Re: [RESULT] Brian Stansberry as jakarta-commons-logging committer
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Simon Kitching wrote: On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 19:49 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote: On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Simon Kitching wrote: Hi, Any sign of Brian's CLA having been received?? Nope, not yet. Jim added in a bunch of received iCLAs on 7/14, and Brian's was not amongst them. You might want to ask him to fax it again, in case it got lost somehow. It was posted, rather than faxed. I don't believe the US post is that slow is it?? Not usually. ;-) You might want to e-mail Jim. All I can tell you is that Brian's name isn't in the iCLAs file, and it didn't get added and then accidentally removed. Beyond that, I have no clue. For all I know, Jim might not have picked up from the PO box for a while, the CLA could be lying on his desk, or it could have fallen into a black hole. Sorry. -- Martin Cooper On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 16:50 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote: Hi, Brian sent his CLA in by post about 12 days ago. How can I check whether it has been received/processed? Thanks, Simon On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 22:50 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote: The votes to elect Brian Stansberry as a committer for jakarta-commons-logging are as follows: +1 Dion Gillard +1 Phil Steitz +1 Robert Donkin +1 Yoav Shapira +1 Emmanuel Bourg +1 Henri Yandell +1 Simon Kitching Brian is therefore elected (Brian has indicated privately that he is willing to accept). Brian, the first thing you need to do is complete a Contributor License Agreement and send it in by mail or fax. Details are here: http://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html Once this is completed we can create a user account for you and arrange the necessary access rights. Note that processing of CLAs can sometimes take a week or two. Your contributions to jakarta commons so far are very appreciated and we all hope you'll enjoy being part of the commons community. Regards, Simon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RESULT] Brian Stansberry as jakarta-commons-logging committer
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 19:49 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Simon Kitching wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Any sign of Brian's CLA having been received?? > > Nope, not yet. Jim added in a bunch of received iCLAs on 7/14, and Brian's > was not amongst them. You might want to ask him to fax it again, in case > it got lost somehow. It was posted, rather than faxed. I don't believe the US post is that slow is it?? > > On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 16:50 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Brian sent his CLA in by post about 12 days ago. How can I check whether > >> it has been received/processed? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Simon > >> > >> > >> On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 22:50 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote: > >>> The votes to elect Brian Stansberry as a committer for > >>> jakarta-commons-logging are as follows: > >>> > >>> +1 Dion Gillard > >>> +1 Phil Steitz > >>> +1 Robert Donkin > >>> +1 Yoav Shapira > >>> +1 Emmanuel Bourg > >>> +1 Henri Yandell > >>> +1 Simon Kitching > >>> > >>> Brian is therefore elected (Brian has indicated privately that he is > >>> willing to accept). > >>> > >>> > >>> Brian, the first thing you need to do is complete a Contributor License > >>> Agreement and send it in by mail or fax. Details are here: > >>> http://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html > >>> > >>> Once this is completed we can create a user account for you and arrange > >>> the necessary access rights. Note that processing of CLAs can sometimes > >>> take a week or two. > >>> > >>> Your contributions to jakarta commons so far are very appreciated and we > >>> all hope you'll enjoy being part of the commons community. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> > >>> Simon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RESULT] Brian Stansberry as jakarta-commons-logging committer
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Simon Kitching wrote: Hi, Any sign of Brian's CLA having been received?? Nope, not yet. Jim added in a bunch of received iCLAs on 7/14, and Brian's was not amongst them. You might want to ask him to fax it again, in case it got lost somehow. -- Martin Cooper Thanks, Simon On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 16:50 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote: Hi, Brian sent his CLA in by post about 12 days ago. How can I check whether it has been received/processed? Thanks, Simon On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 22:50 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote: The votes to elect Brian Stansberry as a committer for jakarta-commons-logging are as follows: +1 Dion Gillard +1 Phil Steitz +1 Robert Donkin +1 Yoav Shapira +1 Emmanuel Bourg +1 Henri Yandell +1 Simon Kitching Brian is therefore elected (Brian has indicated privately that he is willing to accept). Brian, the first thing you need to do is complete a Contributor License Agreement and send it in by mail or fax. Details are here: http://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html Once this is completed we can create a user account for you and arrange the necessary access rights. Note that processing of CLAs can sometimes take a week or two. Your contributions to jakarta commons so far are very appreciated and we all hope you'll enjoy being part of the commons community. Regards, Simon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RESULT] Brian Stansberry as jakarta-commons-logging committer
Hi, Any sign of Brian's CLA having been received?? Thanks, Simon On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 16:50 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote: > Hi, > > Brian sent his CLA in by post about 12 days ago. How can I check whether > it has been received/processed? > > Thanks, > > Simon > > > On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 22:50 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote: > > The votes to elect Brian Stansberry as a committer for > > jakarta-commons-logging are as follows: > > > > +1 Dion Gillard > > +1 Phil Steitz > > +1 Robert Donkin > > +1 Yoav Shapira > > +1 Emmanuel Bourg > > +1 Henri Yandell > > +1 Simon Kitching > > > > Brian is therefore elected (Brian has indicated privately that he is > > willing to accept). > > > > > > Brian, the first thing you need to do is complete a Contributor License > > Agreement and send it in by mail or fax. Details are here: > > http://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html > > > > Once this is completed we can create a user account for you and arrange > > the necessary access rights. Note that processing of CLAs can sometimes > > take a week or two. > > > > Your contributions to jakarta commons so far are very appreciated and we > > all hope you'll enjoy being part of the commons community. > > > > Regards, > > > > Simon > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: svn commit: r225366 - in /jakarta/site: docs/site/downloads/downloads_tomcat-connectors.html xdocs/downloads/downloads.xml
> On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 16:52 -0400, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > > On 7/26/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I just regenerated the site, but I avoided reverting those two. I could > > easily have committed those; I just didn't know what the "etiquette" > > is. > > for me, it's a judgement call depending on the person and the change. > hopefully, other people will jump in here with more general opinions... OK, so if we don't have a clear standing etiquette, here is my opinion: If someone updated xdocs/; he/she most probably also intended to update docs/ *and* intended to do the svn update. I see this as atomic. -Rahul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: svn commit: r225366 - in /jakarta/site:docs/site/downloads/downloads_tomcat-connectors.htmlxdocs/downloads/downloads.xml
Hi, > i posted something to stefan off list (wanted to email him anyway). > > > I just regenerated the site, but I avoided reverting those two. I could > > easily have committed those; I just didn't know what the "etiquette" > > is. > > for me, it's a judgement call depending on the person and the change. > hopefully, other people will jump in here with more general opinions... Notify the person, without overwriting their work, and ask them to make their changes in the xdocs, regenerate the site, and update it properly. So you both did the right thing IMHO. Yoav - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: svn commit: r225366 - in /jakarta/site: docs/site/downloads/downloads_tomcat-connectors.html xdocs/downloads/downloads.xml
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 16:52 -0400, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On 7/26/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hi Jean-Frederic > > > > docs/site/downloads/download_tomcat.html is generated and so these > > changes are in grave danger of being reverted next time someone > > regenerates the site. > > > I also see a pending mod for Stefan's update of whoweare.html. i posted something to stefan off list (wanted to email him anyway). > I just regenerated the site, but I avoided reverting those two. I could > easily have committed those; I just didn't know what the "etiquette" > is. for me, it's a judgement call depending on the person and the change. hopefully, other people will jump in here with more general opinions... - robert signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: svn commit: r225366 - in /jakarta/site: docs/site/downloads/downloads_tomcat-connectors.html xdocs/downloads/downloads.xml
On 7/26/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi Jean-Frederic > > docs/site/downloads/download_tomcat.html is generated and so these > changes are in grave danger of being reverted next time someone > regenerates the site. I also see a pending mod for Stefan's update of whoweare.html. I just regenerated the site, but I avoided reverting those two. I could easily have committed those; I just didn't know what the "etiquette" is. -Rahul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: svn commit: r225366 - in /jakarta/site: docs/site/downloads/downloads_tomcat-connectors.html xdocs/downloads/downloads.xml
hi Jean-Frederic docs/site/downloads/download_tomcat.html is generated and so these changes are in grave danger of being reverted next time someone regenerates the site. - robert On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 18:08 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Author: jfclere > Date: Tue Jul 26 11:08:22 2005 > New Revision: 225366 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=225366&view=rev > Log: > Arrange dowload page for mod_jk. > > Modified: > jakarta/site/docs/site/downloads/downloads_tomcat-connectors.html > jakarta/site/xdocs/downloads/downloads.xml > > Modified: jakarta/site/docs/site/downloads/downloads_tomcat-connectors.html > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta/site/docs/site/downloads/downloads_tomcat-connectors.html?rev=225366&r1=225365&r2=225366&view=diff > == > --- jakarta/site/docs/site/downloads/downloads_tomcat-connectors.html > (original) > +++ jakarta/site/docs/site/downloads/downloads_tomcat-connectors.html Tue Jul > 26 11:08:22 2005 > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ > > > > -The Jakarta Site - Tomcat Connectors (mod_jk, mod_jk2, mod_webapp) > Downloads > +The Jakarta Site - Tomcat Connectors (mod_jk, mod_jk2) > Downloads > > > > @@ -161,8 +161,8 @@ > > > > - > -Tomcat Connectors (mod_jk, mod_jk2, mod_webapp) Downloads > + > +Tomcat Connectors (mod_jk, mod_jk2) Downloads > > > > @@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ > > The KEYS link links to the code signing keys used > to sign the product. The PGP link downloads the OpenPGP > compatible signature from our main site. > > -For more information concerning Tomcat Connectors (mod_jk, mod_jk2, > mod_webapp), see the href="http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/"; class="name">Tomcat > Connectors (mod_jk, mod_jk2, mod_webapp) site. > +For more information concerning Tomcat Connectors (mod_jk, mod_jk2), see > the http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/"; > class="name">Tomcat Connectors (mod_jk, mod_jk2) site. > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/KEYS";>KEYS > @@ -215,18 +215,18 @@ > > > > - href="[preferred]/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk/source/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-current-src.tar.gz">JK > 1.2.10 Source Release tar.gz > + href="[preferred]/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk/source/jk-1.2.14/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-1.2.14.1-src.tar.gz">JK > 1.2.14 Source Release tar.gz > > > -[ href="http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk/source/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-current-src.tar.gz.asc";>pgp] > +[ href="http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk/source/jk-1.2.14/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-1.2.14.1-src.tar.gz.asc";>pgp] > > > > > - href="[preferred]/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk/source/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-current-src.zip">JK > 1.2.10 Source Release zip > + href="[preferred]/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk/source/jk-1.2.14/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-1.2.14.1-src.zip">JK > 1.2.14 Source Release zip > > > -[ href="http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk/source/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-current-src.zip.asc";>pgp] > +[ href="http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk/source/jk-1.2.14/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-1.2.14.1-src.zip.asc";>pgp] > > > > > Modified: jakarta/site/xdocs/downloads/downloads.xml > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta/site/xdocs/downloads/downloads.xml?rev=225366&r1=225365&r2=225366&view=diff > == > --- jakarta/site/xdocs/downloads/downloads.xml (original) > +++ jakarta/site/xdocs/downloads/downloads.xml Tue Jul 26 11:08:22 2005 > @@ -1047,13 +1047,13 @@ > > > > -http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/";> > +http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/";> > primary="http://www.apache.org/dist/"; mirrored="true" > archive="http://archive.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/"; > md5-text="false"> > > href="jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/" directory="true"/> > > - href="jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk/source/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-current-src.tar.gz" > md5="false"/> > - href="jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk/source/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-current-src.zip" > md5="false"/> > + href="jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk/source/jk-1.2.14/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-1.2.14.1-src.tar.gz" > md5="false"/> > + href="jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk/source/jk-1.2.14/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-1.2.14.1-src.zip" > md5="false"/> > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Dual licensing of code
Simon Kitching wrote: On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 13:33 +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am now looking at writing an article about unit testing and would like to be able to provide these classes as code in the public domain, just to make it as easy as possible for readers of the article to reuse that code. Is there any issue with doing this? What is the exact procedure I should follow? IANAL and all that. Since you've written the code, you retain the copyright and can re-license it under whatever license you want to. Just make sure it is your original submission and nothing else. If anybody else contributed code, make sure you get them to agree with your wishes. Thanks Stefan. As there has been no other feedback on this, I think I will try asking on legal-discuss instead. I agree with Stefan's analysis. - Sam Ruby - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dual licensing of code
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 13:33 +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I am now looking at writing an article about unit testing and would > > like to be able to provide these classes as code in the public > > domain, just to make it as easy as possible for readers of the > > article to reuse that code. > > > > Is there any issue with doing this? What is the exact procedure I > > should follow? > > IANAL and all that. > > Since you've written the code, you retain the copyright and can > re-license it under whatever license you want to. Just make sure it > is your original submission and nothing else. If anybody else > contributed code, make sure you get them to agree with your wishes. Thanks Stefan. As there has been no other feedback on this, I think I will try asking on legal-discuss instead. Regards, Simon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dual licensing of code
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am now looking at writing an article about unit testing and would > like to be able to provide these classes as code in the public > domain, just to make it as easy as possible for readers of the > article to reuse that code. > > Is there any issue with doing this? What is the exact procedure I > should follow? IANAL and all that. Since you've written the code, you retain the copyright and can re-license it under whatever license you want to. Just make sure it is your original submission and nothing else. If anybody else contributed code, make sure you get them to agree with your wishes. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Copyright line in code submissions
Robert wrote: >i sometimes find it hard to work out where opinion stops and policy >begins... Then again... it is surely the PMC's business to know or find out, and enforce? I mean, IANAL but as a manager I would think that if the PMC is charged with oversight it is surely marginally better for the PMC as a body to mis-interpret and mis-enforce centrally than for there to be n different personal mis-interpretations of legal requirements of all kinds. I would have thought that a jakarta web-page of legal FAQ would at least allow us to have an auditable standard, and if the standard is wrong it should then be wrong for all to see, wrong everywhere to the same degree and require one fix, rather than a big analysis effort up front. just my 2c.. d. *** The information in this e-mail is confidential and for use by the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for delivery of the message to the intended recipient) please notify us immediately on 0141 306 2050 and delete the message from your computer. You may not copy or forward it or use or disclose its contents to any other person. As Internet communications are capable of data corruption Student Loans Company Limited does not accept any responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. For this reason it may be inappropriate to rely on advice or opinions contained in an e-mail without obtaining written confirmation of it. Neither Student Loans Company Limited or the sender accepts any liability or responsibility for viruses as it is your responsibility to scan attachments (if any). Opinions and views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and may not reflect the opinions and views of The Student Loans Company Limit ed. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. ** - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
