Re: [vdr] Intelligent management of simulcast DVB-S2 / DVB-T channels
Udo Richter writes: > Am 23.02.2012 19:36, schrieb Magnus Hörlin: >> This is an interesting topic and I have had exactly the same ideas. But >> I think this violates Klaus's "Keep it simple" philosophy and (as usual) >> I tend to agree with him. > > If you've ever read the algorithm that picks the best possible device > for a recording, you'd probably agreed that we're already way too far > from keeping it simple. These rules are already way too complex. Adding > the complexity of choosing from different quality sources and > up/downgrading other receivers would probably push this a lot further > towards insanity. Even without the primarylimit it's still deadly complex. The very clever programming syntax used for the device selection makes it very difficult to understand and also to debug. I have an old idea in my head but I've never taken the time to do so, it's also quite erratic: disable channel and device management and allow an external program to decide how to deal with devices and channels. I wouldn't want to start from scratch and work around dvbstreamer, vdr and its plugins are wonderful ! I love it ! (it's just the device and channel management that are too limited imho) I'm not really into C++, it might already be possible to let plugins take over the channel and device management but i doubt it. -- ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
Re: [vdr] Intelligent management of simulcast DVB-S2 / DVB-T channels
Am 23.02.2012 19:36, schrieb Magnus Hörlin: > This is an interesting topic and I have had exactly the same ideas. But > I think this violates Klaus's "Keep it simple" philosophy and (as usual) > I tend to agree with him. If you've ever read the algorithm that picks the best possible device for a recording, you'd probably agreed that we're already way too far from keeping it simple. These rules are already way too complex. Adding the complexity of choosing from different quality sources and up/downgrading other receivers would probably push this a lot further towards insanity. Cheers, Udo ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
Re: [vdr] Intelligent management of simulcast DVB-S2 / DVB-T channels
On 02/23/2012 04:50 PM, Dominic Evans wrote: I remember seeing patches for marking channels as identical in terms of EPG (so e.g., a DVB-S version of the channel can automatically share the EPG entries from the DVB-T version), but has anyone worked on a patch for identifying simulcasting channels, or even had some preliminary design thoughts for how one could be implemented? I can imagine at least the following two use cases: 1) When watching live TV, channel '1' automatically selects the 'best' available version of 'BBC One London' depending on available tuners - e.g., rotating through BBC One HD (DVB-S2), BBC One (DVB-T2), BBC One (DVB-S) and BBC One London (DVB-T). This is much more intuitive than having to manually find an available broadcast of the channel. 2) For recordings, if a timer needs to start a recording on 'BBC One London', depending on its priority and a 'required quality' attribute it will similarly locate a tuner to make the recording with. Assuming it needs the DVB-S2 tuner for HD, if someone with lower priority is currently watching live TV on BBC One HD via DVB-S2 (and only one HD tuner is available) then they will be transparently switched down to the next available tuner quality. Hi. This is an interesting topic and I have had exactly the same ideas. But I think this violates Klaus's "Keep it simple" philosophy and (as usual) I tend to agree with him. /Magnus H ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
