Thanks to everyone for their work!
Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 2010-12-06 17.20:
Well spoken. And with that, I declare the Community Bylaws adopted
(provided nobody from the SC punches me in the face right away)...
--
Florian Effenberger
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document
Hi,
Florian Effenberger wrote on 2010-12-03 10.41:
you know how it works. :-) Here's the poll for next week:
http://www.doodle.com/ctpptfzggtfsht4m
the call has now been scheduled for Saturday, December 11th, 1400 UTC.
For your local date and time, please see
http://www.doodle.com/ctpptfzgg
Florian Effenberger 05 dicembre 2010 20.55:
+1. Can you prepare some text?
Yes, I will do it today or tomorrow. In any case, we must wait at least
a couple of days before we can distribute another announcement.
--
Italo Vignoli
italo.vign...@gmail.com
Mobile +39.348.5653829
VoIP: +39.02.3206
Hi David,
On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 06:02 +0800, David Nelson wrote:
> @mmeeks: Michael, what exactly do you mean by this phrase:
>
> "Members agree to work and contribute to an egalitarian community,
> where roles are not titles and do not grant any special privileges."
>
> Does that mean that ther
Hi Charles,
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 11:08 +0100, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> Last call: are we good on this?
Sigh; I only just got to reading the final draft, busy day yesterday.
Overall it seems to be excellent, I have a few un-addressed concerns:
Members are expected to refrain fr
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 11:59 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> IMHO the "future commitment" is sufficiently built on an
> (already over-long) three month history with the project - I would like
> to see that removed.
To expand on this; is it -really- our intention to deny membership to
people
Hi Michael, :-)
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 19:40, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Well - this is my view :-) it is perhaps not a sensible view, I'm open
> to persuasion, and luckily I don't make these decisions the SC / board
> does / will, but here is my advice:
>
> In my view, authority is con
