DNS lookup. Which will rule out Earthlink, too, among others. -Original Message- From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, October 03, 2002 12:38 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: SMTP to aol.com Subject: SMTP to aol.com What would cause my messages to AOL addresses to be rejected by AOL? I can send reliably to any other domain. Daniel _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Missing INBOXES
Well, since there is no such thing as an 'inbox' except as a view of a bunch of items sharing a particular attribute in a big data base (i.e. the store), one of two conditions or some combination of them must exist: 1. The would be viewer does not have the required matching attribute to access this particular view, or 2. The set of items having this particular view attribute is a null set. Some threads to pull on might include . . . Does the ID (profile) of the inbox of the viewer match the ID of the inbox where (yeah I know) the mail is? Is the mail in the store at all? What do the various transaction logs (i.e. events) tell you about what happened? Clean-up? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Missing INBOXES We are using Exchange 5.5./sp/4. For some reason some users mailbox came up with no mail, once they are in Outlook 2000. I have did the Database clean up utilities for Exchange. Is there something else i can look at. Again nothing was deleted, for some reason they don't have thier mail in the inbox. Thank You _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SMTP to aol.com
I feel your pain. I have been working for close to 6 months now to try to solve that problem. We have reverse DNS. You dont get a NDR; nothing, it just never gets there. If I telnet into their smtp server all goes okay but again the mail never shows up in the recipient's inbox and I have tried quite a few. I finally found a website that had us listed as a blackhole and got removed from it. I even talked to AOL (703-265-4670 - postmaster line) and they ran a check on my subnet against their database and it came up clean. So we are still looking for an answer. Believe me I would rather NOT send to AOL but we sell to the consumer and our customer service dept. gets emails everyday from a domain containing 12 million users -- aol.com. :( - Original Message - From: Daniel L. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:38 PM Subject: SMTP to aol.com What would cause my messages to AOL addresses to be rejected by AOL? I can send reliably to any other domain. Daniel _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SMTP to aol.com
REAL spammers have no trouble getting into AOL. Those who don't know any better (and who haven't paid their entrance fee) get blocked. - Original Message - From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 2:57 PM Subject: RE: SMTP to aol.com Wow...I didn't know anyone ever got rejected by AOL. Without an NDR, it could one of several reasons: 1. You're sending to an address that is over it's quota. 2. You're sending to an address that has been disabled or deleted. 3. Your organization has been blacklisted by AOL and they are blocking all submissions from your domain. -Original Message- From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP to aol.com What would cause my messages to AOL addresses to be rejected by AOL? I can send reliably to any other domain. Daniel _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: list really slow today?
Isn't UUnet having problems? That might cause somethings to be slow. -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: list really slow today? any one else noticing the msgs are taking a long time to show up on the list today? (or is this just my personal hell again) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP to aol.com
And to the questions of the NDR - Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Testing Sent: 10/3/2002 10:25 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 10/3/2002 12:44 PM Could not deliver the message in the time limit specified. Please retry or contact your administrator. amserver.AMFESLAN.local #4.4.7 Daniel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: SMTP to aol.com Lots of reasons. What reason does the NDR give? - Original Message - From: Daniel L. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 12:38 PM Subject: SMTP to aol.com What would cause my messages to AOL addresses to be rejected by AOL? I can send reliably to any other domain. Daniel _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Need help access denied in OWA
Clear cache in IE. Reboot client. Make sure user is enabled. Double check IIs settings for authentication/domain fields. There are articles on this on MS's site. Check there to make your doing it right. - Original Message - From: Todd Youngbauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 4:25 PM Subject: RE: Need help access denied in OWA They get a login screen, enter their information it pops up again because it looks like it does not like the password once you enter it 3 times then you get the access denied. I am using basic authentication and I have set the domain into the basic password settings in IIS. Can't think of any other reason why it won't work _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Need help access denied in OWA
2000 does indeed have a logon screen unless someone has hacked it out. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 5:18 PM Subject: RE: Need help access denied in OWA 2000 does not have a logon screen -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 2:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Need help access denied in OWA A little more info needed. Are you saying they get the logon screen then immediately goes to access denied screen without any input? - Original Message - From: Todd Youngbauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 11:34 AM Subject: Need help access denied in OWA I am having issues where I can not get anyone logged into OWA on a new Exchange 2000 server. I have compared all of the settings on it to other servers I have that are working and can not find any differences. It is and Exchange 2000 Enterprise server that is running on W2k as a member server. When you log in you get 3 prompt and then it goes to access is denied. Any thoughts?/ Thanks Todd _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Employee gone, what to do with the maill box
Sounds like you have the answer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Q Jr. Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 17:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Employee gone, what to do with the maill box I haveThere is a manager, nit mine, but of a guy he just let go, and he needs some information for this past Employees mailbox. What is the best way to allow this user to access this box. Just give him permissionas and have him add it to his profile? E2K, user is using Outlook 2K. - John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: list really slow today?
Nope... Just the backbone of UUNET -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ali Wilkes (IT) Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 16:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: list really slow today? any one else noticing the msgs are taking a long time to show up on the list today? (or is this just my personal hell again) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE : Distribution List
Problem is thoses users are from multiple different sites, multiples different countainers and I only have the smtp address. Going the import way, I need all thoses informations if I read correctly the export file I create yesterday night for testing. -Message d'origine- De : Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Envoyé : 3 octobre, 2002 11:54 À : Exchange Discussions Objet : Re: Distribution List You already have the tool; it's called admin. Do a search in Exchange help for admin import - Original Message - From: Bourque Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:48 PM Subject: Distribution List I have an Excel spreadsheet with 600 smtp e-mail address from some of my internal users and I need to semi-automatically create a Distribution List in Exchange. The DL will be update/recreate every month base on this file extract from an Oracle Database. I can cut and paste those smtp adress in an Outlook message to check/validate user resolution and have the application manager correct the list if necessary. What I have been looking for for the last 3 hours is a program to import this list in Exchange 5.5. Any idea of a tool, free if possible? I really don't need at this point a META Directory import/sync tool. Just a small prog/utility. Any idea? Daniel Bourque Analyste - Centre d'Assistance Technique Loto-Québec [EMAIL PROTECTED] (514) 499-5056 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE : Missing INBOXES
If you look at the mailbox statistic in ExchAdmin, do you see 0 message? -Message d'origine- De : Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Envoyé : 3 octobre, 2002 18:31 À : Exchange Discussions Objet : RE: Missing INBOXES Well, since there is no such thing as an 'inbox' except as a view of a bunch of items sharing a particular attribute in a big data base (i.e. the store), one of two conditions or some combination of them must exist: 1. The would be viewer does not have the required matching attribute to access this particular view, or 2. The set of items having this particular view attribute is a null set. Some threads to pull on might include . . . Does the ID (profile) of the inbox of the viewer match the ID of the inbox where (yeah I know) the mail is? Is the mail in the store at all? What do the various transaction logs (i.e. events) tell you about what happened? Clean-up? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Missing INBOXES We are using Exchange 5.5./sp/4. For some reason some users mailbox came up with no mail, once they are in Outlook 2000. I have did the Database clean up utilities for Exchange. Is there something else i can look at. Again nothing was deleted, for some reason they don't have thier mail in the inbox. Thank You _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Distribution List
Okay, that makes it a bit harder. Since the SMTP address is unique within the org you can use it as an index. You'll need to get fancy in Excel. Export the current list and do a matchup between the list you get from Oracle. Use the resulting matched info to create the list for import. Or... Create an access database. Have it programatically watch for the list from Oracle. At that point it does the export and than drags those into it's own database. It creates a subset of the database based on the Oracle input and writes that out as a CSV and than calls admin to import. This way you can practically automate the whole thing. There ain't no off-the-shelf solution. - Original Message - From: Bourque Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 6:57 PM Subject: RE : Distribution List Problem is thoses users are from multiple different sites, multiples different countainers and I only have the smtp address. Going the import way, I need all thoses informations if I read correctly the export file I create yesterday night for testing. -Message d'origine- De : Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Envoyé : 3 octobre, 2002 11:54 À : Exchange Discussions Objet : Re: Distribution List You already have the tool; it's called admin. Do a search in Exchange help for admin import - Original Message - From: Bourque Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:48 PM Subject: Distribution List I have an Excel spreadsheet with 600 smtp e-mail address from some of my internal users and I need to semi-automatically create a Distribution List in Exchange. The DL will be update/recreate every month base on this file extract from an Oracle Database. I can cut and paste those smtp adress in an Outlook message to check/validate user resolution and have the application manager correct the list if necessary. What I have been looking for for the last 3 hours is a program to import this list in Exchange 5.5. Any idea of a tool, free if possible? I really don't need at this point a META Directory import/sync tool. Just a small prog/utility. Any idea? Daniel Bourque Analyste - Centre d'Assistance Technique Loto-Québec [EMAIL PROTECTED] (514) 499-5056 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE : Distribution List
That was my conclusion after roaming in the Exchange tools web sites yesterday night. Thank's for the ideas -Message d'origine- De : Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Envoyé : 3 octobre, 2002 20:18 À : Exchange Discussions Objet : Re: Distribution List Okay, that makes it a bit harder. Since the SMTP address is unique within the org you can use it as an index. You'll need to get fancy in Excel. Export the current list and do a matchup between the list you get from Oracle. Use the resulting matched info to create the list for import. Or... Create an access database. Have it programatically watch for the list from Oracle. At that point it does the export and than drags those into it's own database. It creates a subset of the database based on the Oracle input and writes that out as a CSV and than calls admin to import. This way you can practically automate the whole thing. There ain't no off-the-shelf solution. - Original Message - From: Bourque Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 6:57 PM Subject: RE : Distribution List Problem is thoses users are from multiple different sites, multiples different countainers and I only have the smtp address. Going the import way, I need all thoses informations if I read correctly the export file I create yesterday night for testing. -Message d'origine- De : Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Envoyé : 3 octobre, 2002 11:54 À : Exchange Discussions Objet : Re: Distribution List You already have the tool; it's called admin. Do a search in Exchange help for admin import - Original Message - From: Bourque Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:48 PM Subject: Distribution List I have an Excel spreadsheet with 600 smtp e-mail address from some of my internal users and I need to semi-automatically create a Distribution List in Exchange. The DL will be update/recreate every month base on this file extract from an Oracle Database. I can cut and paste those smtp adress in an Outlook message to check/validate user resolution and have the application manager correct the list if necessary. What I have been looking for for the last 3 hours is a program to import this list in Exchange 5.5. Any idea of a tool, free if possible? I really don't need at this point a META Directory import/sync tool. Just a small prog/utility. Any idea? Daniel Bourque Analyste - Centre d'Assistance Technique Loto-Québec [EMAIL PROTECTED] (514) 499-5056 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Need help access denied in OWA
We had a similar issue when we went from 5.5 to 2K. I found that if the users put in
their username in the old NT4 fashion - domain\username - they got in. I also found
later that you can assign a default domain to the OWA website using the IIS admin
tool.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thu 10/3/2002 7:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: Re: Need help access denied in OWA
2000 does indeed have a logon screen unless someone has hacked it out.
- Original Message -
From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 5:18 PM
Subject: RE: Need help access denied in OWA
2000 does not have a logon screen
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 2:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Need help access denied in OWA
A little more info needed. Are you saying they get the logon screen then
immediately goes to access denied screen without any input?
- Original Message -
From: Todd Youngbauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 11:34 AM
Subject: Need help access denied in OWA
I am having issues where I can not get anyone logged into OWA on a new
Exchange 2000 server. I have compared all of the settings on it to other
servers I have that are working and can not find any differences. It is
and Exchange 2000 Enterprise server that is running on W2k as a member
server. When you log in you get 3 prompt and then it goes to access is
denied. Any thoughts?/
Thanks
Todd
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ëi¢Ëb@Bm§ÿðà 0w ¢oëzÊ.Ç¿{!}ª¡¶`+r¯zÈm¶ÿÃ
,Ã)är¿²+^±æ«r ìyªÜ
«)N§²æìr¸zf¢Ú%y«Þ{!jx Ë0Êy ¢a1r§ââ²Ö)åËZvh§³ §Ê
RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5
I've download the BE trial copy , but it can't run. Funny, hang on Self Extract. Download again, same thing happened again. Any opinion on new ArcServe2000 BrightStore for the Disaster Recovery on Exchange 5.5 Issue ? Fin -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 11:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Backing up Exchange 5.5 Yes, as a google search would have shown. - Original Message - From: Fioon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:09 AM Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 Hi, May i know which third party are you guys talking about on this Backup Exec ? It's Veritas ?? Thanks -Original Message- From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 2:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backing up Exchange 5.5 I know this has come up before but how is everyone else backing up their Exchange servers. We're using Backup Exec and only backing up the mailboxes not the pub.edb or priv.edb. Is it wise to stop those services periodically to back those up? And how often? We're not using the Open File Agent. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
