Re: [rft] ar9300 HAL updated

2013-04-01 Thread Raphael Kubo da Costa
Adrian Chadd adrian.ch...@gmail.com writes:

 Look in ath/makefile .. At the bottom. There's clang warning overrides
 there. Uncomment them!

Thanks, that did the trick.

___
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: [rft] ar9300 HAL updated

2013-04-01 Thread Adrian Chadd
64 bit kernel? 4 gig RAM?



Adrian


On 1 April 2013 08:07, Raphael Kubo da Costa rak...@freebsd.org wrote:
 Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org writes:

 I've just updated the AR9300 HAL to the March 13 snapshot from QCA.

 This includes calibration and TX power calibration changes that may
 improve stability.

 As always, it's possible I broke something!

 I'd appreciate it if people would test this in STA and AP mode.

 Alright, I've finally managed to get everything built and loaded. As I
 mentioned before, this is HEAD at r248944. I have a Sony Vaio SVT1312
 Ultrabook with an Atheros AR9485 wireless card (I _think_ it is also
 responsible for providing the Bluetooth stuff as well, but I'm not
 sure).

 I use this laptop at home to connect to a WPA2 ADSL router. Connecting
 to it using wpa_supplicant did work, but most of the packages are lost
 and the ones which actually get through do so with a very high latency.
 Meanwhile, my terminal gets spammed with the following:

   ath0: ath_edma_recv_proc_queue: handled npkts 0
   ar9300_reset[4366]: ar9300_stop_dma_receive failed

 Please let me know what other additional information you may need.


 ___
 freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
___
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: [rft] ar9300 HAL updated

2013-04-01 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 1 April 2013 08:44, Raphael Kubo da Costa rak...@freebsd.org wrote:
 Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org writes:

 Please reboot with 4GB of RAM configured.

 See if that fixes it.

 Indeed, booting with hw.physmem=4G makes the connection much more
 reliable -- I do see some of those warnings in the beginning, but they
 go away after the connection is established.

Yup. Those warnings are fine. I need to trace that down and fix it but
it's fine if it happens only whilst scanning.

 My gut feeling is that the average connection speed is still below the
 one I get when I use my WLAN-Ethernet adapter, but I haven't done any
 precise measurements to back that up.

It's still a work in progress! WHat's the signal strength? (ifconfig
wlan0 list sta gives that to you.)

 On a side note: this card is also supposed to provide Bluetooth support,
 right? Is any of your work going to help with that as well?

Well, bluetooth support will work:

* when ath3kfw is patched to include the ability to select an
arbitrary USB device id;
* when we include the updated ath3k firmware images in the base system.

I have the relevant NICs here (AR9462+BT, AR9485+BT) but I haven't yet
sat down and tested the bluetooth side. Mostly because I want to focus
on wifi, not bluetooth.

I haven't yet sat down and figured out the bluetooth coexistence thing
yet either. The code is in there, it's just not enabled. So if you
load the firmware it'll bring up bluetooth but it and 2GHz wifi will
interfere.



Adrian
___
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: ath not working after a motherboard and ram upgrade

2013-04-01 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 31 March 2013 15:24, Adrian Chadd adrian.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
 The problem isn't contigmalloc, it's making sure that it gets bounced via
 the local 32 bits of address space right.

 I'll talk with other developers and see what the deal is with 64 bit address
 space for 32 bit nics.

Please do an svn update in sys/dev/ath/ and rebuild.

I've fixed something in the RX side. I haven't yet gone and fully
reviewed all the descriptor / buffer gymnastics on the TX side so it's
very possible things will stay broken until I do that.

Thanks,



Adrian
___
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: ath not working after a motherboard and ram upgrade

2013-04-01 Thread Adrian Chadd
update again again; I just did some TX related changes.



adrian


On 1 April 2013 14:04, Joshua Isom jri...@gmail.com wrote:
 I just tested it, the network problem's the same.


 On 4/1/2013 3:22 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:

 On 31 March 2013 15:24, Adrian Chadd adrian.ch...@gmail.com wrote:

 The problem isn't contigmalloc, it's making sure that it gets bounced via
 the local 32 bits of address space right.

 I'll talk with other developers and see what the deal is with 64 bit
 address
 space for 32 bit nics.


 Please do an svn update in sys/dev/ath/ and rebuild.

 I've fixed something in the RX side. I haven't yet gone and fully
 reviewed all the descriptor / buffer gymnastics on the TX side so it's
 very possible things will stay broken until I do that.

 Thanks,



 Adrian


___
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: ath not working after a motherboard and ram upgrade

2013-04-01 Thread Joshua Isom
I was the same.  I got these two messages, but I'm only assuming it's 
related because the val makes me think of the pci id.  These were while 
using 16GB, and trying an ifconfig scan.


Apr  1 16:32:51 jri kernel: Memory modified after free 
0xfe003ce3a000(4096) val=168c000c @ 0xfe003ce3a000
Apr  1 16:32:58 jri kernel: Memory modified after free 
0xfe003ce36000(4096) val=168c000c @ 0xfe003ce36000



On 4/1/2013 4:11 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:

update again again; I just did some TX related changes.



adrian




___
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


802.11n performance for AR9280

2013-04-01 Thread Gleb Romanov
Hello,

I have a question about 802.11n performance for AR9280 ( my card is Ubiquiti 
SR71E ) in hostap mode. To measure performance, I'm looking at the download 
speeds from my file server (Samba) through a FreeBSD AP to a laptop with 
Centrino 6300 (agn 3x3:3).
I see 3-4 MBytes/s on the 2.4 GHz band (using ht/20 or ht/40 - doesn't matter) 
and around 5-6 MB/s on the 5 GHz band (ht/40). 
The laptop is running Win 7 and can do 8-9 MB/s with a commercial AP (2.4 GHz  
ht/20  2x2:2)

I run 9.1-RELEASE GENERIC and the question is this is the expected performance 
(from 9.1 RELEASE ) or I'm just doing something wrong? May be bad antennas or 
wires?
If it is expected and I need to switch to HEAD to do better, can I only update 
the ATH_module_releated_stuff and leave the rest of the base untouched?
Any comments would be helpful!

Gleb


---
Here is some info about the system:
Right now it is configured for 2.4 GHz simply because of the range. With 5 GHz 
I need to in the same room with the AP to get the speeds I mentioned.

uname -a
FreeBSD fwall 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE #0 r243825: Tue Dec  4 09:23:10 
UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  amd64

pciconf -lv
ath0@pci0:3:0:0:class=0x028000 card=0x4e050777 chip=0x002a168c rev=0x01 
hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Atheros Communications Inc.'
device = 'AR928X Wireless Network Adapter (PCI-Express)'
class  = network

/etc/rc.conf
wlans_ath0=wlan0
create_args_wlan0=wlanmode hostap
ifconfig_wlan0=apbridge mode 11ng ht channel 3:ht/40
hostapd_enable=YES#for wlan0
hostapd_program=/usr/local/sbin/hostapd   #run from port instead of base

ifconfig
wlan0: flags=8943UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 
1500
ether 00:15:6d:85:25:13
nd6 options=29PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL
media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11ng hostap
status: running
ssid badaboom-n channel 3 (2422 MHz 11g ht/40+) bssid 00:15:6d:85:25:13
country US ecm authmode WPA2/802.11i privacy MIXED deftxkey 2
AES-CCM 2:128-bit AES-CCM 3:128-bit txpower 27 scanvalid 60
protmode CTS -htcompat -ampdu ampdulimit 64k ampdudensity 8 -amsdu
smps wme burst dtimperiod 1 -dfs

/etc/hostapd.conf: 
ht_capab=[HT40+][SHORT-GI-20][SHORT-GI-40][TX-STBC][RX-STBC12][DELAYED-BA][MAX-AMSDU-7935][DSSS_CCK-40][LDPC][GF][SMPS-DYNAMIC][PSMP][LSIG-TXOP-PROT]
(Here I used all available options. I don't see any difference between using 
the line and commenting it out. Huh?)
___
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: 802.11n performance for AR9280

2013-04-01 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi,

9.x doesn't implement 11n aggregation transmission. It only supports
11n MCS rate transmission (with no aggregation) and 11n RX with MCS
and aggregation.

If you update to -HEAD you should see the performance increase.



Adrian

On 1 April 2013 15:10, Gleb Romanov groma...@hellok.org wrote:
 Hello,

 I have a question about 802.11n performance for AR9280 ( my card is Ubiquiti 
 SR71E ) in hostap mode. To measure performance, I'm looking at the download 
 speeds from my file server (Samba) through a FreeBSD AP to a laptop with 
 Centrino 6300 (agn 3x3:3).
 I see 3-4 MBytes/s on the 2.4 GHz band (using ht/20 or ht/40 - doesn't 
 matter) and around 5-6 MB/s on the 5 GHz band (ht/40).
 The laptop is running Win 7 and can do 8-9 MB/s with a commercial AP (2.4 GHz 
  ht/20  2x2:2)

 I run 9.1-RELEASE GENERIC and the question is this is the expected 
 performance (from 9.1 RELEASE ) or I'm just doing something wrong? May be bad 
 antennas or wires?
 If it is expected and I need to switch to HEAD to do better, can I only 
 update the ATH_module_releated_stuff and leave the rest of the base 
 untouched?
 Any comments would be helpful!

 Gleb


 ---
 Here is some info about the system:
 Right now it is configured for 2.4 GHz simply because of the range. With 5 
 GHz I need to in the same room with the AP to get the speeds I mentioned.

 uname -a
 FreeBSD fwall 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE #0 r243825: Tue Dec  4 09:23:10 
 UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  amd64

 pciconf -lv
 ath0@pci0:3:0:0:class=0x028000 card=0x4e050777 chip=0x002a168c 
 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00
 vendor = 'Atheros Communications Inc.'
 device = 'AR928X Wireless Network Adapter (PCI-Express)'
 class  = network

 /etc/rc.conf
 wlans_ath0=wlan0
 create_args_wlan0=wlanmode hostap
 ifconfig_wlan0=apbridge mode 11ng ht channel 3:ht/40
 hostapd_enable=YES#for wlan0
 hostapd_program=/usr/local/sbin/hostapd   #run from port instead of base

 ifconfig
 wlan0: flags=8943UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 
 mtu 1500
 ether 00:15:6d:85:25:13
 nd6 options=29PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL
 media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11ng hostap
 status: running
 ssid badaboom-n channel 3 (2422 MHz 11g ht/40+) bssid 
 00:15:6d:85:25:13
 country US ecm authmode WPA2/802.11i privacy MIXED deftxkey 2
 AES-CCM 2:128-bit AES-CCM 3:128-bit txpower 27 scanvalid 60
 protmode CTS -htcompat -ampdu ampdulimit 64k ampdudensity 8 -amsdu
 smps wme burst dtimperiod 1 -dfs

 /etc/hostapd.conf:
 ht_capab=[HT40+][SHORT-GI-20][SHORT-GI-40][TX-STBC][RX-STBC12][DELAYED-BA][MAX-AMSDU-7935][DSSS_CCK-40][LDPC][GF][SMPS-DYNAMIC][PSMP][LSIG-TXOP-PROT]
 (Here I used all available options. I don't see any difference between using 
 the line and commenting it out. Huh?)
 ___
 freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
___
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


RE: 802.11n performance for AR9280

2013-04-01 Thread Gleb Romanov
Thanks!

Do you recommend to update everything or only ATH module will be enough?

IE get all the sources and follow 
https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html
Or
Download the ATH sources and make all install ?

Gleb

 -Original Message-
 From: adrian.ch...@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.ch...@gmail.com] On
 Behalf Of Adrian Chadd
 Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 6:22 PM
 To: Gleb Romanov
 Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
 Subject: Re: 802.11n performance for AR9280
 
 Hi,
 
 9.x doesn't implement 11n aggregation transmission. It only supports 11n
 MCS rate transmission (with no aggregation) and 11n RX with MCS and
 aggregation.
 
 If you update to -HEAD you should see the performance increase.
 
 
 
 Adrian
 
 On 1 April 2013 15:10, Gleb Romanov groma...@hellok.org wrote:
  Hello,
 
  I have a question about 802.11n performance for AR9280 ( my card is
 Ubiquiti SR71E ) in hostap mode. To measure performance, I'm looking at
 the download speeds from my file server (Samba) through a FreeBSD AP to a
 laptop with Centrino 6300 (agn 3x3:3).
  I see 3-4 MBytes/s on the 2.4 GHz band (using ht/20 or ht/40 - doesn't
 matter) and around 5-6 MB/s on the 5 GHz band (ht/40).
  The laptop is running Win 7 and can do 8-9 MB/s with a commercial AP
  (2.4 GHz  ht/20  2x2:2)
 
  I run 9.1-RELEASE GENERIC and the question is this is the expected
 performance (from 9.1 RELEASE ) or I'm just doing something wrong? May be
 bad antennas or wires?
  If it is expected and I need to switch to HEAD to do better, can I only
 update the ATH_module_releated_stuff and leave the rest of the base
 untouched?
  Any comments would be helpful!
 
  Gleb
 
 
  ---
  Here is some info about the system:
  Right now it is configured for 2.4 GHz simply because of the range. With 5
 GHz I need to in the same room with the AP to get the speeds I mentioned.
 
  uname -a
  FreeBSD fwall 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE #0 r243825: Tue Dec  4
 09:23:10 UTC 2012
 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  amd64
 
  pciconf -lv
  ath0@pci0:3:0:0:class=0x028000 card=0x4e050777 chip=0x002a168c
 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00
  vendor = 'Atheros Communications Inc.'
  device = 'AR928X Wireless Network Adapter (PCI-Express)'
  class  = network
 
  /etc/rc.conf
  wlans_ath0=wlan0
  create_args_wlan0=wlanmode hostap
  ifconfig_wlan0=apbridge mode 11ng ht channel 3:ht/40
  hostapd_enable=YES#for wlan0
  hostapd_program=/usr/local/sbin/hostapd   #run from port instead of
 base
 
  ifconfig
  wlan0:
 flags=8943UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric
 0 mtu 1500
  ether 00:15:6d:85:25:13
  nd6 options=29PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL
  media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11ng hostap
  status: running
  ssid badaboom-n channel 3 (2422 MHz 11g ht/40+) bssid
 00:15:6d:85:25:13
  country US ecm authmode WPA2/802.11i privacy MIXED deftxkey 2
  AES-CCM 2:128-bit AES-CCM 3:128-bit txpower 27 scanvalid 60
  protmode CTS -htcompat -ampdu ampdulimit 64k ampdudensity 8 -
 amsdu
  smps wme burst dtimperiod 1 -dfs
 
  /etc/hostapd.conf:
  ht_capab=[HT40+][SHORT-GI-20][SHORT-GI-40][TX-STBC][RX-
 STBC12][DELAYED
  -BA][MAX-AMSDU-7935][DSSS_CCK-40][LDPC][GF][SMPS-
 DYNAMIC][PSMP][LSIG-T
  XOP-PROT] (Here I used all available options. I don't see any
  difference between using the line and commenting it out. Huh?)
  ___
  freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
  To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-
 unsubscr...@freebsd.org
___
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org