Re: [Tagging] cleanup broken import fix

2014-05-28 Thread Dan S
If I understand right you should probably ask imports@ not tagging@
about making bulk edits, even if they're to fix bulk edits!

Best
Dan


2014-05-28 21:53 GMT+01:00 malenki o...@malenki.ch:
 Recently I found some 10.000 (one of two changesets contained 38k)
 objects tagged like this:¹
 | gnis:fcode=39004
 | natural=water
 | nhd:com_id=146082168
 | nhd:fdate=Mon Mar 06 00:00:00 PST 2006
 | nhd:reach_code=18030012024071
 | source=NHD
 | water=lake;pond

 They were imported by nmixter and in v1 were tagged like this:
 | ele=0.0
 | gnis:fcode=39004
 | gnis:ftype=LakePond
 | natural=water
 | nhd:com_id=146082168
 | nhd:fdate=Mon Mar 06 00:00:00 PST 2006
 | nhd:reach_code=18030012024071
 | source=NHD

 WorstFixer removed ele 0.0 and honoured his name by converting
 gnis:ftype=LakePond to
 water=lake;pond

 Has anyone objections for removing water=lake;pond and also the other
 proprietary data?
 I'd think
 | natural=water
 and
 | source=NHD
 (and in case it is there)
 intermittent=yes
 should be sufficient

 See also: https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2237

 Regards
 Thomas

 ¹ example: https://www.osm.org/way/73966050/history

 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] cleanup broken import fix

2014-05-28 Thread malenki
Dan S wrote on Wed, 28 May 2014 21:57:46 +0100:

If I understand right you should probably ask imports@ not tagging@
about making bulk edits, even if they're to fix bulk edits!

I think you are right.

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging