Unwanted movement of different windows and my mouse and keyboard are shaky.
On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 16:57 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to > fedora-list@redhat.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Upgrade from F8 to F9 failed with libnss3.so: cannot open > shared object file: No such file or directory (Arch Willingham) > 2. Re: Networkmanager seems to ignore WEP code > (Luis Orlindo Tedeschi) > 3. Re: CGI over C++ (Joe Klemmer) > 4. Re: noacpi,acpi=off kernel options (Mark Haney) > 5. Re: Sunday Morning idle queries ?? (William Case) > 6. Re: Networkmanager seems to ignore WEP code (Kevin J. Cummings) > 7. Re: Gnash and youtube (Bassel Safadi) > 8. Re: Sunday Morning idle queries ?? (Tom Horsley) > 9. Re: Gnash and youtube (Ian Chapman) > 10. Using the Fedora 9 KDE Live CD on unsupported video hardware > (Rance Hall) > 11. Re: Problem with system-config-printer.py (Chris Carlson) > 12. Scanner woes in F9 (Matthew Saltzman) > 13. Re: Networkmanager seems to ignore WEP code > (Christopher A. Williams) > 14. Re: CD/DVD writing (Chris Carlson) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 12:04:46 -0400 > From: Arch Willingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Upgrade from F8 to F9 failed with libnss3.so: cannot open > shared object file: No such file or directory > To: "'fedora-list@redhat.com'" <fedora-list@redhat.com> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > I have tried upgrading two different machines from F8 to F9 but both failed. > One I tired just upgrading from the DVD and the other I tired the preupgrade > route. In each case, the upgrade acts like it worked. Once it was finished > and rebooted was were the trouble started. In each case, the gui does not > work and almost anything you try to run from the command line gives you this > error: > > There was a problem importing one of the Python modules required to run yum. > The error leading to this problem was: > > libnss3.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory > > Please install a package which provides this module, or verify that the > module is installed correctly. > > It's possible that the above module doesn't match the current version of > Python, which is: > 2.5.1 (r251:64863, June 15 2008, 23:59:20) > [GCC 4.1.2 20070925 (Red Hat 4.1.2-33)] > > With the first machine, I just did a new install and ignored it but this time > I thought I'd like to see if it is fixable. > > > Any ideas? > > Thanks! > > Arch > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2008 11:09:20 -0500 > From: Luis Orlindo Tedeschi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Networkmanager seems to ignore WEP code > To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@redhat.com> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > Would the WPA problem affect the WEP? > > On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 23:24 +0300, Nicolae Ghimbovschi wrote: > > It is a bug in wpa_supplicant , see this Bugzilla Bug 453390: wifi > > problems with kernel 2.6.25.9-74 > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453390 . > > > > Use the previous kernel, until kernel-2.6.25.9-81.fc9 rolls out . > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 11:16 PM, Luis Orlindo Tedeschi > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This is how it goes... Networkmanager was working fine until I did the > > > first update of the system. From that day on, it seems to me NM ignores > > > the WEP key and keeps asking for the secrets again and again and again > > > and does not connect wireless. I already checked the key several times. > > > NM does find the wireless router (linksys) without problems. Does anyone > > > know how to reset NM and start over or does any one could shed some > > > light into this "black box"? Thanks a lot. Luis > > > > > > -- > > > Luis Orlindo Tedeschi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > -- > > > fedora-list mailing list > > > fedora-list@redhat.com > > > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Simone de Beauvoir - "To catch a husband is an art; to hold him is a job." > > > -- > > +----------------------------------------------------+ > Luis O. Tedeschi, PhD, PAS > Assistant Professor > Texas A&M University > > 230 Kleberg Center p. (+1) 979-845-5065 > 2471 TAMU f. (+1) 979-845-5292 > College Station, TX 77843-2471 > > http://nutritionmodels.tamu.edu > http://nutr.tamu.edu > http://people.tamu.edu/~luis.tedeschi > +----------------------------------------------------+ > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 12:41:09 -0400 (EDT) > From: Joe Klemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: CGI over C++ > To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@redhat.com> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed > > On Sat, 5 Jul 2008, Konstantin Svist wrote: > > >> Anybody knows how can I compile cgi web scripts after writing it on > >> C++??? Or how can C++ generate HTML code?? > > > > In your C++ application, you read in command line parameters (they > > correspond to URL query arguments), and stdin (postdata), then you spit > > out data into stdout - it will appear to the browser as main content > > (HTML or whatnot). It's not an efficient way to code your web apps, > > though, so few do it anymore. > > You might want to check freshmeat for C/C++ CGI libraries. > > -- > Interesting Boring Blog - http://x-nc.blogspot.com > A combination of insight and inanity for your reading pleasure > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2008 13:01:22 -0400 > From: "Mark Haney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: noacpi,acpi=off kernel options > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "For users of Fedora" > <fedora-list@redhat.com> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-1" > > Mark C. Allman wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 13:01 -0400, Mark Haney wrote: > >> It seems with the newer kernels these options no longer work, or there's > >> some syntactical change that is killing my kernels on boot. I have one > >> server here that just refuses to play nice with ACPI. It won't cut the > >> fan on/off and it fills up my log and eventually the HDD. So normally I > >> use something like this: > >> > >> title Fedora (2.6.25.6-55.fc9.i686) > >> root (hd0,2) > >> kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.25.6-55.fc9.i686 ro > >> root=UUID=9f669bab-aff8-4855-aa5f-c683bf60744a noacpi,acpi=off > >> initrd /initrd-2.6.25.6-55.fc9.i686.img > >> > >> In grub, but for some reason when I boot with this kernel it hang every > >> time until I remove the noacpi,acpi=off options. > >> > >> So, what's the correct option(s) for shutting off acpi on boot now? > >> > >> -- > >> Libenter homines id quod volunt credunt -- Caius Julius Caesar > >> > >> > >> Mark Haney > >> Sr. Systems Administrator > >> ERC Broadband > >> (828) 350-2415 > >> > >> Call (866) ERC-7110 for after hours support > >> > > Try it without the "noacpi," string. Just use "acpi=off". > > > > I just tried that option, after take a few days to hang out with the > family. And when I use that option on either kernel I have installed, > the system hangs at 'creating /dev'. When I use noacpi, it boots > properly, but I don't know if that option is being ignored or if it's > the correct one, I'll dig through syslog to find out. > > > > > -- > Libenter homines id quod volunt credunt -- Caius Julius Caesar > > > Mark Haney > Sr. Systems Administrator > ERC Broadband > (828) 350-2415 > > Call (866) ERC-7110 for after hours support > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2008 13:05:06 -0400 > From: William Case <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Sunday Morning idle queries ?? > To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@redhat.com> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > Hi Max and Patrick; > > On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 10:40 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 10:16 -0400, William Case wrote: > > > Hi; > > > > Hi Bill, > > > > > Just wondering about a few things: > > > > > > 1) I noticed a program in the latest update list called 'augeas' for > > > editing config files. I have gone to their site etc.-- looks > > > interesting. Has anyone have experience using it and would like to > > > comment? > > > Installing it now to check it out. Nice idea, as long as they can keep > > the config file descriptions in sync with the various packages. > > > > Let me and others know how it turns out. > > > > 2) I have just installed kmod-nvidia from livnia. I have been watching > > > the discussion here on its effectiveness re: Xorg etc. It seems to work > > > fine for me. Now the question is: which is the best 3D application > > > (window manager??) to use with it? Compiz? > > > > No opinion. I presume if you have a fancy graphics card you got it for > > some sepcific reason, otherwise you don't need it. Nowadays onboard > > video chipsets are more than enough for everyday use, for many values of > > "everyday" (I can even run Compiz on my Intel 965, I just can't be > > bothered). > > > It wasn't purchased for a specific purpose. It is a C51PV GeForce 6150 > integrated in my newly installed M2NPV-VM motherboard. I just thought I > would try out 3D for a bit of time to see what I get. > > > > > 3) My project for the next while is to work out how various multimedia > > > work. The more I delve into the subject the more confusing it gets. > > > I can find lots of info on the various pieces of hardware used, but then > > > what? How do various software components fit together e.g. gstreamer, > > > xine, Totem, ripping, burning, editing, codecs, audio (drivers), video > > > (drivers), etc., etc. Info and howtos on individual pieces of software > > > exist, but I can't seem to find anything online or a textbook that puts > > > it all together in an overview. Wikipedia, for example, is full of > > > stubs on this subject. > > > > Good luck with that (really). It's a definite hole that needs to be > > filled. I'm sure if you do it collaboratively, maybe as a Wiki, people > > will be glad to contribute what they know. > > I have been thinking about your suggestions all morning. I have decided > to develop the following strategy. If you have a better suggestion let > me know. > > 1) Start by using mainly cut and paste from wherever I can find info. > 2) Using NoteCase in conjunction with FreeMind to begin organizing data > conceptually and storing the details. > 3) Begin with hardware (and perhaps the prerequisite drivers even if > drivers are technically software) so that I can develop a basic > understanding of the physical limitations and problems that software has > to overcome for each different type of use. > 4) As I go through the hardware list, perhaps I will pickup the > applicability and use of various pieces of software. > 5) So far I have the following list of hardware, off the top of my head, > that seems to play a role: > RJ45; Twisted Pair Cable > CATV; Coaxial Cable > USB > Wireless > NIC > RAM (how used for sockets, caches, DMA etc. by media hardware) > Audio Card/Chip > Video Card/chip > CD/DVD Drive > CD Disk > DVD Disk > Digital Still Picture Camera > Digital Video Camera > WebCam > TV Tuners > > Any suggestions of additions or deletions gratefully accepted. > > 6) So far, my software list consists of: > Drivers; not a analysis of specific drivers (unless necessary); > but a discussion of generically what the driver for a hardware > component should do. > Licencing; > ALSA; pulseAlsa > gstreamer; > Flash; > > As of yet, a very sparse list indeed. I am unsure of the relationship > between various software components and sub-components (e.g. mySQL, > Apache etc.). Fixing that lack of knowledge is, after all, the point of > the exercise. > > Any tentative suggestions for main or generic types of software, > preferably in some logical tree order, are not only welcome, but, in > fact, begged for. > > I agree with Patrick, that if in fact, no one has yet put such a summary > together, I should create a Wiki site. However, it is probably best > that I assemble the basic information that is readily available first. > > References to the M$ Windows counterpart would be useful; although my > main objective is for Linux, Windows seems to have been there first for > most media uses and seems (from what I have read) to act as a touchstone > for comparisons. > > Any quick remarks as to how these categories of investigation should > line up will help get things started. > > Tom, I will organize quantum theory and end all war after I get this > project done. > -- > Regards Bill; > Fedora 9, Gnome 2.22.2 > Evo.2.22.2, Emacs 22.2.1 > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2008 13:42:59 -0400 > From: "Kevin J. Cummings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Networkmanager seems to ignore WEP code > To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@redhat.com> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > Luis Orlindo Tedeschi wrote: > > Would the WPA problem affect the WEP? > > (For those who have forgotten, my laptop is running F9 x86_64. > Up-to-date through yum daily. It has ipw3945 hardware, and I'm using > the iwl3945 wifi drivers.) > > I read through *all* the duplicate bugs and the comments in 453390, and > many people claimed that while WPA/WPA2 was whacked, WEP still worked > for them. The general claim is that it was a bug in wpa_supplicant. If > so, it should have *no* effect on WEP, which is implemented elsewhere > (isn't it?). > > I find this really strange, because, I booted the new .9-76 kernel > yesterday, and it connected to my AP right away. My AP is a wrt54g, > V3.0, still running its original firmware. And I'm using WPA-AES > encryption, (though I've been thinking of moving to WPA-TKIP and maybe > changing my channel B^). This appears to be the opposite behaviour from > everyone who did a me2 on that bug report! What works for them fails > for me, and what fails for them works for me. Really strange. > > 2-3 weeks ago, I took a long holiday away from home. Brought the laptop > with me because the inn claimed to have free WiFi. In fact, they had a > small Airport AP running 40-bit WEP. (while I was still running the > .6-55 kernel) NetworkManager found the AP just fine, but wouldn't > connect. It just kept re-prompting me for the passphrase. Well, > actually, it had encoded the passphrase and prompted me to reenter the > encrypted 40/128 bit encoding, which was a hex string. Nothing I tried > would connect. So, when I retired to my room for the night, to my > surprise, the laptop found the open wireless from the house across the > street! Bing, bada boom, it connected (I didn't even *ask* it to)! (no > encryption, not WEP, not WPA, nothing). > > When I got back home, I was able to re-connect to my house. WPA-AES. > It connected first try. Really strange! > > Now, after seeing all of the complaints about .9-76, I waited until I > tried to view a DVD, and my system panicked. When I re-booted, it was > the latest kernel, and I expected the WiFi to fail. "Surprise, > surprise, surprise Sergeant Carter!" It connected first time. I even > suspended my lappie overnight, and when I re-booted, it connected again! > > So, maybe I don't know what the bug is, but maybe its related to > WPA/WPA2, but not WPA-AES? > > And I have no clue as what's wrong with WEP, as a lot of the people > commenting on the bug claims they have no problems using WEP! > > So, here I am, not a general user of WEP, having problems getting it to > work at all. Its not one of my "standard" setups. I only expect to use > it rarely. But, I expect it to work when I do, so when it doesn't, it > makes it really hard to fix (How do you fix your internet connection > when you can't get it to work????) How am I supposed to then google for > the answers?! > > -- > Kevin J. Cummings > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Registered Linux User #1232 (http://counter.li.org) > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 21:10:08 +0300 > From: "Bassel Safadi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Gnash and youtube > To: "For users of Fedora" <fedora-list@redhat.com> > Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > On 7/3/08, Ian Chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Is gnash in F9 actually supposed to work with sites like youtube? It worked > > for me in F8 but I cannot get it to work in F9, despite having all the > > codecs installed including those from livna. Just curious if anyone has it > > working and what they did, particularly from PPC users. It works with flash > > in general just not with video streaming for some reason. > > > > -- > > Ian Chapman. > > > > -- > > fedora-list mailing list > > fedora-list@redhat.com > > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > > Some people will not agree with me, but from my point of view, opera 9.5 is > better than firefox in f9, specialy for flash, it have built in adobe flash > player. > > it's not open source, but you consider testing it.. > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20080706/0c87fde8/attachment.html > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 14:33:43 -0400 > From: Tom Horsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Sunday Morning idle queries ?? > To: fedora-list@redhat.com > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 13:05:06 -0400 > William Case <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > WebCam > > UVC is a (relatively) new standard for webcams. I see the latest > fedora 8 kernel (and fedora 9) includes the uvcvideo driver by > default (previously I had to build it myself). It seems to work > fine for me with my logitech cam, and the theory behind standards > is that all UVC compliant cams will work (insert insane chuckling > here). > > The gotcha is determining which cams are UVC compliant - most > manufacturers don't actually advertise it as a feature. On mine I > discovered a support web page for macintosh that mentioned UVC > compliance :-). > > The other gotcha with UVC is that the driver only supports version > 2 of video for linux (V4L2), so only software that is V4L2 aware > can talk to UVC video drivers (I guess linux decided they absolutely > had to copy windows with the multiple incompatible versions > of video for windows that Microsoft went through :-). > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2008 20:01:08 +0100 > From: Ian Chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Gnash and youtube > To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@redhat.com> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Bassel Safadi wrote: > > > Is gnash in F9 actually supposed to work with sites like youtube? It.... > > > Some people will not agree with me, but from my point of view, opera 9.5 > > is better than firefox in f9, specialy for flash, it have built in adobe > > flash player. > > > > it's not open source, but you consider testing it.. > > Well actually I do mainly use Opera as my preferred web browser and have > done since around version 4 or so when I moved from Netscape because it > was so horribly unstable on linux. I believe the built-in flash is only > in the mobile editions of opera? I'm using a powerpc machine so I don't > have the option of using Adobe's official flash plugin but Gnash works > reasonably well for most flash, just not streaming which is a bit > annoying because it used to. > > -- > Ian Chapman. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 10 > Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 14:16:27 -0500 > From: "Rance Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Using the Fedora 9 KDE Live CD on unsupported video hardware > To: "For users of Fedora" <fedora-list@redhat.com> > Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Hey gang, > > I hope this question has a lot more meat on its bones as Ive learned a > great deal about altering the video parameters that are being fed to > the kernel. > > Problem: On my mobo the integrated video card (a via chrome9 based > card) and monitor (an old Samsung SyncMaster 955DF) Fedora 9 cant > figure out what video combination to use and when it screws up, it > locks up the system tight. Only a hard boot will fix it. > > On an install cd anaconda will accept the xdriver=vesa option and > graphical install works fine, The only real issue is that in my > experience Anaconda notoriously uses low resolution so as to hide > problems with a video setup till the actual system is installed. > > So taking what I know and applying that to a LIVE CD (specifically the > KDE one, as Im a KDE guy and dont have much use for Gnome, etc (please > no flames, is a personal preference, I didnt - and wont - say gnome > sucks - it doesnt, just that I dont like it.) > > OK, the Live CD doesnt have anaconda on it (nor should it) but I need > a way to apply what Ive learned about telling the system to use VESA > till I can figure out the details of why my hardware is not working > corectly. > > First, the kernel will accept a vga=xxx code that affects the terminal > consoles, but that doesnt seem to have any affect on X. > > The kernel command line can be altered by adding something like > "video=vesafb:mode:1280x1024-75" > > This seems to really help my situation, but not enough. > > without this alteration the LiveCD will crash and lockup hard within 5 > seconds or so after udev starts. > with this alteration the LiveCD boots successfully and displays a > login prompt (which is further than I ever got before) but the > keyboard is still locked and about 5 seconds or so later I get a funny > horizontal image on the screen that is indicative of overstating the > capability of the video hardware at some level. > > I know I'm on the right track here, but I cant seem to finish the job, > any help much appreciated. > > I need a hint or a pointer to let me know what Im missing please. > > Thanks all > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 11 > Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2008 12:44:53 -0700 > From: Chris Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Problem with system-config-printer.py > To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@redhat.com> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Again, thank you for your response. > > The LD_LIBRARY_PATH as my user is set to /usr/local/lib. This is the > default setting by a default user with F9. There are no libraries in > /usr/local/lib, so there isn't a conflict. > > Since this is repeatable simply by trying to set up a printer from the > desktop, I would think others would be running into it as well. Am I > the only one? Or does everyone else know the manual process so well > that no one bothers to test/fix the wizard? This is not meant as a > criticism. I'm just looking for a solution, and I want to know the odds > of finding someone that has figured it out or is working on it. > > Thanks again, > Chris > > > > > Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 11:50:16 -0700, Chris Carlson wrote: > > > > > >> Thank you, Michael, for responding. > >> > >> Here's what I get when I enter the commands you suggested: > >> > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -q libpng > >> libpng-1.2.29-1.fc9.i386 > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -V libpng > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ldd /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2 | grep libpng > >> libpng12.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 (0x00ab0000) > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# objdump -T /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 | grep expand > >> 00ac5a50 g DF .text 0000001d PNG12_0 png_set_expand > >> 00ac5a90 g DF .text 0000001d PNG12_0 > >> png_set_expand_gray_1_2_4_to_8 > >> > >> I hope that helps. > >> > > > > It looks okay. However, you should have executed those commands > > as your normal user, not "root". Most often, when I've seen such > > an error message, which you refer to, the reason was a modified > > $LD_LIBRARY_PATH pointing to incompatible libs in /usr/local/lib. > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 12 > Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2008 15:48:08 -0400 > From: Matthew Saltzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Scanner woes in F9 > To: fedora-list <fedora-list@redhat.com> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain > > Apparently, scanner configuration is now handled through HAL rather than > UDEV, which means I have no idea how to get my scanner set up. > > I have an Epson Expression 800 SCSI scanner. It is detected with no > problem as /dev/sg0 and gets user root, group lp and permissions > -rw-rw---. So root can see the scanner, but regular users and network > users can't see it. Changing the permissions to -rw-rw-rw by hand makes > the scanner accessible to local users, but still not over the LAN. And > of course, it won't be preserved across reboots. > > I added the network IP range to /etc/sane.d/saned.conf and added > localhost to /etc/sane.d/net.conf, configured /etc/xinetd.d/sane-daemon > as it was when it worked in F8, and opened port 6566 in the firewall. > > Any idea what I'm missing? > > I have sane-backends-1.0.19-10.fc9.i386. The HAL configuration for > scanners is in /usr/share/hal/fdi/policy/10osvendor/19-libsane.fdi. > > TIA. > > -- > Matthew Saltzman > > Clemson University Math Sciences > mjs AT clemson DOT edu > http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 13 > Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2008 14:30:57 -0600 > From: "Christopher A. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Networkmanager seems to ignore WEP code > To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@redhat.com> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 13:42 -0400, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > > Luis Orlindo Tedeschi wrote: > > > Would the WPA problem affect the WEP? > > > > (For those who have forgotten, my laptop is running F9 x86_64. > > Up-to-date through yum daily. It has ipw3945 hardware, and I'm using > > the iwl3945 wifi drivers.) > > I'm running F9 x86_64 as well with the same wireless adapter. You're > not alone. > > My WPA router at home connects up immediately and always has. WEP, OTOH, > has been so bad for me that my laptop locks up hard when trying to > connect to my church's 128-bit WEP network. I can only do a hard reset > to get anything working. > > Any attempt to connect to a WEP router fails - and usually with a hard > system lockup. > > > > > So, maybe I don't know what the bug is, but maybe its related to > > WPA/WPA2, but not WPA-AES? > > > > And I have no clue as what's wrong with WEP, as a lot of the people > > commenting on the bug claims they have no problems using WEP! > > > > So, here I am, not a general user of WEP, having problems getting it to > > work at all. Its not one of my "standard" setups. I only expect to use > > it rarely. But, I expect it to work when I do, so when it doesn't, it > > makes it really hard to fix (How do you fix your internet connection > > when you can't get it to work????) How am I supposed to then google for > > the answers?! > > Same here - I plan to upgrade our church network to WPA soon, but for > now I can't even attempt to connect at risk of a hard system lockup. I > haven't found any answers for this either. > > I booted up an original F9 x86_64 live CD from a USB pen drive just for > grins and connected up to the WEP network with no issues at all. It's > definitely something that has changed along the way. > > > -- > ==================================================== > > By all means marry; > If you get a good wife, you'll be happy. > If you get a bad one, you'll become a philosopher. > > --Socrates > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 14 > Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2008 13:56:22 -0700 > From: Chris Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: CD/DVD writing > To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@redhat.com> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Actually, there have been some complaints. I found that doing it > manually with mkisofs and wodim, I could write to my CD. Doing it with > the GUI failed 100% of the time without any error messages at all. > Nothing on the screen as to why, nothing in /var/log/messages, just > "Error!" in a popup. > > I haven't had the time to debug the GUI, yet. > > Chris > > > Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > Jeffrey Ross writes: > > > >> Is it just me or did something get broken in the last kernel for F9 > >> (x86_64) for CD/DVD writing? > >> > >> I am unable to write to DVD's with 2.6.25.9-76.fc9.x86_64 but I have > >> no problems with 2.6.25.6-55.fc9.x86_64 > >> > >> K3B complains that it is unable to prevent disk ejection (or > >> something like that) > >> > >> Thoughts? > > > > Come on. If everyone's DVD burning stopped working with the new > > kernel, I'd expect to hear people screaming about it a long time ago. > > Obviously this issue affects your particular hardware/software > > configuration. But, since you neglected to describe your hardware, and > > did not post what, if anything, you get in your log files > > (/var/log/messages, etc..) your chances of getting help are rather slim. > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 53, Issue 45 > ******************************************* -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
