For the person that said they couldn't find the test files page on the
auidio site Dain provided here's the deal. So ya know that as ya go in
there's a downloads link? It's on that page. What it is it looks like
they put some files there for you to practise downloading stuff. I guess
so yu can
Don’t talk to me about Sound Blaster .
I’m a little disappointed with the Audio HD device I purchased.
Every other device has no trouble with the digital output of my Cable box but
the Audio HD from Sound Blaster just refuses to play ball.
Now perhaps I’m over reacting and perhaps the Sound
Yeah lots of the Onkyo AVRs will supposedly do 384 32 bit. They have 384
K 32 bit dacs. Some of the new Sound Blasters go to 385K. I just don't
know how 1 records that. Soundforge pro use to be able to go to 32 bit.
But I don't know of an interface or anything like that that whill do this.
hmmm, I cannot find anything that says test recordings on that site.
I tried with two different browsers, in case I was missing something.
On Sun, 01 Apr 2018 15:24:17 -0400,
Dane Trethowan wrote:
>
> I’ve given this some thought and have decided that - for the purposes of this
> discussion -
Besides sampeling rate, the number of bits of each filee influences
heavily the sound quality. I like to record in 24 bit audio when I
can. CD quality is 16 bit. bits refer to the size of each sample.
Bigger samples mean a greater range of audio is captured in each
sample. Even with spoken word
Its also used for audio mastering though higher rates are used these days.
I'm yet to hear a recording at 384K 32 bit as that the maximum my Rotel
A14 Amp will handle.
On 2/04/2018 4:12 AM, Matthew Chao wrote:
Hi, Tim. True, but 96K is required for commercial
broadcasting.--Matt, N1IBB.
Hi, Tim. True, but 96K is required for commercial broadcasting.--Matt,
N1IBB.
On 4/1/2018 2:08 PM, tim cumings wrote:
Inmy jhumble opinion, recording at 96 khz 24 kbps is really a waste of
time. Even with perfect hearing most people can't hear above 22 khz anyway.
On 3/31/2018 11:07 PM,
I’ve given this some thought and have decided that - for the purposes of this
discussion - the participants should be able to hear for themselves the
differences that high sampling rates etc offer so here’s a way.
There a site called http://www.melbarecordings.com.au
Ah I can hear up to 18 K. But I wana see how much difference I can
really hear. Thing is I've done it with an LS-14 but of course this
isn't as pro as the H6 is. Maybe an LS-100 would be but saddly couldn't
get that.
On 4/1/2018 2:08 PM, tim cumings wrote:
Inmy jhumble opinion, recording at
Inmy jhumble opinion, recording at 96 khz 24 kbps is really a waste of
time. Even with perfect hearing most people can't hear above 22 khz anyway.
On 3/31/2018 11:07 PM, Dane Trethowan wrote:
Unfortunately the chap who has been employed to do it didn’t turn up and I was
annoyed about it to
Hell to the yeah. I mean I've heard a car recorded with the F4 the F8's
little brother, but that was way too epic! So the F8 is obviously epic.
On 3/31/2018 11:06 PM, Dane Trethowan wrote:
I’ve had no reason to perform a full multi track recording as yet so I’m only
going on what I read in
11 matches
Mail list logo
