On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Pham Bao Trung
wrote:
> I am using ibus-unikey and have not tried fcitx. On ibus or scim, unikey is
> better than m17n. Ready to move to fcitx if it is really better and can be
> used for Vietnamese input.
Hi, I've packaged fcitx-unikey in AUR [1], maybe you could
I am using ibus-unikey and have not tried fcitx. On ibus or scim, unikey is
better than m17n. Ready to move to fcitx if it is really better and can be
used for Vietnamese input.
Anyway thanks guys!
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Yichao Yu wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Pham Bao Tr
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Pham Bao Trung
wrote:
> I have used ibus for Vietnamese input. The only other option is scim, but
> ibus is far better, so please don't drop ibus.
Btw, what's the input method you are using in ibus right now? Don't
really think ibus provides more options than fcit
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Pham Bao Trung
wrote:
> I have used ibus for Vietnamese input. The only other option is scim, but
> ibus is far better, so please don't drop ibus.
There are at least three components of fcitx supports Vietnamese:
fcitx-table-other(AUR), fcitx-unikey(not packaged ye
I have used ibus for Vietnamese input. The only other option is scim, but
ibus is far better, so please don't drop ibus.
Vietnamese fellows, raise your voices :)
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Yichao Yu wrote:
> For the gnome3.6 ibus-integration problem Felix Yan mentioned above,
> the patch
For the gnome3.6 ibus-integration problem Felix Yan mentioned above,
the patch to split ibus into ibus and libibus is already tested and
can be found here[1].
[1] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/32071
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Yichao Yu wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Yichao Yu
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Yichao Yu wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Allen Li wrote:
>> On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 17:45:51 +0200
>> Alexander Rødseth wrote:
>>
>>> If I understand it correctly, we _could_ drop ibus and just use fcitx
>>> instead, but supporting ibus as well is preferra
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Allen Li wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 17:45:51 +0200
> Alexander Rødseth wrote:
>
>> If I understand it correctly, we _could_ drop ibus and just use fcitx
>> instead, but supporting ibus as well is preferrable, since many people
>> also use ibus.
>
> My gripe with
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 17:45:51 +0200
Alexander Rødseth wrote:
> If I understand it correctly, we _could_ drop ibus and just use fcitx
> instead, but supporting ibus as well is preferrable, since many people
> also use ibus.
My gripe with fcitx is that it is poorly documented (in English at
least),
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 17:45:51 +0200
Alexander Rødseth wrote:
> If I understand it correctly, we _could_ drop ibus and just use fcitx
> instead, but supporting ibus as well is preferrable, since many people
> also use ibus.
Not only Fcitx:)
Arch repo also provides gcin (mainly in Taiwan(?)) and ui
Thanks for all the insightful information!
If I understand it correctly, we _could_ drop ibus and just use fcitx
instead, but supporting ibus as well is preferrable, since many people
also use ibus.
Rumor has it that someone is planning to sponsor a new TU in the near
future, where one of the goa
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Masato Hashimoto
wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:55:39 -0400
> Allen Li wrote:
>
>
>> so dropping it
>> is extremely unfavorable I think.
>>
>> Just my two cents.
>>
>> Allen Li
>
> +1
>
> AFAIK, ibus is default input method framework of Fedora, Ubuntu and
> open
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:55:39 -0400
Allen Li wrote:
> so dropping it
> is extremely unfavorable I think.
>
> Just my two cents.
>
> Allen Li
+1
AFAIK, ibus is default input method framework of Fedora, Ubuntu and
openSUSE.
It's most popular in CJK wide.
--
HASHIMOTO, Masato
Hi all,
Another FYI about the ibus integration in gnome-shell:
There is an official instruction [1] from gnome to disable
ibus-integration, that brings us at least two ways to go:
1) Packaging gnome-settings-daemon and gnome-control-center as-is, and
split ibus package to something like ibus-com
On 17 October 2012 02:05, Yichao Yu wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Yichao Yu wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Rashif Ray Rahman
>> wrote:
>>> On 17 October 2012 00:55, Allen Li wrote:
Hi,
I would like to point out that ibus does Japanese and Korean, whereas
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Yichao Yu wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Rashif Ray Rahman
> wrote:
>> On 17 October 2012 00:55, Allen Li wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I would like to point out that ibus does Japanese and Korean, whereas
>>> fcitx only does simplified Chinese (at least acc
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
> On 17 October 2012 00:55, Allen Li wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to point out that ibus does Japanese and Korean, whereas
>> fcitx only does simplified Chinese (at least according to the wiki).
>> Thus ibus is one of the only input op
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Allen Li wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to point out that ibus does Japanese and Korean, whereas
> fcitx only does simplified Chinese (at least according to the wiki).
No, not true. There is fcitx-mozc[1][2], fcitx-anthy[3][4],
fcitx-m17n[5][6], fcitx-hangul[7][8]
On 17 October 2012 00:55, Allen Li wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to point out that ibus does Japanese and Korean, whereas
> fcitx only does simplified Chinese (at least according to the wiki).
> Thus ibus is one of the only input options for those languages on arch
> at the moment (barring that ot
Hi,
I would like to point out that ibus does Japanese and Korean, whereas
fcitx only does simplified Chinese (at least according to the wiki).
Thus ibus is one of the only input options for those languages on arch
at the moment (barring that other one whose name I'm having trouble
recalling at the
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:20 AM, Felix Yan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your attention to CJK input methods.
>
> FWIK yangtsesu is currently a fcitx user and packager of openSUSE [1].
> His packages are okay and updated regularly, but I'm afraid he doesn't
> have enough time to maintain all ibus s
Hi,
Thanks for your attention to CJK input methods.
FWIK yangtsesu is currently a fcitx user and packager of openSUSE [1].
His packages are okay and updated regularly, but I'm afraid he doesn't
have enough time to maintain all ibus stuff too.
Besides, I would like to maintain fcitx stuff as I am
22 matches
Mail list logo
