DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42067] - [PATCH] Exact positioning of PDF internal links

2007-05-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42067.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42067





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-05-17 08:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=20211)
 -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20211action=view)
small patch file

Patch file to fix j2se1.4 dependency.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42067] - [PATCH] Exact positioning of PDF internal links

2007-05-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42067.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42067





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-05-17 08:43 ---
I discovered recently that FOP still aims to be JDK1.3 compliant so I updated my
Eclipse IDE environment today and discovered this small J2SE1.4 dependency on
the use of String.split().  This small patch should fix this.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42067] - [PATCH] Exact positioning of PDF internal links

2007-05-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42067.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42067


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Attachment #20211|0   |1
is obsolete||




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-05-17 08:45 ---
Created an attachment (id=20212)
 -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20212action=view)
small patch file

checkstyled :-)

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


Re: FOP and XML Graphics Commons Maven artifacts

2007-05-17 Thread Jason Johnston

Jeremias Maerki wrote:

Dear Maven-users,

I've had enough. I've lost enough time on something I don't need.


I'm sorry for your frustration, and want you to know that I greatly 
appreciate the work you've put in.  I'm sure many others do as well. So 
thank you!



I've prepared Maven bundles as per
http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-ibiblio-upload.html and tried
to submit them. Carlos closes those requests [1][2] with a pointer to
the ASF's repository FAQ. I guess that's fine for projects using Maven.
We are not. 



At any rate, it looks like the layout of the staging
directory is totally different to what I prepared in the bundle. So I'd
have to start all over and have to adjust the build scripts again. I
have no time for that.

You have the bundles. Do with them as you please. If anyone wants to
send patches to Batik, FOP and XML Graphics Commons for producing Maven
artifacts, feel welcome to do so.


I'll take a crack at it.  It doesn't look like it's very far off.

--Jason