Hi Erik,
We're happy to accept patches for different SCM servers. Review Board
heavily relies on patches from contributors, and we'll pretty much tell you
if there's a reason we won't accept it (which generally falls into the
following categories: 1) the timing isn't right (should be an extension, for
example), 2) it's too specific to a particular setup, 3) it's not
implemented right (in which case we'll work with you on that).
Right now, we're in a feature freeze, so this won't go into 1.0. It can get
into the next release (probably 1.1) though.
Whenever you feel it's ready for inclusion, go ahead and post it up on
http://reviews.review-board.org/
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.review-board.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 9:04 PM, erikmack wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm preparing a patch to support Microsoft Team Foundation Server
> (TFS). The implementation supports one simple test case. I'll send
> something in after I've road-tested it a little more.
>
> Is there anything special I should consider, outside of your normal
> patch protocol? I don't want to be the guy dropping unsolicited code
> bombs.
>
> Thanks,
> Erik
> >
>
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
