Re: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04

Same here. Support since this is very useful From: BESS on behalf of EXT Jeff Tantsura Date: Tuesday, 4 September 2018 at 11:45 To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" Cc: Stephane Litkowski , "bess@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04 Yes/support On Tu

[bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-per-mcast-flow-df-election-00.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG of the IETF. Title : Per multicast flow Designated Forwarder Election for EVPN Authors : Ali Sajassi

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04

Support for WG adoption Cheers Kris From: BESS on behalf of "stephane.litkow...@orange.com" Date: Tuesday, September 4, 2018 at 12:29 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04 Hi WG, This email begins a two-week poll for BESS working

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04

Hi, Support WG adoption as co-author. I am not aware of any IPR related to this document. Thanks, Neeraj On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 12:29 AM wrote: > Hi WG, > > > > This email begins a two-week poll for BESS working group adoption > draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04 [1] > > > > Please review

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04

Support. Thanks Mankamana From: BESS on behalf of "stephane.litkow...@orange.com" Date: Tuesday, September 4, 2018 at 12:29 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04 Hi WG, This email begins a two-week poll for BESS working group ado

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04

Support Thanks, Jim Uttaro From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of LINGALA, AVINASH Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2018 9:32 AM To: stephane.litkow...@orange.com; bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04 ***Securit

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04

Support, not aware of any IPR. Yours Irrespectively, John From: BESS On Behalf Of stephane.litkow...@orange.com Sent: Tuesday, September 4, 2018 3:29 AM To: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04 Hi WG, This email begins a two-week poll for B

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04

As a co-author , I support for WG adoption. I am not aware of any IPR relevant to this document. ​ Thanks, Avinash Lingala From: BESS On Behalf Of stephane.litkow...@orange.com Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2018 3:29 AM To: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-be

Re: [bess] A question regarding Single-Active ES redundancy mode and DF election in RFC 7432

Krzysztof, You are right, the Port-Active draft uses a different technique for DF election. Regards, Sasha Office: +972-39266302 Cell: +972-549266302 Email: alexander.vainsht...@ecitele.com From: Krzysztof Szarkowicz [mailto:kszarkow...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 4, 2018 3:04 PM

Re: [bess] A question regarding Single-Active ES redundancy mode and DF election in RFC 7432

Hi Sasha, Yes, the end result is sort of Port-Active from the draft you reference, although the tool set (DF election methodology) is not the same. Thanks, > On 2018-Sep-04, at 13:53, Alexander Vainshtein > wrote: > > Krzysztof, > Lots of thanks for your email. If I understand you correctly,

Re: [bess] A question regarding Single-Active ES redundancy mode and DF election in RFC 7432

Krzysztof, Lots of thanks for your email. If I understand you correctly, it actually replaces Single-Active Redundancy Mode with the Port-Active one as defined in the corresponding draft (it also uses the Preference-Based DF Elect

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04

Support for WG adoption, as a co-author. Not aware of any IPR relevant to this document. Thanks. Jorge From: BESS on behalf of "stephane.litkow...@orange.com" Date: Tuesday, September 4, 2018 at 9:29 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04

Yes/support On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 02:06 Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > I support WG adoption. > > Thanks, > > Acee > > > > *From: *BESS on behalf of Stephane Litkowski < > stephane.litkow...@orange.com> > *Date: *Tuesday, September 4, 2018 at 3:29 AM > *To: *"bess@ietf.org" > *Subject: *[bess] WG

Re: [bess] A question regarding Single-Active ES redundancy mode and DF election in RFC 7432

Hi Sasha, To use LAG in A/S mode on per VLAN basis, you can use ‘hack’, where you use preference-based DF election (draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df) to ensure with the configuration that *all* VLANs on given ESI use PE1 as DF, and *all* VLANs on that ESI use PE2 as non-DF. Then, you need to have a

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04

I support WG adoption. Thanks, Acee From: BESS on behalf of Stephane Litkowski Date: Tuesday, September 4, 2018 at 3:29 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04 Hi WG, This email begins a two-week poll for BESS working group adoption

[bess] bess - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 103

A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Stephane Litkowski, a Chair of the bess working group. - Working Group Name: BGP Enabled ServiceS Area Name: Routing Area Session Requester: Stephane Litkowski Number of Sessions:

Re: [bess] A question regarding Single-Active ES redundancy mode and DF election in RFC 7432

Ali, Lots of thanks for a prompt and detailed response. It matches my understanding of the situation with Single-Active Redundancy Mode of Ethernet Segments in EVPN. In particular, your confirmation that “You cannot use LAG to do active/standby on a per VLAN basis (aka EVPN single-active)” was qu

[bess] The BESS WG has placed draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

The BESS WG has placed draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb in state Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Stephane Litkowski) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb/ ___ BESS mailing list BESS

[bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04

Hi WG, This email begins a two-week poll for BESS working group adoption draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04 [1] Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list, stating whether or not you support adoption. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IP