[Bug 17322] Integrate git/Gerrit and Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17322 Bug 17322 depends on bug 47622, which changed state. Bug 47622 Summary: Bugzilla gerrit bot should mention patch author when notifying about a new changeset https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47622 What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 17322] Integrate git/Gerrit and Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17322 Bug 17322 depends on bug 47622, which changed state. Bug 47622 Summary: Bugzilla gerrit bot should mention patch author when notifying about a new changeset https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47622 What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED |--- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 17322] Integrate git/Gerrit and Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17322 christ...@quelltextlich.at changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #34 from christ...@quelltextlich.at --- Should be fixed since we upgraded gerrit and hooks-bugzilla on 2013-06-27. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 17322] Integrate git/Gerrit and Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17322 Bug 17322 depends on bug 47621, which changed state. Bug 47621 Summary: Bugzilla gerrit bot should use a shorter format https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47621 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 17322] Integrate git/Gerrit and Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17322 Bug 17322 depends on bug 47622, which changed state. Bug 47622 Summary: Bugzilla gerrit bot should mention patch author when notifying about a new changeset https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47622 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 17322] Integrate git/Gerrit and Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17322 --- Comment #33 from christ...@quelltextlich.at --- (In reply to comment #32) > (In reply to comment #31) > > (In reply to comment #30) > > > (In reply to comment #29) > > > > Of course this doesn't trigger when a new patchset adds a new reference > > > > to a > > > > bug, which is mildly irritating. :-) > > I can't think of a non-hacky way that would allow me to sleep at night. Would https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/#/c/45201/ allow you to sleep at night? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 17322] Integrate git/Gerrit and Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17322 --- Comment #32 from Chad H. --- (In reply to comment #31) > (In reply to comment #30) > > (In reply to comment #29) > > > Of course this doesn't trigger when a new patchset adds a new reference > > > to a > > > bug, which is mildly irritating. :-) > > > > This was by request, as many changes go through many patch iterations before > > merging. > > Sure; I assume there's no way to trigger only on > new-patchset-which-has-newly-added-bug-reference? > > J. I can't think of a non-hacky way that would allow me to sleep at night. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 17322] Integrate git/Gerrit and Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17322 --- Comment #31 from James Forrester --- (In reply to comment #30) > (In reply to comment #29) > > Of course this doesn't trigger when a new patchset adds a new reference to a > > bug, which is mildly irritating. :-) > > This was by request, as many changes go through many patch iterations before > merging. Sure; I assume there's no way to trigger only on new-patchset-which-has-newly-added-bug-reference? J. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 17322] Integrate git/Gerrit and Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17322 --- Comment #30 from Chad H. --- (In reply to comment #29) > (In reply to comment #28) > > This is now enabled again, with the following config (based on feedback): > > > > Do notify on: > > * New change > > * Restored change > > * Abandoned change > > * Merged change > > > > Do NOT notify on: > > * New patchset > > * New comment > > > > Basically, leave a comment when there's something you should check out in > > Gerrit (someone's started work, someone's giving up, or work is done), but > > not during the normal review cycle (comments & patchets). > > > > I hope this meets everyone's approval. > > Of course this doesn't trigger when a new patchset adds a new reference to a > bug, which is mildly irritating. :-) This was by request, as many changes go through many patch iterations before merging. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 17322] Integrate git/Gerrit and Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17322 James Forrester changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jforres...@wikimedia.org --- Comment #29 from James Forrester --- (In reply to comment #28) > This is now enabled again, with the following config (based on feedback): > > Do notify on: > * New change > * Restored change > * Abandoned change > * Merged change > > Do NOT notify on: > * New patchset > * New comment > > Basically, leave a comment when there's something you should check out in > Gerrit (someone's started work, someone's giving up, or work is done), but > not during the normal review cycle (comments & patchets). > > I hope this meets everyone's approval. Of course this doesn't trigger when a new patchset adds a new reference to a bug, which is mildly irritating. :-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 17322] Integrate git/Gerrit and Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17322 Bartosz Dziewoński changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||47622 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 17322] Integrate git/Gerrit and Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17322 Bartosz Dziewoński changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||47621 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 17322] Integrate git/Gerrit and Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17322 --- Comment #28 from Chad H. --- This is now enabled again, with the following config (based on feedback): Do notify on: * New change * Restored change * Abandoned change * Merged change Do NOT notify on: * New patchset * New comment Basically, leave a comment when there's something you should check out in Gerrit (someone's started work, someone's giving up, or work is done), but not during the normal review cycle (comments & patchets). I hope this meets everyone's approval. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 17322] Integrate git/Gerrit and Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17322 Lydia Pintscher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lydia.pintscher@wikimedia.d ||e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 17322] Integrate git/Gerrit and Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17322 --- Comment #27 from christ...@quelltextlich.at --- (In reply to comment #22) > Per the feedback I got yesterday, we still need to tune down the noisiness on > new patches (we only want notifs on new changesets, not each patchset > attached > to a change) See https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/#/c/43843/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 17322] Integrate git/Gerrit and Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17322 --- Comment #26 from Waldir --- I was asking because of bug 34557 comment 5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 17322] Integrate git/Gerrit and Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17322 --- Comment #25 from Chad H. --- We did disable notifications on comments. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 17322] Integrate git/Gerrit and Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17322 --- Comment #24 from Waldir --- Shouldn't Jenkins' messages be filtered out? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 17322] Integrate git/Gerrit and Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17322 --- Comment #23 from christ...@quelltextlich.at --- (In reply to comment #22) > We could turn on notifs for abandoned/restored (I was thinking those might be > useful), in addition to merges. See https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/55048 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 17322] Integrate git/Gerrit and Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17322 --- Comment #22 from Chad H. --- We could turn on notifs for abandoned/restored (I was thinking those might be useful), in addition to merges. Per the feedback I got yesterday, we still need to tune down the noisiness on new patches (we only want notifs on new changesets, not each patchset attached to a change) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 17322] Integrate git/Gerrit and Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17322
--- Comment #21 from Andre Klapper ---
Slightly bikesheddy:
* I wonder whether it should also set the "patch-in-gerrit" keyword (current
situation/workflow that I'm not a fan of), or whether I should pick up the
debate again on creating something like a "PATCH_IN_GERRIT" bug status - I
consider "getting closer to resolving this report by having a patch in
Gerrit"
a status but no constant property (=keyword). Related: bug 39399, bug 39402,
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2012-December/065046.html -
might be best to discuss in bug 39402.
* I wonder whether it should also notify on Abandoned ("Somebody could pick up
the work" notification in the bug report)?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 17322] Integrate git/Gerrit and Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17322 --- Comment #20 from Chad H. --- Plugin is live again, and is now only notifying on new patch and merge. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 17322] Integrate git/Gerrit and Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17322 --- Comment #19 from Tim Landscheidt --- (In reply to comment #16) > Example: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41889#c6 Cool! The layout needs some work, though :-). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 17322] Integrate git/Gerrit and Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17322 Andre Klapper changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||39402 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 17322] Integrate git/Gerrit and Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17322 --- Comment #18 from christ...@quelltextlich.at --- As the patch to adjust spammyness is sitting upstream already for a few days without comments from the maintainer, I'll link it here, so we can keep track of it: https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/#/c/43280/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 17322] Integrate git/Gerrit and Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17322 jeremyb changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzilla+org.wikimedia@tuxm ||achine.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 17322] Integrate git/Gerrit and Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17322 Quim Gil changed: What|Removed |Added CC||q...@wikimedia.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 17322] Integrate git/Gerrit and Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17322 --- Comment #17 from Chad H. --- Yeah, we got it partially working :) But it's a bit spammy, so I turned it off until we can fine-tune it a bit further. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 17322] Integrate git/Gerrit and Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17322 --- Comment #16 from Andre Klapper --- Example: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41889#c6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 17322] Integrate git/Gerrit and Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17322 Andre Klapper changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|Normal |High CC||aklap...@wikimedia.org, ||anja.jentz...@wikimedia.de, ||christ...@quelltextlich.at, ||dereck...@espace-win.org Assignee|wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia. |christ...@quelltextlich.at |org | --- Comment #15 from Andre Klapper --- AFAIK Christian is working on this, based on comment 14, hence assigning this to him. Note: I'm VERY afraid of duplicated work in this area. Hence I also CC Anja who's been working on WMDE's wikidata bot (see bug 44100 comment 2 for an example), and Dereckson who's been working on communicating between Gerrit, Bugzilla and IRC according to bug 43655. It would be great if you could share some implementation details so far to see if some parts are "reusable". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 17322] Integrate git/Gerrit and Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17322 --- Comment #14 from Chad H. --- I began writing Bugzilla support for Gerrit here: https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/#/c/40750/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 17322] Integrate git/Gerrit and Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17322 Liangent changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugzilla.wikimedia. ||org/show_bug.cgi?id=39399 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 17322] Integrate git/Gerrit and Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17322 Liangent changed: What|Removed |Added CC||liang...@gmail.com --- Comment #13 from Liangent 2012-04-19 17:13:01 UTC --- Hmm you're reusing an old bug so the first several comments seem unrelated or outdated... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 17322] Integrate git/Gerrit and Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17322 --- Comment #12 from Tim Landscheidt 2012-04-19 17:07:11 UTC --- Another argument pro auto-closing: Unambiguity. Bug 35964 just got closed as "RESOLVED FIXED" while the commit is still in review. https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/page.cgi?id=fields.html says for "FIXED": "A fix for this bug is checked into the tree and tested." That's technically obviously true in this case but it doesn't mean that it is resolved in master so that a user can profit from it without too much hassle. If there's no auto-closing, it's up to some developer to follow the review of his commit and then close the bug which will probably lead many developers to close their bugs prematurely. Auto-closing would enable them to "fix and forget". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 17322] Integrate git/Gerrit and Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17322
--- Comment #11 from Tim Landscheidt 2012-04-13
13:01:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> [...]
> Generally, I'm kind of leery about auto-closing an auto-opening bugs. I may
> commit half a fix for a bug and not want BZ to be closed yet.
> [...]
I have neither looked at the code I referenced nor worked in a project with
auto-close, but I assume it would usually work in the way that the commit
message would have to include some (semi-natural) phrase that triggers the
close ("^This fixes bug #(\d+)\.", "^Fixes: (\d+)$", etc.) So if a commit
doesn't fix a bug, you just don't use the exact phrase but maybe "This
partially fixes bug #123"." and everything's as you expected.
Regarding deployment, while I see your point, I think not using this facility
would still leave the ambiguity: Has the deployment *really* been done? In the
past, there have been delays when difficulties were encountered or manpower was
short. Another automated comment on a closed bug will cause no harm, but
*actively* inform the reporter who cares about the bug and not require *them*
to do something.
This of course *could* depend on how the deployment branch is organized, i.
e. how a commit that is "reverted" is recognizable to some script so I would
consider this part low priority.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 17322] Integrate git/Gerrit and Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17322 --- Comment #10 from Chad H. 2012-04-12 22:15:05 UTC --- If we make use of the feature described in issue 124 (see comment 9), we could easily use patchset-created to ping BZ with a "A change for this bug was pushed for review in gerrit 123 [project: foo; branch; bar]" We could follow up with "Gerrit change 123 was merged on DATE [project: foo; branch: bar]" Generally, I'm kind of leery about auto-closing an auto-opening bugs. I may commit half a fix for a bug and not want BZ to be closed yet. (In reply to comment #8) > I don't know whether the configuration management of WMF wikis falls under SVN > as well, but I'd also find it extremely helpful if a bug not only received a > "Fixed in r4711." comment, but also that the fix went live on labs (or > whereever) and finally on the main farm. > The plan right now is to have deployment-labs running master (so it'll get all the latest changes) and deploy master to the cluster every 2 weeks. So I think in the long run this will be a little bit less of an issue. Once we get into the cycle you'll be able to assume that anything over ~2 weeks old has been deployed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 17322] Integrate git/Gerrit and Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17322 Tim Landscheidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||innocentkil...@gmail.com, ||rlan...@gmail.com Component|Subversion |Git/Gerrit AssignedTo|mediaw...@natividads.com|wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia. ||org Summary|Integrate SVN and Bugzilla |Integrate git/Gerrit and ||Bugzilla --- Comment #9 from Tim Landscheidt 2012-04-12 20:30:43 UTC --- git integration: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:Addons Gerrit integration: http://code.google.com/p/gerrit/issues/detail?id=124 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
