Hi Denys,
On Fri, 14 Jul 2017, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Johannes Schindelin
> wrote:
> > Using the constant in a regular `if (...)` pretends that this is
> > anything but a compile time option. Let's use `#if JOBS` instead,
> > making
Hi Xabier,
On Fri, 14 Jul 2017, Xabier Oneca -- xOneca wrote:
> 2017-07-14 16:11 GMT+02:00 Johannes Schindelin :
> > @@ -4182,7 +4186,9 @@ dowait(int block, struct job *job)
> > goto out;
> > }
> > /* The process wasn't found in job
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
> Using the constant in a regular `if (...)` pretends that this is
> anything but a compile time option. Let's use `#if JOBS` instead,
> making it *much* clearer what `JOBS` actually is.
>
> Incidentally, this
Hello Johannes,
2017-07-14 16:11 GMT+02:00 Johannes Schindelin :
> Using the constant in a regular `if (...)` pretends that this is
> anything but a compile time option. Let's use `#if JOBS` instead,
> making it *much* clearer what `JOBS` actually is.
>
> Incidentally,
Using the constant in a regular `if (...)` pretends that this is
anything but a compile time option. Let's use `#if JOBS` instead,
making it *much* clearer what `JOBS` actually is.
Incidentally, this change fixes the build in setups where there are
no headers defining WIFSTOPPED and WSTOPSIG