[Pkg-javascript-devel] libjs-twitter-bootstrap-datepicker is marked for autoremoval from testing

2014-10-17 Thread Debian testing autoremoval watch
libjs-twitter-bootstrap-datepicker 1.3.1+dfsg1-1 is marked for autoremoval from 
testing on 2014-11-17

It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
750717: twitter-bootstrap: FTBFS against uglify 2.x series - -nc is not a 
supported option


___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel


[Pkg-javascript-devel] PCB Prototype Fabrication/Printed circuit board Supply与您共享了相册。

2014-10-17 Thread PCB Prototype Fabrication/Printed circuit board Supply

Dear Sir/Madam,

Glad to know you from your great website, I'm proud to introduce you our  
high quality PCB products, Our advantage is -


The most experienced PCB sample manufacture from CHINA
Quick PCB Prototype Fabrication
Fast shipment according to customer's requirement

High quality with material Grade A FR-4
1 - 6 layer boards
All free test

Please kindly send us some drawings or manufacturing requirements  
description!


We provide 10% discount for all our new customers, and for volume order  
please feel free to get back to us, we will assure you our best price.


I would appreciate if you forward this letter to Technical Manager or to  
other expert responsible for technical integration of new products in your  
company,  for we could discuss all the details of our future cooperation.


Thanks for your attention to the above, we look forward to hearing back  
from you.


Best regards,

NiLu

https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/sredir?uname=11373304602496030&target=ALBUM&id=6056634317235226705&authkey=Gv1sRgCMvIsqqWr83TuAE&invite=CJuxv4cD&feat=email
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] can we use my fork of node-findit?

2014-10-17 Thread Andrew Kelley
Good idea. Done.

On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Jérémy Lal  wrote:

> Le vendredi 17 octobre 2014 à 16:03 -0700, Andrew Kelley a écrit :
> > Alright, node-findit2 is packaged up and ready for review and upload. I
> > think we should send a note to the FTP masters that it will replace
> > node-findit.
>
> Maybe it can be written in the long description of the package ?
> "This module is a backward-compatible rewrite of node-findit"
>
>
>
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] can we use my fork of node-findit?

2014-10-17 Thread Jérémy Lal
Le vendredi 17 octobre 2014 à 16:03 -0700, Andrew Kelley a écrit :
> Alright, node-findit2 is packaged up and ready for review and upload. I
> think we should send a note to the FTP masters that it will replace
> node-findit.

Maybe it can be written in the long description of the package ?
"This module is a backward-compatible rewrite of node-findit"



___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] can we use my fork of node-findit?

2014-10-17 Thread Andrew Kelley
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Andrew Kelley  wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Jérémy Lal  wrote:
>
>> Le vendredi 17 octobre 2014 à 15:04 -0700, Andrew Kelley a écrit :
>> > On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Jérémy Lal  wrote:
>> >
>> > > Le jeudi 16 octobre 2014 à 14:17 -0700, Andrew Kelley a écrit :
>> > > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Jérémy Lal 
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > > What should I do?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Since both have same API, i'd add your patches as quilt patches to
>> > > > > node-findit that is already in debian and add a binary package
>> > > > > node-findit2 (symlinking /usr/lib/nodejs/findit to findit2).
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Or the reverse, change upstream and add binary node-findit to
>> > > > > node-findit2.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > What about this?
>> > > >
>> > > > * Add patch as quilt patch to node-findit that is already in debian
>> > > > * When packaging other package updates that depend on findit2,
>> patch them
>> > > > to depend on node-findit instead, since the patch provides the
>> findit2
>> > > API
>> > > > and bug fixes.
>> > >
>> > > I agree up to that point where you imply that findit2 has a different
>> > > API ? If that's the case then findit2 must be... findit2 !
>> > >
>> >
>> > Hmm, in this case, since upstream seems to be ignoring my pull request,
>> > maybe I will
>> >
>> >  * rename the module to a better fork name (as I did with formidable ->
>> > multiparty)
>> >  * add new node module to debian
>> >  * update packages to depend on new module
>> >  * delete node-findit from debian since nothing depends on it
>>
>> If that's the case, then please keep a name close to the original one,
>> so that when packaging a module depending on (old) findit, one can find
>> easily the new findit to be a match.
>>
>> You might also want to commit to keep a backward-compatible API with
>> node-findit.
>>
>> These are only suggestions.
>
>
> I have thought about it, and I decided to keep the name as findit2. Also I
> agree to commit to backward-compatible API with node-findit, so that debian
> packages can use findit2 instead. I should have a package done here
> shortly. One thing that is kind of funny, is that since I cleaned up the
> code considerably, the lines of code is now small enough that FTP masters
> might say it is too small!! But hopefully if we tell them we are going to
> remove node-findit and this package is intended to replace it, then they
> will be OK with it.
>

Alright, node-findit2 is packaged up and ready for review and upload. I
think we should send a note to the FTP masters that it will replace
node-findit.
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] can we use my fork of node-findit?

2014-10-17 Thread Andrew Kelley
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Jérémy Lal  wrote:

> Le vendredi 17 octobre 2014 à 15:04 -0700, Andrew Kelley a écrit :
> > On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Jérémy Lal  wrote:
> >
> > > Le jeudi 16 octobre 2014 à 14:17 -0700, Andrew Kelley a écrit :
> > > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Jérémy Lal 
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > What should I do?
> > > > >
> > > > > Since both have same API, i'd add your patches as quilt patches to
> > > > > node-findit that is already in debian and add a binary package
> > > > > node-findit2 (symlinking /usr/lib/nodejs/findit to findit2).
> > > > >
> > > > > Or the reverse, change upstream and add binary node-findit to
> > > > > node-findit2.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What about this?
> > > >
> > > > * Add patch as quilt patch to node-findit that is already in debian
> > > > * When packaging other package updates that depend on findit2, patch
> them
> > > > to depend on node-findit instead, since the patch provides the
> findit2
> > > API
> > > > and bug fixes.
> > >
> > > I agree up to that point where you imply that findit2 has a different
> > > API ? If that's the case then findit2 must be... findit2 !
> > >
> >
> > Hmm, in this case, since upstream seems to be ignoring my pull request,
> > maybe I will
> >
> >  * rename the module to a better fork name (as I did with formidable ->
> > multiparty)
> >  * add new node module to debian
> >  * update packages to depend on new module
> >  * delete node-findit from debian since nothing depends on it
>
> If that's the case, then please keep a name close to the original one,
> so that when packaging a module depending on (old) findit, one can find
> easily the new findit to be a match.
>
> You might also want to commit to keep a backward-compatible API with
> node-findit.
>
> These are only suggestions.


I have thought about it, and I decided to keep the name as findit2. Also I
agree to commit to backward-compatible API with node-findit, so that debian
packages can use findit2 instead. I should have a package done here
shortly. One thing that is kind of funny, is that since I cleaned up the
code considerably, the lines of code is now small enough that FTP masters
might say it is too small!! But hopefully if we tell them we are going to
remove node-findit and this package is intended to replace it, then they
will be OK with it.
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] can we use my fork of node-findit?

2014-10-17 Thread Jérémy Lal
Le vendredi 17 octobre 2014 à 15:04 -0700, Andrew Kelley a écrit :
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Jérémy Lal  wrote:
> 
> > Le jeudi 16 octobre 2014 à 14:17 -0700, Andrew Kelley a écrit :
> > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Jérémy Lal  wrote:
> > >
> > > > > What should I do?
> > > >
> > > > Since both have same API, i'd add your patches as quilt patches to
> > > > node-findit that is already in debian and add a binary package
> > > > node-findit2 (symlinking /usr/lib/nodejs/findit to findit2).
> > > >
> > > > Or the reverse, change upstream and add binary node-findit to
> > > > node-findit2.
> > >
> > >
> > > What about this?
> > >
> > > * Add patch as quilt patch to node-findit that is already in debian
> > > * When packaging other package updates that depend on findit2, patch them
> > > to depend on node-findit instead, since the patch provides the findit2
> > API
> > > and bug fixes.
> >
> > I agree up to that point where you imply that findit2 has a different
> > API ? If that's the case then findit2 must be... findit2 !
> >
> 
> Hmm, in this case, since upstream seems to be ignoring my pull request,
> maybe I will
> 
>  * rename the module to a better fork name (as I did with formidable ->
> multiparty)
>  * add new node module to debian
>  * update packages to depend on new module
>  * delete node-findit from debian since nothing depends on it

If that's the case, then please keep a name close to the original one,
so that when packaging a module depending on (old) findit, one can find
easily the new findit to be a match.

You might also want to commit to keep a backward-compatible API with
node-findit.

These are only suggestions.

Jérémy.



___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] can we use my fork of node-findit?

2014-10-17 Thread Andrew Kelley
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Jérémy Lal  wrote:

> Le jeudi 16 octobre 2014 à 14:17 -0700, Andrew Kelley a écrit :
> > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Jérémy Lal  wrote:
> >
> > > > What should I do?
> > >
> > > Since both have same API, i'd add your patches as quilt patches to
> > > node-findit that is already in debian and add a binary package
> > > node-findit2 (symlinking /usr/lib/nodejs/findit to findit2).
> > >
> > > Or the reverse, change upstream and add binary node-findit to
> > > node-findit2.
> >
> >
> > What about this?
> >
> > * Add patch as quilt patch to node-findit that is already in debian
> > * When packaging other package updates that depend on findit2, patch them
> > to depend on node-findit instead, since the patch provides the findit2
> API
> > and bug fixes.
>
> I agree up to that point where you imply that findit2 has a different
> API ? If that's the case then findit2 must be... findit2 !
>

Hmm, in this case, since upstream seems to be ignoring my pull request,
maybe I will

 * rename the module to a better fork name (as I did with formidable ->
multiparty)
 * add new node module to debian
 * update packages to depend on new module
 * delete node-findit from debian since nothing depends on it
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-yauzl 2.0.1-1 MIGRATED to testing

2014-10-17 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the node-yauzl source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: (not in testing)
  Current version:  2.0.1-1

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel


[Pkg-javascript-devel] libjs-twitter-bootstrap-datepicker 1.3.1+dfsg1-1 MIGRATED to testing

2014-10-17 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the libjs-twitter-bootstrap-datepicker source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.0.0.1-1
  Current version:  1.3.1+dfsg1-1

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel


[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-htmlparser2 3.7.3-1 MIGRATED to testing

2014-10-17 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the node-htmlparser2 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: (not in testing)
  Current version:  3.7.3-1

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel


[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-commander_2.3.0-1_sourceupload.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2014-10-17 Thread Debian FTP Masters


Accepted:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 13:22:50 +0200
Source: node-commander
Binary: node-commander
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.3.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers 

Changed-By: Leo Iannacone 
Description:
 node-commander - Complete solution for Node.js command-line interfaces
Changes:
 node-commander (2.3.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Imported Upstream version 2.3.0
   * Bump Standard-Version 3.9.6
   * Do not install packages.json as doc
   * Add autopkgtest suite
Checksums-Sha1:
 fcc9ec724993a774782d6dbe932ef2c17ea4f6ba 2085 node-commander_2.3.0-1.dsc
 57379e6a18a5d5e25b1f0b87212f212a255d6c32 13844 node-commander_2.3.0.orig.tar.gz
 5ffea42f39bb548aa9356b3f9030a11239c3e02d 3404 
node-commander_2.3.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 d9470c09dbc42e526efb4a4397fdf028f30f2d53 14560 node-commander_2.3.0-1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 ed7ff85a8607a5e57ef14b864ac97097c0e97971afc4c63fc53b3d6e74987d21 2085 
node-commander_2.3.0-1.dsc
 56a5ccb98110385d2792fef86a19ca449e8bc8bc77ce791e672002d23e9b701d 13844 
node-commander_2.3.0.orig.tar.gz
 9cfcb7fad955d4174a81e8454a317e13748b02a01edb4a3b49d6bdb3b1867d11 3404 
node-commander_2.3.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 2317c94fb43a7510c5f60b9c10a21200c37efc2a7c6ed2c999b5db366706f9c1 14560 
node-commander_2.3.0-1_all.deb
Files:
 203e1654cac9d2f773efae63630f5223 2085 web extra node-commander_2.3.0-1.dsc
 d8a4945e1ab87a84329a3d3f40538af3 13844 web extra 
node-commander_2.3.0.orig.tar.gz
 2d1fb6913f0b426f123b24cfe7f7fb53 3404 web extra 
node-commander_2.3.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 aff1b9dbf64b55eb1b4022380dc0a47e 14560 web extra node-commander_2.3.0-1_all.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
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=WpC4
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel


[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of node-commander_2.3.0-1_sourceupload.changes

2014-10-17 Thread Debian FTP Masters
node-commander_2.3.0-1_sourceupload.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  node-commander_2.3.0-1.dsc
  node-commander_2.3.0.orig.tar.gz
  node-commander_2.3.0-1.debian.tar.xz
  node-commander_2.3.0-1_all.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel


Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] can we use my fork of node-findit?

2014-10-17 Thread Jérémy Lal
Le jeudi 16 octobre 2014 à 14:17 -0700, Andrew Kelley a écrit :
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Jérémy Lal  wrote:
> 
> > > What should I do?
> >
> > Since both have same API, i'd add your patches as quilt patches to
> > node-findit that is already in debian and add a binary package
> > node-findit2 (symlinking /usr/lib/nodejs/findit to findit2).
> >
> > Or the reverse, change upstream and add binary node-findit to
> > node-findit2.
> 
> 
> What about this?
> 
> * Add patch as quilt patch to node-findit that is already in debian
> * When packaging other package updates that depend on findit2, patch them
> to depend on node-findit instead, since the patch provides the findit2 API
> and bug fixes.

I agree up to that point where you imply that findit2 has a different
API ? If that's the case then findit2 must be... findit2 !

Jérémy.




___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel