For those who haven't noticed mp2-RC1 was released and we should get 2.0
really soon now (my guess another 3-4 weeks, but could happen earlier
too). So it's time to start thinking about preparing a PR that was
discussed here before. Any takers to lead this effort?
--
___
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 11:05 -0500, Stas Bekman wrote:
> For those who haven't noticed mp2-RC1 was released and we should get 2.0
> really soon now (my guess another 3-4 weeks, but could happen earlier
> too). So it's time to start thinking about preparing a PR that was
> discussed here before. A
[moving this into a different thread. let's keep the PR thread focused
just on that: publishing PR]
> * news flash on frontpage on perl.apache.org
>
> one thing (and a thing which constantly annoys me from a PR point of
> view) is the fact that the mod_perl website's frontpage doesn't have a
> ne
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 16:34 -0500, Stas Bekman wrote:
> A little clarification: by posting this I've meant to first of all figure
> out how we post a PR (via ASF/TPF/TicketMaster/etc), not what we post
> inside a PR.
Acronym overload. I thought you meant "public relations", not "press
release."
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 16:29 -0500, Stas Bekman wrote:
> No news is better than stale news. So I'm really -0 on starting any news
> sections. We tried this before, it never worked.
Really? I don't remember that. On the old site? Updates were kind of
difficult back then.
> The only way I can se
Jayce^ wrote:
On Monday 13 December 2004 09:05 am, Stas Bekman wrote:
For those who haven't noticed mp2-RC1 was released and we should get 2.0
really soon now (my guess another 3-4 weeks, but could happen earlier
too). So it's time to start thinking about preparing a PR that was
discussed here befo
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 16:35 -0500, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > * faq
> >
> > this is such a web thing for both developers and project managers and
> > directors. couldn't we write a perl program that scans the total mail on
> > the mailing list extract the 50 most used words. seriously, it would be
[another split, let's keep PR-how thread focused on one thing]
allan juul wrote:
> * bullet list of perhaps 5 major reasons to upgrade
>
> can someone tell joe public in very few sentences what i gain by
> upgrading to mod_perl 2?
>
> * faq
>
> this is such a web thing for both developers and proje
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 15:44 -0700, Jayce^ wrote:
> If we can bring out the points here in a discussion, I'd be willing to
> compile/format them nicely.
How about just collecting the slides that Stas, Phillipe, and Geoff have
used when introducing mp2 at conferences, and trying to summarize the
ju
Jayce^ wrote:
On Monday 13 December 2004 03:30 pm, Stas Bekman wrote:
I guess there is more than 5, but it's a good idea. Any takers?
If we can bring out the points here in a discussion, I'd be willing to
compile/format them nicely. If we could just all chip in the things we each
see as most im
On Monday 13 December 2004 03:59 pm, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Jayce^++, should we better do it on the users list, so others can benefit
> from the discussion? so we kill two birds in one shot. of course it may
> generate some extra noise. So it's up to you Jayce^ to decide whether you
> want to sum mor
On Monday 13 December 2004 03:30 pm, Stas Bekman wrote:
> I guess there is more than 5, but it's a good idea. Any takers?
If we can bring out the points here in a discussion, I'd be willing to
compile/format them nicely. If we could just all chip in the things we each
see as most important, and
On Monday 13 December 2004 04:07 pm, Stas Bekman wrote:
> But at the same time, many users on the modperl list wonder why should
> they move to mp2. That's why I thought to run it there. It'll also give
> you a chance to here why it's not a good idea to move to mp2, which is
> just as important for
Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 16:35 -0500, Stas Bekman wrote:
> * faq
>
> this is such a web thing for both developers and project managers and
> directors. couldn't we write a perl program that scans the total mail on
> the mailing list extract the 50 most used words. seriously, it w
Stas Bekman wrote:
> Jayce^ wrote:
>
>> On Monday 13 December 2004 03:59 pm, Stas Bekman wrote:
>>
>>> Jayce^++, should we better do it on the users list, so others can
>>> benefit
>>> from the discussion? so we kill two birds in one shot. of course it may
>>> generate some extra noise. So it's up
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 17:02 -0500, Stas Bekman wrote:
> But RSS feed to what? Or do you mean RSS feed of perl.apache.org to other
> sites?
That is what I meant.
> I was thinking to have something like modperl.use.perl.org or
> elsewhere where there will be news posted and just have perl.apache.
allan juul wrote:
Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Tue, 2004-12-14 at 00:08 +0100, allan juul wrote:
here's one that spring to mind
1) when i start my browser and go to [URL] the very first time i get
one result but subsequent refreshes output different results. why is
that ?
http://perl.apache.org/docs
allan juul wrote:
Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 16:35 -0500, Stas Bekman wrote:
> * faq
>
> this is such a web thing for both developers and project managers and
> directors. couldn't we write a perl program that scans the total
mail on
> the mailing list extract the 50 most used wor
Didn't take23.org attempt to do this a couple of years ago? What ever
happened to that?
adam
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stas Bekman wrote:
For those who haven't noticed mp2-RC1 was released and we should get 2.0
really soon now (my guess another 3-4 weeks, but could happen earlier
too). So it's time to start thinking about preparing a PR that was
discussed here before. Any takers to lead this effort?
hi
not tak
Stas Bekman wrote:
For those who haven't noticed mp2-RC1 was released and we should get 2.0
really soon now (my guess another 3-4 weeks, but could happen earlier
too). So it's time to start thinking about preparing a PR that was
discussed here before. Any takers to lead this effort?
A little cla
Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 16:29 -0500, Stas Bekman wrote:
No news is better than stale news. So I'm really -0 on starting any news
sections. We tried this before, it never worked.
Really? I don't remember that. On the old site? Updates were kind of
difficult back then.
Correc
On Monday 13 December 2004 09:05 am, Stas Bekman wrote:
> For those who haven't noticed mp2-RC1 was released and we should get 2.0
> really soon now (my guess another 3-4 weeks, but could happen earlier
> too). So it's time to start thinking about preparing a PR that was
> discussed here before. An
Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 16:34 -0500, Stas Bekman wrote:
A little clarification: by posting this I've meant to first of all figure
out how we post a PR (via ASF/TPF/TicketMaster/etc), not what we post
inside a PR.
Acronym overload. I thought you meant "public relations", not
Stas Bekman wrote:
[another split, let's keep PR-how thread focused on one thing]
answering only to some ideas. Hoping that others will followup on the rest
(fingers ache here, need to write some perl code and give my fingers a rest).
allan juul wrote:
> * bullet list of perhaps 5 major reasons
Jayce^ wrote:
On Monday 13 December 2004 03:59 pm, Stas Bekman wrote:
Jayce^++, should we better do it on the users list, so others can benefit
from the discussion? so we kill two birds in one shot. of course it may
generate some extra noise. So it's up to you Jayce^ to decide whether you
want to s
On Tue, 2004-12-14 at 00:08 +0100, allan juul wrote:
> here's one that spring to mind
>
> 1) when i start my browser and go to [URL] the very first time i get one
> result but subsequent refreshes output different results. why is that ?
http://perl.apache.org/docs/1.0/guide/porting.html#Sometime
Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 15:44 -0700, Jayce^ wrote:
If we can bring out the points here in a discussion, I'd be willing to
compile/format them nicely.
How about just collecting the slides that Stas, Phillipe, and Geoff have
used when introducing mp2 at conferences, and trying t
Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Tue, 2004-12-14 at 00:08 +0100, allan juul wrote:
here's one that spring to mind
1) when i start my browser and go to [URL] the very first time i get one
result but subsequent refreshes output different results. why is that ?
http://perl.apache.org/docs/1.0/guide/porting.
> "Stas" == Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stas> [another split, let's keep PR-how thread focused on one thing]
Of course, there can be no advocacy *for* MP2 until this
Apache::Resource thing is resolved. And I mean in a way that everyone
else resolves it in the CPAN. You don't get
Quoting Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > what i had in mind was a very very quick faq of perhaps 10 questions,
> > perhaps only 5 or 2. the important thing is that it is concise and only
> > updated when really needed (ie when people post the same question over
> > and over again - which bt
31 matches
Mail list logo
