Can I be added to the Wiki contributors group?

[Xavier Morera]

I mean for: https://wiki.apache.org/solr/FrontPage

My username is XavierMorera

Regards,
Xavier

-- 

*Xavier Morera*

Entrepreneur | Author & Trainer | Consultant | Developer & Scrum Master

*www.xaviermorera.com *

office:  (305) 600-4919

cel: +506 8849-8866

skype: xmorera
Twitter  | LinkedIn
 | Pluralsight Author

Re: Hierarchical faceting

[Alexandre Rafalovitch]

Would this approach be an answer?
https://lucidworks.com/blog/easy-hierarchical-faceting-and-display-with-solr-and-jquery-and-a-tiny-bit-of-python/

Regards,
   Alex.
Personal: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ and @arafalov
Solr resources and newsletter: http://www.solr-start.com/ and @solrstart
Solr popularizers community: https://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=6713853


On 16 November 2014 20:36, rashmy1  wrote:
> Thank you Evan and Oleg.
>
> This is exactly what I had implemented (Option 2).
> My issue is
>
> Evan Pease wrote
>> Then, in your Solr query, you can simply add:
>>
>> &facet=true
>> &facet.field=category
>>
>> You should see a facet that contains each level of the taxonomy with
>> counts.
>
> As you mentioned, we get each level of the taxonomy while I'd like to do
> drill down query.
>
> For example, if the Solr query was:
> &facet=true
> &facet.field=category
>
> My intention is to get just the first level as results:
> NonFic (8)
> Fic (3)
>
> Then if user clicks on 'NonFic' in UI, we want to fetch only the next
> immediate level:
> NonFic
> Hist (2)
> Sci (6)
>
> Then if user clicks on 'Sci' in UI, we want to fetch only the next immediate
> level:
> NonFic
> Sci
> Phy(4)
> Chem(1)
> Math(1)
>
> Myabe I can still use PathHierarchyTokenizer, but could you let me know how
> to form my facet query to fetch the results one level at a time.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Hierarchical-faceting-tp4169263p4169413.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Hierarchical faceting

[rashmy1]

Thank you Evan and Oleg.

This is exactly what I had implemented (Option 2).
My issue is 

Evan Pease wrote
> Then, in your Solr query, you can simply add:
> 
> &facet=true
> &facet.field=category
> 
> You should see a facet that contains each level of the taxonomy with
> counts.

As you mentioned, we get each level of the taxonomy while I'd like to do
drill down query.

For example, if the Solr query was:
&facet=true
&facet.field=category

My intention is to get just the first level as results:
NonFic (8)
Fic (3)

Then if user clicks on 'NonFic' in UI, we want to fetch only the next
immediate level:
NonFic
Hist (2)
Sci (6)

Then if user clicks on 'Sci' in UI, we want to fetch only the next immediate
level:
NonFic
Sci
Phy(4)
Chem(1)
Math(1)

Myabe I can still use PathHierarchyTokenizer, but could you let me know how
to form my facet query to fetch the results one level at a time.

Thanks!




--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Hierarchical-faceting-tp4169263p4169413.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Is it possible to facet on date fields and aggregate by day/month/year?

[Erick Erickson]

Look at the range faceting stuff. It lets you
specify a start date, end date and gap. And
you can get results for multiple instances
on the same field.

So you could specify one set of parameters
for date_f where the gap was +1MONTH
and another on date_f was +1YEAR.

See:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Faceting#Faceting-RangeFaceting

Best,
Erick

On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 12:38 AM, adfel70  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If my data includes:
> doc1: date_f: 2014-05-01T00:00:00Z
> doc2: date_f: 2014-05-02T00:00:00Z
> doc2: date_f: 2014-06-01T00:00:00Z
> doc2: date_f: 2014-07-01T00:00:00Z
>
> then I can facet on month(date_f) and get
> 05(2)
> 06(1)
> 07(1)
> or facet on year(date_f) and get
> 2014(4)
>
>
> Is it supported?
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-facet-on-date-fields-and-aggregate-by-day-month-year-tp4169366.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: solr IRC

[Shawn Heisey]

On 11/15/2014 10:12 PM, Anurag Sharma wrote:
> Thanks a lot Shawn for the detailed explanation. The wiki is also very
> helpful. Any recommended client like pidgin, adium etc. especially for
> windows.

The last time I used IRC from a Windows machine (which was a long time
ago), I used mIRC.  These days I use irssi inside screen on a Linux machine.

Thanks,
Shawn

Re: fl rename of unique key in solrcloud

[Suchi Amalapurapu]

Thx Jeon. That worked. Now both the fields are returned in the response.
Its a bit inefficient but works neverthless.
Suchi

On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Jeon Woosung 
wrote:

> I guess that I caused by shard which return renamed field.
>
> following code is source code of solr 4.6
> 
> ===
> 986:if ((sreq.purpose & ShardRequest.PURPOSE_GET_FIELDS) != 0) {
> 987:  boolean returnScores = (rb.getFieldFlags() &
> SolrIndexSearcher.GET_SCORES) != 0;
> 988:
> 989:  assert(sreq.responses.size() == 1);
> 990:  ShardResponse srsp = sreq.responses.get(0);
> 991:  SolrDocumentList docs =
> (SolrDocumentList)srsp.getSolrResponse().getResponse().get("response");
> 992:
> 993:  String keyFieldName =
> rb.req.getSchema().getUniqueKeyField().getName();
> 994:  boolean removeKeyField =
> !rb.rsp.getReturnFields().wantsField(keyFieldName);
> 995:
> 996:  for (SolrDocument doc : docs) {
> 997:Object id = doc.getFieldValue(keyFieldName);
> 998:ShardDoc sdoc = rb.resultIds.get(id.toString());
>
> 
>
> If each shard return renamed field name instead of keyFieldName(UniqueKey),
> "id" of 998 line could be null. Because the doc of 996 line wouldn't have
> "keyFieldName"
>
>
> So if you are urgent or you can not wait for patch, you can add unique
> field like this.
> eg) http://
> /solr//select?q=dress&fl=a1:p1&fl=p1
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Garth Grimm <
> garthgr...@averyranchconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6744 created.
> >
> > And hopefully correctly, since that’s my first.
> > On Nov 15, 2014, at 9:12 AM, Garth Grimm <
> > garthgr...@averyranchconsulting.com > garthgr...@averyranchconsulting.com>> wrote:
> >
> > I see the same issue on 4.10.1.
> >
> > I’ll open a JIRA if I don’t see one.
> >
> > I guess the best immediate work around is to copy the unique field, and
> > use that field for renaming?
> > On Nov 15, 2014, at 3:18 AM, Suchi Amalapurapu  > > wrote:
> >
> > Solr version:4.6.1
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Jeon Woosung  > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > Could you let me know version of the solr?
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 5:05 AM, Suchi Amalapurapu  > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> > Getting the following exception when using fl renaming with unique key in
> > the schema.
> > http:///solr//select?q=dress&fl=a1:p1
> >
> > where p1 is the unique key for 
> > For collections with single shard, this works flawlessly but results in
> > the
> > following exception in case of multiple shards.
> >
> > How do we fix this? Stack trace below.
> > Suchi
> >
> > error": {"trace": "java.lang.NullPointerException\n\tat
> >
> >
> >
> >
> org.apache.solr.handler.component.QueryComponent.returnFields(QueryComponent.java:998)\n\tat
> >
> >
> >
> >
> org.apache.solr.handler.component.QueryComponent.handleRegularResponses(QueryComponent.java:653)\n\tat
> >
> >
> >
> >
> org.apache.solr.handler.component.QueryComponent.handleResponses(QueryComponent.java:628)\n\tat
> >
> >
> >
> >
> org.apache.solr.handler.component.SearchHandler.handleRequestBody(SearchHandler.java:311)\n\tat
> >
> >
> >
> >
> org.apache.solr.handler.RequestHandlerBase.handleRequest(RequestHandlerBase.java:135)\n\tat
> > org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.execute(SolrCore.java:1859)\n\tat
> >
> >
> >
> >
> org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.execute(SolrDispatchFilter.java:721)\n\tat
> >
> >
> >
> >
> org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.doFilter(SolrDispatchFilter.java:417)\n\tat
> >
> >
> >
> >
> org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.doFilter(SolrDispatchFilter.java:201)\n\tat
> >
> >
> >
> >
> org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1419)\n\tat
> >
> >
> >
> >
> org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doHandle(ServletHandler.java:455)\n\tat
> >
> >
> >
> >
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:137)\n\tat
> >
> >
> >
> >
> org.eclipse.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:557)\n\tat
> >
> >
> >
> >
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doHandle(SessionHandler.java:231)\n\tat
> >
> >
> >
> >
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doHandle(ContextHandler.java:1075)\n\tat
> >
> >
> >
> >
> org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doScope(ServletHandler.java:384)\n\tat
> >
> >
> >
> >
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doScope(SessionHandler.java:193)\n\tat
> >
> >
> >
> >
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doScope(ContextHandler.java:1009)\n\tat
> >
> >
> >
> >
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:135)\n\tat
> >
> >
> >
> >
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandlerCol

Is it possible to facet on date fields and aggregate by day/month/year?

[adfel70]

Hi,

If my data includes:
doc1: date_f: 2014-05-01T00:00:00Z
doc2: date_f: 2014-05-02T00:00:00Z
doc2: date_f: 2014-06-01T00:00:00Z
doc2: date_f: 2014-07-01T00:00:00Z

then I can facet on month(date_f) and get
05(2)
06(1)
07(1)
or facet on year(date_f) and get 
2014(4)


Is it supported?




--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-facet-on-date-fields-and-aggregate-by-day-month-year-tp4169366.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.