[Unattended] win2ksp4-updates possible bug

2006-05-17 Thread Andreas Heinlein
Hello,

the script win2ksp4-updates.bat (current CVS HEAD) has a bug concerning
the update from KB904706. It exists in two different versions, one for
DirectX 8 and one for DirectX 9. The update script tries to install the
version for DirectX 8, which fails because DirectX 9 was already
installed earlier in the script. I have corrected this for me like this:

:: Security Update for DirectX 9 for Windows 2000 (KB904706)
::
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=FEDC7212-27B8-4993-9965-53E9298DB386
::
URL|DEU|http://download.microsoft.com/download/2/9/a/29a573e0-750c-42d7-9fb0-aed5c7786c7a/Windows2000-KB904706-DX9-x86-DEU.exe|updates/win2ksp4/windows2000-kb904706-dx9-x86-deu.exe
::
URL|ENU|http://download.microsoft.com/download/a/8/f/a8fed1de-6519-4c4e-b67f-f6cb477a74bf/Windows2000-KB904706-DX9-x86-ENU.exe|updates/win2ksp4/windows2000-kb904706-dx9-x86-enu.exe
todo.pl .reboot-on 194
%Z%\updates\win2ksp4\Windows2000-KB904706-DX9-x86-%WINLANG%.exe /passive
/n /norestart

Maybe someone could take the time to find out the download locations for
other languages and update the script.

Thank you!


---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642
___
unattended-info mailing list
unattended-info@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-info


[Unattended] Re: Nameserver configuration under Linux / *ix

2006-05-17 Thread Markus Mahlberg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello List!

Works fine as described below!

Kind Regards,

Markus

[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
 Hello List!
 
 There should be is easier solution to the nameserver issue than
 described in the docs.
 First, you have to add a line to the [global] section of the smb.conf of
 the server where the unattended install directory is hosted
 
 snip
 
 netbios aliases = ntinstall
 
 /snip
 
 Next, you have to edit your lmhosts file on your domain master browser
 pointing to the hosting server, e.g.
 
 snip
 
 192.168.0.1 NTINSTALL
 
 /snip
 
 After a restart of both nmbd and smbd the ntinstall server should be
 found in the local net without dealing with DNS entries or security issues.
 
 So much for the theory... ;)
 
 Since I am new to unattended I will test this and will give a detailed
 report.
 
 Kind Regards,
 
 Markus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFEauJTF8dnMjs8INwRAopfAJ0Qf7xROYiyUu5GbvdP5v5XLDKZmQCfdSzM
xtJJ/2GMfzbqoG4Dhy2wTCw=
=0JGw
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
begin:vcard
fn:Markus Mahlberg
n:Mahlberg;Markus
org:nunet AG
adr;quoted-printable:;;Carlswerkstr. 11-13;K=C3=B6ln;NRW;51063;Deutschland
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Network Operations
tel;work:+49 (0) 221 / 6086901
tel;fax:+49 (0) 221 / 16033-31
tel;cell:+49 (0) 173 / 7043112
url:http://www.nunet.de
version:2.1
end:vcard



Re: [Unattended] Issues with getting Unattended to work with Dell machines.

2006-05-17 Thread Ken Doyle
Hi Steve,   I have used the unattended installation with Dell Machines (on about 10 optiplex gx620's -- but no laptops).   However, we used a volume-licensed copy of WindowsXP for the installation, not the Dell/restore version of windows. Which 4 files are different between the two?   Also, if you are doing the OEM install, you need to use the product key that shipped with that install media, not the keys off the side of the dell machine.  Best,  Ken D.Steven Bambling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  Hi All,I am trying to get unattended working I have everything installed and samba setup correctly. I then upload the I386 folder off of an OEM hologram cd ( Also a dell restore CD). When I use the
 Linux boot disk I fill in the correct areas, then the unattended process starts...or seems to. If I use an OEM I386 folder windows installs but it will not register windows with Microsoft. If I use the Dell restore CD ( only 4 files difference) then during the windows setup it can't find all the files needed to complete the install.Does anyone use Unattended will Dell Machines both Laptop and Desktop and the Windows Product Keys that are on the side of the cases. Any helpful hints or experiences that you have went through would be great!Thanks,STEVE---Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easierDownload IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache
 Geronimohttp://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642___unattended-info mailing listunattended-info@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-info

Re: [Unattended] DriverPacks.net

2006-05-17 Thread Steffen Kaiser

On Sat, 29 Apr 2006, arboreal wrote:


I'll give more details below, but the practical upshots are:
- I reckon Bashrat's DriverPacks are not useable with Unattended by default.


OK, it's long ago, but anyway.

In http://www2.inf.fh-bonn-rhein-sieg.de/~skaise2a/ska/prepOEM.zip there 
are two scripts:


combine takes a hierarchie of folders and merges its content into 
another one effectively flattening the hierarchie. I've updated the script 
with the non-intuitive hierarchie naming of the driver pack and had to 
make some guesses, that are probably wrong. E.g. why some dirs of drivers 
are located as subdirs of ones already merged together.


After flattening, there are some folders left with _no_ .INF file in it.

The V6034 Driverpacks are flattened into 28 individual directories.

Note: It does not help for mass storage drivers.

mkRenameTXT invoked in, e.g., $oem$/$1 it will generate the $$RENAME.TXT 
file setup will use to rename the files back into long filenames. It uses 
temp files in each directory, hence, you can run it multiple times on the 
same hierarchie without problems.


Bye,

--
Steffen Kaiser


---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642
___
unattended-info mailing list
unattended-info@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-info


[Unattended] Problems with parted

2006-05-17 Thread Steffen Kaiser

Hello,

I have serious problems with the use of parted in unatteded Linux boot 
disk.


Usually I install unattended on pre-partitioned hard disks, either by a 
previous version of Windows or using sfdisk (our Linux deployment usually 
runs before the Windows deployment :-) .


However, when I select, for instance, to use all the disk in unattended, 
parted generates an invalid partition tables -- in the eye of Partition 
Magic, which refuses to run at all then. Same for Win98 fdisk. Linux can 
access the partition with no problem, however, today I noticed that parted 
created a partition without a lba flag, whereas the Win98 fdisk does. 
Also, the Win98 fdisk partition started at, what parted displays as 
32KB, whereas parted uses a start sector of 0.


I have this problem on more than one computer with different Boards and 
HDs, e.g. a Dell, an IBM, some nonames using ASUS and Gigabyte boards.


Also, when I order parted to create a fat32 file system on a partition 
(e.g. mkfs 4 fat32), and does not format the partition in DOSemu, 
winnt.exe dies with a division by zero right after it copied 100% of the 
files (some secs before the reboot). -- No issue as to format in DOSemu is 
no timing problem, I just wanted to point this out.


Also, is there a way to have unattended mark an already existing partion 
as target? Because if the partion is formatted as NTFS, DOSemu does not 
seem to use it, regardless if format is actived.
-- That way I noticed above behaviour, as I thought I can skip the DOS 
based format, when I invoke parted mkfs anyway.


Would it be beneficial to drop parted and use sfdisk instead?
IMHO it offers more fine grained control over the partition tables, e.g. 
which slot to use and direct manipulation of partition ID.


Bye,

--
Steffen Kaiser


---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642
___
unattended-info mailing list
unattended-info@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-info


Re: [Unattended] Problems with parted

2006-05-17 Thread Andreas Heinlein
Hello,

which version of the boot media (CD/Disk/TFTP-Image) are you using? I'm
having the same problems since I recompiled (with customized paths) the
boot cd from CVS two weeks ago (the current stable 4.6 wouldn't compile,
but I don't remember exactly what the problem was right now). With the
stable 4.6 release (and entering the paths manually), this does not occur.
Creating the partition manually with parted works. I noticed something
similar like you: choosing one of the automatic partitioning schemes
(like use all disk) makes parted create a primary fat32 partition from
0 to 4000MB. However, starting parted manually and creating a partition
with mkpartfs primary fat32 0% 4GB creates a partition from 32KB to
3997MB, and this works.
So it looks to me the problem is not with parted, but with the way it's
invoked.

Bye,
Andreas

Steffen Kaiser schrieb:
 Hello,

 I have serious problems with the use of parted in unatteded Linux boot
 disk.

 Usually I install unattended on pre-partitioned hard disks, either by
 a previous version of Windows or using sfdisk (our Linux deployment
 usually runs before the Windows deployment :-) .

 However, when I select, for instance, to use all the disk in
 unattended, parted generates an invalid partition tables -- in the eye
 of Partition Magic, which refuses to run at all then. Same for Win98
 fdisk. Linux can access the partition with no problem, however, today
 I noticed that parted created a partition without a lba flag,
 whereas the Win98 fdisk does. Also, the Win98 fdisk partition started
 at, what parted displays as 32KB, whereas parted uses a start sector
 of 0.

 I have this problem on more than one computer with different Boards
 and HDs, e.g. a Dell, an IBM, some nonames using ASUS and Gigabyte
 boards.

 Also, when I order parted to create a fat32 file system on a partition
 (e.g. mkfs 4 fat32), and does not format the partition in DOSemu,
 winnt.exe dies with a division by zero right after it copied 100% of
 the files (some secs before the reboot). -- No issue as to format in
 DOSemu is no timing problem, I just wanted to point this out.

 Also, is there a way to have unattended mark an already existing
 partion as target? Because if the partion is formatted as NTFS, DOSemu
 does not seem to use it, regardless if format is actived.
 -- That way I noticed above behaviour, as I thought I can skip the
 DOS based format, when I invoke parted mkfs anyway.

 Would it be beneficial to drop parted and use sfdisk instead?
 IMHO it offers more fine grained control over the partition tables,
 e.g. which slot to use and direct manipulation of partition ID.

 Bye,




---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642
___
unattended-info mailing list
unattended-info@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-info


Re: [Unattended] Issues with getting Unattended to work with Dell machines.

2006-05-17 Thread IT Support
Thanks for the reply Ken.  Does anyone if know its possible to use the 
CD Keys on the side of the Dell Box and how I would go about doing 
that.  Also the Dell Restore CD has a CD key installed in it.  This is 
what the Dell boxes use to register windows I assume. Does anyone know 
how I might be able to go about using that key of if it is  possible


STEVE

Ken Doyle wrote:

Hi Steve,
  I have used the unattended installation with Dell Machines (on about 
10 optiplex gx620's -- but no laptops).
  However, we used a volume-licensed copy of WindowsXP for the 
installation, not the Dell/restore version of windows.  Which 4 files 
are different between the two? 
  Also, if you are doing the OEM install, you need to use the product 
key that shipped with that install media, not the keys off the side of 
the dell machine.

Best,
Ken D.
 


*/Steven Bambling [EMAIL PROTECTED]/* wrote:

Hi All,

I am trying to get unattended working I have everything installed and
samba setup correctly. I then upload the I386 folder off of an OEM
hologram cd ( Also a dell restore CD). When I use the Linux boot
disk I
fill in the correct areas, then the unattended process starts...or
seems
to. If I use an OEM I386 folder windows installs but it will not
register windows with Microsoft. If I use the Dell restore CD (
only 4
files difference) then during the windows setup it can't find all the
files needed to complete the install.

Does anyone use Unattended will Dell Machines both Laptop and Desktop
and the Windows Product Keys that are on the side of the cases. Any
helpful hints or experiences that you have went through would be
great!

Thanks,
STEVE


---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services,
security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your
job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache
Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642
___
unattended-info mailing list
unattended-info@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-info






---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642
___
unattended-info mailing list
unattended-info@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-info


Re: [Unattended] Issues with getting Unattended to work with Dell machines.

2006-05-17 Thread Matt_Fries

You need to match the type of media with the type of product key that you are using to install Windows XP.

If you use a Volume Licensed edition of Windows XP Professional, then you need to use a Volume License Product key. The Volume Licensed edition will not ask you to Activate windows ever. 

If you use an OEM edition of Windows XP (Sometimes called a System Builder edition), then you need to use a System Builder Key (usually on a sticker on the side of the case). Unattended will install the OS for you, but it does not automatically Activate windows. You can use the OS as much as you want without activating, but you must activate it within a set sime period, or the OS will not do anything else until you do activate it.

There is also the Retail edition which will probably ask you to activate. I use the volume edition just because I don't want to have to deal with activation.







IT Support [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
05/17/2006 01:09 PM


To:unattended-info@lists.sourceforge.net
cc:
Subject:Re: [Unattended] Issues with getting Unattended to work with Dell machines.


Thanks for the reply Ken. Does anyone if know its possible to use the 
CD Keys on the side of the Dell Box and how I would go about doing 
that. Also the Dell Restore CD has a CD key installed in it. This is 
what the Dell boxes use to register windows I assume. Does anyone know 
how I might be able to go about using that key of if it is possible

STEVE

Ken Doyle wrote:
 Hi Steve,
  I have used the unattended installation with Dell Machines (on about 
 10 optiplex gx620's -- but no laptops).
  However, we used a volume-licensed copy of WindowsXP for the 
 installation, not the Dell/restore version of windows. Which 4 files 
 are different between the two? 
  Also, if you are doing the OEM install, you need to use the product 
 key that shipped with that install media, not the keys off the side of 
 the dell machine.
 Best,
 Ken D.
 

 */Steven Bambling [EMAIL PROTECTED]/* wrote:

   Hi All,

   I am trying to get unattended working I have everything installed and
   samba setup correctly. I then upload the I386 folder off of an OEM
   hologram cd ( Also a dell restore CD). When I use the Linux boot
   disk I
   fill in the correct areas, then the unattended process starts...or
   seems
   to. If I use an OEM I386 folder windows installs but it will not
   register windows with Microsoft. If I use the Dell restore CD (
   only 4
   files difference) then during the windows setup it can't find all the
   files needed to complete the install.

   Does anyone use Unattended will Dell Machines both Laptop and Desktop
   and the Windows Product Keys that are on the side of the cases. Any
   helpful hints or experiences that you have went through would be
   great!

   Thanks,
   STEVE


   ---
   Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services,
   security?
   Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your
   job easier
   Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache
   Geronimo
   http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642
   ___
   unattended-info mailing list
   unattended-info@lists.sourceforge.net
   https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-info





---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642
___
unattended-info mailing list
unattended-info@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-info

NOTICE: The information contained in this email message, and any attachments accompanying this transmission, may be legally privileged and/or confidential and protected health information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) and/or entity identified above. The authorized recipient of this information is prohibited from disclosing this information to any other party unless required to do so by law or regulation and is required to protect the information after its stated need has been fulfilled. If you are not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, printing, copying, forwarding, or distributing of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately, by telephone or return email, to advise of wrongful receipt and confirm your understa
 nding of this Notice. Thank You.



Re: [Unattended] CVS 7-zip update

2006-05-17 Thread Eugene Kotlyarov

Hello

Adam Peart wrote:

Good news.  The new Sourceforge CVS server is up  running, and all the
changes are up-to-date, including the Windows updates that were posted
on the 13th.  You need to change the scripts  website to reflect the
new changes.  The site is
http://unattended.cvs.sourceforge.net/unattended/unattended/ etc, etc.

Also, I think the new 7zip release, 4.42, is the next non beta version.


Thank you, I've updated it in CVS


---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642
___
unattended-info mailing list
unattended-info@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-info


Re: [Unattended] win2ksp4-updates possible bug

2006-05-17 Thread Eugene Kotlyarov

Hello

Andreas Heinlein wrote:


the script win2ksp4-updates.bat (current CVS HEAD) has a bug concerning
the update from KB904706. It exists in two different versions, one for
DirectX 8 and one for DirectX 9. The update script tries to install the
version for DirectX 8, which fails because DirectX 9 was already
installed earlier in the script. I have corrected this for me like this:


Thank you. I've updated it in CVS


---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642
___
unattended-info mailing list
unattended-info@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-info