Re: [OSM-talk] Is this legal to what philly.com is doing?

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> On 23. Feb 2018, at 15:40, Paul Norman  wrote:
> 
> Yes. They need to either be attributing OSM, or if the image is taken from an 
> osm.org render, attributing OSM and licensing it CC BY-SA.



indeed they can sell the images, but they have to attribute and mention the 
license (and can’t claim copyright over osm cartography), which they apparently 
don’t do correctly at the moment (on the linked page there’s their copyright 
but not osm’s).

Cheers,
Martin 


___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Is this legal to what philly.com is doing?

[Paul Norman]

On 2/22/2018 8:03 PM, James Mast wrote:

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/politics/will-republicans-impeach-pennsylvania-supreme-court-justices-20180222.html

(ignore what the article is about)


Just happen to see a thumbnail and clicked on the article since I 
noticed the OSM base map.  Nowhere that I can find does it give credit 
to OSM for the use of it.



Now, the part to where I was curious if this was legal (sans the lack 
of credit), is that they are 'selling' the uploaded image.  Is that 
allowed currently under the license that OSM has?





Yes. They need to either be attributing OSM, or if the image is taken 
from an osm.org render, attributing OSM and licensing it CC BY-SA.


A key feature of open licenses is that they do not discriminate by field 
of use, which includes commercial use. Someone who purchased the image 
can either reuse the underlying data under the ODbL, or, in the case of 
a CC BY-SA image, also reuse the image.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Is this legal to what philly.com is doing?

[James]

specifically:
http://philly.reprintmint.com/006-default.html?src=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.philly.com%2Fimages%2F250*250%2Fdixon-390888-f-wp-content-uploads-2018-02-dixon-384405-e-wp-content-uploads-2018-02-new-map-1200x800.png=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.philly.com%2Fimages%2Fdixon-390888-f-wp-content-uploads-2018-02-dixon-384405-e-wp-content-uploads-2018-02-new-map-1200x800.png=006=dixon-384405-e-wp-content-uploads-2018-02-new-map=The%20new%20congressional%20map%20released%20Monday%20by%20the%20Pennsylvania%20Supreme%20Court
.

On Feb 22, 2018 11:06 PM, "James Mast"  wrote:

> http://www.philly.com/philly/news/politics/will-republicans-impeach-
> pennsylvania-supreme-court-justices-20180222.html
>
> (ignore what the article is about)
>
>
> Just happen to see a thumbnail and clicked on the article since I noticed
> the OSM base map.  Nowhere that I can find does it give credit to OSM for
> the use of it.
>
>
> Now, the part to where I was curious if this was legal (sans the lack of
> credit), is that they are 'selling' the uploaded image.  Is that allowed
> currently under the license that OSM has?
>
>
> Just thought I'd throw this out there for somebody more experienced in
> this sector.
>
>
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[OSM-talk] Is this legal to what philly.com is doing?

[James Mast]

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/politics/will-republicans-impeach-pennsylvania-supreme-court-justices-20180222.html


(ignore what the article is about)


Just happen to see a thumbnail and clicked on the article since I noticed the 
OSM base map.  Nowhere that I can find does it give credit to OSM for the use 
of it.


Now, the part to where I was curious if this was legal (sans the lack of 
credit), is that they are 'selling' the uploaded image.  Is that allowed 
currently under the license that OSM has?


Just thought I'd throw this out there for somebody more experienced in this 
sector.

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk