Re: post-review and Windows users
David, It is pretty simple to add a context menu item that will launch a command. The attached registry file will add a right-click menu item for folders in windows explorer that will launch a command window and run post-review selected folder. This obviously has several limitations as it is just for folders and is only useful for creating new reviews, not updating existing ones. I have to say this is not something I've used, just something that came to mind when I saw your post. The attached registry file is written on the assumption that post-review is in the path. -Manny On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:01 AM, David Allouche david.allou...@gmail.comwrote: On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 22:53, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: We would love this too, and we're hoping to get some student proposals from Summer of Code that would begin adding better integration on Windows (namely in IDEs, but some of this would likely require better hooks for post-review in Windows). In my opinion, the first Windows integration work should be integration with Explorer: it is ubiquitous, so it is the best bang for buck. It's possible that now, with post-review existing inside the rbtools package, we could add a flag for graphical output that would, using some standard toolkit, notify people of errors or successes, and then when installed on Windows it would register entries for hooking post-review up to the context menu. It probably wouldn't be a ton of work. The advantage of this is that it keeps the code in the same place, and it's possible to generate setup.exe files for a Python package. Sure. Having post-review packaged separately is certainly a step in the right direction. If you could file a feature request for this, it will help us track it. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=998 Cheers. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- pr.reg Description: Binary data
Re: Project Updates: Google Summer of Code, and new documentation
Christian, Thanks for the docs they're looking good. Now that there is an official doc set are you planning to accept 'bugs' against them? If so, will you be making a 'doc issue' template available when filing a bug? -Manny On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: Hi everyone. I thought I'd let everyone know about two major things that have happened this week. 1) We've been accepted as an organization for this year's Google Summer of Code. This is a yearly event provided by Google where students get a chance to work on various open source projects, and are paid for that work. This is a great opportunity to improve Review Board in interesting ways. We've already had a few student proposals, but would love to hear more. If you are a student or know a student (friend, family, past intern, etc.) who might be interested in being paid to work on Review Board for the summer, have them contact us! We're also providing free Review Board hosting to other open source projects involved in Summer of Code, so if you're working on such a project or know someone who is, there's information on this at http://www.review-board.org/summer-of-code/hosting/ For more information for students who want to work Summer of Code, see http://www.review-board.org/summer-of-code/2009/ 2) We have new documentation available! Our documentation in the past hasn't been as fleshed out as we would have liked, so I've spent the past couple of months working through this and assembling a manual for Review Board. There's a Users Guide, Administration Guide, FAQ, and Code Base documentation. There's still much to do in some of these (particularly the Users Guide and Code Base docs), but it's a definite improvement over what we've had. You can see the new docs at http://www.review-board.org/docs/ If you see anything missing, have something to recommend, or are confused by some part of the documentation, please file a bug and we'll try to get to it. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Any release plan ?
Chip, Will you be releasing a preview of the new GUI anytime soon so that can see what we'll be getting? Will the workflow be essentially the same? -Manny On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 6:39 PM, Christian Hammond [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Hi, To add some more detail on the plans here, I've been working the past few weeks on a large JavaScript UI rewrite for Review Board. The primary goal is to move from YUI/YUI-Ext to jQuery, which cleans up the code, fixes several bugs, and gives us a good platform for extension writers to use down the road. Along with this, we decided to improve the now almost 2 year old Review Board UI and fix a number of known usability problems with it. This new UI should make more sense and introduce a few new features, without forcing you to relearn a bunch of things. I'm nearing completion. Just a few more things to fix up and some unit tests for the UI to write in order to help test it cross-browser. Once that goes up for review, we're nearly ready to enter our alpha stage. Christian -- Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED] VMware, Inc. On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 2:52 PM, David Trowbridge [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: We've been working towards this. You can keep an eye on our plans at http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/wiki/Roadmap -David On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Elmo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, so Django 1.0 'official release, not alpha', has been released for over a month. That is the 'new official release' you where waiting for, right? Thanks On Oct 13, 2:40 am, Fabien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Now that django has a 1.0 version, do you have any plan toreleasea 1st stable version ? Quotinghttp://www.review-board.org/downloads/: Review Board is still in development, but is approaching an officialrelease. We'll be releasing once Django provides a new officialrelease. Thanks. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Poll: How will you be affected if we remove IE6 support?
Moving to IE 6 would be difficult, if not impossible. Also, we're looking at expanding the use of Review Board to other groups within our organization and removing IE6 support would definitely hamper that effort. Regards, Manny On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 12:27 AM, Christian Hammond [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Hi everyone. Due to the large amount of work required to keep IE6 compatibility, I've been considering dropping support and requiring IE7 and up. I'd like to get a feel as to how much this will affect people. If you work in a company where IE6 is the norm and upgrading to IE7 is not really an option or would be simply hard to do, I'd like to know. Please respond to me privately so we don't end up cluttering the list. Thanks, Christian -- Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED] VMware, Inc. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
