[freenet-support] Why is the main Download Freenet 0.7 when it's

[Anonymous Freenet User]

On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland  wrote:
>!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!!
>Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
>   protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg"
>Content-Disposition: inline
>
>
>--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Disposition: inline
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>"Stable enough that updates only come a couple of times a year" ?
>
>That will never happen, not if I have anything to do with it, certainly
>not before 1.0.
>
>0.5 had loads of updates. Granted there were periods when it had fewer
>updates because people were concentrating on other things e.g.
>simulations.
>
>Now, should we try to only put out one new build number a week, or every
>few days? Probably, but only after 0.7 has entered the beta phase.

Ok, I should rephrase  

"until 0.7's stability equals or exceeds that of 0.5 *and* open-net is
activated"



>On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 09:54:31AM -, Anonymous Freenet User wrote:
>>=20
>> I agree.  I am willing to experiment with 0.7, but until it is stable
>> enough that updates only come a couple of times a year and open-net is
>> activated, I will be keeping my main content on 0.5
>--=20
>Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
>Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
>ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
>
>--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg
>Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
>Content-Description: Digital signature
>Content-Disposition: inline
>
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
>Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
>
>iD8DBQFEy4ygOHFIJVywduQRAk5mAKCKvmAG7uJMyLy5nBFc8LFXH9I8SwCfWHRu
>E4+zIwH4Bzwg9qp34vun8xU=
>=J7A9
>-END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
>--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg--
>
>___
>Support mailing list
>Support at freenetproject.org
>http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
>Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
>Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

[freenet-support] Why is the main Download Freenet 0.7 when it's

[Matthew Toseland]

"Stable enough that updates only come a couple of times a year" ?

That will never happen, not if I have anything to do with it, certainly
not before 1.0.

0.5 had loads of updates. Granted there were periods when it had fewer
updates because people were concentrating on other things e.g.
simulations.

Now, should we try to only put out one new build number a week, or every
few days? Probably, but only after 0.7 has entered the beta phase.

On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 09:54:31AM -, Anonymous Freenet User wrote:
> 
> I agree.  I am willing to experiment with 0.7, but until it is stable
> enough that updates only come a couple of times a year and open-net is
> activated, I will be keeping my main content on 0.5
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: 

[freenet-support] Why is the main Download Freenet 0.7 when it's

[Anonymous Freenet User]

On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Scruple Scruple  wrote:
>
>  Why is alpha software Freenet 0.7 being pushed onto users on the
>download page? I think it better that the stable Freenet 0.5 be featured
>as the preferred download.
> 
> http://freenet.sourceforge.net/download.html
> 
> Until Freenet 0.7 has open-net I do not think it is ready to be treated
>in favor of 0.5. New users are not sticking around on 0.7 because there
>are few content, finding peers harder with darknet along other problems,
>bugs and continual updates.
>
>Pushing 0.7 onto new users in spite of it lack of maturity is in poor form.
>  P.S. On a related topic of reports & complains about a lack of content
>on Freenet 0.7, I may have an explanation for that. I am in touch with a
>number of major Freenet (0.5) content providers since I run the largest
>media & content index site on Freenet 0.5 (FreeNova). Many users,
>including my self, are staying with 0.5 until 0.7 proves itself.
> 
> Scruple
>  

I agree.  I am willing to experiment with 0.7, but until it is stable
enough that updates only come a couple of times a year and open-net is
activated, I will be keeping my main content on 0.5

Re: [freenet-support] Why is the main Download Freenet 0.7 when it's

[Anonymous Freenet User]

On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Scruple Scruple [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Why is alpha software Freenet 0.7 being pushed onto users on the
download page? I think it better that the stable Freenet 0.5 be featured
as the preferred download.
 
 http://freenet.sourceforge.net/download.html
 
 Until Freenet 0.7 has open-net I do not think it is ready to be treated
in favor of 0.5. New users are not sticking around on 0.7 because there
are few content, finding peers harder with darknet along other problems,
bugs and continual updates.

Pushing 0.7 onto new users in spite of it lack of maturity is in poor form.
  P.S. On a related topic of reports  complains about a lack of content
on Freenet 0.7, I may have an explanation for that. I am in touch with a
number of major Freenet (0.5) content providers since I run the largest
media  content index site on Freenet 0.5 (FreeNova). Many users,
including my self, are staying with 0.5 until 0.7 proves itself.
 
 Scruple
  

I agree.  I am willing to experiment with 0.7, but until it is stable
enough that updates only come a couple of times a year and open-net is
activated, I will be keeping my main content on 0.5




___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] Why is the main Download Freenet 0.7 when it's

[Anonymous Freenet User]

On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!!
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
   protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg
Content-Disposition: inline


--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Stable enough that updates only come a couple of times a year ?

That will never happen, not if I have anything to do with it, certainly
not before 1.0.

0.5 had loads of updates. Granted there were periods when it had fewer
updates because people were concentrating on other things e.g.
simulations.

Now, should we try to only put out one new build number a week, or every
few days? Probably, but only after 0.7 has entered the beta phase.

Ok, I should rephrase  

until 0.7's stability equals or exceeds that of 0.5 *and* open-net is
activated



On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 09:54:31AM -, Anonymous Freenet User wrote:
=20
 I agree.  I am willing to experiment with 0.7, but until it is stable
 enough that updates only come a couple of times a year and open-net is
 activated, I will be keeping my main content on 0.5
--=20
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.

--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEy4ygOHFIJVywduQRAk5mAKCKvmAG7uJMyLy5nBFc8LFXH9I8SwCfWHRu
E4+zIwH4Bzwg9qp34vun8xU=
=J7A9
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg--

___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]





___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] Why is the main Download Freenet 0.7 when it's Alpha?

[Scruple Scruple]

  Why is alpha software Freenet 0.7 being pushed onto users on the download 
page? I think it better that the stable Freenet 0.5 be featured as the 
preferred download.

 http://freenet.sourceforge.net/download.html

 Until Freenet 0.7 has open-net I do not think it is ready to be treated in 
favor of 0.5. New users are not sticking around on 0.7 because there are few 
content, finding peers harder with darknet along other problems, bugs and 
continual updates.

Pushing 0.7 onto new users in spite of it lack of maturity is in poor form.
  P.S. On a related topic of reports & complains about a lack of content on 
Freenet 0.7, I may have an explanation for that. I am in touch with a number of 
major Freenet (0.5) content providers since I run the largest media & content 
index site on Freenet 0.5 (FreeNova). Many users, including my self, are 
staying with 0.5 until 0.7 proves itself.

 Scruple


-
Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls.  Great rates 
starting at 1?/min.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: