Re: Maximum memory that can be assigned to Tomcat on windows platform
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 07:28, choudh...@labware.com wrote: Hi , Is there any cap on maximum memory that can be assigned to tomcat on 32 bit Windows machines ? I have found out that even if we have 8GB memory in the server , can not assign more 1.4/1.5 GB to Tomcat . I also found this thread which reinforces what I have been seeing ? We are using Tomcat 7.0.19 . www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48793 In any event, a 32bit JVM (1.6, I don't know for lower VMs) cannot allocate more than 3 GB heap space. With so much RAM, why do you still use a 32bit OS and JVM is the question here. -- Francis Galiegue ONE2TEAM Ingénieur système Mob : +33 (0) 683 877 875 Tel : +33 (0) 178 945 552 f...@one2team.com 40 avenue Raymond Poincaré 75116 Paris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Maximum memory that can be assigned to Tomcat on windows platform
Den 30-11-2011 09:21, Francis GALIEGUE skrev: On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 07:28,choudh...@labware.com wrote: Hi , Is there any cap on maximum memory that can be assigned to tomcat on 32 bit Windows machines ? I have found out that even if we have 8GB memory in the server , can not assign more 1.4/1.5 GB to Tomcat . I also found this thread which reinforces what I have been seeing ? We are using Tomcat 7.0.19 . www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48793 In any event, a 32bit JVM (1.6, I don't know for lower VMs) cannot allocate more than 3 GB heap space. With so much RAM, why do you still use a 32bit OS and JVM is the question here. Another question to ask is, why do you have 8GB memory when running 32bit? That is just stupid since 32bit cannot address more than 4GB of memory no matter what you do. Any sysadmin should know that right? disclaimer: I'm not a sysadmin, if I'm wrong please teach me :) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Maximum memory that can be assigned to Tomcat on windows platform
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 09:37, Casper Wandahl Schmidt kalle.pri...@gmail.com wrote: [...] Another question to ask is, why do you have 8GB memory when running 32bit? That is just stupid since 32bit cannot address more than 4GB of memory no matter what you do. Any sysadmin should know that right? disclaimer: I'm not a sysadmin, if I'm wrong please teach me :) With PAE[1] you actually can address up to 2^36 RAM (therefore 64 GB). But not all OSes support that, and anyway the addressable memory at one time (and therefore max memory theoretically accessible to one process at any given moment) is still 2^32. [1] Physical Address Extension -- Francis Galiegue ONE2TEAM Ingénieur système Mob : +33 (0) 683 877 875 Tel : +33 (0) 178 945 552 f...@one2team.com 40 avenue Raymond Poincaré 75116 Paris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Maximum memory that can be assigned to Tomcat on windows platform
Hello , The question is not why I would use 32 bit JVM , the question is whether there is any maximum limit on memory for Tomcat and if yes why ? Regards, Subhrajyoti Mobile: +919830079545 Mail: choudh...@labware.com Web: www.labware.com LabWare LIMS Solutions - Results Count From: Francis GALIEGUE f...@one2team.com To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org Date: 11/30/2011 01:51 PM Subject:Re: Maximum memory that can be assigned to Tomcat on windows platform On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 07:28, choudh...@labware.com wrote: Hi , Is there any cap on maximum memory that can be assigned to tomcat on 32 bit Windows machines ? I have found out that even if we have 8GB memory in the server , can not assign more 1.4/1.5 GB to Tomcat . I also found this thread which reinforces what I have been seeing ? We are using Tomcat 7.0.19 . www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48793 In any event, a 32bit JVM (1.6, I don't know for lower VMs) cannot allocate more than 3 GB heap space. With so much RAM, why do you still use a 32bit OS and JVM is the question here. -- Francis Galiegue ONE2TEAM Ingénieur système Mob : +33 (0) 683 877 875 Tel : +33 (0) 178 945 552 f...@one2team.com 40 avenue Raymond Poincaré 75116 Paris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Tomcat 7 - New attribut aliases in the context configuration item
On 29/11/2011 17:47, Sylvain Goulmy wrote: Hi all, I'd like to know it is possible to have equivalent functionality to the extended document root provided by the WebSphere product. This feature allows you to define a location outside the webapp to make contribution without having to redeploy the application. This mechanism first checks if the resource is present in the application and if not will look for it in the directory extension. So the effect is that multiple physical directories must be searched for a given resource? I thought that the functionality provided by the new attribute aliases for the configuration item context would have a similar behavior, but I see another operation. First of all it is not possible to set an alias on the context '/', making it necessary to declare all the directories in which you want to make the contribution. Also when I set an alias for a directory present in my webapp, it becomes a priority and files in my webapp are no longer available. Do I understand correctly how this new attribute aliases has to be used ? The alias maps a given path to an external directory. Is it possible with Tomcat 7 to set up a mechanism similar to the extended document root of Websphere? Can you give an example of how you would like it to work? p -- [key:62590808] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Maximum memory that can be assigned to Tomcat on windows platform
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 11:44, choudh...@labware.com wrote: Hello , The question is not why I would use 32 bit JVM , the question is whether there is any maximum limit on memory for Tomcat and if yes why ? The question _is_ why you use a 32bit OS and JVM with 8 GB RAM. Tomcat is not limited in memory usage by itself, it is the JVM which limits what it can consume. In the best of cases (32bit Linux and 32bit Sun 1.6 JVM), you are limited to a 3 GB heap size. Use a 64bit OS and JVM. -- Francis Galiegue ONE2TEAM Ingénieur système Mob : +33 (0) 683 877 875 Tel : +33 (0) 178 945 552 f...@one2team.com 40 avenue Raymond Poincaré 75116 Paris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Maximum memory that can be assigned to Tomcat on windows platform
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:14:45 +0530, Choudhury wrote
Hello ,
The question is not why I would use 32 bit JVM , the
question is whether there is any maximum limit on memory for Tomcat
and if yes why ? Regards,
It depends on the windows version used actually. From what I remember this is
limited to maximum 2GB for user processes. The easiest way to test is, is with
a small app that shows some memory information like:
public class MaxMemory {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Runtime rt = Runtime.getRuntime();
long totalMem = rt.totalMemory();
long maxMem = rt.maxMemory();
long freeMem = rt.freeMemory();
double megs = 1048576.0;
System.out.println (Total Memory: + totalMem + ( +
(totalMem/megs) + MiB));
System.out.println (Max Memory:+ maxMem + ( + (maxMem/megs) +
MiB));
System.out.println (Free Memory: + freeMem + ( + (freeMem/megs)
+ MiB));
}
}
Try to run it with different options for the heap. I would be surprised if you
would get over 1600MB.
--
/(bb|[^b]{2})/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Changing session timeout for a webapp via JMX or internal Tomcat API?
Thanks Igor. I made a mistake though. I actually meant modifying web.xml and restarting the webapp. We want to find a way to change session timeouts - even for existing sessions - without doing a restart of the webapp. I know there's also a server-level session timeout in tomcat's /conf/web.xml but that would 1.affect all webapps (we only want to affect the older version - foo##001) and 2.it requires tomcat restart (we are trying to reduce downtime for users) Ellecer On Wednesday, November 30, 2011, Igor Cicimov icici...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Ellecer Valencia elle...@gmail.com wrote: Is there a way to change session timeouts in tomcat via JMX? I've only seen the operation called expireSession, but not one that can change the session timeout period. The only way I've found so far to modify session timeouts is by modifying web.xml and restarting Tomcat. However, in our intended usage, we don't want to restart Tomcat and kick out users. We're looking at using parallel deployment in Tomcat 7, and so we'll have a situation with foo##001 -- old version foo##002 -- new version What we want to do is decrease timeouts in foo##001, so that users move to foo##002 sooner and allow us to get rid of the old version. I've had a look at the Manager MBean and there's operations to get the existing session IDs and to expire individual sessions, but not to change their timeouts (unless I've gone blind and there was something there staring me in the face!). Is there any way - either another MBean in Tomcat or by accessing Tomcat API - to change the session timeouts for a webapp? Someone told me that Weblogic has this feature, so maybe it's not impossible to do it in Tomcat (just speculating) Ellecer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org Can't you just restart the application you are changing the timeout for? Why do you need to restart the whole server?
Re: Tomcat 7 - New attribut aliases in the context configuration item
So the effect is that multiple physical directories must be searched for a given resource? Correct. The alias maps a given path to an external directory. Ok, that's what i had understood. Can you give an example of how you would like it to work? Here is the description of the EDR (Extended Document Root) mecanism in Websphere : Let's assume i have the following application : - Webapps/ - MyApplication/ - images/ - css/ - META-INF/ - WEB-INF/ - index.html I can define an EDR directory in the configuration of my application so that the ressource i access are first retrieved from my application and then in the EDR directory if they don't exist in my application. - /.../.../.../.../EDR/ - images/ - index.html These directories are defined as extension of my application and another important thing is that i can also extend files which are at the root of my application (as index.html). After a few more test with Tomcat i understand that : - You cannot extend directory, if you define an external location which math an existing directory of your application, the ressources of your application become unreachable. - As the documentation say Using '/' as an aliasPath is not allowed., you cannot extend any ressource which is at the root of your application. Things seems clear for me now, please tell if i have missed something. Thank you in advance for your support. On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Pid p...@pidster.com wrote: On 29/11/2011 17:47, Sylvain Goulmy wrote: Hi all, I'd like to know it is possible to have equivalent functionality to the extended document root provided by the WebSphere product. This feature allows you to define a location outside the webapp to make contribution without having to redeploy the application. This mechanism first checks if the resource is present in the application and if not will look for it in the directory extension. So the effect is that multiple physical directories must be searched for a given resource? I thought that the functionality provided by the new attribute aliases for the configuration item context would have a similar behavior, but I see another operation. First of all it is not possible to set an alias on the context '/', making it necessary to declare all the directories in which you want to make the contribution. Also when I set an alias for a directory present in my webapp, it becomes a priority and files in my webapp are no longer available. Do I understand correctly how this new attribute aliases has to be used ? The alias maps a given path to an external directory. Is it possible with Tomcat 7 to set up a mechanism similar to the extended document root of Websphere? Can you give an example of how you would like it to work? p -- [key:62590808]
Logging
When running Tomcat 7.0.20 as a daemon, it doesn't appear to be writing the logs to the file until tomcat is stopped. Is there some way I can make tomcat dump the logs it's holding onto?
Tomcat 7 + exception while adding cookies
hi all, i am getting exception while adding cookies in response *Stack trace*: org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter service SEVERE: An exception or error occurred in the container during the request processing java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 8192 at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractOutputBuffer.write(AbstractOutputBuffer.java:522) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractOutputBuffer.write(AbstractOutputBuffer.java:429) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractOutputBuffer.sendHeader(AbstractOutputBuffer.java:395) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.prepareResponse(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:965) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.action(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:739) at org.apache.coyote.Response.action(Response.java:170) at org.apache.coyote.Response.sendHeaders(Response.java:350) at org.apache.catalina.connector.OutputBuffer.doFlush(OutputBuffer.java:315) at org.apache.catalina.connector.OutputBuffer.close(OutputBuffer.java:275) at org.apache.catalina.connector.Response.finishResponse(Response.java:501) at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:426) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:317) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:204) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$SocketProcessor.run(JIoEndpoint.java:311) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662) org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor endRequest SEVERE: Error finishing response java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException at java.lang.System.arraycopy(Native Method) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractOutputBuffer.write(AbstractOutputBuffer.java:491) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractOutputBuffer.sendStatus(AbstractOutputBuffer.java:331) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.prepareResponse(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:952) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.action(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:739) at org.apache.coyote.Response.action(Response.java:168) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractOutputBuffer.endRequest(AbstractOutputBuffer.java:308) at org.apache.coyote.http11.InternalOutputBuffer.endRequest(InternalOutputBuffer.java:160) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.endRequest(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:990) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:350) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:204) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$SocketProcessor.run(JIoEndpoint.java:311) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662) org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter service SEVERE: An exception or error occurred in the container during the request processing java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor endRequest SEVERE: Error finishing response java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException at java.lang.System.arraycopy(Native Method) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractOutputBuffer.write(AbstractOutputBuffer.java:491) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractOutputBuffer.sendStatus(AbstractOutputBuffer.java:331) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.prepareResponse(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:952) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.action(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:739) at org.apache.coyote.Response.action(Response.java:168) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractOutputBuffer.endRequest(AbstractOutputBuffer.java:308) at org.apache.coyote.http11.InternalOutputBuffer.endRequest(InternalOutputBuffer.java:160) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.endRequest(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:990) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:350) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:204) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:182) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$SocketProcessor.run(JIoEndpoint.java:311) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662) i am using Tomcat 7, Struts2.2.3.1, JDK 1.6 and STS IDE Thanks Regards, Debraj Mallick
Re: Logging
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 07:01 -0800, Thom Hehl wrote: When running Tomcat 7.0.20 as a daemon, it doesn't appear to be writing the logs to the file until tomcat is stopped. Is there some way I can make tomcat dump the logs it's holding onto? Just a guess, but it sounds like it could be buffering. org.apache.juli.FileHandler supports buffering of the logs. The buffering is not enabled by default. To configure it, use the bufferSize property of a handler. The value of 0 uses system default buffering (typically an 8K buffer will be used). A value of 0 forces a writer flush upon each log write. A value 0 uses a BufferedOutputStream with the defined value but note that the system default buffering will also be applied. https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/logging.html It's hard to tell exactly though, without seeing your logging configuration. Please try including your logging.properties (assuming you are using the Java logging), so that we can all see it. Dan
Re: Tomcat 7 + exception while adding cookies
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 08:31 -0800, Debraj Mallick wrote: hi all, i am getting exception while adding cookies in response *Stack trace*: org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter service SEVERE: An exception or error occurred in the container during the request processing java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 8192 at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractOutputBuffer.write(AbstractOutputBuffer.java:522) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractOutputBuffer.write(AbstractOutputBuffer.java:429) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractOutputBuffer.sendHeader(AbstractOutputBuffer.java:395) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.prepareResponse(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:965) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.action(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:739) at org.apache.coyote.Response.action(Response.java:170) at org.apache.coyote.Response.sendHeaders(Response.java:350) at org.apache.catalina.connector.OutputBuffer.doFlush(OutputBuffer.java:315) at org.apache.catalina.connector.OutputBuffer.close(OutputBuffer.java:275) at org.apache.catalina.connector.Response.finishResponse(Response.java:501) at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:426) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:317) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:204) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$SocketProcessor.run(JIoEndpoint.java:311) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662) org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor endRequest SEVERE: Error finishing response java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException at java.lang.System.arraycopy(Native Method) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractOutputBuffer.write(AbstractOutputBuffer.java:491) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractOutputBuffer.sendStatus(AbstractOutputBuffer.java:331) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.prepareResponse(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:952) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.action(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:739) at org.apache.coyote.Response.action(Response.java:168) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractOutputBuffer.endRequest(AbstractOutputBuffer.java:308) at org.apache.coyote.http11.InternalOutputBuffer.endRequest(InternalOutputBuffer.java:160) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.endRequest(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:990) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:350) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:204) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$SocketProcessor.run(JIoEndpoint.java:311) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662) org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter service SEVERE: An exception or error occurred in the container during the request processing java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor endRequest SEVERE: Error finishing response java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException at java.lang.System.arraycopy(Native Method) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractOutputBuffer.write(AbstractOutputBuffer.java:491) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractOutputBuffer.sendStatus(AbstractOutputBuffer.java:331) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.prepareResponse(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:952) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.action(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:739) at org.apache.coyote.Response.action(Response.java:168) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractOutputBuffer.endRequest(AbstractOutputBuffer.java:308) at org.apache.coyote.http11.InternalOutputBuffer.endRequest(InternalOutputBuffer.java:160) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.endRequest(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:990) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:350) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:204) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:182) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$SocketProcessor.run(JIoEndpoint.java:311) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662) i am using Tomcat 7, Struts2.2.3.1, JDK 1.6 and STS IDE Thanks Regards, Debraj Mallick It would be helpful to see your configuration (i.e. server.xml)? Dan
Re: Tomcat 7 + exception while adding cookies
Thankyou Dan for your quick response my *server.xml*: ?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'? !-- Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the License); you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed under the License is distributed on an AS IS BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations under the License. -- !-- Note: A Server is not itself a Container, so you may not define subcomponents such as Valves at this level. Documentation at /docs/config/server.html -- Server port=8005 shutdown=SHUTDOWN !-- Security listener. Documentation at /docs/config/listeners.html Listener className=org.apache.catalina.security.SecurityListener / -- !--APR library loader. Documentation at /docs/apr.html -- Listener className=org.apache.catalina.core.AprLifecycleListener SSLEngine=on / !--Initialize Jasper prior to webapps are loaded. Documentation at /docs/jasper-howto.html -- Listener className=org.apache.catalina.core.JasperListener / !-- Prevent memory leaks due to use of particular java/javax APIs-- Listener className=org.apache.catalina.core.JreMemoryLeakPreventionListener / Listener className=org.apache.catalina.mbeans.GlobalResourcesLifecycleListener / Listener className=org.apache.catalina.core.ThreadLocalLeakPreventionListener / !-- Global JNDI resources Documentation at /docs/jndi-resources-howto.html -- GlobalNamingResources !-- Editable user database that can also be used by UserDatabaseRealm to authenticate users -- Resource name=UserDatabase auth=Container type=org.apache.catalina.UserDatabase description=User database that can be updated and saved factory=org.apache.catalina.users.MemoryUserDatabaseFactory pathname=conf/tomcat-users.xml / /GlobalNamingResources !-- A Service is a collection of one or more Connectors that share a single Container Note: A Service is not itself a Container, so you may not define subcomponents such as Valves at this level. Documentation at /docs/config/service.html -- Service name=Catalina !--The connectors can use a shared executor, you can define one or more named thread pools-- !-- Executor name=tomcatThreadPool namePrefix=catalina-exec- maxThreads=150 minSpareThreads=4/ -- !-- A Connector represents an endpoint by which requests are received and responses are returned. Documentation at : Java HTTP Connector: /docs/config/http.html (blocking non-blocking) Java AJP Connector: /docs/config/ajp.html APR (HTTP/AJP) Connector: /docs/apr.html Define a non-SSL HTTP/1.1 Connector on port 8080 -- Connector port=8080 protocol=HTTP/1.1 connectionTimeout=2 redirectPort=8443 / !-- A Connector using the shared thread pool-- !-- Connector executor=tomcatThreadPool port=8080 protocol=HTTP/1.1 connectionTimeout=2 redirectPort=8443 / -- !-- Define a SSL HTTP/1.1 Connector on port 8443 This connector uses the JSSE configuration, when using APR, the connector should be using the OpenSSL style configuration described in the APR documentation -- !-- Connector port=8443 protocol=HTTP/1.1 SSLEnabled=true maxThreads=150 scheme=https secure=true clientAuth=false sslProtocol=TLS / -- !-- Define an AJP 1.3 Connector on port 8009 -- Connector port=8009 protocol=AJP/1.3 redirectPort=8443 / !-- An Engine represents the entry point (within Catalina) that processes every request. The Engine implementation for Tomcat stand alone analyzes the HTTP headers included with the request, and passes them on to the appropriate Host (virtual host). Documentation at /docs/config/engine.html -- !-- You should set jvmRoute to support load-balancing via AJP ie : Engine name=Catalina defaultHost=localhost jvmRoute=jvm1 -- Engine name=Catalina defaultHost=localhost !--For clustering, please take a look at documentation at: /docs/cluster-howto.html (simple how to) /docs/config/cluster.html (reference documentation) -- !-- Cluster className=org.apache.catalina.ha.tcp.SimpleTcpCluster/ -- !-- Use the LockOutRealm to prevent attempts to guess user
Re: Tomcat 7 + exception while adding cookies
Hi Mallick,
Try settingmaxHttpHeaderSize for the Connector/ in your
server.xml. Its default value is 8192 bytes. I guess you're exceeding this
limit.
i.e.
Connector executor=tomcatThreadPool
port=8080 protocol=HTTP/1.1
connectionTimeout=2
redirectPort=8443
maxHttpHeaderSize={Something greater than 8192}/
More details/exact info:
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/config/http.html#Standard_Implementation
Best Regards,
Martin
Re: Maximum memory that can be assigned to Tomcat on windows platform
On 30 Nov 2011, at 10:45, choudh...@labware.com choudh...@labware.com wrote: Hello , The question is not why I would use 32 bit JVM , the question is whether there is any maximum limit on memory for Tomcat and if yes why No. Tomcat has no knowledge of the memory capacity of the JVM. p ? Regards, Subhrajyoti Mobile: +919830079545 Mail: choudh...@labware.com Web: www.labware.com LabWare LIMS Solutions - Results Count From: Francis GALIEGUE f...@one2team.com To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org Date: 11/30/2011 01:51 PM Subject:Re: Maximum memory that can be assigned to Tomcat on windows platform On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 07:28, choudh...@labware.com wrote: Hi , Is there any cap on maximum memory that can be assigned to tomcat on 32 bit Windows machines ? I have found out that even if we have 8GB memory in the server , can not assign more 1.4/1.5 GB to Tomcat . I also found this thread which reinforces what I have been seeing ? We are using Tomcat 7.0.19 . www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48793 In any event, a 32bit JVM (1.6, I don't know for lower VMs) cannot allocate more than 3 GB heap space. With so much RAM, why do you still use a 32bit OS and JVM is the question here. -- Francis Galiegue ONE2TEAM Ingénieur système Mob : +33 (0) 683 877 875 Tel : +33 (0) 178 945 552 f...@one2team.com 40 avenue Raymond Poincaré 75116 Paris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Maximum memory that can be assigned to Tomcat on windows platform
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Subhrajyoti, On 11/30/11 1:28 AM, choudh...@labware.com wrote: Is there any cap on maximum memory that can be assigned to tomcat on 32 bit Windows machines? See this week's thread called Server crash for memory limit for some information about that. - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk7Wak0ACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PAOzACgoFatvhsCE8sMoDnWFAKOFqpp 5IsAn2MvLYj5kszAFXfaZstjdQaQ/8sU =hvCT -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
RE: Logging
I am using the out of the box configuration for logging. I did a search of my
logging.properties and didn't find buffersize. Here 'tis.
# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
# contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
# this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
# The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
# (the License); you may not use this file except in compliance with
# the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
#
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
#
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
# distributed under the License is distributed on an AS IS BASIS,
# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
# limitations under the License.
handlers = 1catalina.org.apache.juli.FileHandler,
2localhost.org.apache.juli.FileHandler, 3manager.org.apache.juli.FileHandler,
4host-manager.org.apache.juli.FileHandler, java.util.logging.ConsoleHandler
.handlers = 1catalina.org.apache.juli.FileHandler,
java.util.logging.ConsoleHandler
# Handler specific properties.
# Describes specific configuration info for Handlers.
1catalina.org.apache.juli.FileHandler.level = FINE
1catalina.org.apache.juli.FileHandler.directory = ${catalina.base}/logs
1catalina.org.apache.juli.FileHandler.prefix = catalina.
2localhost.org.apache.juli.FileHandler.level = FINE
2localhost.org.apache.juli.FileHandler.directory = ${catalina.base}/logs
2localhost.org.apache.juli.FileHandler.prefix = localhost.
3manager.org.apache.juli.FileHandler.level = FINE
3manager.org.apache.juli.FileHandler.directory = ${catalina.base}/logs
3manager.org.apache.juli.FileHandler.prefix = manager.
4host-manager.org.apache.juli.FileHandler.level = FINE
4host-manager.org.apache.juli.FileHandler.directory = ${catalina.base}/logs
4host-manager.org.apache.juli.FileHandler.prefix = host-manager.
java.util.logging.ConsoleHandler.level = FINE
java.util.logging.ConsoleHandler.formatter = java.util.logging.SimpleFormatter
# Facility specific properties.
# Provides extra control for each logger.
org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.[Catalina].[localhost].level = INFO
org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.[Catalina].[localhost].handlers =
2localhost.org.apache.juli.FileHandler
org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.[Catalina].[localhost].[/manager].level
= INFO
org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.[Catalina].[localhost].[/manager].handlers
= 3manager.org.apache.juli.FileHandler
org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.[Catalina].[localhost].[/host-manager].level
= INFO
org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.[Catalina].[localhost].[/host-manager].handlers
= 4host-manager.org.apache.juli.FileHandler
# For example, set the org.apache.catalina.util.LifecycleBase logger to log
# each component that extends LifecycleBase changing state:
#org.apache.catalina.util.LifecycleBase.level = FINE
# To see debug messages in TldLocationsCache, uncomment the following line:
#org.apache.jasper.compiler.TldLocationsCache.level = FINE
Note that I'm not unhappy with the logging setting, but sometimes, I need the
logs now to debug a problem. I'd just like to be able to tell it to dump the
buffer to file. It sounds like there's no way to do that with the default
logger.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Mikusa [mailto:dmik...@vmware.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 11:46 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Logging
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 07:01 -0800, Thom Hehl wrote:
When running Tomcat 7.0.20 as a daemon, it doesn't appear to be writing
the logs to the file until tomcat is stopped. Is there some way I can
make tomcat dump the logs it's holding onto?
Just a guess, but it sounds like it could be buffering.
org.apache.juli.FileHandler supports buffering of the logs. The
buffering is not enabled by default. To configure it, use the bufferSize
property of a handler. The value of 0 uses system default buffering
(typically an 8K buffer will be used). A value of 0 forces a writer
flush upon each log write. A value 0 uses a BufferedOutputStream with
the defined value but note that the system default buffering will also
be applied.
https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/logging.html
It's hard to tell exactly though, without seeing your logging
configuration. Please try including your logging.properties (assuming
you are using the Java logging), so that we can all see it.
Dan
Re: Tomcat 7 + exception while adding cookies
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Martin, On 11/30/11 12:11 PM, Martin Kuen wrote: Try settingmaxHttpHeaderSize for the Connector/ in your server.xml. Its default value is 8192 bytes. I guess you're exceeding this limit. +1 If you have a lot of cookies or if you are sending SSL certification chains which tend to get long, you may run into this problem. Honestly, Tomcat should probably be doing bounds-checking and emitting a better error message in this case. - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk7WarcACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PDYqgCdEDThHZnVWixafAzaBsBK2nj2 kKEAnigmNp+6k5xM1LlIucMAl5vM2rUh =JFez -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Maximum memory that can be assigned to Tomcat on windows platform
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Casper, On 11/30/11 3:37 AM, Casper Wandahl Schmidt wrote: Another question to ask is, why do you have 8GB memory when running 32bit? That is just stupid since 32bit cannot address more than 4GB of memory no matter what you do. Any sysadmin should know that right? That's per process. All reasonably recent 32-bit OSs can address way more than 4GiB internally. For example: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa366778%28v=vs.85%29.aspx#memory_limits This is generally done through PAE (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_Address_Extension) which allows 32-bit OSs to access more than 4GiB at the kernel level, though each process is still limited to 4GiB. Running a machine with more than 4GiB in 32-bit mode isn't stupid at all IMO. If you have relatively small processes, there's no need for the overhead of 64-bit even if you have 16GiB or more. - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk7WbQYACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PBsWwCgnifhHtqrLUBi7K4PeDjp4hnC JMkAn0gilsNy2hv3zu3nzUkrmrzxoYWF =AZpI -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Logging
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thom, On 11/30/11 10:01 AM, Thom Hehl wrote: When running Tomcat 7.0.20 as a daemon, it doesn't appear to be writing the logs to the file until tomcat is stopped. Is there some way I can make tomcat dump the logs it's holding onto? What tool are you using to read the log file? Anything else we should know? Remote file share/NFS? - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk7Wb9oACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PAjCACfdkWGJ/O+Bv+jPKUxv+bzdL+6 hA0AoIuQpNdivsS6tIB6I06uVl/Xa5ZZ =9PE+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
RE: Logging
I'm using VI to reading the log file. I running a Windows RDP. -Original Message- From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 1:03 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Logging -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thom, On 11/30/11 10:01 AM, Thom Hehl wrote: When running Tomcat 7.0.20 as a daemon, it doesn't appear to be writing the logs to the file until tomcat is stopped. Is there some way I can make tomcat dump the logs it's holding onto? What tool are you using to read the log file? Anything else we should know? Remote file share/NFS? - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk7Wb9oACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PAjCACfdkWGJ/O+Bv+jPKUxv+bzdL+6 hA0AoIuQpNdivsS6tIB6I06uVl/Xa5ZZ =9PE+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
block direct tomcat
Hello I have an Apache-ajp-Tomcat config that works, but I would like to block any access to tomcat directly, either on localhost (except for 8009) or from a client? What/is there a tomcat config to achieve that?
Re: Tomcat 7 + exception while adding cookies
Hi Martin, i have set maxHttpHeaderSize=81920 but still i am getting exception *Stack trace:* 30 Nov, 2011 11:38:48 PM org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter service SEVERE: An exception or error occurred in the container during the request processing java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 8192 at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractOutputBuffer.write(AbstractOutputBuffer.java:522) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractOutputBuffer.write(AbstractOutputBuffer.java:429) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractOutputBuffer.sendHeader(AbstractOutputBuffer.java:395) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.prepareResponse(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:965) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.action(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:739) at org.apache.coyote.Response.action(Response.java:170) at org.apache.coyote.Response.sendHeaders(Response.java:350) at org.apache.catalina.connector.OutputBuffer.doFlush(OutputBuffer.java:315) at org.apache.catalina.connector.OutputBuffer.close(OutputBuffer.java:275) at org.apache.catalina.connector.Response.finishResponse(Response.java:501) at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:426) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:317) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:204) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$SocketProcessor.run(JIoEndpoint.java:311) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662) 30 Nov, 2011 11:38:48 PM org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor endRequest SEVERE: Error finishing response java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException at java.lang.System.arraycopy(Native Method) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractOutputBuffer.write(AbstractOutputBuffer.java:491) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractOutputBuffer.sendStatus(AbstractOutputBuffer.java:331) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.prepareResponse(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:952) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.action(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:739) at org.apache.coyote.Response.action(Response.java:168) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractOutputBuffer.endRequest(AbstractOutputBuffer.java:308) at org.apache.coyote.http11.InternalOutputBuffer.endRequest(InternalOutputBuffer.java:160) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.endRequest(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:990) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:350) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:204) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$SocketProcessor.run(JIoEndpoint.java:311) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662) 30 Nov, 2011 11:38:48 PM org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter service SEVERE: An exception or error occurred in the container during the request processing java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException 30 Nov, 2011 11:38:48 PM org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor endRequest SEVERE: Error finishing response java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException at java.lang.System.arraycopy(Native Method) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractOutputBuffer.write(AbstractOutputBuffer.java:491) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractOutputBuffer.sendStatus(AbstractOutputBuffer.java:331) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.prepareResponse(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:952) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.action(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:739) at org.apache.coyote.Response.action(Response.java:168) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractOutputBuffer.endRequest(AbstractOutputBuffer.java:308) at org.apache.coyote.http11.InternalOutputBuffer.endRequest(InternalOutputBuffer.java:160) at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.endRequest(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:990) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:350) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:204) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$SocketProcessor.run(JIoEndpoint.java:311) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662) 30 Nov, 2011 11:38:48 PM org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter service SEVERE: An exception or error occurred in the container during the request processing
RE: Maximum memory that can be assigned to Tomcat on windows platform
That is just stupid since 32bit cannot address more than 4GB of memory no matter what you do. Any sysadmin should know that right? That's per process. All reasonably recent 32-bit OSs can address way more than 4GiB internally. Yes, but one region in memory is reserved for IO. Drivers use high memory addreses (3Gb) to speak with their devices. To support more than 3Gb on Win/32bit PAE could be used so IO would reside higher than 4Gb. But in this situation drivers need to deal with 64bit pointers. Microsoft believes it would lead to driver fails and BSODs, so it denied it for desktop versions of OSes. But it works in server versions. Idea was: 4Gb is rarely needed on desktop and desktop has cheap hardware and poorly-written drivers. And on server they have good hardware and good drivers and often require more than 4Gb. You could use +4Gb on Win2008/32bit but you _can't_ use more than about 3.5Gb on Win7@32bit. BTW process could access more than 4Gb too (see AWE: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa366527(v=vs.85).as px) but AFAIK Sun JVM does not use it If you have relatively small processes, there's no need for the overhead of 64-bit even if you have 16GiB or more. You can run 32bit apps on 64bit windows (that's called WoW64). Processor and Windows support it and it works pretty well. Ilya Kazakevich, Developer JetBrains Inc http://www.jetbrains.com Develop with pleasure! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
RE: block direct tomcat
Just disable HTTP connector (comment it in server.xml). You can use firewall to protect AJP port from remote clients too. Ilya Kazakevich, Developer JetBrains Inc http://www.jetbrains.com Develop with pleasure! -Original Message- From: cpanon [mailto:cpa...@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 10:05 PM To: Tomcat Subject: block direct tomcat Hello I have an Apache-ajp-Tomcat config that works, but I would like to block any access to tomcat directly, either on localhost (except for 8009) or from a client? What/is there a tomcat config to achieve that? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Problems with forwaring HTTP to HTTPS
Hi list,
I'm a bit puzzled.
I want to forward all incoming HTTP-traffic to HTTPS.
Within my $catalina.home/conf/server.xml I've specified the following
connectors:
Connector port=80 protocol=HTTP/1.1
connectionTimeout=2
redirectPort=443 /
Connector port=443 maxHttpHeaderSize=8192
maxThreads=150
enableLookups=false disableUploadTimeout=true
acceptCount=100 scheme=https secure=true
SSLEnabled=true
SSLCertificateFile=${catalina.base}/conf/test.dom.crt
SSLCertificateKeyFile=${catalina.base}/conf/test.dom.key /
Then I specified in $catalina.home/conf/web.xml the following
transport-guarantee:
security-constraint
web-resource-collection
web-resource-nameProtected Context/web-resource-name
url-pattern/*/url-pattern
/web-resource-collection
user-data-constraint
transport-guaranteeCONFIDENTIAL/transport-guarantee
/user-data-constraint
/security-constraint
In my webapp, additionally I also specified some additional
security-constraints as follows:
security-constraint
web-resource-collection
web-resource-nameProtected Area/web-resource-name
url-pattern/*/url-pattern
/web-resource-collection
auth-constraint
role-namesomeuser/role-name
/auth-constraint
/security-constraint
However, when I call the webapp using http://mywebapp.something, it is
not redirected to HTTPS but the HTTP-scheme is used.
However, when I remove the security-constraints from
$catalina.base/conf/web.xml and change the webapp's
deployment-descriptor to
security-constraint
web-resource-collection
web-resource-nameProtected Area/web-resource-name
url-pattern/*/url-pattern
/web-resource-collection
user-data-constraint
transport-guaranteeCONFIDENTIAL/transport-guarantee
/user-data-constraint
!-- describes the valid roles for this app --
auth-constraint
role-namedomuser/role-name
/auth-constraint
/security-constraint
it's working.
My understanding was, that in the global web.xml
($catalina.home/conf/web.xml) the defaults are specified and promoted
to all webapps. But it seems as the webapp doesn't inherit the element
user-data-constraints from the global web.xml if it specifies it's
own security-constraints - my expectation was, that it inherits
those elements not specified inside the webapp's
deployment-descriptor.
Is is such, that if I specify security-constraints in my local
webapp, the global setting in $catalina.home/conf/web.xml are always
overwritten? If not - where does the inheritiance start and where does
it end?
My business-case is, that I do have a whole bunch of webapps which
have to be re-directed to HTTPS, each of them having their own
security-constraints since you'll have to login to access them, and
additionally multiple domains, so that changing each
deployment-descriptor is giving me a major headache.
I couldn't find anything in the documentation - or let me re-phrase
it: I understood it that way that each element is inherited from the
global deployment-descriptor if not specified in the webapp's own
deployment-descriptor.
If somebody could shed some light here or point me to to right docs,
that would be great.
My configuration:
Using CATALINA_BASE: /home/tomcat/local/apache-tomcat-6.0.33
Using CATALINA_HOME: /home/tomcat/local/apache-tomcat-6.0.33
Using CATALINA_TMPDIR: /home/tomcat/local/apache-tomcat-6.0.33/temp
Using JRE_HOME:/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun
Using CLASSPATH: /home/tomcat/local/apache-tomcat-6.0.33/bin/bootstrap.jar
Server version: Apache Tomcat/6.0.33
Server built: Aug 16 2011 02:16:34
Server number: 6.0.33.0
OS Name:Linux
OS Version: 2.6.26-2-686
Architecture: i386
JVM Version:1.6.0_26-b03
JVM Vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
I'm also using the APR, thus using OpenSSL as SSL-implementation.
TIA
Gregor
--
just because you're paranoid, don't mean they're not after you...
gpgp-fp: 3DB13F197F8A0360814885D1F1F1E2EFAD509AFD
skype:rc46fi
gplus.to/gregor
twitter.com/#/2smart4u
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
[OT] Re: Maximum memory that can be assigned to Tomcat on windows platform
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 18:51, Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote: [...] Running a machine with more than 4GiB in 32-bit mode isn't stupid at all IMO. If you have relatively small processes, there's no need for the overhead of 64-bit even if you have 16GiB or more. This is quite the opposite: a 32bit OS has _more_ overhead than a 64bit OS when running on a 64bit CPU. Just consider filesystem calls such as read(), write(), seek(): their arguments are 64bits, not 32, and have been so before 64bit was even common (2+ GB files are common place today). With a 32bit OS on a 64bit CPU, you eat up two registers whereas a 64bit OS will take only one. And of course, this is without considering wasted TLB space or the sheer time to address just one memory page. -- Francis Galiegue ONE2TEAM Ingénieur système Mob : +33 (0) 683 877 875 Tel : +33 (0) 178 945 552 f...@one2team.com 40 avenue Raymond Poincaré 75116 Paris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Connection has been abanded
Hi, IT is Mac OSX 10.6.8 java -version java version 1.6.0_20 Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_20-b02-279-10M3065) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 16.3-b01-279, mixed mode) tomcat is 7.0.21 database is Sybase ASE 15.0.3 We are getting this error in about every half hour or so: java.lang.NullPointerException Nov 30, 2011 3:21:28 PM org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.pool.ConnectionPool abandon WARNING: Connection has been abandoned PooledConnection[net.sourceforge.jtds.jdbc.ConnectionJDBC3@40c65cd4]:java.lang.E\ xception at org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.pool.ConnectionPool.getThreadDump(ConnectionPool.java:973) at org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.pool.ConnectionPool.borrowConnection(ConnectionPool.java:727) at org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.pool.ConnectionPool.borrowConnection(ConnectionPool.java:585) at org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.pool.ConnectionPool.getConnection(ConnectionPool.java:174) at org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.pool.DataSourceProxy.getConnection(DataSourceProxy.java:124) at pathology.connection.CopathDbInterface.getConnectionFromPull(CopathDbInterface.java:119) at pathology.connection.CopathDbInterface.getConnection(CopathDbInterface.java:85) at pathology.connection.CopathDbInterface.getConnection(CopathDbInterface.java:68) at pathology.histology.server.DashboardServiceImpl.getBlockDashboardStatsMap(DashboardServiceImpl.java:923) at pathology.histology.server.DashboardServiceImpl.getBlockDashboardStats(DashboardServiceImpl.java:513) at pathology.histology.server.DashboardServiceImpl.getDashboardStats(DashboardServiceImpl.java:62) at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor597.invoke(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at com.google.gwt.user.server.rpc.RPC.invokeAndEncodeResponse(RPC.java:569) at com.google.gwt.user.server.rpc.RemoteServiceServlet.processCall(RemoteServiceServlet.java:208) at com.google.gwt.user.server.rpc.RemoteServiceServlet.processPost(RemoteServiceServlet.java:248) at com.google.gwt.user.server.rpc.AbstractRemoteServiceServlet.doPost(AbstractRemoteServiceServlet.java:62) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:641) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:722) at org.apach Any good idea where to start troubleshooting ? Thanks ahead, János - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Maximum memory that can be assigned to Tomcat on windows platform
Am 30.11.2011 12:08, schrieb j...@gniffelnieuws.net:
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:14:45 +0530, Choudhury wrote
Hello ,
The question is not why I would use 32 bit JVM , the
question is whether there is any maximum limit on memory for Tomcat
and if yes why ? Regards,
The limit is the JVM, not Tomcat itself
It depends on the windows version used actually. From what I remember this is
limited to maximum 2GB for user processes. The easiest way to test is, is with
a small app that shows some memory information like:
public class MaxMemory {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Runtime rt = Runtime.getRuntime();
long totalMem = rt.totalMemory();
long maxMem = rt.maxMemory();
long freeMem = rt.freeMemory();
double megs = 1048576.0;
System.out.println (Total Memory: + totalMem + ( +
(totalMem/megs) + MiB));
System.out.println (Max Memory:+ maxMem + ( + (maxMem/megs) +
MiB));
System.out.println (Free Memory: + freeMem + ( + (freeMem/megs)
+ MiB));
}
}
Try to run it with different options for the heap. I would be surprised if you
would get over 1600MB.
This is what we experienced: up to 1GB Heap (Xmx) was stable on all servers.
Heaps larger were very prone to crashes. We've seen a maximum of 1.2GB
Heap on Windows with 32bit JVMs
That's why we have switched to 64bit JVMs on all machines. No need to
swap JVM editions when applications require more memory - just increase
Xmx as long as RAM is available.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [OT] Re: Maximum memory that can be assigned to Tomcat on windows platform
Francis GALIEGUE wrote: On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 18:51, Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote: [...] Running a machine with more than 4GiB in 32-bit mode isn't stupid at all IMO. If you have relatively small processes, there's no need for the overhead of 64-bit even if you have 16GiB or more. This is quite the opposite: a 32bit OS has _more_ overhead than a 64bit OS when running on a 64bit CPU. Just consider filesystem calls such as read(), write(), seek(): their arguments are 64bits, not 32, and have been so before 64bit was even common (2+ GB files are common place today). With a 32bit OS on a 64bit CPU, you eat up two registers whereas a 64bit OS will take only one. And of course, this is without considering wasted TLB space or the sheer time to address just one memory page. I am not knowledgeable at all in such questions, and while you are at it let me ask a question : Does the fact of having a system with a 64-bit CPU (and OS) necessarily (or usually) imply that data transfers between CPU and RAM happen also 64-bit in parallel ? For example, let' suppose that I have an application which handles a very large table of integers (the integers themselves being 2exp31), and that periodically all elements of this table have to be updated. My understanding is that under a 32-bit platform, each integer will occupy 32 bit, while on a 64-bit platform each will occupy 64 bit (the source program remaining the same). If there is not a corresponding 64-bit parallel transfer between CPU and memory, then using a 64-bit CPU would be detrimental, no ? Or is this a non-sensical case nowadays ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
RE: [OT] Re: Maximum memory that can be assigned to Tomcat on windows platform
Does the fact of having a system with a 64-bit CPU (and OS) necessarily (or usually) imply that data transfers between CPU and RAM happen also 64-bit in parallel ? That depends on front bus width. Modern PCs has 64-bit bus AFAIK. In 64-bit CPU 64 is register size and nothing else (although 86x64 mode has some differences with IA32) My understanding is that under a 32-bit platform, each integer will occupy 32 bit, while on a 64-bit platform each will occupy 64 bit (the source program remaining the same). Java integers are always 32bit, are not they? C int may vary from 16 (in BCC 3.1 for DOS) to 64. 64-bit processor mode gives you ability to: 1) address more memory (2^64 bytes theoretically). 2) store more data in register so CPU could now operate 64bit numbers and you need one operation to do something with two 64bit objects opposite to two operations on 32bit. 3) v86 mode is disabled so you can't run 16bit apps :) 4) use new registers, new SSE instructions and so on: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64#Architectural_features - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [OT] Re: Maximum memory that can be assigned to Tomcat on windows platform
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 22:38, André Warnier a...@ice-sa.com wrote: [...] I am not knowledgeable at all in such questions, and while you are at it let me ask a question : Does the fact of having a system with a 64-bit CPU (and OS) necessarily (or usually) imply that data transfers between CPU and RAM happen also 64-bit in parallel ? No, this depends on the bus width, not the address space. And bus widths nowadays are rather in the range of 256/512 bits. For example, let' suppose that I have an application which handles a very large table of integers (the integers themselves being 2exp31), and that periodically all elements of this table have to be updated. My understanding is that under a 32-bit platform, each integer will occupy 32 bit, while on a 64-bit platform each will occupy 64 bit (the source program remaining the same). If there is not a corresponding 64-bit parallel transfer between CPU and memory, then using a 64-bit CPU would be detrimental, no ? Or is this a non-sensical case nowadays ? This depends on the alignment the JVM uses. If it aligns to 8 bytes, then yes, any integer will take up 8 bytes, but so will any byte. In general, the alignment is 4 bytes, except for long values of course. With a 4 byte alignment, this means you can store two ints in a register, and it's then only a matter of logical ands/shifting to obtain the value you want. And these operations are ultra fast ;) -- Francis Galiegue ONE2TEAM Ingénieur système Mob : +33 (0) 683 877 875 Tel : +33 (0) 178 945 552 f...@one2team.com 40 avenue Raymond Poincaré 75116 Paris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Logging
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thom, On 11/30/11 1:04 PM, Thom Hehl wrote: I'm using VI to reading the log file. I running a Windows RDP. Are you using 'vi' in a way that allows it to get updates from the file? I'm no 'vi' expert, but I'm sure it reads the entire file at startup and thinks that it doesn't change. Try using: tail -f stdout.log If you have a POSIX environment handy (like Cygwin, or gnuutils or whatever). - -chris PS: vi on Windows? That's doing things the hard way. ;) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk7WuOIACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PA8hQCfbPXtlASPD28Nr1R7xayvAhZM OWgAoJtmfQ9IHfVNVip7nqSX0vjqonLg =lvdm -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Tomcat 7 + exception while adding cookies
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Debraj, On 11/30/11 1:16 PM, Debraj Mallick wrote: i have set maxHttpHeaderSize=81920 but still i am getting exception *Stack trace:* 30 Nov, 2011 11:38:48 PM org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter service SEVERE: An exception or error occurred in the container during the request processing java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 8192 at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractOutputBuffer.write(AbstractOutputBuffer.java:522) What is the exact Tomcat version? 7.0.what? - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk7WuSUACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PA/2QCcDp5xTeWSRbH237kS/hnvymEw mCkAnix/CYtwTv2reVljqHJfo0ka7RG8 =VDsQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Do any of the Tomcat LDAP-type realms support no password authentication?
Hi, I'm new here, and hope that someone can help. I was wondering if any of the LDAP-type realms (e.g., JNDIRealm, etc.) support an authentication mode where no password or credentials are required? In other words, where just a userID/username is presented, and if that userID/username is present in the LDAP, then the user gets authenticated? Thanks, Jim - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Tomcat 7 + exception while adding cookies
hi Christopher, my tomcat version is : 7.0.14 working on Window7 with JDK 1.6 On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 4:45 AM, Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Debraj, On 11/30/11 1:16 PM, Debraj Mallick wrote: i have set maxHttpHeaderSize=81920 but still i am getting exception *Stack trace:* 30 Nov, 2011 11:38:48 PM org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter service SEVERE: An exception or error occurred in the container during the request processing java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 8192 at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractOutputBuffer.write(AbstractOutputBuffer.java:522) What is the exact Tomcat version? 7.0.what? - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk7WuSUACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PA/2QCcDp5xTeWSRbH237kS/hnvymEw mCkAnix/CYtwTv2reVljqHJfo0ka7RG8 =VDsQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org -- Thanks Regards, Debraj Mallick 9674247281
