Re: Now what's going on and how do I fix it?
I think I know what I did... I copied my old /etc directory over the new one thereby screwing up the mount tab and vfstab and any other files related to the mount table doh!!! Ben Boulanger wrote: On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 21:56, Chris wrote: Activating swap partitions: swapon: /dev/hda7: Invalid argument Sounds like /dev/hda7 isn't set as type 82? Can you get an output of what fdisk says (fdisk /dev/hda, p)? Ben ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: log-reader
tail -f yourLogFileHere ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
RE: Contivity VPN woes
On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 20:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For those who are wondering: In IPsec automatic keying with IKE (Internet Key Exchange), each peer has to have an identity. With X.509 certificates, the ID is almost always the DN (Distinguished Name) of the certificate of that peer. When using Pre-Shared Keys for authentication, though, the most popular choice of ID is the peer's own IP address. Obviously, NAT is going to mess with that. I've never tried it, but I imagine PSKs would still work with NAT if you used aggressive mode and (e.g.) an FQDN ID. Anyone know? I believe that (again, in theory), aggressive mode used in conjunction with oppertunistic encryption fixes the PSK through NAT problems. However, I have to say that I have done IPSec through NAT using PSK's and it works fine. IKE isn't the real trouble spot, usually. The real trouble is AH. If you're using ESP, then things should be fine (depending on the NAT implimentation). If you're using AH, you're dead in the water. In the AH spec, it clearly states that it cannot be NAT'd due to the nature of header munging. there could be some other issues involving ike-through-nat as well ... Oh, there are. This is all in theory. Everything works in theory. In practice, NAT tends to screw up everything. :-) Just today, I was trouble-shooting an IPsec-through-NAT configuration that appears to be causing the FreeS/WAN node at the other end to think the NAT'ed node is another network, instead of a single node. I haven't had a chance to figure that one out yet. Someone forgot to comment out the right/leftsubnet maybe? C-Ya, Kenny -- Tact is just *not* saying true stuff -- Cordelia Chase Kenneth E. Lussier Sr. Systems Administrator Zuken, USA PGP KeyID CB254DD0 http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCB254DD0 ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: Subject: RE: log-reader
I wrote: prettyMuchEverybody wrote: tail -f logfile Sheesh. I hereby certify us all as Linux Professionals. Erik wrote: Fine by me. It makes me look less stupid for not knowing. ;) That would at least make me a Linux User, as opposed to a Linux Luser. Since I'm not sure how you took that, let me say that no ill-will should be read into my msg because it certainly wasn't written with any, and I didn't mean to imply that you're a Luser. I was just amused at how many of us piled on to answer that little query... . ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
RE: Subject: RE: log-reader
-Original Message- From: Michael O'Donnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 10:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Subject: RE: log-reader I wrote: prettyMuchEverybody wrote: tail -f logfile Sheesh. I hereby certify us all as Linux Professionals. Erik wrote: Fine by me. It makes me look less stupid for not knowing. ;) That would at least make me a Linux User, as opposed to a Linux Luser. Since I'm not sure how you took that, let me say that no ill-will should be read into my msg because it certainly wasn't written with any, and I didn't mean to imply that you're a Luser. I was just amused at how many of us piled on to answer that little query... No, none was taken! I assure you. Hence the smiley, which was consciously placed. No implication was assumed, either, it was just self-beratement. Erik ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: Subject: RE: log-reader
FYI, another way to monitor changing events is via the watch command, though it's used in slightly different circumstances than the OP asked about; it's prepared to repeatedly execute some command and keep the screen updated with the results. Example: watch ifconfig ...will show the changing Tx/Rx counts associated w/your Enets. ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: Subject: RE: log-reader
As an alternate solution, if the original poster is an Emacs user, he could have used live-find-file. --kevin -- Kevin D. Clark / Cetacean Networks / Portsmouth, N.H. (USA) cetaceannetworks.com!kclark (GnuPG ID: B280F24E) alumni.unh.edu!kdc ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: Subject: RE: log-reader
I was amused by this whole discussion, since the trick of using 'tail -f filename' is fairly universal amongst the various UNIX implementations. I used it for years on Tru64 UNIX and its antecedants while monitoring my testing (I did TruCluster software QC for several years before my retirement). It is a very, simple, straightforward way to do it. I submit that firing up an entire editor (e.g. emacs, as suggested by Kevin Clark) is an unworthy consumption of valuable system resources, however fun it might be. Be that as it may, it then becomes an interesting problem of what to do about the information as it rolls in. In my case, I do a 'tail -f /var/log/messages' as part of my ppp startup, and I can monitor real time any attempts to hit my system. But, realistically, that particular window is buried below (er, behind) my Netscape Navigator browser window, my Netscape e-mail window, and a couple of others, sometimes for hours, so I frequently don't notice when someone overseas decides to telnet or ftp my dial-up node. So, I'd love to have an audible beep and/or (*gasp*) a pop-up window telling me when I'm being, er, groped over the network. Any ideas? Thanks, Bayard ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
RE: Contivity VPN woes
On 21 Nov 2002, at 8:30am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However, I have to say that I have done IPSec through NAT using PSK's and it works fine. IKE isn't the real trouble spot, usually. Except that I have noticed that IKE using an ID type of IP_ADDR, PSKs, and aggressive mode is a lot more popular then an objective analysis of the protocols would warrant. I suspect the reason is that particular combination is probably the easiest to implement (although I'm just guessing). In any event, the ID type of ID_ADDR doesn't get along with NAT, either. The real trouble is AH. Yes, AH and NAT are fundamentally incompatible. Just today, I was trouble-shooting an IPsec-through-NAT configuration that appears to be causing the FreeS/WAN node at the other end to think the NAT'ed node is another network, instead of a single node. Someone forgot to comment out the right/leftsubnet maybe? The other peer isn't running FreeS/WAN, it's running SafeNet's SoftRemote for Windows. The configuration checks out, and works just fine if I remove the NAT box. This is a dynamic, road warrior config -- FreeS/WAN gateway on one end, %any for the other end (no subnet). The error I'm seeing is that FreeS/WAN is thinking the connection is a gateway, with the public IP address of the router being the gateway address, and the private IP address of the Windows box being behind it -- which is, in a sense, correct, I guess. But since there is no subnet configured in FreeS/WAN, Pluto kicks out the IKE attempt as not matching any configured connection. I suspect I need to tweak FreeS/WAN's config slightly, or maybe add a patch. Like I said, I haven't had a chance to really look into it yet. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: Subject: RE: log-reader
OK great - Both Tom and Ben Boulanger nominated 'swatch', which goes to show that you can teach an old dog like me new tricks. The capability of triggering a sound event is fairly routine nowadays, both under Linux as well as under certain MS products. Back when I started with DEC in '78, I was told that a certain large, well-known customer had a bunch of PDP-11/70's for some critical functions. The PDP-11 architecture had a very nice (IMNSHO) interrupt architecture, so that various events could be properly dispatched to their handler routines. There was even one for when the interrupt stacks themselves were corrupted. (Anyone remember the yellow-zone/red-zone stuff?). Well, this customer, well-known for its technology and its geek humor, set up their systems so that a trap to the system crash vector would close a relay contact and set off an audible alarm. In their case, it was a tape recording of a human death scream. Rather unnerving for service personnel on their first service calls to this particular facility, but at least everyone knew when the system died. Thanks, Bayard ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: [gnhlug-announce] My apologies...
Paul's misconduct is indeed a serious matter; his resignation is hereby accepted. Since punishment must fit the crime, we must devise something truly heinous; some fate so awful that we can barely contemplate it. Done. Paul is hereby sentenced to... REINSTATEMENT! BwaaAAHH! HAHAHAHAHAHA . ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Tech Brew in Manchester tonight
Thought some of you might be interested: http://www.nh.com/ftp/techbrew/ ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: [gnhlug-announce] My apologies...
I fully agree with the punishment. Everyone makes mistakes, but the punishment must fit the crime. But I believe Paul should know, that if he doesn't accept his punishment, we will hunt him down and force him to use Windows 2.0 until he does. :) Paul's misconduct is indeed a serious matter; his resignation is hereby accepted. Since punishment must fit the crime, we must devise something truly heinous; some fate so awful that we can barely contemplate it. Done. Paul is hereby sentenced to... REINSTATEMENT! BwaaAAHH! HAHAHAHAHAHA . ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
RE: [gnhlug-announce] My apologies...
Actually, wasn't 2.0 the last stable version of Windows? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 1:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [gnhlug-announce] My apologies... I fully agree with the punishment. Everyone makes mistakes, but the punishment must fit the crime. But I believe Paul should know, that if he doesn't accept his punishment, we will hunt him down and force him to use Windows 2.0 until he does. :) Paul's misconduct is indeed a serious matter; his resignation is hereby accepted. Since punishment must fit the crime, we must devise something truly heinous; some fate so awful that we can barely contemplate it. Done. Paul is hereby sentenced to... REINSTATEMENT! BwaaAAHH! HAHAHAHAHAHA . ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: log-reader
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, at 9:59am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I seem to recall that there is a way to interactively read logfiles (as they are being generated) from the command line, but I completely forget what utility that is. A quick reminder, anyone? tail -f filename -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: log-reader
tail -f /var/log/whatever. C-Ya, Kenny On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 09:59, Price, Erik wrote: Folks, I seem to recall that there is a way to interactively read logfiles (as they are being generated) from the command line, but I completely forget what utility that is. A quick reminder, anyone? (Right now I'm just lessing the files after the expected error is generated.) (on Gentoo Linux) Erik ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss -- Tact is just *not* saying true stuff -- Cordelia Chase Kenneth E. Lussier Sr. Systems Administrator Zuken, USA PGP KeyID CB254DD0 http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCB254DD0 ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
RE: log-reader
Try this: tail -f someapp.log -Original Message- From: Price, Erik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 9:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: log-reader Folks, I seem to recall that there is a way to interactively read logfiles (as they are being generated) from the command line, but I completely forget what utility that is. A quick reminder, anyone? (Right now I'm just lessing the files after the expected error is generated.) (on Gentoo Linux) Erik ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: Subject: RE: log-reader
Bayard R. Coolidge said: system crash vector would close a relay contact and set off an audible alarm. In their case, it was a tape recording of a human death scream. Rather unnerving for service personnel on their first service calls to this particular facility, but at least everyone knew when the system died. I used the sound of breaking glass for a crash but this is much cooler. Tom goes looking for a human death scream sound -- --- Tom Buskey ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: Subject: RE: log-reader
Bayard R. Coolidge [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I submit that firing up an entire editor (e.g. emacs, as suggested by Kevin Clark) is an unworthy consumption of valuable system resources, however fun it might be. I never suggested firing up an editor to do this. I merely suggested that if the user was already an Emacs user, and they wanted to do this under Emacs, they could use live-find-file. The Emacs process that I'm typing this in has been up since the last time my computer experienced a power failure. Most Emacs users start up Emacs and leave it up for the entire session, however long that might be. So I disagree with your judgement of unworthy. --kevin -- Kevin D. Clark / Cetacean Networks / Portsmouth, N.H. (USA) cetaceannetworks.com!kclark (GnuPG ID: B280F24E) alumni.unh.edu!kdc ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Should a scanned image under Linux and Windows look similiar?
I am a naive novice when it comes to scanners and images, so maybe this is a ridiculous expectation, but I would think that a scanned image under Linux would look fairly close to one scanned under Windows, especially when run on the exact same hardware. Both XSane and the Windows software have default scan values that are almost identical. So why aren't the images almost identical? Here are the two images: http://www.totalnetnh.net/~lamb/scan_windows.jpg http://www.totalnetnh.net/~lamb/scan_linux.jpg The Windows scan is extremely close to the original photo. I have purposely omitted h/w and s/w specifics because I want to know if I have an unreasonable expectation. Thanks, Larry ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: XFSoterica
In a message dated: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 12:14:13 EST Michael O'Donnell said: Anybody here ever messed around with the more esoteric parts of XFS? I'm particularly interested in (what they call) the Real-time section. Contact Rob Lembree. He used to work for SGI and was head of their Linux efforts for some time. I believe (but may be wrong) that he's familiar with XFS development in some way. -- Seeya, Paul -- It may look like I'm just sitting here doing nothing, but I'm really actively waiting for all my problems to go away. If you're not having fun, you're not doing it right! ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: Subject: RE: log-reader
Thanks for the clarification, as I generally invoke an editor ad hoc for editing specific documents, and then dissolve it when I'm done. If you (and other emacs users) fire it up as part of your initial window invocations and leave it up during your entire working session then, yes, I can clearly see that there's no cost associated with using it to check the logs. Conversely, starting up a separate invocation of emacs just to watch the logs seemed to me to be a bit expensive. Doesn't Emacs have a client-server mode (or version) wherein one heavyweight Emacs process remains resident in memory and then a bunch of lightweight Emacs processes can connect to it? ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
RE: Subject: RE: log-reader
-Original Message- From: Kevin D. Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 1:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Subject: RE: log-reader The Emacs process that I'm typing this in has been up since the last time my computer experienced a power failure. Most Emacs users start up Emacs and leave it up for the entire session, however long that might be. Lo, and it is indeed even inscribed unto the Emacs tutorial that said behavior is recommendation-worthy. That's actually the first time I really used Ctrl-z, was when learning Emacs ... I knew about the command but felt like it was bad form to suspend processes. When I saw it recommended in yon Emacs tutorial, I asked about it and found that it's not like putting a video tape on pause ... (this was years ago, I was much younger and even more naive, really) Erik ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: Subject: RE: log-reader
In a message dated: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 14:22:49 EST Michael O'Donnell said: Doesn't Emacs have a client-server mode (or version) wherein one heavyweight Emacs process remains resident in memory and then a bunch of lightweight Emacs processes can connect to it? Yes, gnuserver and gnuclient. If you invoke gnuserv-start when Emacs is fired up, you can then do things like set your EDITOR/VISUAL variables to 'gnuclient' and anything that invokes your editor with send that to the gnuserv process. You can also, from the cmd line use 'gnuclient foo.txt' which does the same thing. -- Seeya, Paul -- It may look like I'm just sitting here doing nothing, but I'm really actively waiting for all my problems to go away. If you're not having fun, you're not doing it right! ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
OpenLDAP
Does anyone know of a good GUI or web-based browser for OpenLDAP? I'd like to be able to create/modify objects, etc. faster, and without as much typign ;-) TIA, Kenny -- Tact is just *not* saying true stuff -- Cordelia Chase Kenneth E. Lussier Sr. Systems Administrator Zuken, USA PGP KeyID CB254DD0 http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCB254DD0 ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: OpenLDAP
Quoting Kenneth E. Lussier [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Does anyone know of a good GUI or web-based browser for OpenLDAP? I'd
like to be able to create/modify objects, etc. faster, and without as
much typign ;-)
http://freshmeat.net/projects/awebdap/?topic_id=28%2C68%2C243%2C129
I tended to like that one.. Searching freshmeat for LDAP Web reveals many,
though.. Take yer pick.. ;-)
--
Thomas Charron
-={ Is beadarrach an ni an onair }=-
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: Should a scanned image under Linux and Windows look similiar?
http://www.totalnetnh.net/~lamb/scan_windows.jpg http://www.totalnetnh.net/~lamb/scan_linux.jpg Well, the look the same except the linux one has NO red in it. it's like it got filtered out some how. Is it a 3 pass color scanner? ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: OpenLDAP
In a message dated: 21 Nov 2002 14:35:27 EST Kenneth E. Lussier said: Does anyone know of a good GUI or web-based browser for OpenLDAP? I'd like to be able to create/modify objects, etc. faster, and without as much typign ;-) Read this months issue of LJ, the entire issue is devoted to LDAP. -- Seeya, Paul -- It may look like I'm just sitting here doing nothing, but I'm really actively waiting for all my problems to go away. If you're not having fun, you're not doing it right! ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: [gnhlug-announce] My apologies...
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I hereby resign as Chairman of MELBA in embarrassement (and boy do I hope you'll accept this resignation :) Is there anyone who thinks we should actually accept this? -- You can only go halfway into the darkest forest; then you are coming out the other side. ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
RE: [gnhlug-announce] My apologies...
No he should not be allowed to resign as chairman without a vote from the majority on the list. Sorry Paul! Jim -Original Message- From: Ben Boulanger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 12:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [gnhlug-announce] My apologies... On Thu, 21 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I hereby resign as Chairman of MELBA in embarrassement (and boy do I hope you'll accept this resignation :) Is there anyone who thinks we should actually accept this? -- You can only go halfway into the darkest forest; then you are coming out the other side. ___ gnhlug-announce mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-announce ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
RE: [gnhlug-announce] My apologies...
I fully agree with the punishment. Everyone makes mistakes, but the punishment must fit the crime. But I believe Paul should know, that if he doesn't accept his punishment, we will hunt him down and force him to use Windows 2.0 until he does. :) Our Constitution forbids the use of cruel and unusual punishment. So Windows is definitely out :-) Hey, I am definitely interested in redoing the CUPS Scanning presentation in January. I had a chance to do a practice run last night. I found out I had a few typos [I hope I spelled typos right ;-)]. = . Regards, Vince McHugh Systems Support Manager NECS\Canon __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
[Fwd: FREENIX Track submission deadline extended until Nov. 25(59596)]
Here's another opportunity to advance the cause - if only by preaching to the choir ;-) -Forwarded Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FREENIX Track submission deadline extended until Nov. 25 (59596) Date: 20 Nov 2002 17:06:36 -0800 Dear Colleague, The submission deadline for the FREENIX track at the USENIX Annual Technical Conference has been extended until Monday, November 25. The 2003 FREENIX program committee would like to encourage you to submit papers about projects which have a solid emphasis on nurturing the open source/freely available software community and talks which advance the state of the art of freely redistributable software. Areas of interest include, but are not limited to: cross-platform source portability and binary compatibility; desktop metaphors; distributed and parallel systems; documentation; embedded systems; file system design; graphical user interface tools; highly available systems; highly scalable and clustered systems; how free software is being developed and managed today; interesting deployments of free software; large-scale system management; network design and implementation; nontechnical aspects of free software: business, legal, etc.; operating system design; print systems; Quality Assurance; security; software development tools; storage systems; system and user management tools; and technical aspects of commercial use of free software. Submissions are due by Monday, November 25. Submission guidelines are available on the USENIX web site: http://www.usenix.org/events/usenix03/ We look forward to receiving your submissions. Erez Zadok, Stony Brook University FREENIX Program Committee Chair --- SAVE THE DATE! USENIX Annual Technical Conference Exhibition (USENIX '03) June 9-14, 2003 - San Antonio, Texas KEYNOTE: Neal Stephenson, cyberpunk visionary and noted author of Cryptonomicon, Snow Crash and The Diamond Age If you do NOT want to receive email announcements about USENIX and SAGE activities, please reply to this message, and you will not receive future email notices. ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: OpenLDAP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Kenneth E. Lussier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Does anyone know of a good GUI or web-based browser for OpenLDAP? I'd like to be able to create/modify objects, etc. faster, and without as much typign ;-) Yes and no. I poked around on freshmeat.net for something like that, after setting up LDAP on Monday by following the article in Linux Journal. GQ worked reasonably well; I could add all sorts of stuff the existing LDAP entries, but I couldn't see any way within GQ to add a completely new entry. I ended up just writing a shell script that would create a dummy entry with a specified UID, which I could then edit with GQ. - -- John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux Unix ICQ 28611923 / AIM abreauj / JABBER [EMAIL PROTECTED] / YAHOO abreauj Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] / WWW http://www.abreau.net / PGP-Key-ID 0xD5C7B5D9 PGP-Key-Fingerprint 72 FB 39 4F 3C 3B D6 5B E0 C8 5A 6E F1 2C BE 99 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iQCVAwUBPd1vvVV9A5rVx7XZAQJgYAP/boy/h/3aShyuLY3N5C3bVQKWRO4qA5XH +rvv2+UoDH8OooDgtg+oxwuOxEIzNuBYCedr956G2OqF8NqGOT69e5zsHwOZvbUn c0sRhtK7O5gVB8hJ9/aOIXXhTMAQIasE6FLjcP8VOY2HpB5t7hZl3YKokeuMRDrE oROZKIotGIE= =8RJj -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
RE: [gnhlug-announce] My apologies...
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, at 1:14pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually, wasn't 2.0 the last stable version of Windows? No, there hasn't been one of those yet. ;-) Kudos to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for making me laugh my a** off. Also, it gives me an idea: How about we make the punishment for resigning reinstatement? I think that would solve all these issues we have with people resigning nicely. ;-) (Seriously, Paul: Don't sweat it. If that's the biggest mistake you make, you're golden.) -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
