Thank you hideou aoi for the report and to Athos for the excellent
analysis!
Summary:
1. On a fresh Noble installation, /etc/default/sysstat says
ENABLED="false" but contrary to that the service is active, and further
if/when the sysstat package is upgraded due to a bugfix, it will become
inactiv
** Changed in: sysstat (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073284
Title:
sysstat service enablement state mismatches debconf and
/etc/d
** Changed in: sysstat (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073285
Title:
sysstat service is not enabled by default
To manage notificatio
Testing the Oracular upload:
dep8 tests are added, which check the default, that preset-all no longer
disrupts things, and that service conditions match /etc/default/sysstat
For upgrade testing within Oracular:
Launch Oracular, ENABLED=false, but sysstat-collect.timer is enabled.
Upgrade to PPA,
Hello James, or anyone else affected,
Accepted software-properties into noble-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-
properties/0.99.49.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new packa
Hello Julian, or anyone else affected,
Accepted software-properties into noble-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-
properties/0.99.49.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new pack
Accepting, but my request to amend the Test Plan from comment 2 still
stands, and needs adjusting (and SRU verification accordingly) prior to
SRU release.
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed
** Tags added: verification-needed verification-n
Hello Julian, or anyone else affected,
Accepted software-properties into noble-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-
properties/0.99.49.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new pack
Accepting, but my request to amend the Test Plan from comment 2 still
stands, and needs adjusting (and SRU verification accordingly) prior to
SRU release.
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed
** Tags added: verification-needed verification-n
Hello James, or anyone else affected,
Accepted software-properties into noble-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-
properties/0.99.49.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new packa
Actually, no need to actually release, since it's identical to the
special binary package, right? So I can just accept the next SRU for
this package into noble-proposed and treat this bug as completed. When
that SRU lands, this no-binary-change one will, too.
--
You received this bug notification
OK I'm releasing this on the basis of Julian's justification above.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061214
Title:
[SRU] Software Sources is not
Actually, no need to actually release, since it's identical to the
special binary package, right? So I can just accept the next SRU for
this package into noble-proposed and treat this bug as completed. When
that SRU lands, this no-binary-change one will, too.
--
You received this bug notification
OK I'm releasing this on the basis of Julian's justification above.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061214
Title:
[SRU] Software Sources is not compatible with deb822
To manage notif
> [ Test Plan ]
> 1. Install python3-ironic: apt-get install python3-ironic
> 2. Check the file /usr/lib/python3/dist-
> packages/ironic/drivers/raid_config_schema.json is available
This is insufficient. The Impact statement says:
> The python3-ironic package available in Ubuntu Noble fails whe
This is missing the previous changelog entry, but also should just be
squashed together. I pinged juliank and jamespage in #ubuntu-devel.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069433
Title:
This is missing the previous changelog entry, but also should just be
squashed together. I pinged juliank and jamespage in #ubuntu-devel.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
Ubuntu.
https://b
This is missing the previous changelog entry, but also should just be
squashed together. I pinged juliank and jamespage in #ubuntu-devel.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
Ubuntu.
https://b
In general this looks good.
> + * Backport upstream commit ecc44dffeb50746cc3e3019750226a80a50082a3
> +to fix test_ssh_leading_data with newer releases of Python
This sounds like it only affects tests, and thus is OK to add to the SRU
without further analysis. However, I was unable to verify
This is missing the previous changelog entry, but also should just be
squashed together. I pinged juliank and jamespage in #ubuntu-devel.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073742
Title:
I see the Test Plan has been copied over from previous bugs. I think we
should also test that apt seems the cloud archive correctly. That was
already being done, so I'll just add to the Test Plan what was actually
being already done.
** Description changed:
Please add support for:
-cloud
I see the Test Plan has been copied over from previous bugs. I think we
should also test that apt seems the cloud archive correctly. That was
already being done, so I'll just add to the Test Plan what was actually
being already done.
** Description changed:
Please add support for:
-cloud
> While this is not related to the frame-pointers, I tried to avoid
having to change the commits I cherry-picked from Debian and this change
was part of it.
SRUs should be minimal by policy, and we do not include unrelated
changes. Changing the commits should not be a problem in principle, or
is t
(or if this is already being done by automated tests, then just point to
them and that's fine)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076419
Title:
lxml: Does not respect compiler flags
To
> Parse some xml and see that it works
This isn't a full review (yet), but please expand on this, so that a
different developer will unambiguously do the same thing as you intend
when performing SRU verification. You could attach a minimal XML file
and specify exactly how lxml is to be used to par
Isn't this missing SRU documentation? How do you propose to test this
change - for example that use of an "old" cloud-config still works as
expected?
Is it correct to treat this as a "deprecation" in Bionic, given that
what cloud-init originally supported in Bionic should remain supported
until Bi
Is this fixed in Oracular? The bug tasks says "In Progress" and it is a
requirement (in fact the first step) to ensure that it is Fix Released
before submitting your SRU.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
> Currently the rally package in Jammy and previous versions of Ubuntu
do not contain the necessary migration scripts in
rally/common/db/migrations/versions/.
This does not explain how the bug affects users and I don't see that
information in the bug description. Please explain how the bug affects
Hello Jeremy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-control-center into noble-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-
center/1:46.3-0ubuntu0.24.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testi
Hello Sebastien, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-control-center into noble-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-
center/1:46.3-0ubuntu0.24.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by te
Hello Jeremy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-control-center into noble-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-
center/1:46.3-0ubuntu0.24.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testi
Hello Jeremy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-control-center into noble-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-
center/1:46.3-0ubuntu0.24.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testi
Hello Sebastien, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-control-center into noble-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-
center/1:46.3-0ubuntu0.24.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by te
Hello Sebastien, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-control-center into noble-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-
center/1:46.3-0ubuntu0.24.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by te
I discussed the plan for noble-updates and for 24.04.1 with Julian in
detail yesterday. I think the plan is likely to be accepted by the SRU
team. We're behind with the documentation, but I'm accepting the newest
upload to noble-proposed now since time is tight. Julian will make sure
that the full
Hello Julian, or anyone else affected,
Accepted apt into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.8.2 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Tes
Hello Julian, or anyone else affected,
Accepted apt into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.8.2 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Tes
Hello Julian, or anyone else affected,
Accepted apt into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.8.2 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Tes
I discussed the plan for noble-updates and for 24.04.1 with Julian in
detail yesterday. I think the plan is likely to be accepted by the SRU
team. We're behind with the documentation, but I'm accepting the newest
upload to noble-proposed now since time is tight. Julian will make sure
that the full
Hello Julian, or anyone else affected,
Accepted apt into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.8.2 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Tes
Also see bug 2076416.
I'm declining to process these without consensus amongst Ubuntu
developers that constant SRUs of these packages is the right
architecture to use.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
bluca asked me to help with sponsoring this.
> Unlike Ubuntu, Debian or Fedora, on Archlinux there is no single
archive key that users can use to verify packages and repositories, the
key of the individual uploader is needed to verify each package that
they upload, so updates are necessary when ne
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1078329
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078329
** Also affects: sysstat (Debian) via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078329
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+
+ Wh
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+
+ In 24.04, we shipped sysstat by default as part of a wider performance
+ engineering effort. The idea is that relevant performance engineering
+ tooling is already present and available when a user finds themselves
+ needing to solve a performance engineerin
Also the new sysstat-rotate.service probably needs this treatment, too.
Package: sysstat
Version: 12.7.5-2
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu oracular ubuntu-patch
When systemd presets are applied, the various systemd services shipped
by sysstat become enabled, even if the debconf sysstat/enable setting
and /etc/default/sysstat ask
Hello Thomas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted plasma-workspace into noble-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-
workspace/4:5.27.11-0ubuntu4.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Accepting, but please fix the Test Plan. These should be step by step
instructions on how to reproduce the problem, and it should be possible
for a developer not familiar with the package to follow the steps
unambiguously. What is the starting point? Which method to "switch to
plasma" should they u
Hello Thomas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted plasma-workspace into noble-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-
workspace/4:5.27.11-0ubuntu4.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Accepting, but please fix the Test Plan. These should be step by step
instructions on how to reproduce the problem, and it should be possible
for a developer not familiar with the package to follow the steps
unambiguously. What is the starting point? Which method to "switch to
plasma" should they u
From #ubuntu-release, Jeremy suggested that this needs doing before the
language packs are generated for 24.04.1.
** Changed in: gsettings-desktop-schemas (Ubuntu Noble)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.04.1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded pa
From #ubuntu-release, Jeremy suggested that this needs doing before the
language packs are generated for 24.04.1.
** Changed in: gsettings-desktop-schemas (Ubuntu Noble)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.04.1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
From #ubuntu-release, Jeremy suggested that this needs doing before the
language packs are generated for 24.04.1.
** Changed in: gsettings-desktop-schemas (Ubuntu Noble)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.04.1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, whic
Steve and/or Matthias, please could you comment?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071949
Title:
[SRU] Missing frame pointers on Noble
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
htt
These two packages conflict with each other. Have you checked user apt
behaviour when this change hits? What will the user experience be over
the transition? Are there any packages which depend on the old package
that will block the switch, or force removal of the depending package,
for some users?
These two packages conflict with each other. Have you checked user apt
behaviour when this change hits? What will the user experience be over
the transition? Are there any packages which depend on the old package
that will block the switch, or force removal of the depending package,
for some users?
** Also affects: python3-defaults (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: dh-python (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:/
** Also affects: python3-defaults (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: dh-python (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed t
This upload is blocked pending discussion in relation to Andreas'
question above.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064751
Title:
[SRU] revert security-regression in Focal's libcrypto++
Hello Scarlett, or anyone else affected,
Accepted kmail into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kmail/4:23.08.5-0ubuntu5.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:
I've accepted most of these. Thank you for working on this!
For kmail, the changelog seemed to be based on Oracular instead of Noble
as expected, and used a confusing version number. I have replaced that
upload for you, also minimising whitespace changes. I will accept this
one and reject the olde
Hello Scarlett, or anyone else affected,
Accepted kmail into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kmail/4:23.08.5-0ubuntu5.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:
Hello Scarlett, or anyone else affected,
Accepted kmail into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kmail/4:23.08.5-0ubuntu5.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:
I've accepted most of these. Thank you for working on this!
For kmail, the changelog seemed to be based on Oracular instead of Noble
as expected, and used a confusing version number. I have replaced that
upload for you, also minimising whitespace changes. I will accept this
one and reject the olde
I've accepted most of these. Thank you for working on this!
For kmail, the changelog seemed to be based on Oracular instead of Noble
as expected, and used a confusing version number. I have replaced that
upload for you, also minimising whitespace changes. I will accept this
one and reject the olde
Hello Scarlett, or anyone else affected,
Accepted akonadiconsole into noble-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/akonadiconsole/4:23.08.5-0ubuntu5.2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new pa
Hello Scarlett, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cantor into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cantor/4:23.08.5-0ubuntu4.2 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
http
Hello Scarlett, or anyone else affected,
Accepted plasma-welcome into noble-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-
welcome/5.27.11-0ubuntu3.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new pac
Hello Scarlett, or anyone else affected,
Accepted akregator into noble-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/akregator/4:23.08.5-0ubuntu4.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. Se
Hello Scarlett, or anyone else affected,
Accepted akonadiconsole into noble-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/akonadiconsole/4:23.08.5-0ubuntu5.2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new pa
Hello Scarlett, or anyone else affected,
Accepted konqueror into noble-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/konqueror/4:23.08.5-0ubuntu3.2 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. Se
Hello Scarlett, or anyone else affected,
Accepted kontact into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kontact/4:23.08.5-0ubuntu4.2 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
ht
Hello Scarlett, or anyone else affected,
Accepted marble into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/marble/4:23.08.5-0ubuntu3.2 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
http
Hello Scarlett, or anyone else affected,
Accepted kalgebra into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kalgebra/4:23.08.5-0ubuntu4.2 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Scarlett, or anyone else affected,
Accepted angelfish into noble-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/angelfish/23.08.5-0ubuntu3.2 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Scarlett, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cantor into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cantor/4:23.08.5-0ubuntu4.2 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
http
Hello Scarlett, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cantor into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cantor/4:23.08.5-0ubuntu4.2 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
http
Hello Scarlett, or anyone else affected,
Accepted akregator into noble-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/akregator/4:23.08.5-0ubuntu4.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. Se
Hello Scarlett, or anyone else affected,
Accepted akregator into noble-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/akregator/4:23.08.5-0ubuntu4.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. Se
Hello Scarlett, or anyone else affected,
Accepted digikam into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/digikam/4:8.2.0-0ubuntu6.2 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
http
Hello Scarlett, or anyone else affected,
Accepted kgeotag into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kgeotag/1.5.0-1ubuntu3.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:
Hello Scarlett, or anyone else affected,
Accepted plasma-welcome into noble-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-
welcome/5.27.11-0ubuntu3.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new pac
Hello Scarlett, or anyone else affected,
Accepted marble into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/marble/4:23.08.5-0ubuntu3.2 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
http
Hello Scarlett, or anyone else affected,
Accepted kontact into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kontact/4:23.08.5-0ubuntu4.2 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
ht
Hello Scarlett, or anyone else affected,
Accepted konqueror into noble-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/konqueror/4:23.08.5-0ubuntu3.2 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. Se
Hello Scarlett, or anyone else affected,
Accepted digikam into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/digikam/4:8.2.0-0ubuntu6.2 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
http
Hello Scarlett, or anyone else affected,
Accepted angelfish into noble-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/angelfish/23.08.5-0ubuntu3.2 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Scarlett, or anyone else affected,
Accepted kalgebra into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kalgebra/4:23.08.5-0ubuntu4.2 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Scarlett, or anyone else affected,
Accepted angelfish into noble-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/angelfish/23.08.5-0ubuntu3.2 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Scarlett, or anyone else affected,
Accepted digikam into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/digikam/4:8.2.0-0ubuntu6.2 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
http
Hello Scarlett, or anyone else affected,
Accepted kgeotag into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kgeotag/1.5.0-1ubuntu3.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:
Hello Scarlett, or anyone else affected,
Accepted kgeotag into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kgeotag/1.5.0-1ubuntu3.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:
Ghadi is working on a replacement upload, so I'm rejecting the current
one as agreed with him.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to tar in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059734
Title:
Tar fails to extra
Ghadi is working on a replacement upload, so I'm rejecting the current
one as agreed with him.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059734
Title:
Tar fails to extract archives that include
And similarly if there's a security revocation required, then this
wouldn't be an additional burden on the Ubuntu security team, either.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075505
Title:
The SRU review queues are backed up at the moment and future updates to
this package will take time, too. Is there any reason this can't go into
noble-backports instead, or indeed remain outside the official archive
for whatever outside-Ubuntu CI needs you have? That way, updates would
be much quic
Thanks all for working on this!
Do we know if releases prior to Noble are affected?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dh-python in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075337
Title:
py3clean fails when us
Thanks all for working on this!
Do we know if releases prior to Noble are affected?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075337
Title:
py3clean fails when using alternate character set
T
I think it's fair to call this Critical since SRU releases generally are
currently blocked by this. Looking at the definition, "Severely affects
applications beyond the package responsible for the root cause" also
applies.
** Changed in: python3-defaults (Ubuntu)
Importance: High => Critical
-
Setting C.UTF-8 would work internally I agree. But what does this mean
for SRUs? Does every affected SRU now have to declare Breaks:
python3-minimal (<< whatever)?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaul
101 - 200 of 1476 matches
Mail list logo
