[Bug 459065] Review Request: italc - intelligent teaching and learning with computers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459065 --- Comment #18 from Axel Thimm 2009-01-22 02:26:03 EDT --- Sure it is, but maybe there are newer spec/srpms, I just looked it up and there are the latest: Spec URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/italc.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/italc-1.0.9-6.src.rpm Note that I found some issues with multiple users using X (with fastuserswitch). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474430] Review Request: python-uulib - Python interface to RFC 4122 compliant UUID objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474430 --- Comment #8 from Ray Van Dolson 2009-01-22 02:11:29 EDT --- Updated spec and SRPM: http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/python-uuid/python-uuid.spec http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/python-uuid/python-uuid-1.30-2.el5.src.rpm Switched to noarch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #19 from _pjp_ 2009-01-22 01:39:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > The cause is this *.spec not acknowledging RPM_OPT_FLAGS. > In other words: You must somehow propagate $RPM_OPT_FLAGS from inside of the > *.spec into the build-machinery. I'm sorry, I still don't get what you are trying to convey. Could you please be more specific. > 4. You patch's file name is weird. The standard extensions for patches is > *.diff or *.patch. Huh...I'll do the change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #18 from _pjp_ 2009-01-22 01:28:51 EDT --- > 1 - instead changing conf-cc please use daemontools-0.76-errno.patch as > Patch0 Pardon me..? > 2 - debug info package is not being created for some reason, we need to figure > why It did for me as daemontools-debuginfo-0.76-2.fc10.i386.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458238] Review Request: ibus - An input bus for Linux.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458238 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Alias|ibus| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480567] Review Request: dnssec-conf - DNSSEC and DLV configuration and priming tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480567 --- Comment #4 from Paul Wouters 2009-01-21 23:34:55 EDT --- - Upstream was at 1.13, but upstream misplaced the file and fixed it :=) - Upstream license is GPLv2+, not GPLv2 - spectool -g now properly downloads 1.13 - fixed macros in changelog Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/dnssec-conf/dnssec-conf.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/dnssec-conf/dnssec-conf-1.13-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480249] Review Request: unalz - Decompression utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480249 --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-01-21 23:26:33 EDT --- Version update: Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/unalz.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/unalz-0.64-1.fc10.src.rpm It looks like the author put the license information on more source file headers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473367] Review Request: autotrust - DNSKEY trust anchor update utility that uses RFC-5011
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473367 --- Comment #11 from Paul Wouters 2009-01-21 23:24:03 EDT --- done Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/autotrust/autotrust.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/autotrust/autotrust-0.2.1-0.2.rc1.fc10.src.rpm rpmlint autotrust-0.2.1-0.2.rc1.fc10.src.rpm /autotrust-0.2.1-0.2.rc1.fc10.x86_64.rpm /autotrust-debuginfo-0.2.1-0.2.rc1.fc10.x86_64.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 --- Comment #9 from Stuart D Gathman 2009-01-21 23:25:39 EDT --- Removed -lsmutil with patch. (Some systems need it.) New SRPM: http://customdesigned.users.sourceforge.net/pymilter-0.9.0-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #35 from Matthew Barnes 2009-01-21 23:11:08 EDT --- Only solution I can think of that doesn't involve hacking on Samba's build scripts is to split ldb into it's own standalone package (not a subpackage) and list it as a BuildRequires in the samba4.spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #17 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-01-21 22:34:04 EDT --- Let's pick this up again. SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/xmonad.spec SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/xmonad-0.8.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Currently, this only compiles on rawhide, so get your rawhide builders ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #4 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-01-21 22:35:28 EDT --- Let's pick this one up too SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib.spec SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.8.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Only builds in rawhide for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464430] Review Request: k12linux-quick-start-guide - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #48 from Warren Togami 2009-01-21 22:30:43 EDT --- http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/k12linux-quick-start-guide It is built. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ You have to fill out the form to get it into the repository for F-9 and F-10. Skip testing, as there is nothing left to test in this case. (Normally you would put a package into testing first.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 --- Comment #46 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-21 21:48:35 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=79716 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #34 from Ankur Sinha 2009-01-21 21:32:05 EDT --- hi, It's ankursi...@fedoraproject.org. I have changed change my bugzilla login email to it. I do need a sponsor. regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 --- Comment #22 from Ankur Sinha 2009-01-21 21:35:04 EDT --- hi, Its "ankursinha". I'll finish Beteckna in a few days. What do I need to do once I'm sponsored? Is it still just package and submit? regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467403] Review Request: mingw32-libgpg-error - MinGW Windows GnuPGP error library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467403
Bug 467403 depends on bug 467398, which changed state.
Bug 467398 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and
utilities for producing multi-lingual messages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398
What|Old Value |New Value
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution||NEXTRELEASE
--- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-21 21:22:33 EDT ---
Sorry for the delay here:
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License (LGPLv2+)
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
f3e9870e213518b407a959f8d29cd554 libgpg-error-1.6.tar.bz2
f3e9870e213518b407a959f8d29cd554 libgpg-error-1.6.tar.bz2.orig
See below - BuildRequires correct
See below - Spec handles locales/find_lang
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install
MINGW32 - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage.
MINGW32- .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig
MINGW32- .so files in -devel subpackage.
MINGW32- .la files are removed.
OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions)
See below - No rpmlint output.
OK - final provides and requires are sane.
SHOULD Items:
OK - Should build in mock.
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should have dist tag
MINGW32 - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
or /usr/sbin
Issues:
First off, this is my first mingw32 review, so I am sure I will ask some
stupid questions...
1. For buildrequires I see in the build.log:
checking for msgfmt...
no
checking for gmsgfmt...
:
checking for xgettext... no
checking for msgmerge... no
...
checking for GNU gettext in libc...
no
Should you add those to BuildRequires?
2. Any reason you can't use %{?_smp_mflags} with your make?
Or does that not work with mingw32 packages?
3. rpmlint of course has a bunch to say... perhaps you could get it
to not complain when the package is mingw32-* on a lot of these?
Ignore:
mingw32-libgpg-error.noarch: W: no-documentation
mingw32-libgpg-error.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/gpg-error-config
mingw32-libgpg-error.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gpg-error.h
mingw32-libgpg-error.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgpg-error.dll.a
mingw32-libgpg-error.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgpg-error.la
mingw32-libgpg-error.noarch: E:
arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgpg-error.dll.a
mingw32-libgpg-error.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32
mingw32-libgpg-error.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgpg-error.dll.a
Should you be using %find_lang here:
mingw32-libgpg-error.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/libgpg-error.mo
mingw32-libgpg-error.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/libgpg-error.mo
mingw32-libgpg-error.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/pl/LC_MESSAGES/libgpg-error.mo
mingw32-libgpg-error.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ro/LC_MESSAGES/libgpg-error.mo
mingw32-libgpg-error.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/sv/LC_MESSAGES/libgpg-error.mo
mingw32-libgpg-error.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/vi/LC_MESSAGES/libgpg-error.mo
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #34 from Jerry Amundson 2009-01-21 21:10:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > Andrew, something annoying I've been struggling with: > > If I already have the samba4 packages installed and I go to rebuild them, the > configure script wants to link against the libldb.so from samba4-libs instead > of building its own. So I have to uninstall all my samba4 packages (along > with > openchange and evolution-mapi) before building new ones. > > Any way to force samba to build its own ldb whether it finds one already > installed or not? Has progress been made here? Annoying, yes, and I'm guessing would be a blocker at some point... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481070] Review Request: ctan-musixtex-fonts - Adobe Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review |Review Request: |Request:ctan-musixtex-fonts |ctan-musixtex-fonts - Adobe |- Adobe Type 1 versions of |Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX |MusiXTeX fonts |fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464430] Review Request: k12linux-quick-start-guide - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #47 from Peter Scheie 2009-01-21 19:37:23 EDT --- I don't know how to answer the question. I've run make build & make update for a version 0.0.9 and 0.0.10 in the past couple of weeks; do I need to do something beyond that? Another change was subsequently necessary; Warren said he built it, but that it wasn't in the repo. I don't understand what I should do next. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #32 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-21 19:36:58 EDT --- According to this review Ankur needs a sponsor? and the first package can only be approved by one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #33 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-21 19:40:47 EDT --- Ankur, what is your FAS account name? You should use the same email address for bugzilla and FAS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #46 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-21 19:26:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #45) > Even if we don't backport all these packages, this can still go in rawhide. Well assuming ghc-6.10.1 reaches f10-updates then no problem to create an F-10 branch for ghc-X11. > Also, i see you made some changes to the templates. I'm gonna have to actually > update the package once the templates hit rawhide. Better to do that now IMHO: perhaps I should have left cabal2spec in ghc longer but I wanted the review package to be installable - I would appreciate more testing while we are proposing the revision to FPC. I am not anticapating any major changes until we add the ghc requires deps scripting for rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481071] Review Request: tex-musixtex - Sophisticated music typesetting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481071 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||480887 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480887] Review Request: kguitar - Guitar Tabulature Music Editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480887 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||481071 --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-01-21 19:07:16 EDT --- Update: Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/kguitar.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/kguitar-0.5.1-2.20090120svn.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: - Updated description - Added TeX support I put the TeX support inside the main package, which pulls about 30MB of dependencies (if TeX is not installed). I can put it in a subpackage but I don't think 30MB of deps is too much to care about. But please let me know what your suggestion for the subpackage name is, if you think that will be a better option. kguitar-tex kguitar-kgtabs tex-kguitar tex-kgtabs tex-kguitar-kgtabs ??? (this question was to anyone who reads this) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 --- Comment #92 from Deji Akingunola 2009-01-21 19:02:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #91) > The links to the rpm and spec files below seem to be unreachable. > > > ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2-1.0.8-1.fc10.src.rpm > > ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2.spec > > Does anyone have a mirror available or is there an "official" version > somewhere? You can now get them at; http://deji.fedorapeople.org/mpich2-1.0.8-1.fc10.src.rpm http://deji.fedorapeople.org/mpich2.spec Note: It is not an official Fedora package yet. Can someone please review this package, pretty please ;). @Orion, You were once trying to do the review, anything holding it back. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481070] Review Request:ctan-musixtex-fonts - Adobe Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||481071 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481071] Review Request: tex-musixtex - Sophisticated music typesetting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481071 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||481070 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481071] New: Review Request: tex-musixtex - Sophisticated music typesetting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tex-musixtex - Sophisticated music typesetting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481071 Summary: Review Request: tex-musixtex - Sophisticated music typesetting Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fed...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/tex-musixtex.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/tex-musixtex-0.114-1.src.rpm Description: MusicTeX provides TeX extensions for music typesetting. It allows you to use TeX to write polyphonic, orchestral or instrumental music. MusixTeX is growing up from MusicTeX and has advantages both in set of macros and quality of output. The package contains source files (macros, styles), fonts (mf, tfm) and the MusiXTeX+plain format. Rpmlint: tex-musixtex.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/musixtex ../../../../fonts/ctan-musixtex/ This one is resolved through dependencies tex-musixtex-doc.noarch: W: no-documentation Well, this package is TeX documentation, which goes to its own TeX folder. Notes: The upstream version of this package is T114. The project is pretty mature and I don't think they will change the release version scheme. I set the Fedora version as 0.114, which is also the way this is versioned in Debian. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481070] New: Review Request:ctan-musixtex-fonts - Adobe Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:ctan-musixtex-fonts - Adobe Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070 Summary: Review Request:ctan-musixtex-fonts - Adobe Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fed...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/ctan-musixtex-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/ctan-musixtex-fonts-1.13-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This package provides Adobe Type 1 fonts (PFB format) for MusiXTeX (musixtex). The fonts are based on the original MetaFont sources, such as musix20.mf, which are distributed with MusiXTeX. The fonts provided here may be used to produce printer-independent PostScript files or PDF files. Rpmlint: Silent Notes: The map files that can be found in the tarball are provided in the tex-musixtex package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480859] Review Request: diffuse - graphical diff tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480859 --- Comment #7 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-01-21 18:41:01 EDT --- fix your buildroot according with guidelines https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480859] Review Request: diffuse - graphical diff tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480859
--- Comment #5 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-01-21
18:36:55 EDT ---
macronify more.
from
%{_bindir}/diffuse
%{_datadir}/diffuse/
to
%{_bindir}/%{name}
%{_datadir}/%{name}/
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480859] Review Request: diffuse - graphical diff tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480859 --- Comment #6 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-01-21 18:38:41 EDT --- change from %defattr(-,root,root) to %defattr(-,root,root,-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480859] Review Request: diffuse - graphical diff tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480859 --- Comment #4 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-01-21 18:34:46 EDT --- you're missing somethint in changelog * Wed Jan 21 2009 Jon Levell 0.2.15-2 should be something like this * Wed Jan 21 2009 Jon Levell - 0.2.15-2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481056] Review Request: squeak-vm - a Smalltalk interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481056 --- Comment #3 from Gavin Romig-Koch 2009-01-21 18:30:47 EDT --- BZ481064 is also related. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480859] Review Request: diffuse - graphical diff tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480859 Jon Levell changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 Depends on|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480859] Review Request: diffuse - graphical diff tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480859 --- Comment #3 from Jon Levell 2009-01-21 18:25:05 EDT --- I hope I've addressed all the comments. Updated files are: Spec URL: http://coralbark.net/fedora/diffuse/diffuse.spec SRPM URL: http://coralbark.net/fedora/diffuse/diffuse-0.2.15-2.fc10.src.rpm RPM URL: http://coralbark.net/fedora/diffuse/diffuse-0.2.15-2.fc10.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481056] Review Request: squeak-vm - a Smalltalk interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481056 --- Comment #2 from Gavin Romig-Koch 2009-01-21 18:26:18 EDT --- I've sent a note about this package (and related packages) to fedora-packaging, subject "Squeak and Etoys packages". BZ481066 is related to this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481066] New: Review Request: etoys - the Etoys image for the Squeak VM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: etoys - the Etoys image for the Squeak VM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481066 Summary: Review Request: etoys - the Etoys image for the Squeak VM Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ga...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://squeak-fedora.googlecode.com/files/etoys.spec SRPM URL: http://squeak-fedora.googlecode.com/files/etoys-4.0.2201-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Squeak Etoys was inspired by LOGO, PARC-Smalltalk, Hypercard, and starLOGO. It is a media-rich authoring environment with a simple powerful scripted object model for many kinds of objects created by end-users that runs on many platforms, and is free and open source. It includes 2D and 3D graphics, images, text, particles, pres-entations, web-pages, videos, sound and MIDI, etc. It includes the ability to share desktops with other Etoy users in real-time, so many forms of immersive mentoring and play can be done over the Internet. This package depends on the squeak-vm package (BZ481056). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481066] Review Request: etoys - the Etoys image for the Squeak VM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481066 --- Comment #1 from Gavin Romig-Koch 2009-01-21 18:20:12 EDT --- I've run rpmlint on the spec, SRPM, and RPM; no errors, no warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481064] New: Review Request: squeak-image - the standard image file for the Squeak VM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: squeak-image - the standard image file for the Squeak VM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481064 Summary: Review Request: squeak-image - the standard image file for the Squeak VM Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ga...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://squeak-fedora.googlecode.com/files/squeak-image.spec SRPM URL: http://squeak-fedora.googlecode.com/files/squeak-image-3.10.2.7179-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This is the standard Squeak image as distributed by sqeak.org. The Squeak image is split into three interdependent parts, the .image file, the .changes file, and the .sources file. This package depends on the squeak-vm package (BZ481056). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481064] Review Request: squeak-image - the standard image file for the Squeak VM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481064 --- Comment #1 from Gavin Romig-Koch 2009-01-21 18:16:12 EDT --- I've run rpmlint on the spec file, the SRPM, and the x86 and x86_64 RPMs, no errors, no warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478660] Review Request: dateshift - A date/time test tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478660 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||tcall...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|tcall...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-01-21 17:57:30 EDT --- Review === Good: - rpmlint checks return: dateshift.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libdsintercept.so.0.0.0 e...@glibc_2.2.5 dateshift-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation You should continue trying to get upstream to resolve this, but I won't block this package review on it. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream (0bcc71038686a1afdd0713b01eb81e7652634fa6) - license text in %doc - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file Bad: - License tag (GPLv2) is wrong. License tag should be GPLv2+. * Please fix the license tag before you commit to cvs, but this package is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481056] Review Request: squeak-vm - a Smalltalk interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481056 --- Comment #1 from Gavin Romig-Koch 2009-01-21 17:39:11 EDT --- I've run rpmlint on the spec file, the SRPM, and the i386 and x86_64 rpms, no errors, these are the only warnings: squeak-vm.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/squeak/3.10-4/SqueakV3.sources ../../../..//usr/share/squeak/SqueakV3.sources squeak-vm.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/squeak/3.10-4/SqueakV39.sources ../../../..//usr/share/squeak/SqueakV39.sources These links point to files in the squeak-image package, to be submitted for review as soon as I finish this review. These files are arch independent, as is all of squeak-image, except that for historical reasons squeak-image requires these packages to be in this arch dependent (under /usr/lib/) place. rpmlint, rightfully, doesn't like arch dependent files in a noarch package, so putting the files in an arch independent place (under /usr/share) in squeak-image, and haveing links to them from /usr/lib (or /usr/lib64) in squeak-vm (which is arch dependent). squeak-vm-nonXOplugins.i386: W: no-documentation This is a sub-package that is dependent on it's super-package and the super-package has doc. squeak-vm-nonXOplugins.i386: W: executable-stack /usr/lib/squeak/3.10-4/SqueakFFIPrims Yes, it does have an executable-stack, it must. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480591] Review Request: ctan-kerkis-fonts - Kerkis type 1 fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480591 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nicolas.mail...@laposte.net |paska...@di.uoa.gr Flag||fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-21 17:23:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > 3. kerkis calligraphic and the small caps variants clearly needs their own > > subpackage. Please make sure you only group in the same font subpackage > > fonts > > of the same family (differing only in weight, width or slant). I didn't > > check > > the others > > OK with the Calligraphic family. > > The SmallCaps files however define the font family to be "Kerkis", and not > "Kerkis-SmallCaps" or something like that. I put it therefore in the -serif > subpackage. Ok. However please note that both the w3c (in CSS) and Microsoft (in its whitepaper to new fonts authors) only define weight, width or slant as selection axis for font faces within a font family. So if the font files were created today, small caps would be a different font family. > It's kind of dead upstream, and considering that the primary force to create > the font was the usage in LaTeX, I don't think I will be very successful. I > will try though. xetex uses fontconfig IIRC > New spec and srpm in the same location > http://gallagher.di.uoa.gr/any/rpms/ctan-kerkis-fonts/ ❉❉❉ APPROVED ❉❉❉ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481056] New: Review Request: squeak-vm - a Smalltalk interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: squeak-vm - a Smalltalk interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481056 Summary: Review Request: squeak-vm - a Smalltalk interpreter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ga...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- This is my first package and I need a sponsor. Spec URL: http://squeak-fedora.googlecode.com/files/squeak-vm.spec SRPM URL: http://squeak-fedora.googlecode.com/files/squeak-vm-3.10.4-3.fc10.src.rpm Description: Squeak is a full-featured implementation of the Smalltalk programming language and environment based on (and largely compatible with) the original Smalltalk-80 system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-01-21 17:19:26 EDT --- Small problem with Python 2.6 in Rawhide. The updated package below fixes this: Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/coccinelle.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/coccinelle-0.1.4-3.fc11.src.rpm * Wed Jan 21 2009 Richard W.M. Jones - 0.1.4-3 - Patch for Python 2.6. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1072634 rpmlint reports: coccinelle.src:42: W: configure-without-libdir-spec - This is OK because this isn't an autoconf-based configure. coccinelle.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/coccinelle/standard.h - Coccinelle uses this as a data file, it's not a normal include file. coccinelle.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/spatch - This file shouldn't be stripped, which will damage it. coccinelle.x86_64: W: ocaml-mixed-executable /usr/bin/spatch - This is fine. Prelink-defeating config script is implemented. coccinelle.x86_64: W: ocaml-naming-policy-not-applied /usr/lib64/ocaml/stublibs/dll*.so - This is OK because it's not an OCaml library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nicolas.mail...@laposte.net |sanjay_an...@yahoo.co.in Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #21 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-21 16:59:31 EDT --- This one is good ✖✖✖ APPROVED ✖✖✖ You can continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a If you still need sponsoring state your FAS username here and I'll approve it (however that does not mean you're of the hook for bug #476720 ; please finish packaging Beteckna) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 Kelvin J. Hill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kel...@bughunter.co.uk --- Comment #91 from Kelvin J. Hill 2009-01-21 16:54:33 EDT --- The links to the rpm and spec files below seem to be unreachable. > ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2-1.0.8-1.fc10.src.rpm > ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2.spec Does anyone have a mirror available or is there an "official" version somewhere? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476536] Review Request: zapplet - Zenoss monitoring tray applet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476536 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:38:14 EDT --- zapplet-0.1-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update zapplet'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0850 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478614] Review Request: python-transitfeed - Google Transit Feed Specification library and tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478614 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:39:28 EDT --- python-transitfeed-1.1.9-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476536] Review Request: zapplet - Zenoss monitoring tray applet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476536 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:37:49 EDT --- zapplet-0.1-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update zapplet'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0837 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478614] Review Request: python-transitfeed - Google Transit Feed Specification library and tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478614 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478614] Review Request: python-transitfeed - Google Transit Feed Specification library and tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478614 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:37:14 EDT --- python-transitfeed-1.1.9-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468462] Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468462 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:38:02 EDT --- sbackup-0.10.5-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476979] Review Request: python-libasyncns - Python binding for the libasyncns
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476979 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:33:12 EDT --- python-libasyncns-0.7-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-libasyncns'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0794 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468462] Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468462 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480528] Review Request: botan - Crypto library written in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480528 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:34:42 EDT --- botan-1.8.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update botan'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0812 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467399] Review Request: mingw32-readline - MinGW port of readline for editing typed command lines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467399 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:33:51 EDT --- mingw32-readline-5.2-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467407] Review Request: mingw32-sqlite - MinGW Windows port of sqlite embeddable SQL database engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467407 Bug 467407 depends on bug 467388, which changed state. Bug 467388 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-pdcurses - Curses library for MinGW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467388 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Bug 467407 depends on bug 467399, which changed state. Bug 467399 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-readline - MinGW port of readline for editing typed command lines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467399 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:36:29 EDT --- mingw32-sqlite-3.6.6.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468462] Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468462 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:33:05 EDT --- sbackup-0.10.5-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467391] Review Request: mingw32-gdbm - MinGW port of GNU database routines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467391 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:35:01 EDT --- mingw32-gdbm-1.8.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:33:41 EDT --- dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update dustin-dustismo-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0800 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476660] Review Request: rubygem-restr - Simple client for RESTful web services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476660 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:34:16 EDT --- rubygem-restr-0.4.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rubygem-restr'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0807 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467407] Review Request: mingw32-sqlite - MinGW Windows port of sqlite embeddable SQL database engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467407 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467399] Review Request: mingw32-readline - MinGW port of readline for editing typed command lines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467399 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467391] Review Request: mingw32-gdbm - MinGW port of GNU database routines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467391 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475897] Review Request: ncmpcpp - Clone of ncmpc with new features and written in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475897 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:26:43 EDT --- ncmpcpp-0.2.5-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ncmpcpp'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0713 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467396] Review Request: mingw32-freetype - Free and portable font rendering engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467396 Bug 467396 depends on bug 478640, which changed state. Bug 478640 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-dlfcn - Implements a wrapper for dlfcn (dlopen dlclose dlsym dlerror) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478640 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:31:07 EDT --- mingw32-freetype-2.3.8-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480646] Review Request: urlwatch - A tool for monitoring webpages for updates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480646 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:27:35 EDT --- urlwatch-1.7-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update urlwatch'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0729 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476660] Review Request: rubygem-restr - Simple client for RESTful web services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476660 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:31:03 EDT --- rubygem-restr-0.4.0-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update rubygem-restr'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0783 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475897] Review Request: ncmpcpp - Clone of ncmpc with new features and written in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475897 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:29:01 EDT --- ncmpcpp-0.2.5-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update ncmpcpp'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0759 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467396] Review Request: mingw32-freetype - Free and portable font rendering engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467396 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:27:53 EDT --- dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dustin-dustismo-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0736 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468376] Review Request: mingw32-SDL - MinGW Windows port of SDL cross-platform multimedia library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468376 Bug 468376 depends on bug 478640, which changed state. Bug 478640 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-dlfcn - Implements a wrapper for dlfcn (dlopen dlclose dlsym dlerror) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478640 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:28:33 EDT --- mingw32-SDL-1.2.13-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468376] Review Request: mingw32-SDL - MinGW Windows port of SDL cross-platform multimedia library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468376 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467388] Review Request: mingw32-pdcurses - Curses library for MinGW
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467388 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:31:26 EDT --- kdenetwork-4.1.4-2.fc10, kdeaccessibility-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdeadmin-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdeartwork-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdebase-runtime-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdebase-workspace-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdebindings-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdeedu-4.1.4-1.fc10, kde-filesystem-4-23.fc10, kdegames-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdegraphics-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdelibs-4.1.4-2.fc10, kde-l10n-4.1.4-2.fc10, kdemultimedia-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdepim-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdepimlibs-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdeplasma-addons-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdesdk-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdetoys-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdeutils-4.1.4-1.fc10, kopete-cryptography-1.3.0-8.fc10, kdebase-4.1.4-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480380] Review Request: python-epdb - extended python debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480380 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478640] Review Request: mingw32-dlfcn - Implements a wrapper for dlfcn (dlopen dlclose dlsym dlerror)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478640 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:28:26 EDT --- mingw32-dlfcn-0-0.3.r11.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480646] Review Request: urlwatch - A tool for monitoring webpages for updates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480646 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:27:38 EDT --- urlwatch-1.7-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update urlwatch'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0731 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478640] Review Request: mingw32-dlfcn - Implements a wrapper for dlfcn (dlopen dlclose dlsym dlerror)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478640 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:30:16 EDT --- mingw32-gettext-0.17-7.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467388] Review Request: mingw32-pdcurses - Curses library for MinGW
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467388 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:30:50 EDT --- mingw32-pdcurses-3.4-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480380] Review Request: python-epdb - extended python debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480380 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:26:47 EDT --- python-epdb-0.11-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480380] Review Request: python-epdb - extended python debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480380 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:28:53 EDT --- python-epdb-0.11-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480528] Review Request: botan - Crypto library written in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480528 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:25:31 EDT --- botan-1.8.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update botan'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0698 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481040] Review Request: skyeye - integrated simulation environment for typical Embedded Computer Systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481040 manuel wolfshant changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://www.skyeye.org/index ||.shtml CC||cgoo...@yahoo.com.au -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481040] New: Review Request: skyeye - integrated simulation environment for typical Embedded Computer Systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: skyeye - integrated simulation environment for typical Embedded Computer Systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481040 Summary: Review Request: skyeye - integrated simulation environment for typical Embedded Computer Systems Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wo...@nobugconsulting.ro QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org/skyeye/skyeye.spec SRPM URL: http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org/skyeye/skyeye-1.2.6-2.rc1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Originating from GDB/Armulator, the goal of SkyEye is to provide an integrated simulation environment for typical Embedded Computer Systems. Now it supports a series ARM architecture based microprocessors and Blackfin DSP Processor. You can run some Embedded Operation System such as ARM Linux, uClinux, uc/OS-II (ucos-ii) etc. in SkyEye, and analysis or debug them at source level. koji scratch build at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1072452 EL-5 build in use for a couple of days in the company I work for. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 --- Comment #51 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-01-21 16:13:43 EDT --- I can't answer this question for Devrim, but 2 years is alot of time. Devrim have your own repo. http://yum.pgsqlrpms.org/ and It's have a slony 2.0 rpm in his repo. http://yum.pgsqlrpms.org/srpms/8.3/fedora/fedora-10-x86_64/ I don't know if him want to continue, but if he is not available I want to contribute to have slony imported into fedora. (In reply to comment #50) > Devrim, what's up with this package, do you still want to proceed. > I'm running out of patience after two years ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 456190] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456190 --- Comment #22 from Justin Zygmont 2009-01-21 16:04:45 EDT --- I tried following all the sketchy guidelines, and following your advise, etc. I'm ready to just leave it with comments like this, I can build a fedora RPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481004] Review Request: pg_top - top for postgresql
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481004 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-01-21 16:00:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: pg_top Short Description: pg_top is 'top' for PostgreSQL processes Owners: itamarjp Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481004] Review Request: pg_top - top for postgresql
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481004 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-01-21 15:52:21 EDT --- Looks good, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480870] Review Request: crda - An 802.11 wireless regulatory compliance daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480870
Bill Nottingham changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|nott...@redhat.com
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Bill Nottingham 2009-01-21 15:49:29
EDT ---
MUST items:
- Package meets naming and packaging guidelines - OK
- Spec file matches base package name. - OK
- Spec has consistent macro usage. - ***
The 'v' in the version seems extraneous. In fact, there seem to be identical
tarballs on the upstream download site with and without the 'v'.
- Meets Packaging Guidelines. - OK
- License - BSD ***
The code doesn't specify a license, so it's assumed from the included LICENSE
file. Would be nice if the code made it explicit.
Given the keys/signing involved in the build process, it would have been highly
entertaining if this package was GPL3. Alas, it is not.
- License field in spec matches - OK
- License file included in package - OK
- Spec in American English - OK
- Spec is legible - OK ***
'An' in the summary is probably superfluous.
- Sources match upstream md5sum: - OK
- Package needs ExcludeArch - N/A
- BuildRequires correct - OK
- Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. - OK
- Package has a correct %clean section. - OK
- Package has correct buildroot
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) - OK
- Package is code or permissible content. - OK
- Doc subpackage needed/used. - ***
There are READMEs for both the daemon and the wireless regdb that should
probably be in %doc.
- Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. - OK
- Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. - N/A
- Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. - OK (tested rawhide
x86_64, F10 x86)
- Package has no duplicate files in %files. - OK
- Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. - OK
- Package owns all the directories it creates. - ***
Should own /usr/lib/crda
- No rpmlint output. - ***
crda.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/udev/rules.d/regulatory.rules
See below about udev rules.
crda.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
Can be ignored.
- final provides and requires are sane: - ***
Arguably, should require udev.
SHOULD Items:
- Should build in mock. - OK (tested i386)
- Should build on all supported archs - didn't test
- Should function as described. - didn't test, don't have appropriate drivers
- Should have sane scriptlets. - N/A
- Should have dist tag - OK
- Should package latest version - OK
Random notes not covered above:
- We end up building two different upstreams into one package here. It could be
done with the wireless db built as a separate package, that includes its pubkey
in /etc/pki for the daemon to build later. If the daemon and the regulatory
information are going to be updated asynchronously, that might be worthwhile
- system udev rules should go in /lib/udev/rules.d, and usually are named
XX-regulatory.rules, where XX is some relative numeric priority
- the regulatory db is on /usr ... will it be needed before /usr is mounted?
- the usage flow seems to be 'user sets a domain -> netlink message to kernel
-> uevent -> udev helper to daemon -> reads database -> new netlink message to
kernel -> implements restrictions in driver. Seems overly convoluted, but..
meh.
- we remove the upstream key, and sign the regulatory db with our own key,
generated at build time (and then thrown away). As I understand it, this means
users won't be able to drop in new upstream releases of the regulatory db. Is
this intentional?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://www.emn.fr/x-info/co ||ccinelle/ --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-01-21 15:46:38 EDT --- Home page is http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/ and there is a LWN article about the tool here: http://lwn.net/Articles/315686/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481034] New: Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 Summary: Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjo...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/coccinelle.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/coccinelle-0.1.4-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Coccinelle is a tool to utilize semantic patches for manipulating C code. It was originally designed to ease maintenance of device drivers in the Linux kernel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481004] Review Request: pg_top - top for postgresql
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481004 --- Comment #2 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-01-21 15:26:06 EDT --- done. http://ispbrasil.com.br/pg_top/pg_top.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/pg_top/pg_top-3.6.2-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480887] Review Request: kguitar - Guitar Tabulature Music Editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480887 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-01-21 15:25:50 EDT --- Right. Will do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
