-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 04/02/2012 18:39, Boris Epstein a écrit :
>>
> Hello Laurent,
>
> Thanks! Very useful info, I never even heard of MooseFS and it
> sounds very nice.
>
> One question: what happens if you lose your master server in their
> designation? Or is it
On Saturday 04 February 2012 19:18, the following was written:
> On 02/03/2012 11:56 PM, Robert Spangler wrote:
> > On Friday 03 February 2012 09:10, the following was written:
> >> On 02/03/2012 08:07 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > Having a 4 NIC s
Boris Epstein wrote on 02/04/2012 11:57 AM:
> What is RAID0+1?
Nested RAID. Paraphrasing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID :
For a RAID 0+1, drives are first combined into multiple level 0 RAIDs
that are themselves treated as single drives to be combined into a
single RAID 1.
Phil
_
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
> Boris Epstein wrote on 02/04/2012 11:57 AM:
> > What is RAID0+1?
>
> Nested RAID. Paraphrasing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID :
>
> For a RAID 0+1, drives are first combined into multiple level 0 RAIDs
> that are themselves treated as s
On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 17:15 -0700, Larry Martell wrote:
> Just installed mysql on centos 6.2. When I try to start it with service I get:
>
> #service mysqld start
> MySQL Daemon failed to start.
> Starting mysqld: [FAILED]
>
> Nothing at all is written
On Sat, 4 Feb 2012, Digimer wrote:
> On 02/04/2012 06:15 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> Does anyone know if it is possible to construct a cloud of sorts out of
>> several CentOS machines so as to enable a VM (or several VM's) that would
>> run on top of that cloud and have failo
On 02/05/2012 04:37 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Phil Schaffner> wrote:
>
>> Boris Epstein wrote on 02/04/2012 11:57 AM:
>>> What is RAID0+1?
>>
>> Nested RAID. Paraphrasing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID :
>>
>> For a RAID 0+1, drives are first combined into mult
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Tait Clarridge wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 17:15 -0700, Larry Martell wrote:
>> Just installed mysql on centos 6.2. When I try to start it with service I
>> get:
>>
>> #service mysqld start
>> MySQL Daemon failed to start.
>> Starting mysqld:
On 02/05/2012 10:17 AM, Robert Spangler wrote:
> On Saturday 04 February 2012 19:18, the following was written:
>
>> On 02/03/2012 11:56 PM, Robert Spangler wrote:
>> > On Friday 03 February 2012 09:10, the following was written:
>> >>On 02/03/2012 08:07 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Jim Wildman wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Feb 2012, Digimer wrote:
>
> > On 02/04/2012 06:15 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> >> Hello everyone,
> >>
> >> Does anyone know if it is possible to construct a cloud of sorts out of
> >> several CentOS machines so as to enable a VM (or s
On 02/03/2012 05:07 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
> Searching the web I only found about creating a file
> /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-br0, but did not find where to
> explicitely list what ports will be bridged.
>
> Where is it configured?
For reference:
As far as I know, bridged n
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Larry Martell wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Tait Clarridge wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 17:15 -0700, Larry Martell wrote:
>>> Just installed mysql on centos 6.2. When I try to start it with service I
>>> get:
>>>
>>> #service mysqld start
>>>
On 02/05/12 1:22 PM, Larry Martell wrote:
> clone(child_stack=0,
> > flags=CLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID|CLONE_CHILD_SETTID|SIGCHLD,
> > child_tidptr=0xb7746b98) = 17017
wild guess says, its forking itself, and THAT process invokes
/etc/init.d/mysqld
--
john r pierceN 37,
On Feb 5, 2012, at 10:32 AM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
> Boris Epstein wrote on 02/04/2012 11:57 AM:
>> What is RAID0+1?
>
> Nested RAID. Paraphrasing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID :
>
> For a RAID 0+1, drives are first combined into multiple level 0 RAIDs
> that are themselves treated as sin
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
> On Feb 5, 2012, at 10:32 AM, Phil Schaffner
> wrote:
>
> > Boris Epstein wrote on 02/04/2012 11:57 AM:
> >> What is RAID0+1?
> >
> > Nested RAID. Paraphrasing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID :
> >
> > For a RAID 0+1, drives are first combin
On 02/05/12 2:42 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> What you are saying seems to make sense actually. I wonder how much a RAID6
> with a few spares would make sense. If we are talking a large number of
> disks then RAID 6 + 2 spares means overpaying only for 5 disks. Not a lot
> if the total number of them
On Feb 5, 2012, at 5:42 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> What you are saying seems to make sense actually. I wonder how much a RAID6
> with a few spares would make sense. If we are talking a large number of
> disks then RAID 6 + 2 spares means overpaying only for 5 disks. Not a lot
> if the total numbe
On 02/05/12 3:24 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
> It might be easier to do the striping in software cause that's a zero
> over-head operation and it makes the hardware RAID easier to setup, maintain
> and can make rebuilds less painful depending on the controller.
I just tried a bunch of combinations on
On 02/06/2012 12:33 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 02/05/12 3:24 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
>> It might be easier to do the striping in software cause that's a zero
>> over-head operation and it makes the hardware RAID easier to setup, maintain
>> and can make rebuilds less painful depending on the co
On 02/05/12 3:49 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> What about Software RAID 10 (far)? It gives 2 x read speed and 1 x write
> speed (speed of single HDD).
we use raid10 for all our database servers. often as many as 20 disks
in a single raid set.
--
john r pierceN
On 02/04/2012 07:53 AM, Robert Spangler wrote:
>
> DEVICE=eth#
> ONBOOT=yes
> BRIDGE=br#
>
Thank you so much, Robert.
That is the thing I wanted to do.
For the record, in Debian world, it's
auto br0
iface br0 inet static
address 192.168.0.10
network 192.168.0.0
n
---
snip
centos 6 host, centos 6 virtual machine.
Network connection from outside server disappears in regards to the
virtual server.
snip
---
Tested the heck out of it.
Further testing shows the network unreachable, even if network restarted
in host.
A
22 matches
Mail list logo
